US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Leftists somehow seem to make their opposition seem way cooler when they try to lampoon them.

SITTING ON HIS THRONE OF SKULLS, MITCH MCCONNELL AGREES WITH THIS STATEMENT.​

This video's creator was outspokenly anti-Trump and made this video to lampoon him. He didn't expect people to actually like the iconography and consider it aesthetic and genuine Trump support. He's salty to this day, just like Mat Furie.
Gonna be honest, from the videos alone I wouldn't have guessed Mike Diva is anti-Trump since he also made one poking fun at the Hillary campaign's efforts in "How do you do, fellow youths" (link to a different site because the video is now private on his YouTube).

There's swasticas and the Hitler salute in the video, the BIG BEAUTIFUL WALL word CUNT when Trump appears and the world exploding in the end but the rest unironically paints Trump in the same light as the "God Emperor" meme his online fanbase has always loved.

But good on him for not being butthurt enough to try and erase the video from existence like the band Brave Shores tried to do with that one where Trump dances to one of their songs.
 

At End of Bitter Campaign, Joe Biden Anguishes Over 'My Only Surviving Son'​


https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/PGHK6krjqUXQ9fz88Mj8Jg--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTY0MDtoPTk2MA--/https://sneed.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/0Fr2li_RTh2ck5IZwMzU7g--~B/aD02NzIwO3c9NDQ4MDtzbT0xO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_new_york_times_articles_158/5762770d0ed4414c01deb67b73c0a0a1
Hunter Biden, the former vice president's son, at his art studio in Los Angeles, Nov. 1, 2019. (Elizabeth Weinberg/The New York Times)
WASHINGTON — Joe Biden and his son Hunter talk every day, typically a fast check-in initiated by the Democratic presidential nominee, often from the back of a car between campaign stops. Although Biden tries to touch base with his two grown children and five grandchildren once a day, doling out “I love yous,” Hunter Biden is a special case.

“My only surviving son,” is how the former vice president refers to his “Hunt,” whose battles with addiction have made for a long-running high-wire act within the Biden universe.

The stresses of Biden’s presidential campaign have made an already complicated father-son relationship even more so. From the outset of the race, President Donald Trump and his allies have made Hunter Biden’s business dealings a centerpiece of their efforts to portray his father as an unscrupulous swamp presence.

Some of the attacks are unfounded, but the facts of Hunter Biden’s troubled life have provided the president with ample fodder. Hunter Biden took a highly paid position with a Ukrainian oligarch regarded by the United States as corrupt, and later acknowledged he most likely got the job because his father was overseeing U.S. policy in the country at the time. He went into business with a number of partners who have subsequently been convicted of unrelated crimes. And his struggles with addiction have contributed to the less admirable lines on his résumé, including his abrupt departure from the Navy Reserve in 2014.

Beyond the attacks, aides say the former vice president agonizes over how his hyper-public position has added to the formidable burdens of being his remaining son. If Hunter Biden sounds down on the phone, Biden aides say, it can send his father into a funk and inflict a melancholy that lingers.

Joe Biden will rarely bring up Hunter Biden himself, they say, although others certainly will. When a reporter asks a skeptical question about Hunter Biden, the mood in the room shifts. Aides become tense knowing that Joe Biden might lash out. “You’re a damn liar, man,” Joe Biden said, jarringly, at a December campaign event in Iowa after a voter suggested he had sent his son to Ukraine to “get a job and work for a gas company” in order to gain access to that country’s ruling class.

“It’s almost a cliché now,” said Ted Kaufman, Joe Biden’s longtime chief of staff and short-term successor in the Senate after Biden became vice president in 2009. “Joe Biden used to say this all the time, and he meant it: ‘Delaware can always get another senator, but the kids can’t get another father.’ His rule was that if one of his kids ever called, we were told to get Biden no matter where he was.’’

In his more raw and vulnerable moments, friends say, Biden will let himself wonder if he might have fallen short as a parent. Despite all of his efforts, the nightly Amtrak commutes from Washington to Wilmington and the obvious mutual affection, they say he wishes he could have done more to protect his children and steer them clear of harm.

As is well known, Biden’s first wife and daughter were killed in a car crash a few weeks after he was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1972. Beau, then 3, and Hunter, 2, were badly injured but survived. Beau Biden died of brain cancer in 2015, and Biden has described his late son — an Iraq War veteran and a former attorney general of Delaware — as his hero, inspiration and role model. He has spoken expansively of Beau Biden’s example, military service and his own grief over his eldest son’s death.

Hunter Biden, now 50, is a tougher subject. He has been the source of fatherly anguish as well as a Republican fixation. His struggles with drug and alcohol and messy family and business entanglements have been relentlessly chronicled. After Beau Biden died, Hunter Biden became romantically involved with his brother’s widow, Hallie, creating a tabloid-ready humiliation and internal family fractures.

Trump now calls his opponent’s son a “criminal.” At campaign rallies, the mention of Hunter Biden prompts “lock him up” chants.

Publicly, Joe Biden has been reluctant to discuss Hunter Biden except to reaffirm his love and support, and to assert that his son did nothing wrong. “The good thing is, Hunter, God love him, he is the best he’s been since Beau passed away,” Joe Biden said in an interview. This was back in January, a few weeks before the Iowa caucuses. Joe Biden was in the back seat of a black Suburban heading from Des Moines to a rally in nearby Indianola.

