Upon repeated rewatching the second angle doesn't show any exculpatory evidence, in fact it points away from Crowder and the unionist when the event takes place, and Crowder is mischaracterizing multiple parts of the event yet again. Including how he claims the DA just saw TYT and based his declaration on that. He did not, the police also declared against crowder. And Crowder himself decided not to press charges because he knew damned well he was fucked. To add to that he also claims youtube age restricted the video... But age restriction isn't a total nuking it just restricts it to some viewers and demonetizes it. So where the fuck is the age restricted video and why did he not use it as evidence 8 years ago. We all know the answer, he knows damn well his video is worthless he's just waving keys in front of your face and hoping you don't pay attention. And the fact he'd resort to such a tactic should've clued you into why I hate him.
Oh and while we're at it. See the part where he shows one of the union members with a box cutter trying to slash the tent? Didn't that spark a bulb in your head? Had Crowder not been there. Had Crowder not spent the whole day trying to provoke people. THAT would've been the most notorious event. Shit I'd say it should've been anyway if life was fair. But that's the issue with narrative. Your side had ammo. Your side could've made the unionists look awful. But Crowder, and only Crowder, gave them their own ammo. He handed the narrative to them in a silver fucking platter. Hell, if at least he'd been self aware enough to not make the post-fight narrative all about himself by releasing article after article about it the media couldn't have really done much to use the incident, the only videos about it came from his associates. But his ego wouldn't allow him to do so. He HAD to make it all about himself. And he HAD to focus the spotlight on his ass, shady as the event might be. And the result? The obvious. He allowed for the real issues to be hidden under the rug by taking the spotlight away from the points your side of the argument should be seeking to hammer home. This is why I say he's toxic. Don't you get it yet? He actively harms your side far worse than the lefties ever could.
Also, see this shit right here: "If you're siding with TYT you should know that you're walking in shit. But it's not surprising given that you were a commie."
See that's the kinda arguments that hurt you more than they help. In the original comment I very deliberately chose to show TYT dunking on Crowder BECAUSE they're so awful that to give enough ammo that even they can use it safely is a very low bar. And I'd say I was extremely unsubtle about it with the adjectives I used for them. I was exemplifying how Crowder's conduct can easily hurt a good case by making even the lowest of the low look good in comparison. 'Cause any half decent spin artist can look good when they get their hands on good ammo. It's when they're starved of it than their true colors show. And Crowder doesn't even need to be starved to start showing his true colors. On the very video you linked he makes awful argument after awful argument despite having had 8 fucking years to prepare and the prior videos I linked about climate change show damned well how much he's willing to pull out of his ass. Do you really not see the point yet?
As for me having been a commie. Yeah. I did in my previous rant say we all have weakspots and I am used to people using them even when it is irrelevant. Exemply. Fucking. Gratia. This kinda shit might be good for a cheap shot but in a serious debate it makes you look petty and willing to use a falacious attack on the character of the person instead of the information. I would avoid it if I were you. Specially if your target has exposed the weak spot deliberately like I just did. If they hide it at least you might get a rise out of them and make them trip harder. But you sure won't get me with that, I am the kinda guy that isn't afraid to admit I'm garbage.
Of course you could say all I'm doing is attack Crowder's character. But I'm not trying to dispute the data he presented here, I'm not making an argument against what he said, Hell I didn't watch his video but I think you can tell by my input on this thread I sure hope Trump wins every single fucking lawsuit. I'm simply warning you of using bad sources to transmit said data. Because I am on your side. And now I have to deal with Crowder being on it too. And I know the kind of self-sabottage he can inflict on us. That's the whole damned point.