Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV] said:
The whole squad is representing, everyone who was relevant to the development of Critical Theory and Postmodernism thought is there
Click to expand...
I would expect everyone to roll only 1s even when they have plenty of buffs and bonuses. No kidding on that.
They are so incompetent they would easily be able to fuck up even the simplest of tasks.
 
CivilianOfTheFandomWars said:
View attachment 1731578
Ladies... do y’all just hate the female form or something? Are you all secretly fundamentalist Muslims and think we need more niqabs and abayas these days, or am I just not seeing the issue with a space ronin’s chestplate.
Click to expand...
In terms of practicality, armor with shaped breasts isn't practical for melee combat as it redirects blades into the center of the chest, which from my extensive research shows is a somewhat vital area for protection. Even with things like bullets, it's a structural weakness in the armor.

But in terms of fictional media and merchandising, "feminine" armor appeals to female consumers. If you've ever heard of Monster Hunter, the game has literal hundreds of armor designs which have female variants. In an interview with what I believe was the art director, he was questioned on what is his targeted style for armor, and he specified his company polled female players and the overwhelming majority preferred armor which both made their character's face visible and didn't make them look masculine. Even if you designed fictitious armor solely to appeal to a female demographic, men will invariably like it anyway because, shockingly, men generally like looking at women.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Sunlight, Daughter of Cernunnos, the fall of man and 9 others
0 1 said:
In terms of practicality, armor with shaped breasts isn't practical since for melee combat as it redirects blades into the center of the chest, which from my extensive research shows is a somewhat vital area for protection. Even with things like bullets, it's a structural weakness in the armor.

But in terms of fictional media and merchandising, "feminine" armor appeals to female consumers. If you've ever heard of Monster Hunter, the game has literal hundreds of armor designs which have female variants. In an interview with what I believe was the art director, he was questioned on what is his targeted style for armor, and he specified his company polled female players and the overwhelming majority preferred armor which both made their character's face visible and didn't make them look masculine. Even if you designed fictitious armor solely to appeal to a female demographic, men will invariably like it anyway because, shockingly, men generally like looking at women.
Click to expand...
People want the old Xena, not Brienne of Tarth.
Shocking.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: PizzaOfLass, Pina Colada, madethistocomment and 7 others
0 1 said:
In terms of practicality, armor with shaped breasts isn't practical since for melee combat as it redirects blades into the center of the chest, which from my extensive research shows is a somewhat vital area for protection. Even with things like bullets, it's a structural weakness in the armor.

But in terms of fictional media and merchandising, "feminine" armor appeals to female consumers. If you've ever heard of Monster Hunter, the game has literal hundreds of armor designs which have female variants. In an interview with what I believe was the art director, he was questioned on what is his targeted style for armor, and he specified his company polled female players and the overwhelming majority preferred armor which both made their character's face visible and didn't make them look masculine. Even if you designed fictitious armor solely to appeal to a female demographic, men will invariably like it anyway because, shockingly, men generally like looking at women.
Click to expand...
Even then, the armor for the female Mandalorians isn't boobplate. It's a somewhat unrealistically formed breasplate, certainly, but it doesn't have the gap in the center that would direct blows/shots to the sternum. There's no place in that armor that serves as a shot trap that wouldn't also be in a medieval domed breastplate. And since the Mandalorians seem to wear comparatively very thin padding under their armor, and they keep that armor pretty much full time, I imagine it would be a lot more comfortable for the wearers.

What I'm not seeing a lot of people commenting is how the "boobplate" actually covers more of the vitals above, below and around the chest than many of the male armors on display.

CivilianOfTheFandomWars said:
People want the old Xena, not Brienne of Tarth.
Shocking.
Click to expand...
Female empowerment is kicking ass and looking good while at it. I'm fine with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pina Colada, Jhonson Jhonson, Maiden Astraea and 7 others
7528.png
https://twitter.com/audible_com/status/1327343209664614403 (https://archive.vn/9ibL3)
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Sunlight, PizzaOfLass, chickenbutt and 6 others
Twitter threw this out:
Screenshot_20201117-061805_Twitter.jpg
And got a yelling at:
20201117_061945.jpg
20201117_061958.jpg
20201117_062014.jpg
I find it extremely fucking hard to believe twitter is where the #1 site of transphobes congregate. You can get fucking shanked for saying shit about trans people on that site, exceeded only by reddit and trans dedicated websites.