In subsequent months, Joe Biden’s campaign would be routed in the early primaries before being resurrected in South Carolina, grounded by the coronavirus and propelled to the Democratic nomination. Current polling gives Joe Biden a better-than-decent shot at becoming the president-elect next week. All the while, Hunter Biden has made for unnerving background music, and a steady din of concern for the patriarch of a family that has seen its share of public grief.

“I’m saying sorry to him, and he says, ‘I’m the one who’s sorry,’” Hunter Biden said in a sprawling and confessional interview last year with The New Yorker. “And we have an ongoing debate about who is more sorry.” Hunter Biden declined to comment for this article.

For all of the pain surrounding Beau Biden’s death, Joe Biden is much more eager to publicly discuss him than Hunter Biden. Beau Biden is, in a way, a safer space — a source of pride and even an idealized version of himself. “I think Joe would be the first to acknowledge that Beau was an upgrade,” President Barack Obama said to laughter in his eulogy for Beau Biden. “Joe 2.0.”

Friends wonder what it must be like for Hunter Biden — in addition to his portrayal as a problem child — to hear his brother so repeatedly canonized as his father’s ideal. If Beau Biden is a golden boy to be boasted about on a debate stage, what does that make Hunter Biden if not an easy pivot to shame?

“He got the Bronze Star,” Joe Biden said in his first debate with Trump, listing Beau Biden’s accomplishments, as he often does.

“Really?” Trump said, interrupting. “Are you talking about Hunter?”

“I’m talking about my son, Beau Biden,” the former vice president shot back.

“I don’t know Beau, I know Hunter,” Trump said, then brought up Hunter Biden’s drug use.

Joe Biden was ready. “My son, like a lot of people, like a lot of people you know at home, had a drug problem,’’ he said. “He’s overtaken it. He’s fixed it. He’s worked on it. And I’m proud of him.”

When he talks about Hunter Biden, Joe Biden often speaks of him in terms of Beau Biden and the survivors bond they shared. “Beau and Hunt and I, there was like a steel band that ran through our chests connecting us,” Joe Biden said in the interview in January. “While Beau was literally taking his last breaths, we were sitting on his bed, me on one side, Hunter on the other, holding hands in a circle.”

Beau Biden’s death was more devastating for Hunter Biden than anyone else, Kaufman said. “They were together all the time,” he said. “They had this incredible, remarkable bond.”

When the boys were young, Joe Biden was either bouncing back and forth between Washington and Wilmington or taking them along with him. “As a single man, he never seemed to go anywhere without one of his boys,” said Harry Reid, the former Democratic Senate majority leader. From his own experience, Reid said he was painfully aware of how complicated it could be for the adult children of public figures, especially those who entered or at least brushed up against the family business.

Over the years Hunter Biden took on roles that intersected with his father’s political career, including working with a Delaware-based credit card issuer, working at the Commerce Department under President Bill Clinton and working as a lobbyist on behalf of various universities, associations and companies.

After Joe Biden became Obama’s running mate in 2008, Hunter Biden terminated his lobbying registrations, which included a company that had lobbied the staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on which his father had served, about online gambling issues.

Months after his father became vice president, Hunter Biden joined with Christopher Heinz, the stepson of John Kerry, then a senator, and Devon Archer, a Kerry family friend, to create a network of investment and consulting firms.

Hunter Biden and Archer pursued business with international entities that had a stake in U.S. foreign policy decisions, sometimes in countries where connections implied political influence and protection.

Joe Biden’s all-purpose rejoinder to any criticism of Hunter Biden is to simply reassert his fatherly devotion.

“It was the kind of love that you have when you’ve gone through a tragedy together,” said Robert Buccini, a close friend of the Biden family who was inseparable from Beau and Hunter. “The vice president and his boys were the three survivors. He would always look them in the eye and say, ‘I love you.’ And the boys would say ‘I love you Dad.’ I think in that generation, it’s really unique for a father to be that expressive.”

One of the recurring tropes around Joe Biden’s candidacy is that the grief his family has suffered tends to put the slings of a campaign into perspective. In other words, what on a campaign could be crueler than what the Biden family has already faced?

Joe Biden has said as much. “That’s true,” he acknowledged in January. “Look, the idea of losing an election, losing an argument, losing — I mean, Christ.”

Still, no one can deny the gravity of Joe Biden’s current enterprise, least of all him. And it’s not as if he is above lofty rhetoric of his own, like casting this election as some epic “battle for the soul of America.” The presence of Trump on the ballot makes this election a different beast. “If I lose,” Joe Biden said, “it’s not as if it’s just, ‘OK, so I lost a race to John McCain, or lost to whoever.’”
—————————-


"Vote for me because the wrong son died and I can't disown the crackhead because he's all I got left."
 
This just sounds like a plea for pity votes. These aren’t the words of a man that’s winning, but a man that’s admitting defeat by using his personal grief as a way to guilt people into voting for him.
Biden is such a piece of shit he used to lie about how his wife and daughter were killed, accusing the other driver of being drunk. He's a complete sociopath.
 
This just sounds like a plea for pity votes. These aren’t the words of a man that’s winning, but a man that’s admitting defeat by using his personal grief as a way to guilt people into voting for him.
Billy Carter wasn't half as big an anchor when it came to embarrassing family members haunting your political career as Hunter has been.

Even if Biden wins, he's going to have that loser's shadow following his administration around, living in the metaphoric basement at the White House and embarrassing everyone as the nation's First Slacker.

We had Billy Beer, can we have Hunter Heroin this time round' ?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1698556
Yeah considering how “touchy” Biden is that’s certainly something I would have avoided saying. Didn’t he also finger a women without her consent a while back? Or am I thinking of some other old pervy politician.
No, that was him. And the DNC and the media (redundant I know) responded by successfully memoryholing both it and #MeToo as a whole.
 
lol, Texas is “too close to call”.

