Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[chimpburgers]

I think only Macie has ticked him off more than I have. I'm not sure whether to be proud or ashamed.

He also doesn't seem to understand that if everyone but him is "crazy," you can just flip that around pretty easily...

Fuckbot confirmed for only crazy person.

But amazingly she wasn't blocked by him. I guess he sees something in her that you or supdup possibly didn't have for whatever reason.

Well, of course. Modern science is worthless and does worthless research in these fields because it must abide to PC. Hence they never research anything useful or interesting. What you're claiming confirms my points about society completely.

But if it happens to be useful for supporting your beliefs, then it's not all worthless to you is it?

 

[supdup]

Macie, you don't know what a scientific study is and you're lying it isn't peer reviewed. I am not even gonna mention Google Scholar for you. You are too demented.

Wasn't Google Scholar mentioned TO fuckbot yesterday?

I don't think this dude has a creative bone in his body.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

A good example of what I'm telling you is the book by thornhill and palmer, Natural History of Rape, which was attacked by liberals for establishing that rape is often guided by the desire for sex, not domination, and that it can be a viable reproductive strategy for men with low reproductive chances (which non-seductive men like incels are). . It's dangerous to publish un-PC stuff. Crazy lunatics here may claim this is a conspiracy theory but what happened with the book I'm mentioning isn't a conspiracy - it happened in public.

Actually, the book was attacked for a variety of reasons, largely to do with issues surrounding the credibility of the theory they were establishing, particularly regarding the questionable scientific methods by which they reached their conclusions. They were also accused of using an argument based around a naturalistic fallacy to try to avoid a legitimate discussion about the ethical connotations of their theory. Nice try though, at least you're citing sources now, even if they are 15 year-old discredited fringe theories.

 

[ON 190]

1) but true
2) america would me my first guess
3) nope, another proof you're probably from america. it is important to those who go on working as scientists. it is not that important for those who become teachers in fucking elementary schools, that's for sure. but my point is that it is hardly important for getting a degree, where all the works you do are just compilations with no real scientific value anyway. your egyptology example is likely not the truth anymore because there should enough literature in english now but what matters and is my point is that before real scientific careers your works will almost certainly be compilations. some of the people i went to college with are in science now. maybe 2-3 of them. most who are employed work in primary and high schools, and are not doing science at all.
4) because Macie claimed I do. I do, but she couldn't have heard so before this moment.

"If I disagree with you, you must be from America! I HATES me some Amurricans, I tell you what!"

 

[sugoi-chan]

but what matters and is my point is that before real scientific careers your works will almost certainly be compilations. some of the people i went to college with are in science now. maybe 2-3 of them. most who are employed work in primary and high schools, and are not doing science at all.

That's a good explanation of Researcher's First Published Paper, but that still doesn't excuse why you're citing shitty papers in defense of inceldom as if they were cutting edge research in the field.

 

[ON 190]

Wasn't Google Scholar mentioned TO fuckbot yesterday?

I don't think this dude has a creative bone in his body.

In almost 2000 pages and 10,000 posts, yep. It's literally the first time he's mentioned it. We call him out on it and I guarantee he'll claim he always knew about it but just never saw the need to bring it up!

 

[supdup]

But amazingly she wasn't blocked by him. I guess he sees something in her that you or supdup possibly didn't have for whatever reason.

a vagina

 

[DrChristianTroy]

So Holden says "Incel is used in scientific studies and research!" I ask him to prove the proof.

He:
1) says I'm crazy
2) gives a 10 page article from a non-peer reviewed journal, written by a teacher and her students, about an analysis on an INTERNET POLL of 82 men. There is no scientific information or research in this paper.
3) I ask for something more legit. Something peer-reviewed in the science community. Something preferably not about poll analysis.
4) told I'm a lying crazy bitch
5) Holden posts another link to a study
6) it's literally the same exact study by the same exact authors at the same exact time (2001). The ONLY difference is that it's in a different non-peer reviewed journal with a different title. It is literally the same case data...82 men on the internet doing a poll and then them talking about it.
7) I point this out and ask for either a real scientific research article or for Holden to admit he was pulling shit out of his ass again
told I'm too crazy to talk to

How did anything in this sequence mean IM the crazy one? Holden just tried to link the same poll study twice as proof that there's scientific research done about incel.....

(Edit: I literally went to bed, came back about 7 hours later, and Holden is still here... Get some fucking sleep Holden!)

It's almost like the dude is fucking retarded. And the best part, he'll still obsess over all of your posts because you have a vagina. Mazels.

