- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
All I ask of you guys is to just spam this image to every salty person you see online if Trump wins.
Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
The only winners on this whole debacle are the non-Americans, I expect a lot of salt and riots regardless of who wins.
Oughta be a good shit show.
Oughta be a good shit show.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
Everyone likes an underdog story, right? So why do I get the impression that, despite being the incumbent, Trump is still the underdog? Does the media have the power to distort enough people's perception of reality? I guess we'll soon find out.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
brookslazor
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2019
the only winning move is not to play and let's just say I'm a non-player character
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
I think Minnesota is ambitious, but who knows, maybe all the rioting will provide enough of a Republican turnout boost? Here's my best guess, where PA and AZ would be sufficient for Trump, but makes PA basically a must-win for Trump. If he can't win PA, WI and MI are even less likely.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2020
We can only hope to be so lucky
I'm sure the Russian voting bots will make sure their buddy trump wins.
Lol stay asshurt trumpfags.
Lol stay asshurt trumpfags.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
Those are.... not good numbers for the party of asses, good for the party of drunk pachyderms
Gapernaper Rifle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2020
These are some of the reasons why Trump is worthy of two terms
https://710wor.iheart.com/featured/...t-of-president-trumps-accomplishments-so-far/
- Joined
- May 27, 2020
BEEP BOOP COMMRADE
verygayFrogs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
I have the rest of the week off after Tuesday so I get the shitshow full force.
Does it help I’m super nervous bout the election’s violence? No, but I get the shitshow in full force
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
Idk, if you look at early voting in WI it looks a LOT better than in PA.... PA is looking rough in terms of early voting.
I guess its pretty hard to tell, though. A lot of REGISTERED democrats in these areas might be flipping Trump as they feel the democratic party ceases to actually represent them, and the early voting would just indicate that they are "registered democrats". The high "democrat voter turnout" might be partially Trump voting union boys who've been registered as democrats. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
I don't like those Pennsylvania numbers. Trumpers better show the fuck up!
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
It's actually the other way around.
It's believed that up to 2/3rds of the votes on Election Day will be for Trump. The Republicans have been pushing voting in person and the Democrats have been pushing voting by mail. The Democrats should have a MUCH bigger lead by now.
I would say the most shocking number in that group is that the Republican vote is already leading in Michigan. That's not supposed to even be close. It should be like Michigan Biden+10 in mail-ins or something.
The only Republican number that's concerning is Pennsylvania. I don't know what the fuck is happening there. +43 is ridiculous.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
Anything less than 70% cumulative early vote for Biden is not good for Biden
Asses = donkeys
Pachyderms = elephants
Donkey = symbol of Democratic Party
Elephant = symbol of Republican Party
legalkochi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
All I can say is that Trump will win.
You don't get 18 million votes in an uncontested primary, having the most unprecedented, fervent base in possibly the history of presidential campaigns, have 2.5 million grassroots volunteer and a ground game that goes beyond the Obama campaign's ground game, and barnstorm the country with multiple rallies in multiple days, only to just fucking lose.
That makes no sense at all.
Hard work pays off and produces an easy win for the candidate that does it.
Biden has not worked hard nor had the stamina or energy to campaign as vigorously as the President, to show to the entire country why he should be elected over the incumbent President.
It's really a no-brainer.
You don't get 18 million votes in an uncontested primary, having the most unprecedented, fervent base in possibly the history of presidential campaigns, have 2.5 million grassroots volunteer and a ground game that goes beyond the Obama campaign's ground game, and barnstorm the country with multiple rallies in multiple days, only to just fucking lose.
That makes no sense at all.
Hard work pays off and produces an easy win for the candidate that does it.
Biden has not worked hard nor had the stamina or energy to campaign as vigorously as the President, to show to the entire country why he should be elected over the incumbent President.
It's really a no-brainer.
captkrisma
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
I've noticed something that is similar to the 2016 election, and that is the overarching value of holding a political rally. 2016 was lost due to hubris, 2020 will be lost out of fear of the boogeyman.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton attended over 350 fundraisers for her party. Compare this to Trump's 60, and you can see where her time was spent. Trump held over 300 rallies compared to Clinton's 278. So while the elites were spending $1000 a plate to eat with an old lady who might talk for a few minutes, the masses were standing in arenas and getting whipped up to support their candidate. Hillary did not spend her time with the public, and it cost her.
Flash forward to now, where Trump is scheduled to hold 10 rallies over the course of two days, and compare that to the 2 rallies and a fundraiser (really? This late in the game?) for Biden. Trump has held over 60 rallies since the RNC. Biden has put a lid on most public events and gatherings up until now, the last possible moment to campaign.
If Trump wins, it's because he went to the people, not the other way around.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton attended over 350 fundraisers for her party. Compare this to Trump's 60, and you can see where her time was spent. Trump held over 300 rallies compared to Clinton's 278. So while the elites were spending $1000 a plate to eat with an old lady who might talk for a few minutes, the masses were standing in arenas and getting whipped up to support their candidate. Hillary did not spend her time with the public, and it cost her.
Flash forward to now, where Trump is scheduled to hold 10 rallies over the course of two days, and compare that to the 2 rallies and a fundraiser (really? This late in the game?) for Biden. Trump has held over 60 rallies since the RNC. Biden has put a lid on most public events and gatherings up until now, the last possible moment to campaign.
If Trump wins, it's because he went to the people, not the other way around.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
Keep in mind that PA flipping red is a very recent thing; we are watching the target demographics for the parties flip right in front of our eyes. A lot of those registered democrat voters might actually be Trump voters that either haven't changed their registration yet or simply view Trump as a better candidate to suit their needs than Biden.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
This week will be the last week of my two weeks notice at my current job that's absolutely filled with TDSers. I'm extremely tempted to post this in the general work chat on my last day if Trump is re-elected:
But I probably won't because I'm a pussy and I know they're the type that would fuck me over on future HireRight reference checks if I did
- Status