Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
So let's believe there wasn't any real fraud going on (even though there probably was)

On one hand, Biden did manage to win back pretty much every "Blue wall" state that was won by Trump in 2016, plus he picked up both Arizona and Georgia, both long believed to be out of reach by Democrats, and even managed to snag that one district in Nebraska.

On the other hand, he lost both Ohio and Florida, both states long considered crucial to win the presidency, lost Texas, which the Democrats were hoping to win, and he still lost that one district up in Maine.

Don't really know if this should really be a good or negative sign for the Democrats going forward, especially with Republicans claiming fraud in some of these states.
The Democrats need to forget about winning Iowa and Ohio ever again. Florida is still possible, but becoming less blue with each passing election.
The two states that I think they can flip in the future one day are Texas and North Carolina.
 
Using Arizona as the example. The first tweet indicates that 44% of the people that had an absentee ballot returned and counted for them never requested, filled out, or returned an absentee ballot. That implies someone voted for them. The 2nd tweet indicates that 50% of the people that did request an absentee ballot, filled it out, and returned it never had it received or counted. I don't know all the factors involved with this poll but Tim Pool is reporting on it, and the guy posting the info is one of the data analysts working for the Trump campaign in one way or another.

The implication is that if this shit is true, Trump really did win by a landslide. I hope I'm being true to the source material because I'm kind of in shock at the moment as to what this means for our elections.
View attachment 1738513
Well hopefully they dont have only tweets i want to see fire and brimstone. They have being cockteasing for so long that the stripper pole is nearly broken at this point.They need to just get something done already.
 
Using Arizona as the example. The first tweet indicates that 44% of the people that had an absentee ballot returned and counted for them never requested, filled out, or returned an absentee ballot. That implies someone voted for them. The 2nd tweet indicates that 50% of the people that did request an absentee ballot, filled it out, and returned it never had it received or counted. I don't know all the factors involved with this poll but Tim Pool is reporting on it, and the guy posting the info is one of the data analysts working for the Trump campaign in one way or another.

The implication is that if this shit is true, Trump really did win by a landslide. I hope I'm being true to the source material because I'm kind of in shock at the moment as to what this means for our elections.

Edit- one of the people tied up in this was an olympic athlete that was training out of state and someone got and absentee ballot and voted as him in his stead. They're claiming to have piles of affidavits. Not saying it's true, just that if it is true, this pretty much means war.
View attachment 1738513
Just as easy to believe is that a large portion of the ballots counted towards people that didn't request them actually came from the people who requested and sent in their ballots but never had them marked as received. Between shitty election tech and untrained retards counting ballots, it's not that hard to see happening. Fraud is also a possible example, sure, but never discount general human ignorance and fuckups.
 
The Democrats need to forget about winning Iowa and Ohio ever again. Florida is still possible, but becoming less blue with each passing election.
The two states that I think they can flip in the future one day are Texas and North Carolina.
Georgia, too. I wonder if it has anything to do with their recent dives into solar energy.
 
Georgia, too. I wonder if it has anything to do with their recent dives into solar energy.
While I think it's important they try holding onto the Midwest, they need to give the Sun Belt states more attention since they're gaining more Electoral Votes.
Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania won't be as valuable when compared to Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina in the future.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ForTheHoard
Any Massachusettsbros here? I know I'm late to mention this but I was hoping to see a red wave in New England this year. The signs were all there. There have been Trump signs everywhere across the state, as well as several large rallies in the smaller suburban towns, especially in Western/Northern Mass. I'm aware Boston gets to decide what the rest of this state does every election, but I had hope. Even the western counties got swept blue.
firefox_2020-11-19_22-21-37.png

At least Jo got some votes
The Democrats need to forget about winning Iowa and Ohio ever again. Florida is still possible, but becoming less blue with each passing election.
The two states that I think they can flip in the future one day are Texas and North Carolina.
They'd have to have a solid moderate candidate to flip Texas. I visited the lone state earlier this year and the amount of Trump signs and flags is astronomical compared to the other states I passed through.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Gorillad Cheese
Lol still didn't answer my question. I see the truth hurts.

I've been saying you're in love with Trump for months now. You stole my post because the truth hurts. Why do you and the others always have to defend every thing he does? Seriously, why? If it's because he makes it okay to be racist again, then just say it.
It's always been ok to be racist. You are a faggot.
 