Bonus Tard at the bottom not helping the cause:
Screenshot_20201117-061839_Twitter.jpg
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Sunlight, PizzaOfLass, chickenbutt and 8 others
Oglooger said:
As someone who appreciates both "practical armor" and "boob armor" is that at long as it looks cool, there is no issue, it is but a fantasy after all. My issue lies in over designed armor and 2inch thick pauldrons (Korean MMOs and WoW comes to mind) The Emperor of mankind though is an exception.
Click to expand...

I am a fan of “observations” decoupled from “issues“ or “problematic” labels. I think this difference in verbiage is what keeps a subject from being able to turn into a screed. It is a valid observation to make that a given fantasy armor design does not seem to be fulfilling the function of armor. It is a further valid observation that perhaps the function of the fantasy armor is not necessarily the same as the function of real armor. It may be, but it also may be to look hot. Neither of these are issues. We have to be able to make observations that aren’t just setups for complaints and problematizing things.

Yes boob window armor looks ridiculous. Yes it also looks good. Yes I have cosplayed as Alias from Curse of the Azure Bonds. No I have not cosplayed as Captain Phasma or Brienne of Tarth. I mean for one thing it’s easier and cheaper, and for another, I would never cosplay as Phasma, and Brienne is ruined for me now that she got pumped-and-dumped by Jaime, and then cucked by Cersei in the final stretch, and after all that shit she‘s still simping for Jaime in her final scenes.

I just feel like I can point out a pattern without it being a judgment or a concern. To me it is neither. I like discourse that is from that angle. I have a lot of observations. Most actually are not judgments or concerns. I have a ton of observations to make about porn, for example. Because I’m female people assume I’m going to either indict it or use it as an excuse to advertise I’m a Cool Sex Positive Feminist. Lol neither, it’s just pattern recognition.

But pattern recognition upsets people who don’t want to admit the pattern is there and/or don’t want to admit they’re part of the pattern.

Anyway black people commit a disproportionate amount of crime, gay guys are disproportionately degenerate, sometimes women do lie about sexual assault, and the only people I want attending to my landscape or re-roofing my house are teams of Hispanic men led by the white guy who owns the business.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Sunlight, Grapefruit Soda, UnsufficentBoobage and 7 others
I know it's probably out of topic, but for me this is really ridiculous way
So I saw the. TW's for...Danganronpa characters. Yes I understand the fact, that some characters can remind the peoples, but they don't exist, they can't hurt you. And if you are really sensitive/young, so why are you watching medias like Danganronpa, JJBA, Dorohero, they are not for you. Watch/play something more fitted for you like: MHA, Saiki K, Animal Crossing, Pokemon.... For me TW are useful for something, like abuse, rape,murder,things that people usually don't experience.
20201106_205439.jpg
20201106_203933.jpg
20201106_203241.jpg
20201106_204125.jpg

Nicknames are censored, cause they are kids and I hope they will grow up
If you really care about your followers triggers I suggest you write all characters used in post and use "Hide" option in Stories. The character list will help and your followers and curious normies, which want to know the character/series
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: PizzaOfLass and scallion
TerribleIdeas™ said:
View attachment 1733918

(((Every single time))) + (((Pink-pilling))) = ???
Click to expand...
Can't these fucks get their narrative straight? Is a virus a bad thing (the coof) or a good thing (the queers are gonna getcha)?

Also, last I checked cishet men want pussy. If you're delivering it, we don't care whether or not you munch on carpet on your free time (unless you're giving us video evidence of it), and we sure as shit don't care about your dangerhaired friends.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PizzaOfLass, TerribleIdeas™, UnsufficentBoobage and 1 other person
TerribleIdeas™ said:
View attachment 1733918

(((Every single time))) + (((Pink-pilling))) = ???
Click to expand...

Just a thought, but am I the only one who immediately rolls their eyes at gay people who refer to themselves or other gays as queer? I never understood minorities' and/or far-left wackos' obsession with "reclaiming" or "taking back" words previously considered slurs.

In the case of SJWs, I think it's because identifying as simply gay, lesbian or bisexual isn't nearly as controversial as it was a few decades ago (Ellen DeGeneres coming out on her sitcom is a good example). Being viewed as merely gay doesn't get them those sweet oppression points they so desperately crave. They're all about shock value. That's also the reason they add new genders and switch them on an almost hourly basis depending on who they're trying to piss off that day.