"Please don't vote, please god don't vote. I'm begging you."

Also, yeah, Texas is too close to call but he cancels an Austin event because people are honking at him like a little bitch. Uh, isn't winning Texas more important than being a little bitch boy? Also, for some reason, Biden is fucking campaigning in Minnesota where Dems haven't lost in 40+ years. What the fuck is he doing? Making sure his 60+ lead is locked in or something? And even there Trump voters are shitting in his mouth so much he had to call them ugly people.

Yeah, it is obvious he's nowhere near as strong as the media wants you to think he is. They need him to win because if he doesn't, the media is fucked for the next decade.
 
"Please don't vote, please god don't vote. I'm begging you."

Also, yeah, Texas is too close to call but he cancels an Austin event because people are honking at him like a little bitch. Uh, isn't winning Texas more important than being a little bitch boy? Also, for some reason, Biden is fucking campaigning in Minnesota where Dems haven't lost in 40+ years. What the fuck is he doing? Making sure his 60+ lead is locked in or something? And even there Trump voters are shitting in his mouth so much he had to call them ugly people.

Yeah, it is obvious he's nowhere near as strong as the media wants you to think he is. They need him to win because if he doesn't, the media is fucked for the next decade.

You can tell what a great leader Biden would be by his inability to handle people mocking him in crowds...
 
Joe Biden has now embraced it. He has morphed into a less likable Jeb!.
ElssLRFWoAEoguw.png
 
A few more articles on the Bidens...

A Collusion Tale: China and the Bidens Not only were the Bidens’ Chinese business contacts known to have ties to the regime; they also may have been clandestine agents.

Understand what’s going on here: The media-Democrat complex is warning you, on the basis of no evidence, that if you don’t close your eyes to the explosive revelations from Hunter Biden’s computers, you will be abetting a Russian intelligence operation; yet it has become increasingly obvious that this is because, if you open your eyes, you may find out that the Bidens were selling themselves to an actual Chinese intelligence operation.

Among the more amazing revelations in the Biden corruption scandal that the media-Democrat complex is blocking voters from seeing is this: The corrupt Chinese businessmen with whom the Bidens were colluding not only had a record of buying political influence, not only were known to have high-level ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the regime, but also were clandestine agents of China — at least, that’s what the FBI and Justice Department seem to have told the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The Bidens were seeking a $40 million liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal with CEFC, a Shanghai-based energy conglomerate that was flying high until early 2018. By then, however, it had become crystal clear to Xi Jinping’s government that the company’s machinations on behalf of the regime had been penetrated by U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement. CEFC formally went bankrupt earlier this year, but that was two years after the regime pulled the plug on its operations – which appear to have been a cover for Chinese intelligence operations.

The Bidens, with former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter as the point-man, dealt with CEFC in 2017. They were the beneficiaries of its corrupt practices and were smack in the middle of things when CEFC began to unravel due to American investigations — investigations that Hunter Biden agreed to look into on behalf of his CEFC partners.

CEFC Was China
CEFC posed as a private company. Make no mistake, though, CEFC was China. Its meteoric rise would not have been possible otherwise, and its rapid collapse happened because its usefulness as an instrument of the Communist regime’s influence was undermined by American surveillance operations.

CEFC’s precursor company was begun in 2002 by Ye Zianming, an obscure young man who became fabulously wealthy by opaque means. It is not hard to figure out what happened, though: The Communist regime smiled on him. He has acknowledged getting his big break in 2006, when the regime permitted him to acquire assets it had confiscated from a major smuggler. Over the next dozen years, he lived the life of a globe-trotting tycoon. Hunter Biden, in the overstatement that appears to be a family tic, has referred to Ye as not only “my partner” but as “the richest man in the world.” Ye did indeed live large, but it was the Chinese government that let that happen, lavishly backing his venture, while he, in turn, spread China’s influence, particularly by purchasing political connections in America, Europe, and Africa.

From the start, the New York Times has reported, CEFC retained former top officials of the regime and was strongly tied to the Chinese Communist Party, establishing an internal party committee and rearing young officials through the Communist Youth League. Ye himself had been deputy secretary of the China Association for International Friendly Contact (CAIFC). That is the public name for a division of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA), known as the General Political Department’s International Liaison Department — as explained in a comprehensive report by the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, mainly compiled by Senators Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) and Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa).

Naturally, after Xi Jinping disappeared Ye in early 2018, CAIFC denied both that Ye had been associated with it and that it had anything to do with the PLA. In reality, as the Senate report elaborates, under Ye’s leadership, CEFC conducted extensive joint activities with the PLA’s General Political Department, and even funded a training center for “applied psychological operations and propaganda directed against Taiwan.” As the report concludes, “Ye and his associates had robust relationships with China’s military units, some of which were involved in matters in direct opposition to U.S. policy in the region.”

Designed to promote the Communist regime’s international muscle-flexing, CEFC was a natural instrument of China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative, which Xi announced in 2013. The Hoover Institution’s Asia scholar, Michael Auslin, explains that OBOR is a form of “debt-trap diplomacy.” Beijing entices foreign governments with billions in infrastructure aid then manipulates them to do its bidding. The Washington Examiner’s Jerry Dunleavy recounts that Ye told Caixin Global, a Chinese media outlet, that CEFC “aim[ed] to serve the state’s strategy.” And serve it he did. Ye, for example, was named a political adviser to a pro-Beijing member of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council, a body China used for years to bring the formerly free zone to heel.

