Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[SIGSEGV]

Have you real the Kommunist manifesto?

No, I'm not a commie.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

No, I'm not a commie.

Go read it.
How can you know whether Marx was right or wrong without reading his work?

 

[Just A Butt]

When will you prove you are white?

 

[SIGSEGV]

Go read it.
How can you know whether Marx was right or wrong without reading his work?

It's much easier to just look at all the failed communist countries.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

It's much easier to just look at all the failed communist countries.

It's much easier to just look at all the failed communist countries.

I knew you were going to say this and my response is how do you know they are even following marxism? are there differences between marxist as described by marx and what has been tried in other nations?

 

[SIGSEGV]

I knew you were going to say this and my response is how do you know they are even following marxism? are there differences between marxist as described by marx and what has been tried in other nations?

Are there differences between pedophilia and ephibophilia?

 

[Swiss46]

I knew you were going to say this and my response is how do you know they are even following marxism? are there differences between marxist as described by marx and what has been tried in other nations?

Why are you obsessed with Marx all of a sudden?

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

Why are you obsessed with Marx all of a sudden?

He was a revolutionary and a white man, just like what Boxy wants to be.

 

[Popper Whiting]

we already the discussion
pedophilia vs Hebephilia vs ephebophilia
they lost the arguement, could not defend AOC at 16 or 18 and resorted to calling me a pedo to trick other people

like yourself
the same fags in this thread are incredibly dishonest.

But you are a pedo. The whole whateverphilia argument pedos role out is like an alcoholic distinguishing themselves as not an alcoholic but a wine enthusiast or social drinker. Giving yourself a fruity new word to call yourself doesn't infact change what you are, whether you be a pedo or an alcoholic.

But you said you were willing to impregnate a 12 year old that you are married to with parental consent.

So this means people who do that aren't paedophiles, ephebophiles or hebephiles?

Off topic, what sort of women attract you? What is the best woman to have as a white person?

Here is an example I had a chuckle at which pretty much proves your point using the man's own words.

I said 12 isn't a bad min age of consent because some women do reach maturity faster and that was the historical age before the Christian feminists changed it. If the options are 12 (10+2) vs 18 (20-2), I would chose 12.

Those fucking Christian feminists by the way, ruining it for good racially pure kiddie fiddlers. People had it so nice in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution when most didn't have to bother with shit like an education or age of consent. AND THE FUCKING CHRISTIAN FEMINISTS HAD TO RUIN IT ALL!

 

[Purin Chan]

@BoxerShorts47 The AOC from 16-17 exists so people close in age don't get arrested.
You're just a nonce, accept it.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

@BoxerShorts47 The AOC from 16-17 exists so people close in age don't get arrested.
You're just a nonce, accept it.

Yes, because 16/18 AOC is bullshit.
Original AOC was 10/12.
People 16-17 had sex.
Maybe it was immoral if our of marriage but not illegal
AOC 16/18 passed.
People 16-17 still have sex.
Such a BIG problem that "Romeo + Juliet" loophole has to be added to the law.
Clearly people don't believe that 16/18 should be AOC and instead of adding this loophole, they should have just lowered the AOC.

 

[Lonely Grave]

From your manifesto:

The truth is that DNA is real; DNA is not a social construct. There are biological differences between individuals, ethnicities and races. Equality is a lie. But the left worships, “All [people] are created equal” as their number 1 commandant so they attack science as racist. They call science, aka the truth, racist and attack anyone mentioning biological differences as a racist [heretic] and fire them from their jobs through the civil rights act as creating a “hostile workplace.” They’ve achieved Catholic Church- Galileo level of censorship and established civil rights/social justice as the state religion.

Because the Left cannot admit there are biological differences between races, any inequality—such as Blacks or Hispanics underperforming in education and business--MUST be blamed on white people. They’ve invented a conspiracy theory, systemic racism, to blame whites for the failures of non-whites. Systemic racism is a double standard because the left will never praise white supremacy when non-whites outperform whites like Asians in education or Blacks in sports. The left only blames whites when non-whites underperform; the left never praises whites when non-whites overperform.

The left has spent decades trying to “close the gap” by increasing funding to black and brown schools and no matter how much money they spend; they cannot close the gap because the gap is genetic. Instead of admitting that equality is a lie and biological differences exist, they enact diversity quotas to fix the gap. They claim to be against discrimination but advocate discrimination against Whites and Asians. Total hypocrisy. They will never allow us to judge non-whites by the content of their character.

Categorically incorrect. Would you like a clinical class on the human genome? I wouldn't even call myself a leftist and even I know your points are merely regurgitated alt-right nonsense. Why, Harvard even had the manners to say it for me!

