Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Useful_Mistake]

The fact that Melinda keeps returning here and engaging with us, over and over, for a solid year, is a pretty big depth charge to her claim of IIED. It couldn't have been that traumatic, you kept coming back for more.

Just reviewed her original petition again. She doesn't even make an argument for Null. She says he owns Kiwifarms, and that is "extreme and outrageous". (Unless her pleading is just poorly worded, in which case she still doesn't allege anything illegal)

Only then does she start to make an argument against Null, by alleging things impossible to prove. She further defeats her points by implying that only defendant 2 acted intentionally, not Null

(76) is, of course, stupid. The fact that he talks about Melinda, is not a reason enough to remove protections. She further fails to prove that he can, and how he has done, editing of content, for an assumed purpose of harming her.

Those are her only arguments against Null. Sad and pathetic really.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Maybe? I mean they are sending it to the same address that is a mailbox (everything following what I just said is according to Melinda's server) from where the mail is send to a third party from whom Null can buy back his mail. Seems to me this option is open to some mail being lost
View attachment 1734071

Melinda's server was apparently taking the word of a moron who thinks that things like "Electronic Mailbox" are proper nouns - note the odd capitals and quotation marks. I imagine at her direction they somehow managed to fuck up the simple act of mailing it.

Also I don't know how that was ever considered effective personal service. They don't even allege that they're certain Josh personally received them, only that they believe he'd have the option to.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

. I imagine at her direction they somehow managed to fuck up the simple act of mailing it.

I have no idea how much influence she had over the process aside from paying the server

Also I don't know how that was ever considered effective personal service

Court considered the server adfidavid that he served correctly as evidence enough.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

I'd just like to point out once again that I never called CPS on Melinda. She knows exactly who called, she's been told over and over who it was. She's a fucking dummy.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

She knows exactly who called, she's been told over and over who it was. She's a fucking dummy.

I haven't been here since that happened. Who really called CPS?

 

[Kosher Salt]

Court consider's the server adfidavid that he served correctly as evidence enough.

It literally doesn't say that he did though. I guess it's optimistic of me to expect a court to actually bother reading the affidavit of service and saying "hey this doesn't actually say that you served him, try again."

On what planet or what jurisdiction is "I put it in the mail, someone might've given it to him, idk though" considered effective personal service? The court should be able to reject that sua sponte.

There are some instances where registered mail is considered effective service. You've either got a signature or you've got the mailman's ability to I.D. the person who refused the attempt to deliver it; that's something you can actually take to a judge. This isn't even that.

 

[Deadpool]

In order to prove IIED, a Plaintiff has to prove emotional damages, not financial

I hope you have some actual credible unbiased witnesses because you'll have to prove emotional damages. Family and acquaintances (normally I'd say friends, but we all know you don't have any) won't cut it. Especially online acquaintances. Better hope you've at least seen a psychologist at least once and their willing to speak on your behalf otherwise you'll get exactly what you deserve, nothing.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Family and acquaintances (normally I'd say friends, but we all know you don't have any) won't cut it. Especially online acquaintances, won't cut it.

That's not legally accurate

I'd just like to point out once again that I never called CPS on Melinda. She knows exactly who called, she's been told over and over who it was. She's a fucking dummy.

Like I believe what you say....NOT!

The fact that Melinda keeps returning here and engaging with us, over and over, for a solid year, is a pretty big depth charge to her claim of IIED. It couldn't have been that traumatic, you kept coming back for more.

"More" of what?

And no, my interactions here don't take away from my claims of IIED. That will be covered at the hearing. More to come

What you have to prove is:
1.That you suffered some sort of damages
2. That the court can make those damages go away
Since you asked 50 grand as a compensation, you will have to somehow prove that he caused you 50k worth of damages

That's not correct for IIED. Stay tuned for the hearing

 

[Deadpool]

Like I believe what you say....NOT!

The person who called has admitted that he called them multiple times, and that he was the only one who called. Also that comeback hasn't been funny since Borat in the early 2000's and it was tired then. Are you permanently stuck in the late 90's?

That's not legally accurate

Citation needed.

 

[White Baby]

And no, my interactions here don't take away from my claims of IIED. That will be covered at the hearing. More to come

Your lawsuit claims that you "occasionally" post on the forum when in actuality you post here multiple times a day on the regular.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

It literally doesn't say that he did though.

Kinda does. Even if he pretty much did it wrongly.

On what planet or what jurisdiction is "I put it in the mail, someone might've given it to him, idk though" considered effective personal service?

Honestly? Pretty much nowhere, bar very special circumstances.

That's not legally accurate

Since it's you saying it's not, then it probably is.

Like I believe what you say....NOT!

Please prove to us that he did. Because you'll have to prove it to the court, might as well get in some practise.

"More" of what?

More emotional damage, I believe he meant.

That's not correct for IIED. Stay tuned for the hearing

That is true for everything. I've been right on everything so far, I'm certain I am right on this too.

 

[LoverofPi]

How is a mother and daughter having a good close bond "emotional incest"? I don't agree with your POV. Mothers and daughters have a pre-disposition to a close bond because they are both females.

Except you didn't say close bond, you said you "talk like sisters" and that she gives you hope for humanity. THAT was the warning sign.

I would not do that. YHWH gave them to me to care for, they are my blessings.

So treat them as such.

I live in the USA. Most Americans (USA) are narcissistic. It comes with the culture.

This is not the case. But the fact that you're saying it about an entire nation. Hooboy, the projection is powerful in this one.

