2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I did read it and it doesn't take that into account. Trump literally told his supporters to not vote by mail, and then was shocked when, in the bigger cities, he only got 20% of the vote. Republicans already get few votes from big cities, and then when he told his supporters to not vote by mail, that is what you're gonna get. He told them to not vote by mail so he could claim conspiracy, which you guys are buying hook, line and sinker, so congrats on getting conned by a senile boomer conman.
you can consult the voter registration for mail-in ballots and the return rates for both democrats and republicans, there are no massive discrepancies, sometimes democrats asked for more ballots, but nothing about organic turnout or voter preference pattern would explain these results.

WBatJN.png


AMwzCe.png


In any election the totals flatline when you arrange by the size of precint, you don't get a discrepancy

Look at Georgia:
sBqh7K.jpg

When you arrange by size of precint, there is a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between Trump and Biden, if biden were to win in a fair election, he should have a graph that follows the patterns where the values flatline, biden with a line higher in the graph (indicating a higher share of the vote) and trump with a flat line lower, when you compare both with Jo, you see there was no tampering on her votes, the pattern respects what an election should show, Trump and Biden however show an extremelly unnatural, obviously manipulated diagonal line that is directly related to the size of precints, the chance of that happening naturally makes this basically impossible.

"Imagine we have a giant bag of 10,000 marbles. Half are red and half are blue. We are going
to pull them out in groups of 10 marbles. Most of the time, 5 will be blue and 5 will be red.
Sometimes there will be a 6/4 split or a 7/3 split. There will be a few 8/2 and 9/1 splits. And
we can even have the odd case of 10 of red or 10 blue. As we add them up and graph the
cumulative percentage, it won’t take long for it to hit 50% and stay there."
basically after sampling every marble, you will get an even distribution of marbles to the point they reach an equilibrium indicative of the share of marbles in the bag, half for each, a flat line in the middle of the graph.

Basically you are seeing a scenario when Trump always loses and Biden always wins, and the more votes in a batch, the more trump loses and more biden wins, from a random poll of votes from several districts, this should never happen.
 
She opens up the parts she's using. Like when the north opened up just in time for her daughter's graduation or her husband was caught "do you know who I am"ing to try to get his boat in the water a week early.
We are mere peasants and soon the weight of the situation will force us to accept that fact. That or our worst fears being realized.
 
you can consult the voter registration for mail-in ballots and the return rates for both democrats and republicans, there are no massive discrepancies, sometimes democrats asked for more ballots, but nothing about organic turnout or voter preference pattern would explain these results.

WBatJN.jpg

AMwzCe.jpg

SA9kje.jpg


In any election the totals flatline when you arrange by the size of precint, you don't get a discrepancy

Look at Georgia:
sBqh7K.jpg

When you arrange by size of precint, there is a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between Trump and Biden, if biden were to win in a fair election, he should have a graph that follows the patterns where the values flatline, biden with a line higher in the graph (indicating a higher share of the vote) and trump with a flat line lower, when you compare both with Jo, you see there was no tampering on her votes, the pattern respects what an election should show, Trump and Biden however show an extremelly unnatural, obviously manipulated diagonal line that is directly related to the size of precints, the chance of that happening naturally makes this basically impossible.


basically after sampling every marble, you will get an even distribution of marbles to the point they reach an equilibrium indicative of the share of marbles in the bag, half for each, a flat line in the middle of the graph.

Basically you are seeing a scenario when Trump always loses and Biden always wins, and the more votes in a batch, the more trump loses and more biden wins, from a random poll of votes from several districts, this should never happen.
Don't bother. He's not honestly debating you. This is great info though.
 
you can consult the voter registration for mail-in ballots and the return rates for both democrats and republicans, there are no massive discrepancies, sometimes democrats asked for more ballots, but nothing about organic turnout or voter preference pattern would explain these results.