CEFC’s status as a “private business” was camouflage for the spread of China’s tentacles. In its early 2017 heyday, when it began reeling the Bidens in, CEFC was the rare “private” company that was charged with storing part of the regime’s s strategic oil reserve. When Xi visited Prague in March 2017, CEFC was along for the ride, applying to purchase a 50 percent stake in a major European banking giant, the J&T Finance Group, which had inroads not only to the Czech Republic, but Russia, Croatia, and Slovakia, among other places. The deal eventually fizzled because CEFC’s funding seemed too fishy to the Czech central bank. But that was only after, in a nod to Beijing, Ye was formally appointed as an economic policy adviser to the Czech government — the company having become “one of China’s biggest investors in central Europe,” Reuters reported.
And why not? CEFC was backed by a 30-billion-yuan line of credit from the China Development Bank, which is formally controlled by the regime. In September 2017, CEFC was thus permitted to obtain a $9 billion stake of Rosneft, Russia’s state oil giant. Even Vladimir Putin saw the wisdom of receiving a top CEFC executive at the Kremlin, as if he were Xi’s own emissary.

FISA Surveillance
United States intelligence agencies clearly took notice. As the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross reports, our government obtained at least one FISA surveillance warrant that yielded evidence against Chi Ping Patrick Ho, one of CEFC’s heavyweights. The surveillance authorized by the FISA court included electronic eavesdropping as well as physical searching.

As Russiagate and the challenges to investigating it have made painfully clear, FISA surveillance is classified. The government applications and evidentiary showings that lead to it are closely guarded national-security secrets. Even on the rare occasions when evidence derived from FISA surveillance is used in court, as it was in Ho’s eventual prosecution for corruption crimes, the lawyers for the defendant and the trial prosecutors are not informed of the factual basis that predicated the surveillance. The full breadth of the counterintelligence investigation is not revealed publicly. The full range of targets remains secret, and we learn neither how long the monitoring went on nor what specific intelligence-gathering methods were employed.

What we get is just a bare-bones notice, such as the Justice Department provided during Ho’s prosecution, advising that FISA evidence would be offered at the trial. (In the inevitable litigation over admissibility of this evidence, the public is permitted to see only bland legal discussions about the FISA statute and precedents. The underlying, classified facts that triggered the surveillance remain secret.)

The CEFC scenario is a good example of why revelations about counterintelligence investigations are sparse, and why U.S. spy agencies often push against Justice Department use of evidence collected through foreign-intelligence surveillance operations, even to the point of trying to block indictments. Prosecution triggers discovery rules — the production to the defense of relevant information in sensitive government files. Moreover, when it is disclosed — even without providing much detail — that evidence has been collected under FISA, this alerts the foreign power at issue that its operations have been penetrated and monitored by U.S. intelligence agencies. That’s why intelligence agents, even if they stumble upon provable criminal activity, hate prosecutions: Once the FISA hand is tipped, the foreign power takes steps to shut down whatever activities may have been compromised.

To be clear, a FISA warrant would not have been issued, enabling surveillance that yielded evidence against a top CEFC official, unless the FISA court found probable cause of clandestine activity on behalf of a foreign power. We don’t know exactly how many CEFC officials were under surveillance, or who they were, but it emerged at Ho’s trial that the FBI had been monitoring CEFC since at least 2016. Government surveillance resulted in key corruption evidence against Ho, who worked directly for Ye. Indeed, the Times noted that, within days of Ho’s arrest, Ye was interviewed by the FBI.

Hunter Represents ‘the F***ing Spy Chief of China’

Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised, then, that Hunter Biden referred to Ho as “the f***ing spy chief of China,” as I related in a column on Wednesday. Ho is quite the character. He was the home-affairs secretary for the Hong Kong government in the early 2000s. Then, he launched a CEFC-backed non-government organization, the China Energy Fund Committee (“CEFC-NGO”), which was accredited by the United Nations and registered as a charitable entity in the United States. This gave Ho the resources and the cachet to practice CEFC’s highly effective modus operandi: the bribery of influential foreign politicians and government officials, who were then relied on to open doors for CEFC and, derivatively, for China.

At Ho’s criminal trial in the Southern District of New York, prosecutors proved that he used CEFC-NGO as the vehicle for multi-million dollar bribery schemes that roped in the president of Chad and Uganda’s foreign minister. The Justice Department also presented email evidence demonstrating that Ho was asked to “intervene with the Chinese state” so it might arm Chad to fight the Boko Haram jihadist organization. Furthermore, Ho discussed similar possibilities of arming Libya and Qatar, as well has helping Iran move sanctioned money out of China.

Ho was arrested in New York in November 2017. When that happened, the first call he made was to Joe Biden’s brother, Jim — who has a long history of cashing in on his brother’s political influence. Jim Biden says he assumed the call was intended for Joe’s son, Hunter.

That is probably true. After all, in the summer of 2017, months before Ho’s November arrest, Hunter Biden had agreed, at Ye’s request, to represent Ho as a lawyer. As The New Yorker reported in its sympathetic mega-profile of Hunter, Ye explained that he feared — correctly, as it turned out — that Ho was under investigation by U.S. authorities. Hunter, who occasionally dabbles in the practice of law, agreed to try to determine whether and to what extent Ho was in legal jeopardy.