If you deny this, then you yourself deny science and contradict your own points. As for your inane bleating about age of consent, I've given the same scholarly treatment elsewhere on this thread - would you like me to retrieve it again so that we can see again your incredible stupidity?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

From your manifesto:

Categorically incorrect. Would you like a clinical class on the human genome? I wouldn't even call myself a leftist and even I know your points are merely regurgitated alt-right nonsense. Why, Harvard even had the manners to say it for me!

If you deny this, then you yourself deny science and contradict your own points. As for your inane bleating about age of consent, I've given the same scholarly treatment elsewhere on this thread - would you like me to retrieve it again so that we can see again your incredible stupidity?

Link 1 is false. Variations within races doesn't negate variations between races.
Like 2 is true. Genetic differences are true and you can cluster people by DNA.

 

[Stardust]

Okay so you want to end up as a crazy cat women and purge your DNA from the human genome?

Those questions were about you. You are unmarried and without kids, despite your manifesto beliefs. They did not and shall not work, so HOW are you going to convince others to adhere? Imagine a fat, lazy NEET telling you how to live healthy and independent, their credibility is nonexistent.

As for your age of consent nonsense, you used to cite 14 as the ideal age. The age of 12 was mentioned infrequently by you, but now it has replaced 14. This is exactly what several said would happen if the age of consent was decreased, that the consenting age would get pushed lower and lower. In your same "sources" it mentions the age of 7 for Delaware; why not 7, Boxy? It was BEFORE those dang feminists ruined it - and anything BEFORE them is automatically superior and right, right?

If you say yes, you are a pedo. If you say no, you sabotage your own argument. But yes or no, you are still a faggot loser.

 

[Omsko1029]

Yes, because 16/18 AOC is bullshit.
Original AOC was 10/12.
People 16-17 had sex.
Maybe it was immoral if our of marriage but not illegal
AOC 16/18 passed.
People 16-17 still have sex.
Such a BIG problem that "Romeo + Juliet" loophole has to be added to the law.
Clearly people don't believe that 16/18 should be AOC and instead of adding this loophole, they should have just lowered the AOC.

This thread seemed so laudable. Then to see the majority of these posts end up as word salad and half-sentences- that is disappointing.

If you want pointers on how to debate, learn how to lay your ideas out in a more constructive format.

As an aside, I think a lot of AOC laws are outdated, non-functional, and need to be updated, but don't lower them. Yikes.

 

[Lonely Grave]

Link 1 is false. Variations within races doesn't negate variations between races.
Like 2 is true. Genetic differences are true and you can cluster people by DNA.

And in both cases you lose. Racism is a social construct that is not a one-way street. Modern genetics may result in 'unique' human beings, but if everyone is unique then there can be no distinction. Your points amount to nothing more that meaningless supposition and projection for the alt-right who do nothing but misconstrue facts for personal gain. Admit it Boxy, you're way out of your league here.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

And in both cases you lose. Racism is a social construct that is not a one-way street. Modern genetics may result in 'unique' human beings, but if everyone is unique then there can be no distinction. Your points amount to nothing more that meaningless supposition and projection for the alt-right who do nothing but misconstrue facts for personal gain. Admit it Boxy, you're way out of your league here.

Racism is a social construct. This is 100% true.
Racism is de facto ONLY applied about white people. All other groups get "indigenous rights."
Everyone has unique DNA but people can still be clustered. No difference between crusting whites vs blacks or German shepherds vs labs. Races aka subspecies are the 1st step to different species. This is exactly what natural selection predicts.
You're just total science deniers because you think god made everyone equal.
You're the new religious right.

 

[Lonely Grave]

Everyone has unique DNA but people can still be clustered. No difference between crusting whites vs blacks or German shepherds vs labs. Races aka subspecies are the 1st step to different species. This is exactly what natural selection predicts.
You're just total science deniers because you think god made everyone equal.
You're the new religious right.

You're the science denier. You claim races lead to different species where that's clearly impossible, since we all belong to Homo sapiens sapiens, I have never believed in God, I was never raised in a religious household, you are merely proving my point that you're a whackjob with some serious projection issues.

 

[Purin Chan]

Original AOC was 10/12.

[Citation needed]

 

[BoxerShorts47]

You're the science denier. You claim races lead to different species where that's clearly impossible, since we all belong to Homo sapiens sapiens, I have never believed in God, I was never raised in a religious household, you are merely proving my point that you're a whackjob with some serious projection issues.

homo sapiens sapiens is a social construct and political.

Wagging the Dog

Sup, dawg?

stonetoss.com

[Citation needed]

read the last page. the citation was there.

I have never believed in God, I was never raised in a religious household

learning to worship the preamble to the dec. of indep. in k-12 is the same thing as learning to worship the Bible in sunday school
yes or no. do you acknowledge that there are biological differences between races? That we are not the same. That we are not equal?