2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
That AA stream is definitely worth a watch, or at least a listen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-IM2kKENAI
https://archive.vn/wip/Mqe8v

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4
 

Attachments

How would it be over? I'm not expecting anything from Hannity, won't even bother watching it, but saying it will all be over sounds like doom sperging to me.
Reminds me of "Trump is finished, we really mean it this time!", yet somehow this isn't considered cope.
 
I wonder Joe and Kamala is wondering right now. We tried too hard and about to lose it all. For the number of votes Biden got, no organic support any kind is probably the biggest red flag.

They tried so hard. And got so far. But in the end, it doesn't even matter.

Make it the moon, and large enough to be visible from Earth.

That would be pure clownworld tier satire turned reality. The rivers of salt would never end. Just imagine looking up to the nights sky, and seeing the flag looming over you. God damn, makes me shed a tear of pride just to think of it and I'm not even a burgerlander. 'MURICA!
 
No, I lost the bet because I thought Trump was gonna win Minnesota. But we took it! So that's even BETTER! He literally said at his rallies that he would flip it and well, well, well, he DIDN'T. Stupid Drumpf. Reality never goes the way of the Orange Man.
It hurts to see you like this you stupid pink faggot...
c01f05c42b5106ad6bd471bb7ea198a4ef27944b8b25a2e0e04d38ebf6ababa3.jpeg
But this is the price you must pay for the sin of gambling...
 
So, hold on. We've established Biden isn't going to do much about Trump's lawsuits since that would go against the narrative that he's winning (even more so if his cases are dismissed). Is that why the ACLU (and likely a bunch more organizations by the time the week is over) is stepping up to bat for him instead? Just to serve as legal surrogates to keep the narrative going?
 
Not too long ago, Veritas had someone who is presumably the famed whistleblower insist that he did not recant his testimony and said to stay tuned for evidence of this lack of recantation.

That Tweet was made unavailable, and soon after, this was posted:

1605055496577.png


Here's the video:



If that's truly the inspector, it doesn't make a difference that he recanted if they extorted that out of him.

View attachment 1721564
Apparently, the legal roaches are also coming out of the woodwork.
I have no idea how "feelings" are going to explain away directly disobeying a SC order. But we shall see.
>illegally

Why did I trust the ACLU to know what legality is...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back