CEFC Reels in the Bidens
By then, Ye and CEFC had enticed Hunter and the Biden family with promises of a huge financial score. Ye had been seeking connections with eminences on both sides of the Washington’s political aisle. These feelers eventually landed Ye a May 2017 meeting with Hunter in Miami. They began negotiating a joint venture between CEFC and the Biden family, the $40 million LNG project on Monkey Island in Louisiana — which Hunter, in familiar Bidenesque exaggeration, described in his recorded rant as “a $4 billion deal to build the largest f***ing LNG port in the world,” adding that he’d negotiated the deal at Ye’s “$58 million apartment.”

Ye certainly followed CEFC’s negotiation style in dealing with Hunter. Besides promising astronomical returns for his politically influential partners, Ye followed up the meeting by sending Hunter a thank-you card and a 2.8-carat diamond. Hilariously, Hunter told The New Yorker’s Adam Entous that it never occurred to him that this could be a bribe — “What would they be bribing me for? My dad wasn’t in office.” Leaving aside the fact that Joe Biden was already preparing his 2020 presidential run, Hunter made clear to business partners involved in the CEFC negotiations that Ye was pushing the deal because he wanted to be associated with the Biden family name.
Of course, it is not Hunter Biden who makes that name a valuable commodity.

It was Hunter’s negotiations with Ye that generated emails, first reported in the New York Post, which set forth the expected “remuneration package.” The emails are said to come from Hunter Biden’s computers, and the ones relevant to CEFC have been corroborated by Anthony Bobulinski. He is a former naval officer and wealthy investor who was recruited by James Gilliar, a Hunter Biden associate, to structure the partnership between CEFC and the Bidens — not just Hunter, but the family.

Bobulinski is a participant in the emails and had several face-to-face meetings with Hunter and Jim Biden, as well as at least two personal meetings with Joe Biden. Bobulinski has related that, in the equity distribution as originally conceived, Hunter was to receive a 20 percent cut, and to hold an additional 10 percent for his father, Joe Biden (referred to as “the big guy” in the relevant email), while Joe’s brother, Jim Biden, was also to get 10 percent. Bobulinski indicates that, by the time the deal was finalized, Joe’s 10 percent cut was to be held by Jim rather than Hunter.

As the Wall Street Journal’s Kim Strassel details, and as Bobulinski himself verified in an interview with Fox News’s Tucker Carlson, Bobulinski became disenchanted with the deal as it was negotiated in the spring and summer of 2017. He saw it as an energy business venture that required business protocols and corporate governance. He came to believe Hunter regarded it as a “personal piggybank” and objected to the fact that Hunter brought no value other than his name.

The Biden name, however, was what China wanted. And to repeat, CEFC was China, and everybody knew it. Gilliar admonished Bobulinski that the players on the CEFC side of the venture “are intelligence so they understand the value added” by the Biden connection. In text messages, Hunter scolded Bobulinski, reminding him that CEFC execs were “coming to be MY partner to be partners with the Bidens,” and that “in this instance only one player holds the trump card and that’s me. May not be fair but it’s the reality because I’m the only one putting an entire family legacy on the line.”
Hunter knew CEFC was under U.S. government investigation. Not only did Ye tell him that, Hunter agreed to look into it as counsel for Patrick Ho. In a May 2017 text, Gilliar reminded Bobulinski, “Don’t mention Joe [Biden] being involved, it’s only when u are face to face, I know you know that but they are paranoid.” Actually, it is not paranoia when you are nervous because you know you are cutting dubious deals with shady characters tied to a hostile foreign regime. Is it any wonder that Jim Biden told Bobulinski that the family was ever mindful of having “plausible deniability”?

Cashing In

The LNG venture collapsed on the Chinese end, the promised millions in capitalization never materializing. But while this cut out such participants as Bobulinski, the Bidens figured out a way to get paid.

As the Senate report details, Ye had an underling, Gongwen Dong, establish a line of credit through a business they controlled, “Hudson West III LLC,” issuing credit cards for Hunter, Jim Biden, and Jim’s wife, Sara. The three charged more than $100,000 luxury-item purchases. On August 4, a CEFC subsidiary partially underwritten by a Chinese state-owned petroleum company (Shangai Huaxin Group), sent Hunter’s law firm, Owasco, another $100,000.

Four days later, a CEFC subsidiary wired $5 million to Hudson West III; over the next year, nearly $4.8 million of these funds were transferred to Owasco — said to be for “consulting.” During the same period of time, Owasco funneled nearly $1.4 million to Jim Biden, through the bank account held by Jim and Sara Biden, under the auspices of a consulting firm, the Lion Hall Group. Hudson West also sent over $76,000 directly to Jim Biden’s Lion Hall Group, during 2018.
On November 2, 2017, CEFC attempted to send Hunter Biden’s firm $1 million through the Hudson West III account. As the Senate report details, CEFC initially explained this payment as a “consultation fee” to Hudson West III for “market investigation of a natural gas project” which was deemed unnecessary, resulting in the refund of the money. However, Hunter Biden later acknowledged that it was a $1 million fee that should have gone to his law firm for the representation of Patrick Ho, but had to be refunded because Hunter provided the wrong wire-transfer instructions. The problem was subsequently corrected, and the payment went through.

Real Collusion

Yet, the end was near.

On November 18, Ho was arrested by the FBI at JFK International Airport in New York City after he arrived on a flight from Hong Kong. When he was permitted to make a phone call upon being detained, Ho chose to call Jim Biden, the brother of the former vice president and soon-to-be presidential candidate. Jim later told the Times that he was surprised by the call (I bet!), and assumed Ho meant to call Hunter, whose contact information Jim gave to Ho. “There is nothing else I have to say,” Jim told the paper. “I don’t want to be dragged into this anymore.”