Any Massachusettsbros here? I know I'm late to mention this but I was hoping to see a red wave in New England this year. The signs were all there. There have been Trump signs everywhere across the state, as well as several large rallies in the smaller suburban towns, especially in Western/Northern Mass. I'm aware Boston gets to decide what the rest of this state does every election, but I had hope. Even the western counties got swept blue.
View attachment 1738526
At least Jo got some votes

They'd have to have a solid moderate candidate to flip Texas. I visited the lone state earlier this year and the amount of Trump signs and flags is astronomical compared to the other states I passed through.
To be fair, Biden performed quite well for a Democrat in Texas. Getting 46 percent of the vote there when compared to Clinton's 43 percent is a good sign. But yes, they need a Moderate if they're ever going to have a chance there.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VooDew
We need to just make it a rule that noone over 50 can run for president. Enough fucking geriatrics. Its called the White House, not the Retirement Home.
Won't happen. Supreme court has ruled that no additional qualifications can be added to who can be president. That's why their attempt at impeachment was flat out stupid. Even if by some miracle they convinced repubs to imprison him, he could still run from jail and has enough of a cult base that it will kill repubs chances at the white house as long as he lives.

It's for the better anyway. If we allowed our government to change the rules on who could be president, why wouldn't they just make it so no 'peasant' can be president? Or any other number of qualifiers. Why not change it so that only foreigners can be president? It's a rabbit hole I rather not descend.
 
So let's believe there wasn't any real fraud going on (even though there probably was)

On one hand, Biden did manage to win back pretty much every "Blue wall" state that was won by Trump in 2016, plus he picked up both Arizona and Georgia, both long believed to be out of reach by Democrats, and even managed to snag that one district in Nebraska.

On the other hand, he lost both Ohio and Florida, both states long considered crucial to win the presidency, lost Texas, which the Democrats were hoping to win, and he still lost that one district up in Maine.

Don't really know if this should really be a good or negative sign for the Democrats going forward, especially with Republicans claiming fraud in some of these states.
We've gained new swing states (Georgia and Arizona), and the old swing states (Florida, Ohio, and Iowa) have probably gone through enough of a demographic shift to make them red states. With manufacturing dead all the union jobs left Ohio, and Cubans seemed to have reached a critical mass in Florida.

In the case of Georgia Atlanta is starting to become an up and coming city, a lot of priced out Californians are moving there. As for Arizona enough retired boomers must have died so that their vote no longer cancels out the Mexicans and College kids.
 
Using Arizona as the example. The first tweet indicates that 44% of the people that had an absentee ballot returned and counted for them never requested, filled out, or returned an absentee ballot. That implies someone voted for them. The 2nd tweet indicates that 50% of the people that did request an absentee ballot, filled it out, and returned it never had it received or counted. I don't know all the factors involved with this poll but Tim Pool is reporting on it, and the guy posting the info is one of the data analysts working for the Trump campaign in one way or another.

The implication is that if this shit is true, Trump really did win by a landslide. I hope I'm being true to the source material because I'm kind of in shock at the moment as to what this means for our elections.

Edit- one of the people tied up in this was an olympic athlete that was training out of state and someone got and absentee ballot and voted as him in his stead. They're claiming to have piles of affidavits. Not saying it's true, just that if it is true, this pretty much means war.
View attachment 1738513
Maybe Tim Pool disagrees but that's not what those numbers say.
This was a random sampling of Republicans that the State says were sent ballots. In each of the four battleground states, 18% - 44% said they were sent absentee ballots despite never requesting them. Of those who did request ballots and then returned them, 20% - 50% are claiming the State never recorded their vote.

Still shady as fuck, especially the second part, but it is not the case that 44% of AZ respondents claim someone cast an absentee ballot in their name.
 
It might be okay in your trailer park, but it's not okay to civilization
I'm going to assume, just based on the 5 pages of this thread I've skimmed, that you are a mentally ill faggot and or tranny. I'm not going to have an internet slapfight with some diseased cocksucker while he jerks his girldick to all the negative attention. I just wanted to stop in and let you know decent people want you dead. Go 41% yourself, you disgusting abomination.
 
I'm going to assume, just based on the 5 pages of this thread I've skimmed, that you are a mentally ill faggot and or tranny. I'm not going to have an internet slapfight with some diseased cocksucker while he jerks his girldick to all the negative attention. I just wanted to stop in and let you know decent people want you dead. Go 41% yourself, you disgusting abomination.
Calm down, little guy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back