WBatJN.jpg

AMwzCe.jpg

SA9kje.jpg


In any election the totals flatline when you arrange by the size of precint, you don't get a discrepancy

Look at Georgia:
sBqh7K.jpg

When you arrange by size of precint, there is a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between Trump and Biden, if biden were to win in a fair election, he should have a graph that follows the patterns where the values flatline, biden with a line higher in the graph (indicating a higher share of the vote) and trump with a flat line lower, when you compare both with Jo, you see there was no tampering on her votes, the pattern respects what an election should show, Trump and Biden however show an extremelly unnatural, obviously manipulated diagonal line that is directly related to the size of precints, the chance of that happening naturally makes this basically impossible.


basically after sampling every marble, you will get an even distribution of marbles to the point they reach an equilibrium indicative of the share of marbles in the bag, half for each, a flat line in the middle of the graph.

Basically you are seeing a scenario when Trump always loses and Biden always wins, and the more votes in a batch, the more trump loses and more biden wins, from a random poll of votes from several districts, this should never happen.
yeah, except that still doesn't take into account the order in which they counted the votes and where they came from. They counted the areas where there'd be a higher concentration of Biden votes towards the end. They're bigger cities, so the votes take longer to count generally (since more areas and all that). It's really not a tough concept. I know Trump losing is hard for you guys, but just accept it and move on. It's a lot healthier.
 
yeah, except that still doesn't take into account the order in which they counted the votes and where they came from. They counted the areas where there'd be a higher concentration of Biden votes towards the end. They're bigger cities, so the votes take longer to count generally (since more areas and all that). It's really not a tough concept. I know Trump losing is hard for you guys, but just accept it and move on. It's a lot healthier.
This thread is an endless feedback loop of confirmation bias. Its anything but healthy.
 
yeah, except that still doesn't take into account the order in which they counted the votes and where they came from. They counted the areas where there'd be a higher concentration of Biden votes towards the end. They're bigger cities, so the votes take longer to count generally (since more areas and all that). It's really not a tough concept. I know Trump losing is hard for you guys, but just accept it and move on. It's a lot healthier.
That graph has nothing to do with time, dumbfuck. Please put in some effort.
 
yeah, except that still doesn't take into account the order in which they counted the votes and where they came from. They counted the areas where there'd be a higher concentration of Biden votes towards the end. They're bigger cities, so the votes take longer to count generally (since more areas and all that). It's really not a tough concept. I know Trump losing is hard for you guys, but just accept it and move on. It's a lot healthier.
Yeah, yeah we get it, you trained in the art of naval gazing contrarianism, you're a master at it, you have honed the craft, you have ascended into levels of arguing in bad faith beyond the levels of mere mortal redditors.

"But actually" You decry, index finger firmly taut and waggling toward the heavens, "I have a contrarian view-point which actually makes me the victor, and therefore the intelligent one" globs of spit pool upon your ill-fitting marvel cinematic universe t-shirt. Yet, there were no up-boats to be found, you are empty, alone, desolate, nay potentially terminally homosexual, even.
 
yeah, except that still doesn't take into account the order in which they counted the votes and where they came from. They counted the areas where there'd be a higher concentration of Biden votes towards the end. They're bigger cities, so the votes take longer to count generally (since more areas and all that). It's really not a tough concept. I know Trump losing is hard for you guys, but just accept it and move on. It's a lot healthier.
thats the beaulty of it, winning doesn't change the ratio of distribution, tampering does, the ratio of distribution of votes in any election is absolutely random.

if biden had won due to a higher share of the votes coming from massively democratic precints, he would still have a flat line with no relation to trump, except his line would be higher in the graph.

in a fair election, the more votes you sample, the less variation you have, in Georgia, the more votes sampled, the more biden started to win while simultaneously trump started to lose, exaclty at the same rate, exactly in the same precints, exactly with the same vote counts.
 
you can consult the voter registration for mail-in ballots and the return rates for both democrats and republicans, there are no massive discrepancies, sometimes democrats asked for more ballots, but nothing about organic turnout or voter preference pattern would explain these results.