Evidently, Jim made no mention of any dragging by the expense account and payments that had been steered his way thanks to CEFC and Ye — for whom Ho worked, and by whom Jim’s nephew, Hunter, was being generously paid to serve as Ho’s lawyer.

Six weeks after Ho’s arrest, Ye sent CEFC staff what would turn out to be a final directive, in what the Financial Times described as a poem in traditional Chinese style, stating, “Take heavy responsibility for the Belt and Road, Work Harder to Make New Moves.”

On February 8, 2018, federal prosecutors announced in a court filing that they would be introducing against Ho evidence derived from classified foreign intelligence surveillance. About a week later, Ye was detained in China, on the order of Xi Jinping. It is said to be a “bribery” investigation, but Ye has not been seen or heard from since.
Or, as Hunter Biden put it, “The richest man in the world is missing, who was my partner.”

For over three years, the American people were barraged with a media-Democrat drumbeat, fueled by anonymous intelligence agency leaks but based on no actual evidence, that Donald Trump had “colluded” in the intelligence operations of a hostile foreign power. Journalists and investigators scorched the earth searching for proof, particularly any financial exchanges between Trump associates and shady Russian characters tied to the Kremlin. They came up empty.

Next Tuesday, the media-Democrat complex would have the American people elect as their president Joe Biden who, based on significant evidence, appears to have been ensnared in his family’s energetic collusion with clandestine operatives of a hostile foreign power. And there is no doubt that millions of dollars were exchanged, going to the Biden family from shady Chinese characters with significant ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the regime of Xi Jinping.

Go figure.

NR Daily
Get the day’s best NR stories
delivered right to your inbox.
Subscribe for free.
CEFC Reels in the Bidens
By then, Ye and CEFC had enticed Hunter and the Biden family with promises of a huge financial score. Ye had been seeking connections with eminences on both sides of the Washington’s political aisle. These feelers eventually landed Ye a May 2017 meeting with Hunter in Miami. They began negotiating a joint venture between CEFC and the Biden family, the $40 million LNG project on Monkey Island in Louisiana — which Hunter, in familiar Bidenesque exaggeration, described in his recorded rant as “a $4 billion deal to build the largest f***ing LNG port in the world,” adding that he’d negotiated the deal at Ye’s “$58 million apartment.”
CEFC Reels in the Bidens
By then, Ye and CEFC had enticed Hunter and the Biden family with promises of a huge financial score. Ye had been seeking connections with eminences on both sides of the Washington’s political aisle. These feelers eventually landed Ye a May 2017 meeting with Hunter in Miami. They began negotiating a joint venture between CEFC and the Biden family, the $40 million LNG project on Monkey Island in Louisiana — which Hunter, in familiar Bidenesque exaggeration, described in his recorded rant as “a $4 billion deal to build the largest f***ing LNG port in the world,” adding that he’d negotiated the deal at Ye’s “$58 million apartment.”

Ye certainly followed CEFC’s negotiation style in dealing with Hunter. Besides promising astronomical returns for his politically influential partners, Ye followed up the meeting by sending Hunter a thank-you card and a 2.8-carat diamond. Hilariously, Hunter told The New Yorker’s Adam Entous that it never occurred to him that this could be a bribe — “What would they be bribing me for? My dad wasn’t in office.” Leaving aside the fact that Joe Biden was already preparing his 2020 presidential run, Hunter made clear to business partners involved in the CEFC negotiations that Ye was pushing the deal because he wanted to be associated with the Biden family name.
Of course, it is not Hunter Biden who makes that name a valuable commodity.

It was Hunter’s negotiations with Ye that generated emails, first reported in the New York Post, which set forth the expected “remuneration package.” The emails are said to come from Hunter Biden’s computers, and the ones relevant to CEFC have been corroborated by Anthony Bobulinski. He is a former naval officer and wealthy investor who was recruited by James Gilliar, a Hunter Biden associate, to structure the partnership between CEFC and the Bidens — not just Hunter, but the family.

Bobulinski is a participant in the emails and had several face-to-face meetings with Hunter and Jim Biden, as well as at least two personal meetings with Joe Biden. Bobulinski has related that, in the equity distribution as originally conceived, Hunter was to receive a 20 percent cut, and to hold an additional 10 percent for his father, Joe Biden (referred to as “the big guy” in the relevant email), while Joe’s brother, Jim Biden, was also to get 10 percent. Bobulinski indicates that, by the time the deal was finalized, Joe’s 10 percent cut was to be held by Jim rather than Hunter.

As the Wall Street Journal’s Kim Strassel details, and as Bobulinski himself verified in an interview with Fox News’s Tucker Carlson, Bobulinski became disenchanted with the deal as it was negotiated in the spring and summer of 2017. He saw it as an energy business venture that required business protocols and corporate governance. He came to believe Hunter regarded it as a “personal piggybank” and objected to the fact that Hunter brought no value other than his name.

The Biden name, however, was what China wanted. And to repeat, CEFC was China, and everybody knew it. Gilliar admonished Bobulinski that the players on the CEFC side of the venture “are intelligence so they understand the value added” by the Biden connection. In text messages, Hunter scolded Bobulinski, reminding him that CEFC execs were “coming to be MY partner to be partners with the Bidens,” and that “in this instance only one player holds the trump card and that’s me. May not be fair but it’s the reality because I’m the only one putting an entire family legacy on the line.”
Hunter knew CEFC was under U.S. government investigation. Not only did Ye tell him that, Hunter agreed to look into it as counsel for Patrick Ho. In a May 2017 text, Gilliar reminded Bobulinski, “Don’t mention Joe [Biden] being involved, it’s only when u are face to face, I know you know that but they are paranoid.” Actually, it is not paranoia when you are nervous because you know you are cutting dubious deals with shady characters tied to a hostile foreign regime. Is it any wonder that Jim Biden told Bobulinski that the family was ever mindful of having “plausible deniability”?