 

[chimpburgers]

a vagina

He really needs Leighanna in his life. Is her Ronald McDonald hair not good enough for him?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Then why the fuck are you citing a "modern scientific" article in defense of inceldom?

I have no idea what the fuck is inceldom, and you have no idea what our fight/argument was about. I make no judgements about the value of the article itself.
One very important thing one must remember is that practically none of us here are scientists who can evaluate scientific articles correctly. I am not one, you are not that. So it is hilarious how it is always the craziest people (24cocksinhiswife, macie), who can't even grasp simple facts about me, are always whining about science. It is like me telling some soccer player who earns 100k an year how to play like Messi - in this comparison those people being me, 100 k player being my level of scientific knowledge and Messi being actual scientists. I mean, these people are diagnosing online and don't know the difference between my lesbian ex and the girl I impregnated. Don't take them seriously, ffs.

 

[sugoi-chan]

One very important thing one must remember is that practically none of us here are scientists who can evaluate scientific articles correctly. I am not one, you are not that. So it is hilarious how it is always the craziest people (24cocksinhiswife, macie), who can't even grasp simple facts about me, are always whining about science.

Uh, that's a skill you pick up in college, one of the first actually. From one history major to another, you might want to go back and get a refund from your university if they didn't teach you how to evaluate peer-reviewed articles (science or not).

 

[supdup]

One very important thing one must remember is that practically none of us here are scientists who can evaluate scientific articles correctly. .

You gotta love the rationalizing. "Since I don't know what the fuck I'm doing, other people must not either."

 

[ON 190]

Uh, that's a skill you pick up in college, one of the first actually. From one history major to another, you might want to go back and get a refund from your university if they didn't teach you how to evaluate peer-reviewed articles (science or not).

You mean you can't use Wikipedia and articles from love-shy.com as sources in your papers?

Fuck, I am going to need to completely rewrite my thesis.

 

[supdup]

More Fuckbot fun from the Offspring(the band) forums, of all places

http://offspring.com/community/showthread.php?51254-Love-shy-and-incel-the-fuck

 

[ON 190]

More Fuckbot fun from the Offspring(the band) forums, of all places

http://offspring.com/community/showthread.php?51254-Love-shy-and-incel-the-fuck

He really can't control his dogma-spewing. It's almost sad.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Also, since Macie reverted to saying incels have a mindset of being "entitled", which is complete nonsense, I'd like her to explain why so many people have a mindset that

1. It is completely ok for any male to go without women for a lifetime against their will?

2. It is completely ok that these males should also be giving money for this?

3. It is completely ok for chosen groups to rape or do worse, but groups designed as slaves are bad if they're even complaining?

 

[Lunete]

You're guessing wrong.

Anyway, whether you eventually find and understand the right reason or not, my point still stands - you are recommending dangerous, dangerous things to young men. Things that last applied in 1955. The last thing modern Western women want is to be treated like human beings worthy or respect, empathy or any consideration.

This attitude is why you've never been in a successful relationship. Enjoy being a bitter, lonely, virgin loser for the rest of your life.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

But amazingly she wasn't blocked by him. I guess he sees something in her that you or supdup possibly didn't have for whatever reason.

Yes, this is true. Unlike supdup, Macie at least makes a sane point here and there and in her I actually recognize signs of intelligence I've never seen in his case. For example, some of the things she asked on Skype were really good questions. On the other hand, a woman like Ruin is just that - a complete mental ruin.

This attitude is why you've never been in a successful relationship. Enjoy being a bitter, lonely, virgin loser for the rest of your life.

Did you read anything I told you? I didn't have this attitude until 2014, when I was 25 years old ! Using your reasoning there was no reason for me not to be in a successful relationship before that.

Why wasn't I in one when I was supporting basically all of feminism? What's your brilliant answer to this question?

 

[ON 190]

Yes, this is true. Unlike supdup, Macie at least makes a sane point here and there and in her I actually recognize signs of intelligence I've never seen in his case. For example, some of the things she asked on Skype were really good questions. On the other hand, a woman like Ruin is just that - a complete mental ruin.

That's the sound of everyone's point sailing so far over Fuckbot's head that it almost reaches orbit.

Edit: I'm still baffled by the Offspring forums, of all places...

 

[sugoi-chan]

1. It is completely ok for any male to go without women for a lifetime against their will?

It's perfectly okay for you specifically to go without a woman for a lifetime against your will. We decided this at the last Liberal Feminist Cabal Meeting.