2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So let's see...we've lost the soapbox due to the mass censorship over the past few years that has really picked up recently.

lol ballot box

The ammo box just gets you charged with murder for self defense.

Guess the jury box (or in this case, courts I guess) are all that's left, and that could do with some shoring up too.

All this to just barely squeak by a moderate populist who monitors the situation and not much else against a senile neolib who's palling around with wokies. If we're lucky.

Even if Trump wins I don't like the look of this in the longer term one bit.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Late
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Livecorpse, tehpope and 3 others
JohnDoe said:
Are you familiar with the legal term spoilation? Destroying ballots is legally the stupidest idea you could have, because the court will, as a matter of fact and law, treat that as proof positive that the destroyed evidence was as harmful as possible and weigh it as such. The best case outcome for the Democrats is having the contested, destroyed ballots completely invalidated and removed from the totals.
Click to expand...
So if the Democrats destroy ballots all those count for Trump?
That sounds so unrealistic but I wouldn't be surprised at this point
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Candlelight Desolation and 3 others
Zero Day Defense said:
If he does that now, while he's winning, then he gives up any plausible deniability. Why would he do that?
Click to expand...
The thing is, is that Biden isn’t even really “winning” at this point. AZ has been retracted as well as MI. If Biden carries this all the way to the end, he may end up with even less electoral votes than what he had, much like what happened to Hillary after the recount. Also, genuine recounts will most likely go towards Trump, seeing as how every state hesitant to actually count is trending towards Trump. If Trump ends up winning the states that it looked like he was on midnight on election night, Biden is toast. Also, the only people claiming that Biden is actually winning is the MSM, which doesn’t decide the election.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Parthenos and 6 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Parthenos and 9 others
Coh said:
That was before a lot of evidence came out that this shit is going on. I think Ben is a weasel, but I don't think he can't help but be a little upset that there's people fufkcin around with his party at least.
Click to expand...
Well it shows you how much evidence there truly is if even Shapiro who usually says large scale voter fraud doesn't happen all much. Is starting to notice things
 
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Mr Imperial Guard, verissimus and 1 other person
JohnDoe said:
Are you familiar with the legal term spoilation? Destroying ballots is legally the stupidest idea you could have, because the court will, as a matter of fact and law, treat that as proof positive that the destroyed evidence was as harmful as possible and weigh it as such. The best case outcome for the Democrats is having the contested, destroyed ballots completely invalidated and removed from the totals.
Click to expand...

And during the lawsuit, how will you know if the 200k PA ballots they give you to review are the ones they "counted" at 4:00 AM on Election Day with nobody around, or a completely legit batch that they gave you instead?

That level of tracking is available in some states, but I don't think it's happening in PA. You would only catch the difference if you asked to review all 7 million+ ballots and came up 200k short. Then the shrugging and shocked Pikachu faces begin, and you'd have to prove willful destruction of a specific subset. Maybe that's actually provable and I'm just a doomer, but how much confidence in the transparency of the PA election machine do you have right now?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, JohnDoe and 2 others
JambledUpWords said:
The thing is, is that Biden isn’t even really “winning” at this point. AZ has been retracted as well as MI. If Biden carries this all the way to the end, he may end up with even less electoral votes than what he had, much like what happened to Hillary after the recount. Also, genuine recounts will most likely go towards Trump, seeing as how every state hesitant to actually count is trending towards Trump. If Trump ends up winning the states that it looked like he was on midnight on election night, Biden is toast. Also, the only people claiming that Biden is actually winning is the MSM, which doesn’t decide the election.
Click to expand...
Wait Michigan has been retracted?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Mr Imperial Guard, verissimus, Tour of Italy and 1 other person
JohnDoe said:
Are you familiar with the legal term spoilation? Destroying ballots is legally the stupidest idea you could have, because the court will, as a matter of fact and law, treat that as proof positive that the destroyed evidence was as harmful as possible and weigh it as such. The best case outcome for the Democrats is having the contested, destroyed ballots completely invalidated and removed from the totals.
Click to expand...
Furthermore, has nobody noticed the borderline absurd quietness of William Barr and other high-ranking executive branch figures under Donald Trump? Where are they? What are they doing? What do they know?

Are they investigating or looking for anything in particular? Given by all the screeching from rags over William Barr allowing armed federal agents in polling stations in this time of much unrest, it seems that the executive branch knows something that we don't at this time. Knows something big.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Livecorpse, tehpope and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back