Cashing In

The LNG venture collapsed on the Chinese end, the promised millions in capitalization never materializing. But while this cut out such participants as Bobulinski, the Bidens figured out a way to get paid.

As the Senate report details, Ye had an underling, Gongwen Dong, establish a line of credit through a business they controlled, “Hudson West III LLC,” issuing credit cards for Hunter, Jim Biden, and Jim’s wife, Sara. The three charged more than $100,000 luxury-item purchases. On August 4, a CEFC subsidiary partially underwritten by a Chinese state-owned petroleum company (Shangai Huaxin Group), sent Hunter’s law firm, Owasco, another $100,000.

Four days later, a CEFC subsidiary wired $5 million to Hudson West III; over the next year, nearly $4.8 million of these funds were transferred to Owasco — said to be for “consulting.” During the same period of time, Owasco funneled nearly $1.4 million to Jim Biden, through the bank account held by Jim and Sara Biden, under the auspices of a consulting firm, the Lion Hall Group. Hudson West also sent over $76,000 directly to Jim Biden’s Lion Hall Group, during 2018.

On November 2, 2017, CEFC attempted to send Hunter Biden’s firm $1 million through the Hudson West III account. As the Senate report details, CEFC initially explained this payment as a “consultation fee” to Hudson West III for “market investigation of a natural gas project” which was deemed unnecessary, resulting in the refund of the money. However, Hunter Biden later acknowledged that it was a $1 million fee that should have gone to his law firm for the representation of Patrick Ho, but had to be refunded because Hunter provided the wrong wire-transfer instructions. The problem was subsequently corrected, and the payment went through.

Real Collusion

Yet, the end was near.

On November 18, Ho was arrested by the FBI at JFK International Airport in New York City after he arrived on a flight from Hong Kong. When he was permitted to make a phone call upon being detained, Ho chose to call Jim Biden, the brother of the former vice president and soon-to-be presidential candidate. Jim later told the Times that he was surprised by the call (I bet!), and assumed Ho meant to call Hunter, whose contact information Jim gave to Ho. “There is nothing else I have to say,” Jim told the paper. “I don’t want to be dragged into this anymore.” Evidently, Jim made no mention of any dragging by the expense account and payments that had been steered his way thanks to CEFC and Ye — for whom Ho worked, and by whom Jim’s nephew, Hunter, was being generously paid to serve as Ho’s lawyer.

Six weeks after Ho’s arrest, Ye sent CEFC staff what would turn out to be a final directive, in what the Financial Times described as a poem in traditional Chinese style, stating, “Take heavy responsibility for the Belt and Road, Work Harder to Make New Moves.”

On February 8, 2018, federal prosecutors announced in a court filing that they would be introducing against Ho evidence derived from classified foreign intelligence surveillance. About a week later, Ye was detained in China, on the order of Xi Jinping. It is said to be a “bribery” investigation, but Ye has not been seen or heard from since.
Or, as Hunter Biden put it, “The richest man in the world is missing, who was my partner.”

For over three years, the American people were barraged with a media-Democrat drumbeat, fueled by anonymous intelligence agency leaks but based on no actual evidence, that Donald Trump had “colluded” in the intelligence operations of a hostile foreign power. Journalists and investigators scorched the earth searching for proof, particularly any financial exchanges between Trump associates and shady Russian characters tied to the Kremlin. They came up empty.

Next Tuesday, the media-Democrat complex would have the American people elect as their president Joe Biden who, based on significant evidence, appears to have been ensnared in his family’s energetic collusion with clandestine operatives of a hostile foreign power. And there is no doubt that millions of dollars were exchanged, going to the Biden family from shady Chinese characters with significant ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the regime of Xi Jinping.

Go figure.


 
Last edited:
Sorry for the double post but I hit the character limit...

NBC News explains what happened when it tried to report on alleged Hunter Biden emails​

Dave Bartkowiak Jr., Digital Managing Editor

In a detailed report this week explaining the network’s approach to an “elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden’s son and business in China," NBC News explains how and why the story “isn’t being covered” by major media outlets.

Simply put: It’s not supported by any evidence, according to NBC News and several other organizations, specifically the Wall Street Journal and Fox News, two of the only organizations given access to key documents.

From the NBC News report:

"The complaints from President Donald Trump and his allies have been growing louder as the election approaches: Why isn’t the mainstream media covering the Hunter Biden laptop story?

Trump and his allies say there is evidence of corruption in emails and documents allegedly found on a laptop belonging to Democrat Joe Biden’s son. They say those and other documents show that Hunter Biden used his father’s influence to enrich himself through business deals in Ukraine and China, and that his father not only facilitated that, but may have benefited financially.

But the Wall Street Journal and Fox News — among the only news organizations that have been given access to key documents — found that the emails and other records don’t make that case. Leaving aside the many questions about their provenance, the materials offered no evidence that Joe Biden played any role in his son’s dealings in China, let alone profited from them, both news organizations concluded.

As to Ukraine, a single email published by the New York Post suggests Joe Biden may have had a meeting with a representative of a Ukrainian company that employed his son. Trump and his allies alleged that means Joe Biden has lied when he said he never discussed his son’s business roles. The Biden campaign denies the meeting happened.

