Culture A 'child fair' in Brussels sells children to gay couples - yes really, not a joke

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

A two day long international child expo took place in Brussels over the weekend. No, this isn’t about an expo for products for children, but trading actual, real children in the form of surrogacy.
The event conducted by the pro-LGBT Men Having Babies organization has an itinerant character, with the organization moving to different locales to promote its activities on a regular basis. In September, the organization held its event in Paris, in October in Taipei and in December it will take place in Tel Aviv.

The goods being sold are children and the buyers are rich gay men who can afford to spend between $90,000 to $150,000.
Included in the price is not only the chance to rent a uterus for nine months, but also legal assistance, ova and semen delivery, and coverage of travel expenses.

Due to the pandemic, the expo has a hybrid character — some of it is in-person while other parts are conducted online. Gay couples are invited to booths to check out prospectuses, and given the wide selection of products, it appears that many have difficulty even making up their minds. You can choose a race, gender, hair, eye color, and other attributes for the child.

Women are being treated like broodmares because that is their only job. No one is asking for their opinions, feelings, dreams, or plans. They’re simply females whose usefulness has been reduced to the uterus.
Everything points to a new battle in the cultural war, this time concerning the legalization of surrogacy.

The fair takes place in Brussels despite commercial surrogacy being banned in the country. In all reality, if such deals are being made and uteri are being used like incubators, then it is clear this law no longer has any relevancy.
In this context, it is perhaps no surprise that the first transgender deputy prime minister in European history, Petra de Sutter, was appointed in Brussels. De Sutter, an LGBT activist, is demanding legalization of surrogacy across all of Europe.

Now, everything points to a new battle in the cultural war, this time concerning the legalization of surrogacy.
There is no doubt that we’re dealing with a form of enslaving women and human trafficking. Surrogacy tramples on human dignity in every aspect. It is likely that nearly all the women involved would not freely agree to being a broodmare and giving birth to a child for gay couples if they were not forced to do so by tragic financial situations.

It is also not a coincidence that surrogates are recruited from poor countries.


Yet in the West, a whole media campaign has been initiated to revalue and switch the meanings concerning this issue. What is in reality the debasement of women and instrumentalization of children is being presented by the media as a great good and human right. Sentimental stories about celebrities, such as Elton John or Ricky Martin, who bought children from surrogacy and proudly display them are meant to legitimize this shameful procedure.


The fact that rich men are using poor women is being covered up by touching stories about happy children in gay families and sublime slogans about human rights.


A few more years of this brainwashing and public opinion will change. We’ve already seen that what was treated as a deviancy 20 years ago, today is seen as a cultural, social and legal norm.


It very well might be that surrogacy — the enslavement of women and child trade — will be considered a human right and thousands will go out onto the streets to protect that right at some point in the near future.
 
I...don't really see the problem?

Chick gets easy money.
Dudes get a normal family they can clearly afford.

As long as they arn't trafficking woman to impregnate its just kinda a thing that happens. And anyone who spends 90K to impregnate a trafficked woman is clearly getting ripped off.
 
Women are being treated like broodmares because that is their only job. No one is asking for their opinions, feelings, dreams, or plans. They’re simply females whose usefulness has been reduced to the uterus.
'Women are too stupid to freely enter into contracts.'
- Feminists in 2020
It is likely that nearly all the women involved would not freely agree to being a broodmare and giving birth to a child for gay couples if they were not forced to do so by tragic financial situations.
'Wahhhh! Other women are doing things with their vaginas I don't agree with! Make them stop!'
Feminists and pro-lifers have at last found common ground.
 
Jesus. Fucking. Christ. I don't have words for how absolutely dystopian and fucked this is.
If you're attracted to the same sex, fine whatever, but shit like this is really starting to make me think the whole "homosexuals can't properly raise a child" people are on to something, if the rich degenerate assholes have this sort of blatant disregard for human life.
 
I like how they've completely redefined the word "slavery" to its entirely opposite meaning. Surrogate mothers get paid for their services, and actually have to be mature adults who've consented to carrying the child. Like nearly everything else, criminalizing it only creates more problems and actually creates the potential for slavery and exploitation.
 
So the race of newborn children is subject to market forces, hmm? Comparing those numbers to see which races have higher valuation probably won't show us any uncomfortable truths or anything given how racially tolerant the gay community has been historically.
Kinda like this?
https___cdn.cnn.com_cnnnext_dam_assets_161028123811-ut-affirmative-action-bake-sale.jpg
 
Having two fathers (or mothers) will never be "normal", the only thing worse would be if they were troons.

If you're gay/lesbian and can't bring yourself to at least try to reproduce normally (P in V), maybe that's nature's way of telling you you shouldn't have your own children. It's like women who have difficulty conceiving for whatever reason and spend tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars on fertility treatments. Maybe they should try to sort out the issues that are blocking conception naturally and if that still doesn't work, let it be. If you can't get pregnant it's usually because your body can't or doesn't want you to, and for a good reason. When you fight that you're way more likely to have genetic defects in whatever children may result.

Also, the Evil Stepmother trope is based on reality; statistically children tend to do far, far better when raised in the presence of both biological parents, because with few exceptions no one is going to love and care for you as much as your own flesh and blood will. Adoption can be wonderful but it isn't the same as biological offspring. Anyone who argues that it is is in denial of God/nature/evolution.
 
If you're gay/lesbian and can't bring yourself to at least try to reproduce normally (P in V), maybe that's nature's way of telling you you shouldn't have your own children.

I personally have bought into the Gay Uncle theory that if they exist, it's the gays' job to make the community better for people who actually are raising children
 
So, what about the children's take on this? Imagine how your mom sold you to a pair of rich old dudes for a small fortune.

Shit must be traumatizing.
I don't see how this is any different to how an adopted child whose mom was a pregnant teen who gave them up for adoption would feel. The bigger problem with surrogacy is when the surrogate mother chooses to breach the contract and keep the child. Several states (NJ, for one) have ruled in favor of the surrogate mother. The most famous case happened in the 1980's and was pretty fucked up because the surrogate mother stole the child from the couple, who only went through with it because the wife had MS.
 
Are we seriously upset that gay people are doing the same thing straight people are doing? How many white trash married couples could adopt? The answer is a resounding none. Same goes for poor blacks. Fostering? Maybe... but adoption? That's got a fiscal element to it that the poor don't reach. If a rich gay couple wants a kid and can afford the sort of surrogate parenting that is generally the domain of the upper class who cares? Nobody complains when rich straight couples hire a surrogate for reproduction purposes why complain about gays? I rate this whole story dumb.
 
I don't see how this is any different to how an adopted child whose mom was a pregnant teen who gave them up for adoption would feel. The bigger problem with surrogacy is when the surrogate mother chooses to breach the contract and keep the child. Several states (NJ, for one) have ruled in favor of the surrogate mother. The most famous case happened in the 1980's and was pretty fucked up because the surrogate mother stole the child from the couple, who only went through with it because the wife had MS.
The adoptive parents won that case, even though the surrogacy contract was thrown out by the court.
 
Back