Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[NyQuilninja]

9. guns. all of em. bye bye

Most likely freedom of speech online and in public as well unless your black or approved minority

 

[Smarty Pants]

There are zero Fact Statements that can be verified in any of those articles. They are all opinion pieces written by people who have a deeper hatred of Trump than Holocaust survivors have of Hitler.

Tell me which parts do you think are false, Trumptard? You want to defend this pedophile enabler - so be it - but at least mount some kind of defense for your claim that it's all bullshit.

 

[GameDevAnon]

Dude there are fucking dozens of publications reporting the exact same thing

So a bunch of people saying the exact same thing automatically means it's true? And that it's Super True if all of those people saying the same things are members of the media?

Something like this?

Or this?

Yes, I'm sure we should all wholeheartedly trust the people in the videos I've just linked because they're very clearly looking out for our best interests and are not just being told what to say so they can keep their jobs. Who is the editor at Vanity Fair, by the way?

What happens when another "official source" disagrees with YOUR source? Like this one?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

Who do we believe? I'm sure we should just pick YOUR sources, right?

 

[Dyn]

LOL
There are zero Fact Statements that can be verified in any of those articles. They are all opinion pieces written by people who have a deeper hatred of Trump than Holocaust survivors have of Hitler.
I'm sure they're being objective though.

Sure there are, they're the actual testimonials of named Trump insiders spilling the beans and their stories match up with the recorded timeline of business deals they talk about. What kind of evidence would you actually accept when we're talking about Trump's personal attitude and feelings towards Epstein from years ago? What kind of evidence do you think would reasonably exist?

Just admit it, you're not as unbiased or rational as you think you are. You're running on feels and asshurt, but you can't just let go of your ego and admit it. It's okay to just like Trump and be mad people are criticising him, you don't have to pretend to be operating on any higher plane of logic than that.

 

[GameDevAnon]

Sure there are, they're the actual testimonials of named Trump insiders spilling the beans

This is called "gossip."

 

[Smarty Pants]

So a bunch of people saying the exact same thing automatically means it's true? And that it's Super True if all of those people saying the same things are members of the media?

No it doesn't mean it's true, but it's not in dispute by anyone on your side.

Yes, I'm sure we should all wholeheartedly trust the people in the videos I've just linked because they're very clearly looking out for our best interests and are not just being told what to say so they can keep their jobs. Who is the editor at Vanity Fair, by the way?

They're definitely not looking out for our best interests but the facts that they report on - Trump wanting to buy a property in Palm Beach and then losing an auction to Jeffrey - are not being denied by anyone.

What happens when another "official source" disagrees with YOUR source? Like this one?

This doesn't disagree with my source. How does it disagree with my source? It's a simple enough timeline for you to get:

Trump is friends with Jeffrey -> Trump wants to buy Florida property -> Epstein outbids Trump on the property he knows Trump wants -> Trump is mad at Epstein until the end of time

 

[Moist Nugget]

Lots of talk about Benford's law, so I thought I'd drop a link to a video by one of my favorite channels that covers the topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXjlR2OK1kM

and another one, more relevant. I think this was the one I meant to post originally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIsDjbhbADY

 

[Dyn]

This is called "gossip."

Sure, people who want to dismiss it could call it "gossip". Other people could call it "testimony" and it would be considered fit to be shown in court. It's objectively plausible and it's unchallenged. It's evidence. What do you want, a DNA test and carbon dating to prove how people felt about each other years ago?

Just let it go and accept you're running on emotions here dude. Nobody's going to think any less of you.

 

[Ninjaweedsniper420]

Ok so I haven't been following this shit for a while now. What is happening? Is there any truth to the fraud claims or is it just cope?

 

[Grog]

In anything it only accelerated under his term as everything went as extreme to the Left as it could to spite him and his supporters.

During his term, he did nothing that people voted him for, energized and motivated his enemies, and threw his supporters under the bus at every point. People like the Proud Boys are the saddest cucks ever.

 

[Biggie Smalls' Taint]

Lots of talk about Benford's law, so I thought I'd drop a link to a video by one of my favorite channels that covers the topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXjlR2OK1kM

and another one, more relevant. I think this was the one I meant to post originally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIsDjbhbADY

Um... I don't know how to tell you this, sweaty, but math? Yeah it's been debunked.

 

[Suburban Bastard]

Ok so I haven't been following this shit for a while now. What is happening? Is there any truth to the fraud claims or is it just cope?

just cope

 

[GameDevAnon]

No it doesn't mean it's true, but it's not in dispute by anyone on your side.

They're definitely not looking out for our best interests but the facts that they report on - Trump wanting to buy a property in Palm Beach and then losing an auction to Jeffrey - are not being denied by anyone.

This doesn't disagree with my source. How does it disagree with my source? It's a simple enough timeline for you to get:

Trump is friends with Jeffrey -> Trump wants to buy Florida property -> Epstein outbids Trump on the property he knows Trump wants -> Trump is mad at Epstein until the end of time

I have to admit, I admire your tenacity. For a shill you are pretty good.

