2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly I was skeptical on this Benford's Law thing, but huh. Seeing even Jojo match the graphs is really something.
And its been confirmed with the second digit test...
Benford's Law is made up of three tests, the first, second, and third digit. The chances of messing up BOTH to this degree is somewhere around the order of one in a few hundred billion.
 
And its been confirmed with the second digit test...
Benford's Law is made up of three tests, the first, second, and third digit. The chances of messing up BOTH to this degree is somewhere around the order of one in a few hundred billion.
>inb4 this is the one in a few hundred billion...
>four times
 
Are they actually implying that they'll just count, and count, and count, and count? That sounds sketchy.
Pretty much. Republicans want to stop the count until they can get observers in place. Dems just want to count, count, count!

Also, a bunch of bellwether districts that have gone Trump in 2020:
1604737499200.png

And Florida has been a bellwether since 1928 (only missing twice). Also Trump.
 
Seeing "The Count" memes all over social media. It's a dem meme 'cause there's waay too many words..
View attachment 1713938
EDIT: and it hasn't been republicans holding up the vote.. it's been democrats, waiting until they know how many votes to "find". Classic projection, as always.
It would have been funnier if only the top text was there. Even then, it’s still an uninspiring meme that looks like it was made by corporate.
 
>inb4 this is the one in a few hundred billion...
>four times
The SC won't buy that. Honestly, fuck all the other 'proof', most of it is not terribly solid that has been made publicly available. Lots of smoke, but not enough fire to move the supreme court to really want to lay into it.

Benford's Law is something different, it is a literal mathematics proof. Short of having the architects come in and say "Yes, we did it", its as close to incontrovertible evidence of fraud as you can get.
 
And its been confirmed with the second digit test...
Benford's Law is made up of three tests, the first, second, and third digit. The chances of messing up BOTH to this degree is somewhere around the order of one in a few hundred billion.
Can't wait to have people tell me that Drumpf supporters is anti-science and this is all Q-Anon spergery though. :story:

It's only settled science when it matches what you believe, huh?
 
OH we are going full retard now.

So a partisan group who are known Trump supporters is having a random person make claims with no evidence.

Who is this guy and why should we trust him and another question, you can't tell this is fake and a full setup?
So they are doing a interview with a guy that is supposed to be working.

Why the FUCK are they doing it like that?? If this is a big crisis thing with evidence to back it op you would throw a pile of money at the guy to get him in to be a whistleblower. That is what i would do if i had some one who could blow a huge chunk out of the Democratic win and show voter fraud on a grand scale.

But all we got now is. Unknown guy makes claim.

You have now shown me 3-4 things and they are all twitter level trash with no real evidence. And like i said look into 2016, Election, Detroit, voting machines and follow that trail. There is something there, but you will need to dig a bit and compare some things. It is something that has a bit more concrete proof.
 
OH we are going full retard now.

So a partisan group who are known Trump supporters is having a random person make claims with no evidence.

Who is this guy and why should we trust him and another question, you can't tell this is fake and a full setup?
So they are doing a interview with a guy that is supposed to be working.

Why the FUCK are they doing it like that?? If this is a big crisis thing with evidence to back it op you would throw a pile of money at the guy to get him in to be a whistleblower. That is what i would do if i had some one who could blow a huge chunk out of the Democratic win and show voter fraud on a grand scale.

But all we got now is. Unknown guy makes claim.

You have now shown me 3-4 things and they are all twitter level trash with no real evidence. And like i said look into 2016, Election, Detroit, voting machines and follow that trail. There is something there, but you will need to dig a bit and compare some things. It is something that has a bit more concrete proof.
Benford's. Law. It is a literal mathematics proof.
 
Pretty much. Republicans want to stop the count until they can get observers in place. Dems just want to count, count, count!

Also, a bunch of bellwether districts that have gone Trump in 2020:
View attachment 1713949
And Florida has been a bellwether since 1928 (only missing twice). Also Trump.
These are meaningless coincidences. The Bedford test is a real argument.
 
You know what would be good for the states? And would piss of liberals to no end... An electoral college -within- the states.
They used to have it, but I believe they got rid of it at some point. I wouldn’t mind bringing it back though. Some counties have way too much power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back