- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
Expecting the GOPe to do anything about something without pointing a gun to their head? Haha.If these machines were so obviously flawed, why weren't the republicans doing lawsuits to get them excluded months ago?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Expecting the GOPe to do anything about something without pointing a gun to their head? Haha.If these machines were so obviously flawed, why weren't the republicans doing lawsuits to get them excluded months ago?
It’s typical “can live anywhere vs must live somewhere” conflict. The elite have become locusts and obviously they vote democrat.Apparently (according to Newsweek so....yeah), there are fewer Trump-oriented counties than thought.
Wonder who exactly they looked into.
Didn't they got thrown out in Michigan?
The trigger for the right is make it a fight or die situation. That or do some very grievous harm to them. McVeigh did what he did as revenge for ruby ridge.
It’s typical “can live anywhere vs must live somewhere” conflict. The elite have become locusts and obviously they vote democrat.
Why does her voice sound like that
Imagine that crowd in DC armed. Tell me how the NG is going to deal with them.
The problem is that the Police are being not just demonetized, but directly held in a vice. Most are familiar with the leaks by now, but the TL;DR from the cops in areas like NYC and Portland is that if you crack down on the leftist activists, your pension is forfeit. Voice public support for the likes of Trump, and your job is history. In extreme-blue areas like NYC, the police will throw you to the wolves in seconds if you get attacked by the ANTIFA crowd, because it's easier for them to appease them and let them burn down your home or business than to do the right thing and face sanctions.I'm not sure the police or national guard would want to deal with them. The Democrats were talking about defunding or abolishing the police. Both police and military are overwhelmingly Republican. There have already been reports of the police taking the side of the Proud Boys over AntiFa and BLM. The police and NG could ignore an illegal order to shoot into the crowd and then arrest the person giving the order.
And if the police won't deal with them and the NG won't do it you've basically got a revolution. The state has lost its coercive power and the revolutionary forces have gained it.
That is a common thread among liberals. They are impatient and impertinent. They want "the quick fix" so they throw themselves behind whatever "revolutionary" fix they come up with. (Notice how defund the Police has been rolled out. Immediate cuts, loud virtue signaling but no plan. They don't have the details on how social workers will be integrated into the police force, nor standards to ensure safety, or what training they even need. Police forces are being depleted and it will be probably 3 years before a social worker is even put on the force.)What McVeigh did took a fuckton of planning and patience. Anders Breivik spent YEARS pretending to be a WOW playing NEET while squirreling money away to purchase his guns and materials.
Your average BLM activist simply does not have that type of patience or long-term planning skills for something like that. Otherwise, they would have a fucking JOB and not be on welfare and/or living off Mommy and Daddy. Let's also not forget the OPSEC involved of keeping your mouth shut online about your great plan to blow up a bunch of "white supremacist Trump-humpers." These fuckers get suicidal thoughts if twitter is down for 12 hours, no way they could keep OPSEC.
The right also won't operate alone. The extreme left's burnt enough bridges and pissed off enough people, and I don't think they realize how bad it's backfiring.So the left will have numbers but the right will negate that by hitting harder when they do hit.
Oh no they get copystriked too?The problem is that the Police are being not just demonetized, but
May as well be.Oh no they get copystriked too?![]()
Optics don't matter either way at this point. If Trump does manage to get the re-election, just like how we feel with Joe, half the country will view him as illegitimate. The only good thing that could come from this is using it to the advantage of the country, and these four years to purge these people and fix our elections. Good optics went out the moment Joe won via fraud. It's a blood sport now.But if he expects the Supreme Court/Congress to give him the presidency I doubt it'll be good optics to mass arrest/terminate danger hairs and cuckolds.
No sane person is in favor of the “online harassment, stalking, and abuse that now is a too-frequent reality for Americans, particularly for young people and women.”
As this article notes, however, this is a Trojan Horse. Censoring “disinformation” and “hate speech” will in practice mean censoring speech that the elites don’t favor, including explorations of the motivating ideology behind jihad terrorism. Islamic groups and their Leftist allies have been insisting for years that discussing how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism amounts to “hate speech.” Now their efforts are about to bear fruit.
“Biden Campaign Website Promises Internet Censorship Taskforce,” by Alexander Hall, Newsbusters, November 11, 2020 (thanks to David):
“
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. The Biden campaign is using causes like women’s safety as a Trojan horse to usher in a new era of internet censorship.
Former Vice President Joe Biden has said that he “plans to convene a task force to create best practices for containing online harassment, which disproportionately affects women and young people,” CNBC summarized in a Nov. 10 report. Biden’s campaign website declared that if he gains the presidency, his administration “will shine a light on the online harassment, stalking, and abuse that now is a too-frequent reality for Americans, particularly for young people and women,” recognizing that “culture change must extend to our online lives.”
CNBC’s reporting consulted multiple experts who eagerly anticipate a new wave of censorship to wipe out their political enemies.
Carnegie Mellon University professor of computer science, engineering and public policy Kathleen Carley proclaimed, “I think the task force could be very important because it’s very clear there is a lot of online disinformation and hate speech and we’ve seen how that’s been a significant way to harm women and vulnerable groups such as a children and minorities,” reported CNBC.
Yeah, Teddy Roosevelt was unhappy with Taft's performance, so he formed the Bull Moose Party and ran for a third term to split the vote. He succeeded, and caused the Wilson administration (congratulations_you_played_yourself.gif) It's obviously not common, but there is precedent.
That is a common thread among liberals. They are impatient and impertinent. They want "the quick fix" so they throw themselves behind whatever "revolutionary" fix they come up with. (Notice how defund the Police has been rolled out. Immediate cuts, loud virtue signaling but no plan. They don't have the details on how social workers will be integrated into the police force, nor standards to ensure safety, or what training they even need. Police forces are being depleted and it will be probably 3 years before a social worker is even put on the force.)
The right want evolutionary change. Create a policy, see what its effects are, make further changes. They have patience and will try to take stock of the situation.
So the left will have numbers but the right will negate that by hitting harder when they do hit.