> I'm not on either side, you guize! I'm making fun of everyone equally!
> you seem angry, GDA, this thread seems to be making you angry
> this thread seems to be making you tense, GDA, maybe you should take a break?
> here are some thoroughly debunked articles written by people who are trying to destroy Trump. These are all 100% true.
> if you deny the truthiness of my sources, you are a dummyhead
> I'm going to lie about the context of my claims and if you call me out on it, you're being a Trumptard

Trump's people DID deny it, dumbass.
It's hilarious that you think I DON'T know the details of the playbook all you faggots are using. You guys use the same infiltration tactics over and over and over again with no variation.
Do you think that no one else has noticed that shills have literally flooded this board over the past week? People keep sending me "You noticed it too?" DMs.
We ALL know what you faggots are doing.

 

[Smarty Pants]

Ok so I haven't been following this shit for a while now. What is happening? Is there any truth to the fraud claims or is it just cope?

I'm hearing all kinds of shit on twitter about tens of thousands of "confirmed dead person ballots" and all kinds of "glitches", but given the media blackout on all of this we'll have to wait and see whether Trump's team shows the beef next week.

 

[GameDevAnon]

Lots of talk about Benford's law, so I thought I'd drop a link to a video by one of my favorite channels that covers the topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXjlR2OK1kM

and another one, more relevant. I think this was the one I meant to post originally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIsDjbhbADY

Facebook and Twitter are literally combing through posts right now and removing any post that talks about Benford's Law. Don't believe me? Go make a post about it right now and see how long it stays up.

 

[GameDevAnon]

Sure, people who want to dismiss it could call it "gossip". Other people could call it "testimony" and it would be considered fit to be shown in court.

You don't know how court works.
Are any of these statements sworn? Are they depositions? Have they been stated IN court, under oath? If the answer is No to any of these questions, then it is by definition, NOT testimony.

Did any of the statement makers have a falling out with Trump before they made their statements? Were any of them looking to cash in on the media's blind hatred of Trump? No? Are you sure? How do you know?

Everything these people said about Trump is gossip, not fact.

 

[Cubanodun]

Facebook and Twitter are literally combing through posts right now and removing any post that talks about Benford's Law. Don't believe me? Go make a post about it right now and see how long it stays up.

The system is so fucked that a guy was banned for tweeting "Vote hammer" they are trying very hard to suppress and demotivate everyone to prevent orange man coming back (even when he is not technically gone yet)

But a serious shitposting question does Orange man have ANY chance of saving this election? here on tv people say that if he manage to get to the supreme he could save it, others say that this is a 4D chess game, that he actually has some kind of weird plan involving lefties celebrating , and others say that Biden is fucking doomed because he recieved Maduro's death kiss

 

[Smarty Pants]

I have to admit, I admire your tenacity. For a shill you are pretty good.

Yeah, it's impossible to dislike both Jewish-grandchildren-having candidates - no way. Thanks for admitting I'm pretty good though - that's the one true statement in your post.

> here are some thoroughly debunked articles written by people who are trying to destroy Trump. These are all 100% true.

Yeah, they're not thoroughly debunked. Where are your citations, faggot? Debunked by whom?

> I'm going to lie about the context of my claims and if you call me out on it, you're being a Trumptard

I'm openly admitting that every single article I've shared has an anti-Trump angle. That's not the point. There is absolutely no way in hell that Trump and Epstein weren't at the very least friendly acquaintances. Nobody is denying that he wanted that Palm Beach property and Jeff snatched it. That's what I'm sending you those articles for - not for the authors' implication that Trump also fucked little girls on Little St. James.

Trump's people DID deny it, dumbass.

Denied WHAT? Obligatory [citation needed].

It's hilarious that you think I DON'T know the details of the playbook all you faggots are using. You guys use the same infiltration tactics over and over and over again with no variation.

I don't even know if A&H existed when I started using this forum, and if it did it took me a very long time to discover it. Yes dude - you caught me - I was only pretending to talk about a fat Virginian drunk to gain the Kiwi's trust so that one day, two years later, I can have a D&C demoralization session during the presidential election.

Do you think that no one else has noticed that shills have literally flooded this board over the past week? People keep sending me "You noticed it too?" DMs.

Oh wow people are talking about a fucking presidential election in a time when 4chan is an absolute shithole and you get banned from everywhere else.

So tell me, why am I spending so much more time in a thread that's overwhelmingly anti-Trump rather than being in the Trumptard Hugbox that is the other, 50% larger thread?

We ALL know what you faggots are doing.

You don't know shit, Lebowski.

 

[LUNEKO]

Holy shit, hahaha.
View attachment 1717146

It makes me laugh how fucking hard they are recycling the "madam president" title, they really wanted Hillary to run but she wasn't having it anymore haha

 

[NSJAP]

From the fresh FTN