2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The argument is not so much that mail-ins are illegal, more the specific circumstances they were handled in PA and other disputed states were illegal because it allowed too high a false positive rate. You'd never be able to pull this off in a pure blue state like CA or NY.

All Giuliani and co need to do is to make the case that fuckery flipped places like PA that were heading to Trump before the fuckery went into overdrive.

I think the Democrat fondness for mail-ins will disappear after this. Then again COVID will be long gone by 2024 no matter what happens. In fact given Cuomo's tweet it will be long gone by mid-2021 according to the media. Mail-ins were always a way for the Democrats to commit fraud in this specific election. Next time they'll try something else.
Part of the contention in Pennsylvania is also the fact that the court has no right to unilaterally rewrite election laws in the state, which they don't. That would eliminate any ballot arriving after 8pm election day and any mail in ballot without a properly matching signature.
 
Is that anything to do with us? At this point, I don't trust any news station to report factually.

This is a taste of the bold new multipolar world that the smart foreign policy set has been telling us about. China and Russia bully their neighbours and no one even mentions it.

Turkey is becoming more and more of a problem that any decent journalism would have denounced incessantly for the last decade, but half of Europe is afraid of enraging the Sublime Porte of Ankara, half is addicted to Turkish soap operas and the average American would never believe there's an actual country named after a bird. And wait until they learn about the countries called Hungry and Georgia 2-caucasus DLC.
 
Part of the contention in Pennsylvania is also the fact that the court has no right to unilaterally rewrite election laws in the state, which they don't. That would eliminate any ballot arriving after 8pm election day and any mail in ballot without a properly matching signature.

So this is how Trump may actually win this at the SCOTUS?
 
So this is how Trump may actually win this at the SCOTUS?
For PA at least, yes. The other one to keep an eye out is Wisconsin, whose laws apparently also do not allow mail-in ballots to be received after closing the polls. He might not need the USSC there, however, because the state's Supreme Court is currently friendly to R.
 
Great bait headline, Twatter.

Screen Shot 2020-11-10 at 11.46.27 AM.png
 
So this is how Trump may actually win this at the SCOTUS?
Trump has a few lines of attack in each.

The legislatures in these states are largely doing audits and recounts, these will pick up any... incorrect ballots. Legally, he can attack failures of protocol. He has good chances in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania on that. Finally, you have things like the Dominion software and things like sharpie BS or other misc. issues. These can go to either the legislature or the courts, and will chip away at the lead of Biden.

The idea for most states, at least as far as I can tell from Trump's actions, is less "Win bigly" and more "hit the results with as many things as possible to chip the lead down till it flips".
 
Great bait headline, Twatter.

View attachment 1720760
>"Twitter doesn't influence elections"
For lying to Congress so blatantly, Jack Dorsey deserves the Roger Stone treatment: arrested in his pajamas at 4 a.m., perp-walked at gunpoint, and with Tucker Carlson on scene to capture the moment.
 
Lefty Twitter keeps on posting this "rebuttal" to the GOP and thinking they are clever. It's one of the dumbest arguments I've heard and the responses to the tweet are even worse.

View attachment 1720749

https://mobile.twitter.com/benyahr/status/1325866008893132804
Any argument will be officially be declared void if it includes a .gif of a pop artist, TV series, movie, cartoon, anime or other pop culture shit in it. 99.9% of what came before the .gif is usually horseshit anyways, but still.
 
They are impatient and like things to be done instantly. It's one thing I have noticed and they tend to just do things without thinking it through.
Traditionally the "left" or deep state or whatever you want to call them have been quietly patient for hundreds of years slowly putting all of this in place through the education system, judiciary, popular culture, everything. They had the long game in mind. However for whatever reason (human nature I guess) once the finish line was in view within the past 10 years they dropped their old mask of silent patience and got greedy and too eager. This was first revealed in 2012 after the sandy hook shooting, they completely underestimated peoples resolve over the 2nd Amendment and overplayed their hand. Now for the past four years the college kid iphone crowd has taken over and the only thing they know is "I want it now!" and "It will be my way". Instead of quietly dripping some fraud to win as they have for over 200 years they went full teenage girl on FB and let it fly in all directions with a media still thinking we are watching Dan Rather on CBS nightly news like 1995. Too much too fast will always be rejected by an unfortunate host, thats what we have had over the last 10 years. If they could only have remained patient for about 10 years more. its probably too late anyway, but at least the shit is flying at this point.
 
Any argument will be officially be declared void if it includes a .gif of a pop artist, TV series, movie, cartoon, anime or other pop culture shit in it. 99.9% of what came before the .gif is usually horseshit anyways, but still.
Ron Paul gifs are encouraged, though.

1605031084483.png
 
Here's another source for the Republicans winning a contingent election

https://theconversation.com/congress-could-select-the-president-in-a-disputed-election-149580

Though the House has a Democratic majority, such an outcome would almost certainly benefit Trump. Here’s why: In a concession to small states concerned their voices would be marginalized if the House was called upon to choose the president, the founders gave only one vote to each state. House delegations from each state meet to decide how to cast their single vote.

That voting procedure gives equal representation to California – population 40 million – and Wyoming, population 600,000.

This arrangement favors Republicans. The GOP has dominated the House delegations of 26 states since 2018 – exactly the number required to reach a majority under the rules of House presidential selection. But it’s not the current House that would decide a contested 2020 election; it is the newly elected House, and many Nov. 3 congressional races remain undecided. So far, though, Republicans have retained control of the 26 congressional delegations they currently hold, and Democrats have lost control of two states, Minnesota and Iowa.

Evenly divided delegations count as abstentions, and Republican gains in Minnesota and Iowa are moving these states from Democratic to abstentions.

I still think if the Republicans keep their nerve they can go through the recount process. If that runs out of time trying to undo the numerous issues with the ballot have the state legislatures nominate electors.

If none of that gives them 270 votes but doesn't give it to the Democrats either they'll win by contingent election.

People, particularly Brits, unfortunately, often mock Americans for their 'He who has the biggest balls wins and stays free' attitude but in this case it's absolutely the way to go. The media will whinge and gaslight and AntiFa and BLM will be reactivated to riot but if the Republican party keeps its nerve it can keep the White House and clean up places like PA just like it cleaned up Florida post-2000. And I think this time it will do so with popular approval no matter how much the media claim the contrary.

I'm biased because while I don't trust top-level politicians like Trump or Biden or even most of the House or Senate of either party I've met Democrats and Republicans and I strongly prefer the latter. Republicans remind me of the Brits I know who voted for Brexit and while Trump is not the ideal representative for them in my limey faggot opinion, he's the only one they've got right now, Dark Knight style.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back