2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And why should I be surprised that this happens to a person who keeps posting mean tweets, and calls people -may god forgive me uttering this word- fat?

I mean, Jesus, trump is the guy who said this:
View attachment 1735366
Like, no fucking wonder everyone spat in the face of statistics, nature and even logic itself to overwhelmingly vote him out.
No, I mean that's why they voted him in, but he didn't go hard enough so they went for Joe "BoonSlayer88" Biden
 
Now that Mitch has given up, how long until Trump concedes?

Mitch.jpg
 
Huh, wonder why people re freaking out?... oh it's a nothingburger. Bitch we all knew that was going to the courts anyway you hyped yorselves like dummies.

Salt's starting to come in over Michigan.
View attachment 1734842

"This is a coup detat"

1-No, rigging the election was a coup, you mong.

2-According to your lawyers you can't prove a coup causes any harm, so it's fine anyway.

I still can't believe that argument was used first thing I did after waking up wascheck the thread, it felt like a dream.
 
So, where's the source?

But let's say it's true. If Mitch is throwing the towel in, then the GOP deserves to be blasted back into irrelevance.

That isn't a source on its own, what's even the point of posting this if it's not verified other than fearmongering?

Well here's an article

 
During a news conference, a reporter asked McConnell (R-Ky.) why the GSA had yet to launch the official transition process. The majority leader responded that legal disputes over the election would be settled in court first, but he promised that “all of this will happen right on time and we’ll swear in the next administration on Jan. 20.”

“We’re going to have an orderly transfer from this administration to the next one,” McConnell said. “What we all say about it is, frankly, irrelevant.”
So MSM spinning things as usual. This reads like McConnell simply hedging his bets, or being outwardly neutral, much like how Pompeo did.

Imagine projecting this hard.
 
So MSM spinning things as usual. This reads like McConnell simply hedging his bets, or being outwardly neutral, much like how Pompeo did.

Imagine projecting this hard.
I completely agree.

Plus, McConnell has a personal investment in Trump winning a second term and/or exposing the fraud. He would be an absolute moron to be like "Orange Man Bad ... So lemme potentially give up my Majority Leader Status!" The Senate ain't a done deal for the GOP, as we all know.

But yeah, ultimately he didn't specify which Administration we would be transitioning to. It's so easy to see what the media is trying to do here. Last week, it was Melania telling Trump to concede, last week it was Mike Pence, now it's the Turtle. Keep pushing that narrative hard, news media!
 
One of those things that just never goes away once you see it: They're all obsessed with the ideal of a Utopia they're completely incapable of ever bringing about.

And they'll kill every single one of us and destroy everything -- Laws, Culture, Countries, everything -- to try. We know this because this is what happens every single time the radical left goes full commie.
 
I completely agree.

Plus, McConnell has a personal investment in Trump winning a second term and/or exposing the fraud. He would be an absolute moron to be like "Orange Man Bad ... So lemme potentially give up my Majority Leader Status!" The Senate ain't a done deal for the GOP, as we all know.

But yeah, ultimately he didn't specify which Administration we would be transitioning to. It's so easy to see what the media is trying to do here. Last week, it was Melania telling Trump to concede, last week it was Mike Pence, now it's the Turtle. Keep pushing that narrative hard, news media!
Didn’t they also do that with Trump at his COVID conference when he didn’t specify which administration will be sworn in next
 
you can consult the voter registration for mail-in ballots and the return rates for both democrats and republicans, there are no massive discrepancies, sometimes democrats asked for more ballots, but nothing about organic turnout or voter preference pattern would explain these results.

View attachment 1735172

View attachment 1735173

In any election the totals flatline when you arrange by the size of precint, you don't get a discrepancy

Look at Georgia:
sBqh7K.jpg

When you arrange by size of precint, there is a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between Trump and Biden, if biden were to win in a fair election, he should have a graph that follows the patterns where the values flatline, biden with a line higher in the graph (indicating a higher share of the vote) and trump with a flat line lower, when you compare both with Jo, you see there was no tampering on her votes, the pattern respects what an election should show, Trump and Biden however show an extremelly unnatural, obviously manipulated diagonal line that is directly related to the size of precints, the chance of that happening naturally makes this basically impossible.


basically after sampling every marble, you will get an even distribution of marbles to the point they reach an equilibrium indicative of the share of marbles in the bag, half for each, a flat line in the middle of the graph.

Basically you are seeing a scenario when Trump always loses and Biden always wins, and the more votes in a batch, the more trump loses and more biden wins, from a random poll of votes from several districts, this should never happen.
This thread in a nutshell right now:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back