The lack of major new revelations is perhaps the biggest reason the story has not gotten traction, but not the only one. Among others: Most mainstream news organizations, including NBC News, have not been granted access to the documents. NBC News asked by email, text, phone call and certified mail, and was ultimately denied."


———

Instagram Starts Clamping Down on Misinformation
Instagram on Thursday took aim at the spread of misinformation on its platform, announcing that it would temporarily eliminate users’ ability to view some recent posts ahead of Election Day.

In two tweets, Instagram said it would remove the “recent” tab from hashtag pages. Previously, users could view the most recent posts tagged with a particular hashtag. Now, only “top” posts under a specific hashtag that have been reviewed by the platform will be viewable.

Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, said the change was made to “reduce the real-time spread of potentially harmful content that could pop up around the election.”
The change took effect Thursday night and the “recent” tab will return sometime after the election, an Instagram spokeswoman said. The platform said it hopes the change will allow it to proactively stop misinformation from spreading, rather than having to wait until a falsehood has already been widely shared.

Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation analyst at the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan think thank, said Instagram’s decision, just days before the election, was “rather late” but “better than nothing.”

“I hope in the future the social media platforms recognize that elections are an inflection point in disinformation campaigns, not an end point,” she said. “A decision like this earlier in the cycle might have lessened the spread of voting misinformation, for instance.”

Ms. Jankowicz said much of the misinformation spreading on Instagram was related to QAnon, the baseless pro-Trump conspiracy theory, and false information about Senator Kamala Harris of California, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee.

Instagram’s decision follows crackdowns on viral falsehoods by Facebook and Twitter. Twitter recently added context to trending topics and de-emphasized retweets ahead of the election, while Facebook said it would ban political ads indefinitely. Both companies have added some labels to misleading posts and highlighted accurate voting information after rising alarm about the possibility of a disputed election outcome and the chaos that could follow.



How Three Election-Related Falsehoods Spread

Falsehoods about Tuesday’s election have overwhelmed local election officials, who said they were dealing with “tsunamis of misinformation,” have lost sleep and were working extra long hours.

The officials told us they were dealing with several common flavors of election-related misinformation. So we decided to track three categories of the rumors they had encountered using CrowdTangle, a Facebook-owned analytics tool, and then focused on the spread of one the lies in each of the categories. We also recorded the volume of tweets about the rumors we followed using BuzzSumo, another analytics tool.

The data showed how a single rumor pushing a false narrative could rapidly gain traction on Facebook and Twitter, generating tens of thousands of shares and comments. That has made the misinformation particularly hard for elections officials to fight.

“The true costs of misinformation are not paid by platform companies,” said Joan Donovan, the research director at Harvard University’s Shorenstein Center. “They are paid by everyone else who has to deal with the aftermath.”

A spokesman for Facebook, Andy Stone, said that it prohibits voter interference, is working with fact-checking organizations and has introduced a voter information hub of accurate information.

Twitter said it did not create any specific Twitter Moments explaining these particular rumors, but does aim to proactively debunk false claims and provide information about voting by mail.

Here’s what we found.

1. False claims of ballot “harvesting”

This misinformation features the unproven assertion that ballots are being “harvested,” or collected and dropped off in bulk by unauthorized people.

In the example we focused on, Representative Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat, was falsely accused last month of being engaged in or connected to systematic illegal ballot harvesting.

There were 3,959 public Facebook posts sharing this rumor, according to our analysis. Those posts generated 953,032 likes, comments and shares. Among those who shared the lie were two pro-Trump Facebook groups targeting Minnesota residents, as well as President Trump himself. At least 26,300 tweets also discussed the falsehood.

Jeremy Slevin, a spokesman for Ms. Omar, said in an emailed statement that there was no truth to the claim.

2. False claims of mail-in ballots being dumped or shredded

Mail-in ballots and related materials being tossed was another popular falsehood that election officials said they were hearing. We looked at one of these rumors, which was pushed by a far-right website called The Right Scoop. This month, the site published an article with the headline, “Tons of Trump mail-in ballot applications SHREDDED in back of tractor trailer headed for Pennsylvania.”

The article generated 163 individual public posts on Facebook. It was liked, commented and shared 91,000 times on the social network, according to our analysis. It was also shared 1,032 times on Twitter.

Politifact debunked the video on which the article was based. Facebook added a label to posts that shared the rumor saying it contained false information.

The Right Scoop later corrected its post — but its correction did not travel as far as the lie, receiving just a single like on Facebook. The Right Scoop did not respond to a request for comment.

3. False claims of planned violence at polling sites by Antifa and Black Lives Matter protesters

Election officials also said people were confronting them with false assertions that antifa, the loose collection of left-wing activists, and Black Lives Matter protesters were coordinating riots at polling places across the country.

One of those rumors began this month when The Federalist, a conservative outlet, noticed that a liberal activist website called Shut Down DC said people should protest on the streets if Mr. Trump was re-elected. Right-wing commentators then attached inflammatory captions to their posts sharing The Federalist’s article. Many said it was evidence of planned far-left violence on Election Day and after, and stated, without proof, that Black Lives Matter was involved.

The false rumor was then shared in 472 public Facebook posts, according to our analysis. It generated 99,336 likes, shares and comments. On Twitter, the rumor was shared at least 400 times.

Craig Sawyer, a right-wing commentator and Marine veteran, shared the rumor on Facebook on Oct. 16. He said in an email that his post was not a call for violence and that The New York Times should focus on “the key planners and financiers of all the rioting, arson, looting and murder” instead.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back