. . .
Instead she is being told, "men are prevents. They are sexually harassing you."
. . .
So those men are not prevents or . . .
Why can you not fucking spell? Don't you fucking
dare tell white men how to think or behave when you make a mockery of their language with every post you make, Diego.
So you acknowledge that people under the age of consent can in fact consent to sex?
They can say "Yes" but the point is, and I realise your autism might make this difficult to understand:
They aren't mentally or emotionally ready for it. It's consent, but not
informed consent.
Well women my age are starting to hit the wall but I'm not lusting after 14 yr olds. I'm just saying that AOC would be better at that age.
Man with no job, no income, no social skills wants wider dating pool because women his own age "are starting to hit the wall".
Nigger. Please.
I'm abolishing k-12. I don't respect most teachers. Most teachers only care about forcing the students to repeat what they want to hear. Total narcissism.
And students fucking teachers occurs quite regularly. You're just criminalizing normal human sexuality
Let me guess: You had a teacher you wanted to stick your swarthy micropeen into? But she wanted you to, you know, actually do your schoolwork, or something and was disgusted by the thought of banging this juvenile ape that lusted after her? Is that what this is all about,
@PedoShorts47? Did you get BTFO'd by your Special Ed teacher and now you're gonna show her what's what?
. . .
Do you acknowledge that AOC causes child abuse for many women because it teaches them that men are perverts and are "sexually harrashing" them.
I never said they are. And not all women are innocent and sweat.
. . .
Seriously, if you want to talk to the whites, learn our language and its proper usage, you illiterate fucking monkey.
power dynamics = feminist propaganda and the basis of power + prejudice = racism redefinition.
So you don't think you would have any sway or "perceived authority" over a 14 yo girl? You're
that delusional?
no, there is no difference between a 14 yr old girl having sex with a 16 yr old vs a 30 yr old. exact same. the only difference is 14 + 16 occurs soo frequently that they needed to make a romeo+juliet loophole in the law.
14 and 16 yo kids haven't developed the emotional or mental maturity to know that they shouldn't be banging. What do you
actually think the "Romeo + Juliet loophole" is for? If a 30 year old doesn't understand the ramifications of fucking a child, then they should be sterilised, as should retards like you.
and power imbalance. again feminist garbage and basis of many issues including workplace sexual harassment lawsuits. I don't accept "power dynamic" when it comes to adults, they are free to consent or not.
Power dynamic is a bs way to get around the fact that there is no real force of violence so you're making up a social construct to act like a force.
You don't get to have an opinion on workplace issues, you jobless wanker. Free to consent or not is a lofty idea, but the reality is that if someone is in a position to make your life very difficult, they have the upper hand in a power dynamic.
Sounds like you resent women, not feminists.
@NoncerShorts47, it's fine to be a faggot, these days; no one's gonna judge you for that, just accept it. We'll judge you for being retarded, a kiddy fiddler and a Heinz 57 racial mutt, but not for being legit gay.