I have to make a list of Exhibits and start scanning them onto my computer. I'm also brainstorming who to call as witnesses.

I can talk fairly well in court just from memory but I think I will also write out an outline of what I am going to say

I look forward to the transcripts. It will be a hoot.

"More" of what?

More picking pointless fights on the internet.

And no, my interactions here don't take away from my claims of IIED. That will be covered at the hearing. More to come

Oh, this will be most entertaining.

That's not correct for IIED. Stay tuned for the hearing

I look forward to it. It's gonna be a hoot.

 

[Baby Yoda]

@wwqqdas Have you ever had a guy put you on all fours and suck your butthole? I did it to a girl the other day and it was so hot.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Kinda does. Even if he pretty much did it wrongly.

Unless he's claiming that Joshua Moon is an "Employee @ Kwik Pack & Ship (Electronic Mailbox)," then no, it absolutely does not say that he served Josh. It says that he served someone else.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Unless he's claiming that Joshua Moon is an "Employee @ Kwik Pack & Ship (Electronic Mailbox)," then no, it absolutely does not say that he served Josh. It says that he served someone else.

It does say he served him. It says "I personally served the individual". But, I agree, it is a horrible service that would not be accepted anywhere. I guess I am just being a bit nitpicky. I get what you mean, though.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Citation needed.

Like I'm going to help you? Pa-lease. Do your own research.

Don't worry @Null , apparently Scotts and Moons have been warring for quite some time on fine Virginia soil

Scott v Moon (1925) (VA)

Are you permanently stuck in the late 90's?

I liked the 90s. That's when it was sexy for women to wear their clothes. It also was the decade of some great bands and skater guys.

Unless he's claiming that Joshua Moon is an "Employee @ Kwik Pack & Ship (Electronic Mailbox)," then no, it absolutely does not say that he served Josh. It says that he served someone else.

He was served at his address. Doesn't matter who gets the mail. They have a legal obligation to pass it on.

Not only that, but its quite pompous for you to question the Deputy Marshal, the Clerk and the Judge -- all who have said he was properly served.

WHINE AND CRY ALL YOU WANT FELLAS. JUDGMENT HAS BEEN DECREED

But the fact that you're saying it about an entire nation. Hooboy, the projection is powerful in this one.

Its not a projection, it's an observation. Americans (USA) are a proud people generally, and narcissism runs high in this country. Must be all the Hollywood influence.

I look forward to the transcripts. It will be a hoot.

I'm going to have to actually wear make up and do my hair! Can't go on camera looking like I rolled outta bed!

 

[Chariot Of Mara]

Like I'm going to help you? Pa-lease. Do your own research.

Don't worry @Null , apparently Scotts and Moons have been warring for quite some time on fine Virginia soil

Scott v Moon (1925) (VA)






I liked the 90s. That's when it was sexy for women to wear their clothes. It also was the decade of some great bands and skater guys.






He was served at his address. Doesn't matter who gets the mail. They have a legal obligation to pass it on.

Not only that, but its quite pompous for you to question the Deputy Marshal, the Clerk and the Judge -- all who have said he was properly served.

WHINE AND CRY ALL YOU WANT FELLAS. JUDGMENT HAS BEEN DECREED



Its not a projection, it's an observation. Americans (USA) are a proud people generally, and narcissism runs high in this country. Must be all the Hollywood influence.






I'm going to have to actually wear make up and do my hair! Can't go on camera looking like I rolled outta bed!

Make sure to test your camera, and microphone for technical difficulties! Wouldn’t want to look like a moron talking with your microphone muted or improperly working. And just a suggestion, I’d keep your children off camera and out of microphone range.

And I don’t understand the 90’s obsession. Not just Melinda, but for anyone stuck in the 90’s.

 

[Kosher Salt]

He was served at his address. Doesn't matter who gets the mail. They have a legal obligation to pass it on.

lolno

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

He was served at his address. Doesn't matter who gets the mail. They have a legal obligation to pass it on.

Not only that, but its quite pompous for you to question the Deputy Marshal, the Clerk and the Judge -- all who have said he was properly served.

WHINE AND CRY ALL YOU WANT FELLAS. JUDGMENT HAS BEEN DECREED

Judgment may be defaulted, but you'll be lucky to see a red fuckin' cent out of anyone. You have no income, nobody found out about your books until after you announcing it and it's unlikely you've sold many copies, therefore financial damages cannot be incurred.

 

[LoverofPi]

Like I'm going to help you? Pa-lease. Do your own research.

The woman who keeps alleging she's debating, everyone.

He was served at his address. Doesn't matter who gets the mail. They have a legal obligation to pass it on.

Not only that, but its quite pompous for you to question the Deputy Marshal, the Clerk and the Judge -- all who have said he was properly served.

WHINE AND CRY ALL YOU WANT FELLAS. JUDGMENT HAS BEEN DECREED

Sure feeling all that emotional distress there.

Its not a projection, it's an observation. Americans (USA) are a proud people generally, and narcissism runs high in this country. Must be all the Hollywood influence.

It's pure bullshit and projection, Mel. The US has an NPD rate of 0.5%, roughly on par with every other country we have information on. That you allege to have such a high encounter rate with narcs absolutely reinforces the "assholes all day" understanding of your personality.

I'm going to have to actually wear make up and do my hair! Can't go on camera looking like I rolled outta bed!

I hold out hope you'll manage to get dismissed after getting a default judgement. I believe in you, Mel.