Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is incredibly embarrassing. Out of all the 33 candidates that Fuentes and the America First people have endorsed, only 3 of them had won their respective contests.
(most didn't even make it to the General Election)
download.png
 
I bothered to watch this since it's t he first salt-miney celebratory vid I've seen from anyone remotely left so far, but this is pathetic. It's basically "Look at Joe be happy" and social media posts, some of which are ironic shitposts.
Plus starting off with blue wave? I swear these people think every election cycle is a blue wave even when they lose ground.
 
So, pol is currently sperging out with a conspiracy that Thomas and Kavanaugh will spearhead a SCOTUS election turnover for Trump due to the attacks they suffered from Biden and Harris respectively.

While I know Kavanaugh has no real spine and nothing like that is likely to happen in reality, I am sure Thomas will at least write an opinion that eviscerates Biden on paper and I can't wait to read it.
 
god bless his melanated soul
The far left hates the DNC establishment more than Trump.
They don't want to be represented by a bunch of safe, centre-right neo liberal hypocrites.
Also they secretly love to be under the rule of the Cheeto Hitler because it gives them limitless fuel to their victimhood.

That's why they're not seething like your average DNC shill while the GOP is doing their 2000-esque Bush/Gore shitshow to take the election.
 
they’ll find out what a mistake they’ve made when companies start going to Mexico and overseas and the economy really starts going belly up.
I was just going to say "creating more jobs" is easy. Hike taxes on businesses sky high and expand arbitrary regulations. So many jobs will be created....In China, Mexico, India, etc...

Oh, did they think he meant create jobs here? lol no.

I'm pretty sure part of the grand scheme of things is to decimate the economy though. A population that's relatively well off won't embrace radical change otherwise. Whether it be Communism, "The Great Reset", or any other major power grab. All those groups seeking major change need the economy to crumble.


That's not to say Biden specifically wants to do that shit, but the people pulling his strings and influencing him sure do.
 
I'm pretty sure part of the grand scheme of things is to decimate the economy though. A population that's relatively well off won't embrace radical change otherwise. Whether it be Communism, "The Great Reset", or any other major power grab. All those groups seeking major change need the economy to crumble.


That's not to say Biden specifically wants to do that shit, but the people pulling his strings and influencing him sure do.
I've mulled these sorts of thoughts over as well. Not sure I'm all in on them but it would at least make sense.
I lean towards just more government control since they tend to believe in infinite money anyway.
 
I think Trump's side is spinning this out in the (frankly realistic) hope that Joe croaks of old age.

I'd take the Scottish referendum as an example, when it was clear it was a loss for the nationalists, video 'proof' started flooding independence pages, groups. Convincing folk it had been jiggered. When in reality, well, there were vote counters aligned with both campaigns and so and so, if there was voter fraud, they'd be the first to know and the first to blow the lid off it.

Trump could easily spend the next month trying to prove there was fraud, though I don't see there being much hope, he could try and argue on the technicality of votes coming in late, but considering the pandemic, and republican efforts to stonewall those votes in the first place, it just doesn't look good. Hell, it's almost a modified re-run on 2000.
There is an extra aspect in Scotland too, with the religious divide. A vote against
independence was regarded a show of monarchist loyalty by many Protestants.

Rangers vs Celtic...It goes even into politics. Any Scot knows this.
 
Doing a quick cursory search brings up a unanimous: no, not really.
Unless
1. The same person is calling up repeatedly,
2. They are calling from a jurisdiction where it is considered disorderly conduct, but even still they would have to call them up yelling and swearing at them in a targeted harmful way.

So if someone calls up pretending to report voter fraud and it ends in a joke where the individual claims to have seen Kanye or Jeb committing the crime; most likely not illegal

Now if someone calls up and says "Fuck your mother for raising you to be a republican you filthy whore. How dare you run this operation against America, I'll come down there and kick your teeth in" at the top of their lungs. It's most likely illegal
 
So about this list AOC was talking about? Can't get more communist totalitarian hellhole than that.
I'll admit, that's very odd.

If DC is anything like our capital, it's a very small circle. You don't need a list to know who works for who or who they previously worked for. Staffers are recycled and will easily find jobs elsewhere. It happens on both sides of politics.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Rekkington
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back