Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Stilgar of Troon]

Boxy is indifferent to the Winner sticker, for the reason you mention. He believes, always and by default, he is winning or - after the manifesto, after he owns the libtards on the Internet, etc - he will win. What Boxy needs is the Informative sticker, as in his autistic mind, this reinforces his points and is similiar to a Seal of Approval. Boxy, according to himself, already has the victory. What he needs, though, is the "proof" for spectating eyes to behold.

Remember, this is the faggot who tried to ransom us with 'rate me Informative or no answers for you'. He's not done this with any other sticker rating, as of typing this response. So, take that for what you will.

To be completely fair, all of his posts are informative. Every single one informs us, as readers, that he's a hopeless faggot with a sub-grade school command of English.

 

[L. Duse]

Boxy is indifferent to the Winner sticker, for the reason you mention. He believes, always and by default, he is winning or - after the manifesto, after he owns the libtards on the Internet, etc - he will win. What Boxy needs is the Informative sticker, as in his autistic mind, this reinforces his points and is similiar to a Seal of Approval. Boxy, according to himself, already has the victory. What he needs, though, is the "proof" for spectating eyes to behold.

Remember, this is the faggot who tried to ransom us with 'rate me Informative or no answers for you'. He's not done this with any other sticker rating, as of typing this response. So, take that for what you will.

If he doxes himself or at least give us his name instead of making us call him @BoxerShorts47, I would take him more seriously and I will certainly give him that informative rating.

Imagine going IRL, preaching white nationalism, using Boxershorts47 as an alias, only for people to come across the Twitter account with the same name.

And I tried searching for Boxershorts1 or Boxershorts2 on Twitter. No result. It is not a common username at all especially if you take into account how homoerotic it sounds.

Yet somehow, he claims that Twitter Boxershorts47, a username no one really uses, isn't him.

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

If he doxes himself or at least give us his name instead of making us call him @BoxerShorts47, I would take him more seriously and I will certainly give him that informative rating.

Imagine going IRL, preaching the white nationalism, using Boxershorts47 as an alias, only for people to come across the Twitter account with the same name.

And I tried searching for Boxershorts1 or Boxershorts2 on Twitter. No result. It is not a common username at all especially if you take into account how homoerotic it sounds.

Yet somehow, he claims that Boxershorts47, a username no one really uses, isn't him.

"It is just one big coincidence, I already said that twitter account isn't mine you midwit feminist libtard concern troll."

 

[The Pink Panther]

i hate niggers

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

i hate niggers

Don't hate yourself bby.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Don't hate yourself bby.

Me not hate myself.

Me hate other niggers.

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

Me not hate myself.

Me hate other niggers.

Understandable, have a nice day.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Understandable, have a nice day.

you too

 

[AnOminous]

To be completely fair, all of his posts are informative. Every single one informs us, as readers, that he's a hopeless faggot with a sub-grade school command of English.

I'm pretty sure one fact remains, that if any Kiwi, worth any respect, enters a room with this guy in it, the flip faggot is not leaving that room alive.

 

[Balanced Boomer]

*spergfest right of conquest + wall of text*

I know it's not as glorious as slaughtering red savages and eating turkey to commemorate giving the buffalo people smallpox blankets, but aren't the spics and camel fuckers equally entitled to proclaiming right of conquest via their silent, passive invasion? I mean, you've already conceded that they're winning on that front.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

I'm pretty sure one fact remains, that if any Kiwi, worth any respect, enters a room with this guy in it, the flip faggot is not leaving that room alive.

Flensed, salted and packed in a barrel, guaranteed. Like all pedos should be.

 

[Stardust]

I love how this thread has become, in some ways, a therapy thread.

Feeling depressed? Look here, you're not Boxy. Having a bad day? Come here, dunk on Boxy. Want to see a politically divided community unite for, at least, one thing? It's here, a common disdain for Boxy.

How pathetic a life this Flip faggot has, to simply exist as a cautionary standard for us. "Don't be like Boxy" is, perhaps, the greatest PSA anyone can hear.

 

[draggs]

I'm pretty sure one fact remains, that if any Kiwi, worth any respect, enters a room with this guy in it, the flip faggot is not leaving that room alive.

That fine upstanding Kiwi wouldnt even have to touch him. Good thing too, that's definitely not recommended

Have a nice conversation about his views like here and he'd swallow his tongue

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

Want to see a politically divided community unite for, at least, one thing? It's here, a common disdain for Boxy.

Being politically correct means to acknowledge that @BoxerShorts47 is a colossal faggot and deserves to be deported into a whirlpool while trapped in a fridge full of friend chicken.

 

[Stardust]

Being politically correct means to acknowledge that @BoxerShorts47 is a colossal faggot and deserves to be deported into a whirlpool while trapped in a fridge full of friend chicken.

On the topic of deportation, what country has primary custody? Obviously, nobody wants him, but for speculation's sake:

Boxy admits to being a Jewish Slav, was outed as Hispanic, unintentionally revealed himself as Bosnian, and is highly suspected of being Filipino. If we accept his Ashkenazi Jew proclamation, then we have India or Iran thrown into the [racial] mix.