View attachment 1735172

View attachment 1735173

In any election the totals flatline when you arrange by the size of precint, you don't get a discrepancy

Look at Georgia:
sBqh7K.jpg

When you arrange by size of precint, there is a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between Trump and Biden, if biden were to win in a fair election, he should have a graph that follows the patterns where the values flatline, biden with a line higher in the graph (indicating a higher share of the vote) and trump with a flat line lower, when you compare both with Jo, you see there was no tampering on her votes, the pattern respects what an election should show, Trump and Biden however show an extremelly unnatural, obviously manipulated diagonal line that is directly related to the size of precints, the chance of that happening naturally makes this basically impossible.


basically after sampling every marble, you will get an even distribution of marbles to the point they reach an equilibrium indicative of the share of marbles in the bag, half for each, a flat line in the middle of the graph.

Basically you are seeing a scenario when Trump always loses and Biden always wins, and the more votes in a batch, the more trump loses and more biden wins, from a random poll of votes from several districts, this should never happen.
Why are you still even engaging with this faggot; he loses no matter the outcome.

If he's pretending to be retarded, then any shred of cleverness to his trolling is negated because he had to expose himself as a retard to do it.

If he's actually serious about his arguments and pearl clutching over the summer and truly is blissfully, willfully ignorant of how fucked he and his family are in a Biden Harris presidency; then imagine the surprise on his face when he's gulag'd like the rest of us for posting on a fucking ___phobic/___ist gossip forum.

He's a faggot, he'll never not be a faggot, so leave him to his faggot logic and faggot tier bait.
 
Wayne county is the kind of area where most of the neighborhoods have barred windows, double locked doors and a good amount of the people in the area seem to have some sort of drink or drug addiction and a criminal record to go with it. I can see 2 people getting spooked by some local threats if that's what happened.

That said, apparently they didn't want to certify because the numbers didn't match up, and that's still something. Because they likely didn't just magically find the numbers in a few hours after voting. Someone in the chain will go "hang on a second" and I'm sure the lawyers will be looking into it if they don't. I'll be surprised if it gets stuffed back into the bottle and completely forgotten as a result.

That and I'm pretty sure this wasn't any of the Trumps teams doing, it was general due process showing itself to have issues. I struggle to keep up but I'm gathering that their actual legal team only started filing suits today?
 
I just think the math is the very best evidence everyone has that this election was defrauded.

I don't know if judges know shit about math, but if my employer owns me a 3000 USD payment and the fucker deposits me 3 bucks, I sure hope the bank receipt is some sort of proof that the fucker still didn't pay me.
 
I've worked in healthcare, this is pretty much par for the course tbh
Same. That's what makes it even worse.

@Just Some Other Guy
Oh, I know. It's one of the reasons I self-ejected out of healthcare and into engineering. It's not without problems but I don't want to neck myself because of my work environment anymore. Especially helps that most people (in my particular field, at least) are open to different ideas especially with hard data to back them up.
 
Last edited:
This guy supposedly works in the healthcare industry.

Think about that for a bit.
Lol, you should hear from my friend at U of M. You think most of those there know anything about how their government actually works or how to look up and interpret your own statistics?

Not a big enough rainbow in the world for that one.


Even at my own hospital it's mostly "Turn on news, repeat what is said".
 
Yeah the Dooming over Michigan is overblown. If @Gehenna a guy who has been skeptical of Trump's chance and seems to be pretty on the money with the situtation, thinks it's not something to be dooming over then I think people need to chill out a bit.

This could still possibly get us a Michigan audit and if it doesn then like Gehenna said it gives Trump's team more ammunation.

Besides today was a decent day we got our first taste of Rudy in court and it went well and we also saw that Trump's team is still willing to fight in Neveda and there's a good chance that Pandora's box has been opened in Clark County.

We really gotta play this by ear I think it's gonna be a big week and it could be a bumpy ride. Don't waste your energy on this.
 

I just find it funny that capitalism and socialism both lead to the same result. North Korea conditions. Or thats how its looking
I'm going to grab this and use it as an excuse to run off on another one of my tangents.