And of course, only THEY can use such words with each other. #checkyourprivilege, shitlord!
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Wych Elm, Cilleystring, PizzaOfLass and 15 others
TerribleIdeas™ said:
View attachment 1732503

This is a special kind of stupid - you intentionally went out on a date with another guy, got caught by your black boyfriend, and his family beat your ass, because "black american culture" very intentionally operates as an "honor culture". The fact that you were probably pregnant with your boyfriend's child while you were out cheating on him makes it an even more egregious offense in an honor culture, because you were very intentionally attempting to trap some poor fuck with that pregnancy.

Also, there's a strong chance this is a reddit-tier story, and was made the fuck up for clout. Regardless of the truth of the story, the fact that people think that anyone should be exempt from some kind of repercussions for a blatantly dishonest relationship offense like this is an idiot; sure, maybe your ho ass shouldn't have gotten beat, but you were clearly willing to risk saddling a guy with a pregnancy that wasn't necessarily his, condemning him to a minimum of 18 years of paying child support to you ass, while in college, when you're supposed to be getting a degree to make something of your life with.
Click to expand...
It’s funny about the person saying only men feel pissed about their girlfriend/wife cheating on them because misogyny. I can think of at least 4 country songs where a woman murders a man because he cheated on her.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sunlight, gobbles, Pina Colada and 5 others
  • Like
Reactions: PizzaOfLass, Super-Chevy454, UnsufficentBoobage and 1 other person
MirrorNoir said:
Revenge of the faggots.

They want to flood mass media, especially kids mass media, with gay and trans character to normalize it in the eyes of kids. And for the following reasons:

1. To artificially create the illusion they are the majority to spite straight people
2. To brainwash kids at a super young age into thinking they are gay in hopes that for every kid they expose to it, they can "convince" a young kid into thinking he's gay and/or trans.

In general, for the longest time most kids don't know what gay is until they are in their teens as it's something parents keep from their kids and kids can't access media that feature gay characters or gay issues until they are older. And in some cases, some folks used to never know what homosexuality was until college or when they move to a big city with a thriving and open gay community scene.

This goes against the LGBT mafia's current MO that you have to expose kids to the existence of gays/trans so you can handcuff them into the lifestyle early in life, especially through forced transgenderfication before they even hit puberty (since if you do the surgery/hormone treatment before puberty, you fuck them up so badly they have zero choice but to commit for life to being trans).

As a gay man, I grew up back when homosexuality was rarely talked about in childhood except in discussion of AIDS and rumors about David Bowie or Prince or other musicians who experimented sexually or explicitly evoked an androgynous appearance that would lead to rumors of them being gay. It wasn't until I was around twelve-thirteen that I started watching media that involved homosexuality (Philadelphia, Doing Time On Maple Drive, Dynasty, Dressed to Kill, Melrose Place etc) and that gayness was always something of a forbidden fruit deal: it was something that made a novel or film or TV show edgier than normal.

While I can see the argument of more representation IN THEORY, cramming it down peoples throats and blood libeling them if they complain is the sort of shit that undoes all of the shit that gay people have gained over the last couple of decades. Granted, I also think that there is a part of the LGBT community, that doesn't care about that and that is why the trans community is so deadset on forcing a hellish ultimatium from society at large, where they would GLADLY destroy all of the legal and societal gains made by gays, lesbians, and bisexuals if they can't get get their way.

The irony is that it feeds into the whole "and suddenly, without any warning, Germany turned Nazi overnight" copy paste. There are those in the LGBT community who SEE the backlash coming and that it's going to be apocalyptic if the gay/trans mafia doesn't stop this "full speed ahead" accelerationist crap. They have utterly forgotten the cautionary tale of Weimer and think that so long as they can help the DNC achieve one party dictatorship rule over the nation, they'll never face any consequence and will "win".
Click to expand...
When the eventual backlash does come, I'll remember there are some good faggots out there.
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
Boob window armor is the worst; shaped boob armor is kinda dumb; actually drawing nipples or putting big dumb weird rings to try to look like areolae doesn’t make it necessarily not-armory, but it is stupid.
Click to expand...
People always seem to forget shit like this was real life
cuirass.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: Aaa0aaa0, PizzaOfLass, Pina Colada and 7 others
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Sunlight, superbigboy, the fall of man and 16 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back