Every few weeks, Boxy, you keep adding every race to your repertoire - except white.

 

[L. Duse]

You're making up hypoethical situations which are unlikely, so exception, not the rule, to strawman my arguments.. I'm not going to respond to not serious posts.

What a coward using excuses to run away from a debate.

First it is "concern trolling" now it is "strawmans". Maybe you should give us examples on what both mean.

You need a lesson in English. I am not sure what concern trolling means in your head but I know what a strawman or a hypothetical situation is.

That 5 year old getting pregnant did happen. It is not a hypothetical situation. You are making up excuses and running away.

A strawman is a misrepresented argument. You argued for the age of consent to be lowered to 10 or 12. You said that as long as she is sexually mature and can breed and you are married to her with parental consent then you can have sex with her.

A real strawman would be, are you arguing for sex slavery? This is a misrepresentation because you are not arguing for prostitution or slavery.

However, what we are doing is to discuss the implications of your argument. Not strawmanning it.

You said the age of consent should be lowered citing how different girls sexually mature at different ages. Well, you have cases of girls sexually maturing at 5. Would you have sex with that 5 year old then seeing that you are arguing that sexual maturity is what that counts?

age of consent was 10/12 before 1880. So that was the standard age of consent during the America revolution and civil war. Did they have a huge problem with 5 year olds getting pregnant?

Then do you dispute claims by dieticians and experts that girls hit puberty quite late at 13 or 14 during the 1880s? People were more impoverished and undernourished then and so hit puberty later.

And yes, if you say that sexual maturity counts then people in the 1880s were having sex with 12 year old girls who have yet to hit puberty. Is that considered paedophilia? By today's standards, yes.

Right now, girls are hitting puberty at 7 or 8 due to overnutrition especially after 1980. Would you marry and breed with them then? Your scenario of girls sexually maturing earlier in the good old days of the Founding Fathers never really existed. However, they exist now.

Your actual strawman where you misrepresented your own sexual maturity argument by asking, "Did the founding fathers have a problem with 5 year olds getting pregnant?" is now a plausible scenario in this day and age.

Would you do a Delaware and lower the age of consent to 7? Not a strawman. I am following your argument that sexual maturity is what that matters.

https://m.nutritioninsight.com/news/opinion-diet-and-social-stress-factors-the-major-culprits-in-girls-early-puberty.html

Around the 1900s, in the US the average menarche –when a girl gets her first period- was about 14. After the World War 2 the age of puberty was typically at 11-12 years. Especially since the 1980s has the age of puberty fallen and for increasing number of girls is now gradually declined to 7-8. Ever since the turn of the century many environmental, societal and dietary changes are occurring and by the age of 7 girls are starting to develop breasts and the onset of menstruation.

 

[L. Duse]

https://www.medschool.lsuhsc.edu/medical_education/undergraduate/spm/SPM_100/documents/tannerstagescard.pdf

No. V or maybe IV is what I would consider mature.

So you are admitting that not all 12 year olds are sexually mature? When you say I consider IV and V mature, you imply that I, II and III aren't.

Then why lower the age of consent to *have sex* to 12? You want to also have sex with those 12 year olds at Stages I, II and III of puberty and are not sexually mature in your view?

ED: Our leader of the white movement chooses to negrate instead of addressing arguments.

I guess running away, negrating, saying that people with arguments he can't counter are "trolling" or "strawmans" is how he thinks he wins debates.

And he wonders why no one wishes to rate him "informative" and why no one thinks he is winning?

 

[Stardust]

@BoxerShorts47, I'll make you an offer:

Show us your thumb, with confirmable identification, and I will (painstakingly) go back and change all my ratings for your posts to Informative.

But wait, there's more! Alongside rerating you, I will apologize to you.

But wait, there's even more! Alongside rerating you and apologizing, I will change my title to "Boxy's Bitch', if you are indeed white.

You won't though, you wetback wignat. You Jewish jabroni. You Bosnian buffoon. You Slavic sissy. You faggot Flip. You Indo-incel. You Iranian ignoramus. You child-chasing cuck. You moronic mulatto mutt muppet.

 

[Balanced Boomer]

@BoxerShorts47 ey yo rate me mad all you want, but address the question, faggot. Do you recognize the joint wetback/sand-nigger right of conquest of America via passive invasion yes/no?

 

[Stardust]

@BoxerShorts47 ey yo rate me mad all you want, but address the question, faggot. Do you recognize the joint wetback/sand-nigger right of conquest of America via passive invasion yes/no?

He does, and doesn't want it to happen. Boxy insists he is the one to rally to, to save the white race. But, if we grant benefit of the doubt, and believe he'll lead the whites, this is still a really dumb goal:

Boxy demonizes non-whites. Whites vs non-whites racial war occurs. Victorious, whites deport all non-white survivors to countries of origin. Boxy is non-white and must be deported. Boxy, being a race traitor, is now deported where he is ostracized or killed by non-whites. This is assuming he survives his sought race war, which he may, being a coward.

He is so retarded, he's crusading for his own demise. The whites won't want him, and the non-whites will kill him. This is 4D chess on a 145 IQ level, ladies and gentlemen.