A lot of people don't understand this alliance between Corporate America and the Socialist Bloc embodied by BLM, Justice Democrats, AntiFa, and the rest. It seems like a paradoxical arrangement that will inevitably end with somebody being stabbed in the back, or is simply handwaved away as "the Jews playing everyone", but I think that the solution can be found by simply following one question to its logical conclusion:

"What is the actual, practical difference between the Government subsuming the Corporations and the Corporations subsuming the Government?"

For those of you who do not know how publicly-traded corporations work, here's a brief primer. The Company takes Labor from the Worker and uses it to make a Product. That Product is then sold to the Consumer for a Profit. That Profit is then used to pay the Worker for his Labor (along with other costs), some is put into the Company's bank account for a rainy day or future expansion, and the rest is split among the Shareholders. The only barrier to being a Shareholder is the buy-in cost, you can go out and buy a share of any one of them you please starting at 9AM EST today/tomorrow. You can do this even if you Work for the Company, and even then still purchase the Company's products. Thus, you end up in a situation where the Company takes Labor from (you) the Worker to create a Product which it sells to (you) the Consumer and shares the profits with (you) the Shareholder. Maybe you're starting to see where I'm going with this.

So, what does it mean to be a Shareholder? It is, in essence, citizenship in the Company. You are invested in the well-being of the Company, you may vote in matters of how the Company conducts itself, and you reap the rewards of the Company's success. Granted, those among you who actually own stock might be saying "but I've only got one share, it doesn't even matter if I vote". This is because votes are weighted by the number of shares a Shareholder has: in quite literal terms, those with more shares are more invested in the well-being of the Company, and so their voices are granted more import.

Now, let's take this to the national scale. As a citizen of the Nation of Company, you receive one share in the nation. You can acquire more shares by investing yourself more deeply in the well-being of the Company. For instance, soldiers don't get to go home after work, they are always on the watch, often living in shitty conditions, and--of course--are putting their lives on the line for the sake of the Company, ergo, they have a greater investment in the Company, and thus deserve a greater cut of the profits. It was a common saying in the USSR during the Second World War that the best reason to join the Red Army was "at least they have food". This carries all the way up to the top of the chain, the CEO, The Premier, Il Duche, or Der Fuhrer. He is the one charged with keeping the entire ship upright, even when he is "on vacation" he is still making the same life-or-death decisions, he's just staring at pretty scenery while he does it. And, of course, if the whole thing falls apart, his head will be the first on the chopping block. Truly, he is more invested in the fate of the Company than anyone else, and so he gets the biggest cut: the best food, the most expensive booze, the pretty villa on the seaside. You can even see this line of thinking evinced in certain forms of Holocaust apologism: "of course the Jews starved, there was a food crisis, and they needed to feed the soldiers and the workers". The Jews were not citizens, they had no stock in the Nation of Company, so why should they get any of the benefits of being Shareholders?

But how does this effect you, the Joe on the street who is just trying to make it through the day? You wake up and go to work at a Company-run business, where you Work to produce a good or service. You are paid in Company money, which can only be spent on goods and services produced by the Company. You buy Company bread with Company money for dinner, maybe you go out to the Company-run theater and watch a movie made by the Company extolling the virtues of being a patriotic and hardworking employee of the Company. You come home to find that the quarterly reports have come in, and the Board has elected that the dividends from this quarter's profits will be spent building a new park for the Shareholders to enjoy.

And the crazy thing? This might actually be able to function if the nation actually managed to run itself like a business. Unfortunately for Socialists, they have a nasty habit of killing anyone who knows how to run a business and insist on operating their country like a fucking charity. Take, for instance, the classic Socialist measure of price controls. If the government and the economy are the same, then price controls are nothing short of the Company declaring that it will sell its own product at a loss. Do this across your entire economy, and you will bankrupt yourself in record time. Money starts piling up in peoples' bank accounts, shelves empty as demand outstrips supply, and the government must either confiscate the holdings of the Shareholders, or print more money, leading into the death spiral of hyperinflation.

What does Socialism look like? It looks like the Company Store.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back