2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
captkrisma said:
This. Recounts don't tend to actually go in favor of the person requesting the recount either. Last election Hillary requested Wisconsin and they managed to find 135 more votes for Trump.
Click to expand...
Ahh but this election is the farthest thing in the world from a typical election. Moreover, recounts aren't the only means of fixing this fraudulent bullshit either. All it would take to flip PA, for example, would be for SCOTUS to decide that silly story about those 100k ballots that were received before they were mailed being due to a "clerical error" is the bullshit excuse for electoral fraud that it clearly is, and then subtract those votes from Biden's tally to flip PA back to Trump.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, secret watcher, JambledUpWords and 6 others
Gustav Schuchardt said:
I'm too lazy to dig up the source but I remember someone saying of 2016 "No matter who wins it's the apocalypse but if Hillary wins the apocalypse will be cold and gray, like The Road. If Trump wins the apocalypse will be with flame-throwing guitars, like Mad Max : Fury Road"

View attachment 1722406View attachment 1722407
Click to expand...
Fury Road is a great example of how women in total leadership roles end up ruining their society.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Punished Benis, spiritofamermaid, babadook and 6 others
FunPosting101 said:
Ahh but this election is the farthest thing in the world from a typical election. Moreover, recounts aren't the only means of fixing this fraudulent bullshit either. All it would take to flip PA, for example, would be for SCOTUS to decide that silly story about those 100k ballots that were received before they were mailed being due to a "clerical error" is the bullshit excuse for electoral fraud that it clearly is, and then subtract those votes from Biden's tally to flip PA back to Trump.
Click to expand...

When can we expect them to try and address that? People are gonna doom about that until a decision is made.

And what's the chances of Trump flipping the other states that are with a 10k lead for Biden.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and FunPosting101
InsolentGaylord said:
When can we expect them to try and address that? People are gonna doom about that until a decision is made.

And what's the chances of Trump flipping the other states that are with a 10k lead for Biden.
Click to expand...
We'll know more next week. The other states have issues of their own that have already been posted in this thread, I'm a lazy fucker though, so you'll have to look them up yourself.
 
You can't say they're not trying


Screenshot_20201111-142105~2.png
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Magnum Magazine, spiritofamermaid and 16 others
Puerto Pollo said:
You can't say they're not trying


View attachment 1722419
Click to expand...
Nothing significant will be found in Texas for much the same reason as nothing significant would be found in New York, so unless he's offering this for evidence regarding electoral fraud in other states this specifically won't do much. It is a nice gesture though.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco, spiritofamermaid, Zero Day Defense and 6 others
Puerto Pollo said:
It doesn't specify that it has to be within Texas, does it? 1 million dollars is an astronomical sum, especially to people who are starting to realize the cat is out of the bag.
Click to expand...
I don't know. I think they'd need to offer $1 million PLUS immunity from prosecution. I have a feeling that anyone with any serious evidence is also involved.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, XYZpdq, Puerto Pollo and 1 other person
  • Like
Reactions: Parthenos, spiritofamermaid and Puerto Pollo
Secret Asshole said:
I think it is very likely that Biden will win. Under normal circumstances. But under these circumstances? Who the fuck knows. I'm sticking to my guns and still predicting a Biden win with the assumption that it will return to normal. But the my heart and the writer in my says Trump. Because Kavanaugh and Thomas making Harris and Biden eat shit is hysterical. Trump winning destroys the media and big tech, even if he doesn't. It would be insanity. Utter fucking Chaos. And I really, really want that.
Click to expand...

I've seen this said several times in this thread and in a few different ways, and I don't really understand it. PA is the strongest legal case they have, to the point where I'm sort of just waiting for it to happen, rather than talking about percentages and chances. I don't know how they'll rule but given that PA directly ignored an order, and kept counting without oversight, and along with numerous other witness testaments to attempts to defraud the process, I just don't see how SCOTUS rules in a way that doesn't end up flipping PA to Trump or completely invalidating for both candidates. It seems like nothing short of an open goal.

So if you're saying that Trump's win hinges on PA, as so many agree, it's baffling to me that anyone can also say that a Biden win is still likely. I'll grant that a Trump win isn't certain, but the situation in PA, as well as WI largely, has made the situation for both candidates extremely tenuous, and right now I like Trumps chances a lot more than Biden's.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnitaSarsleezian, CrippleThreat and 15 others
Some JERK said:
I don't know. I think they'd need to offer $1 million PLUS immunity from prosecution. I have a feeling that anyone with any serious evidence is also involved.
Click to expand...
I assume that's implicit in the offer as well, but I could be wrong.

Regardless, I'm not sure how I should feel about this. On one hand, I suppose it's not wrong to try and encourage people to report. On the other, it feels like ambulance chasing. I hope Dan's prepared to have a neverending stream of nothingburgers being shoved down his phones.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Flaming Carrot, Some JERK and 2 others
Smarty Pants said:
Wait so did the USPS driver recant or not? Is the recording with that Jew Fed genuine? The guy says he still stands by his allegations but the media is saying the literal exact opposite. Someone explain.

Twitter Video
Click to expand...
Current Veritas story is that he signed a paper without reading it after four hours of Fed interrogation and has said afterwards he stands by his statement.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Parthenos, spiritofamermaid, WhimsicalTrolli and 8 others
iRON-mAn said:
I've seen this said several times in this thread and in a few different ways, and I don't really understand it. PA is the strongest legal case they have, to the point where I'm sort of just waiting for it to happen, rather than talking about percentages and chances. I don't know how they'll rule but given that PA directly ignored an order, and kept counting without oversight, and along with numerous other witness testaments to attempts to defraud the process, I just don't see how SCOTUS rules in a way that doesn't end up flipping PA to Trump or completely invalidating for both candidates. It seems like nothing short of an open goal.

So if you're saying that Trump's win hinges on PA, as so many agree, it's baffling to me that anyone can also say that a Biden win is still likely. I'll grant that a Trump win isn't certain, but the situation in PA, as well as WI largely, has made the situation for both candidates extremely tenuous, and right now I like Trumps chances a lot more than Biden's.
Click to expand...
Because SCOTUS itself is not a gaurantee.

Too much fuckery is possible there and the conservative view is to be skeptical of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthenos, spiritofamermaid, WhimsicalTrolli and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back