Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

OneHandClapping said:
I'll have to search for it, but I remember an archive posted of Geico Caveman puffing up his chest and challenging Nick and Ty to post how many cases they have "won" and promising that he has "won" more.

Ty, and mostly Nick, never talk about this because they just do their shit. People like Geico need validation.
Click to expand...
How pathetic.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dean Pentel, HighwayStar, Drowningman and 3 others
I've seen some sperging about Chris Pratt being in the new Thor movie. A lot of them post claims and rumors about him.
It reminds me too much about the sperging about Vic.

Spotted this interesting discussion from back in January
"People are weirdly eager for Chris Pratt to be a bad guy. Every time they go for him it reminds me how surprisingly good a person he is, if the worst dirt they can find is that a kid had alcohol while at a party one time lolol"
"The article NAMES the people who groomed and abused the kid. Yet the only person you want to destroy over it is Pratt, who didn't give him alcohol or abuse him. That it happened at his home doesn't mean he's to blame. Is Shaliene Woodley culpable too bc Nils Larsen was her agent?"

rnyjesaye45a45.png
People are trying to destroy Chris because they don't like him. If they wanted to destroy the people who deserved it, there's plenty of them whose involvement is FAR less questionable. I'll stop defending him on the day there's real evidence that he isn't anything but a great guy
drytbstww4q.png

"They should investigate, charge, and punish people. Not make assumptions and jump on one particular person baselessly just bc they don't like him as a person."
"If he's innocent, he's IS a victim of twitter mob idiots trying to destroy his career. A small thing in the scheme of things -- I just think people should be considered innocent until proven guilty, whether you're a fan of them or not."
dtfsybu34.png
dsntgfsjyhftrw.png
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hotfartz :), Xenomorphs Are Cute, BlueSpark and 5 others
PorkeyDuck said:
I've seen some sperging about Chris Pratt being in the new Thor movie. A lot of them post claims and rumors about him.
It reminds me too much about the sperging about Vic.

Spotted this interesting discussion from back in January
"People are weirdly eager for Chris Pratt to be a bad guy. Every time they go for him it reminds me how surprisingly good a person he is, if the worst dirt they can find is that a kid had alcohol while at a party one time lolol"
"The article NAMES the people who groomed and abused the kid. Yet the only person you want to destroy over it is Pratt, who didn't give him alcohol or abuse him. That it happened at his home doesn't mean he's to blame. Is Shaliene Woodley culpable too bc Nils Larsen was her agent?"

View attachment 1728587
People are trying to destroy Chris because they don't like him. If they wanted to destroy the people who deserved it, there's plenty of them whose involvement is FAR less questionable. I'll stop defending him on the day there's real evidence that he isn't anything but a great guy
View attachment 1728586

"They should investigate, charge, and punish people. Not make assumptions and jump on one particular person baselessly just bc they don't like him as a person."
"If he's innocent, he's IS a victim of twitter mob idiots trying to destroy his career. A small thing in the scheme of things -- I just think people should be considered innocent until proven guilty, whether you're a fan of them or not."
View attachment 1728585
View attachment 1728592
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, Vic was never given the same benefit of the doubt. I wonder how many of these users commented on Vic?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Decimator, theworstkindofeurofag, Riku and 3 others
OneHandClapping said:
I'll have to search for it, but I remember an archive posted of Geico Caveman puffing up his chest and challenging Nick and Ty to post how many cases they have "won" and promising that he has "won" more.

Ty, and mostly Nick, never talk about this because they just do their shit. People like Geico need validation.
Click to expand...
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
How pathetic.
Click to expand...
Yeah, we're supposed to take a loser "lawyer" from Australia with a gay avatar like that seriously, but not a Texan lawyer who represented and won cases for million-dollar corporations and a self-employed Minnesota law practitioner with a wife and five children.

How pathetic indeed.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: OHenri41412, Bethesda's Todd Howard, Rondo Richter Belmont and 5 others
The Singer Of Songs said:
What is the obsession by these nitwits with "scores"? It's not the number that's important, it's that the one that kills your entire case is the one that matters.
Click to expand...
Also if you cherrypick your cases, like criminal prosecutors do, you can have win rates of well over 90% and in fact if you don't you suck. It's fucking meaningless. It's like a general practice doctor boasting that 99% of his patients live and taunting an oncologist who treats pancreatic cancer that half of his die.

Wolff is just insecure that he looks like a thawed out ice caveman from 30,000 years ago.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Hotfartz :), OHenri41412, FadeIntoObscurity and 13 others
  • Like
Reactions: Xenomorphs Are Cute, Rondo Richter Belmont, Riku and 5 others
PorkeyDuck said:
I've seen some sperging about Chris Pratt being in the new Thor movie. A lot of them post claims and rumors about him.
It reminds me too much about the sperging about Vic.

Spotted this interesting discussion from back in January
"People are weirdly eager for Chris Pratt to be a bad guy. Every time they go for him it reminds me how surprisingly good a person he is, if the worst dirt they can find is that a kid had alcohol while at a party one time lolol"
"The article NAMES the people who groomed and abused the kid. Yet the only person you want to destroy over it is Pratt, who didn't give him alcohol or abuse him. That it happened at his home doesn't mean he's to blame. Is Shaliene Woodley culpable too bc Nils Larsen was her agent?"

View attachment 1728587
People are trying to destroy Chris because they don't like him. If they wanted to destroy the people who deserved it, there's plenty of them whose involvement is FAR less questionable. I'll stop defending him on the day there's real evidence that he isn't anything but a great guy
View attachment 1728586

"They should investigate, charge, and punish people. Not make assumptions and jump on one particular person baselessly just bc they don't like him as a person."
"If he's innocent, he's IS a victim of twitter mob idiots trying to destroy his career. A small thing in the scheme of things -- I just think people should be considered innocent until proven guilty, whether you're a fan of them or not."
View attachment 1728585
View attachment 1728592
Click to expand...
Lol these are two completely different issues. I know y'all would die for Vic and while I understand that, you're grasping at straws.
 
  • Dumb
  • Informative
Reactions: Hotfartz :) and PorkeyDuck
Look
Son of Sparda 84 said:
Guys we hit a 1 year landmark. Its been 1 year and BT has not kept his word
View attachment 1730241
Click to expand...
Looking at Twitter and the ISWV crowd are pretty quiet, just going about their normal weeb business, and only occasionally does someone seem to bring it up.

KV on the other hand have all had a field day with the Hughes in the old BHBH repressing the Trump campaign in one of the Texas filings, and then bringing up the 0-17 again and again.

Seems as though one side has moved on for the moment, but we all know this will change hard once the COA pulls their finger out. Guessing they are waiting for all the votes to be certified before making any rulings.
 
  • Feels
  • Disagree
Reactions: Hotfartz :), P5Fever, theworstkindofeurofag and 7 others
Laundui_or_douchette? said:
Look

Looking at Twitter and the ISWV crowd are pretty quiet, just going about their normal weeb business, and only occasionally does someone seem to bring it up.

KV on the other hand have all had a field day with the Hughes in the old BHBH repressing the Trump campaign in one of the Texas filings, and then bringing up the 0-17 again and again.

Seems as though one side has moved on for the moment, but we all know this will change hard once the COA pulls their finger out. Guessing they are waiting for all the votes to be certified before making any rulings.
Click to expand...
From what someone posted earlier in either this thread or the lawsuit thread, they made their ruling and are just waiting on it to be typed up.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hotfartz :)
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back