2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This "Civil War" they keep sperging about, if they really had any sort of intent to fight in it or any idea of what such a thing would entail, should be the last thing they could possibly want. If infrastructure gets disrupted for even a week, I'd imagine most of them would be sobbing uncontrollably in a corner somewhere because they can't post their 'hot takes' on Twitter anymore. Not to mention I don't see the Tranny Brigade faring well against, well, anyone. Not even an old Fudd with his 30-06. Half of them would probably hang themselves before they saw combat. Do these people genuinely believe that they would find victory or even survive should such a thing happen?

If they had any sense they would be furiously backpedaling to avoid such a result, but they've done so much stupid shit over the Summer that they've proven themselves wrong. All of those "racist, bigoted, homophobic fascist Nazis" they keep claiming are behind every blade of grass sure seem tolerant of retards burning their cities down. If they do manage to piss people off to the point that we reach some kind of "civil war" state of affairs, they most likely won't be alive long enough to understand what went wrong, if they even could.

You're fragile enough that you've "got a bad feeling" and are asking random chucklefucks on Twitter to soothe you, and you think you're going to wage war? Good fucking luck.

I'm just spitballing how easy it would be to disrupt all the shit these types rely on to have their comfy lifestyles, and it's uh... yeah. I mean, Power, Food, Internet, Cell service? They're all fragile as fuck, if there was a real bout of civil unrest. Without knowing enough to think about it too hard, you could take out power for a lot of people by targeting substations and then targeting the repairmen. Cell towers can be jammed, or just destroyed. Food has to go on highways, railways, and ports, and those would be destroyed in the first week or two. Internet... it's trivial to find where the fiber lines are in any area, and destroying them requires a lot of resources to fix.

That's just the easy stuff. Then you can get into the really vile crap like targeting Antifa for "direct action." I mean, even Joggers figured out how to do drive by shootings, and they're fucking stupid.

Meanwhile, the other side has people who break down into tears if you call them by their real pronouns.
 
You're fragile enough that you've "got a bad feeling" and are asking random chucklefucks on Twitter to soothe you, and you think you're going to wage war? Good fucking luck.

excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me, but I'm gonna be the next katniss 360 noscoping voldemort with my make-shift bow (you only need string and wood after all)! take that drumpflets, you're finished!

vacant stare 1600516065627.jpg


lmao.jpg


1604793440373.jpg
 
Because they have the memory span of a fish. Also their version of "democracy" is not conservatives version of "democracy."

And aren't we a federal republic more than a "Democracy?'

From my experience with Lolbertarians they are just liberals who are either

Diddlers or just left wing flexible (they are libs but they want to dabble on meme magic or wants to have guns but would push for gun control.) Basically the Skeptic community on steroids
 
So is Georgia irrelevant now?

Oh apparently the certification for this Friday doesn't mean anything since Trump is still in the 1% margin, he can still request a recount after Friday in Georgia. It'll be done by machine at the request of Donald Trump by Tuesday. The first recount netted 14,000 extra for Trump, with only a 12,284 margin between Biden and Trump. The machine recount will not be paid for by Trump but by Georgian tax payers.

The fight in Georgia isn't over yet LMAO.


"Trump can't ask for a recount because we already had a recount. Neener Neener!"

Why are liberals crying about democracy when they want to abolish the Constitution, take away our guns and believes in socialism? A few weeks ago they hated this country.

They're post-modernists -- that's "Marxism as a religion," if you don't know. They don't believe words have definitions. To them, "crying about democracy" is just them using words as a magic spell to try and gain power over you.

See also: Fascist, Nazi, Racist, Transphobe.

They don't care about Democracy. They don't even believe Democracy is a thing. They only believe in power. Their words are chosen to try and "win" an argument, logic, reasoning, ethics, reality be damned. Because to a post-modernist, them "winning" is the only thing that matters, because it's the only thing that actually exists.
 
How many times can a presidential candidate ask for a recount? Apparently the one that's totes gonna happen is gonna be recount #3. What happens if they just stay stuck in the 1% margin forever?
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Aaa0aaa0
All of this civil war talk is stupid because it'll be like watching fat people riding electric Carts fighting fat whales with blue Mohawks and soyboy numales with Nintendo switches unleashing their soylent Grimmance.

While us autistic retards watch from afar at the shit show.
1605865616610.png
 
I'm just spitballing how easy it would be to disrupt all the shit these types rely on to have their comfy lifestyles, and it's uh... yeah. I mean, Power, Food, Internet, Cell service? They're all fragile as fuck, if there was a real bout of civil unrest. Without knowing enough to think about it too hard, you could take out power for a lot of people by targeting substations and then targeting the repairmen. Cell towers can be jammed, or just destroyed. Food has to go on highways, railways, and ports, and those would be destroyed in the first week or two. Internet... it's trivial to find where the fiber lines are in any area, and destroying them requires a lot of resources to fix.

That's just the easy stuff. Then you can get into the really vile crap like targeting Antifa for "direct action." I mean, even Joggers figured out how to do drive by shootings, and they're fucking stupid.

Meanwhile, the other side has people who break down into tears if you call them by their real pronouns.

If you wanna know how easy it is to fuck this people up, play "workers and resources: soviet republic" for a while and once you have a decent city base try to get a neighborhood to be up to their standards. I fucking dare you. It will give you a decent outlook at the horrors of communism too btw. Great game, catchy as fuck songs, would commit humanitarian disasters again! But point is, yeah the coastal elites really, REALLY don't know just how many failsafes our current infrastructure has and how fucking easy it is to wreck them. There's a reason "mountain people" have always been the best warriors in any given guerrilla outbreak, they can actually live without commodities. Civil Wars are about endurance, you can't win by starting resources alone. Just ask the catalonians how that went for them.

excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me, but I'm gonna be the next katniss 360 noscoping voldemort with my make-shift bow (you only need string and wood after all)! take that drumpflets, you're finished!


Whenever I am dismayed at people thinking the bow would be a good weapon for untrained idiots instead of the obvious choice (spoilers it's the crossbow), I always just take a step back and realice I'm actually glad they're just ruining bows for the rest of us and not putting their filthy paws on the real bae of medieval ranged weaponry. I mean really. Who even cares about bows anyway?

What? Pfff. The british aren't people!

And aren't we a federal republic more than a "Democracy?'

From my experience with Lolbertarians they are just liberals who are either

Diddlers or just left wing flexible (they are libs but they want to dabble on meme magic or wants to have guns but would push for gun control.) Basically the Skeptic community on steroids

Believe it or not the Libertarians were originally an ofshoot of the repubs. Libertarianism is basically just meant to be "I want the state to be as small as logistically viable". Sadly it has since gotten infiltrated. Mostly by neolibs hoping to excuse corporate tyranny and ancoms hoping to gain recruits through very, very poor attempts at dogwhistling.

All of this civil war talk is stupid because it'll be like watching fat people riding electric Carts fighting fat whales with blue Mohawks and soyboy numales with Nintendo switches unleashing their soylent Grimmance.

While us autistic retards watch from afar at the shit show.

I knew Null reminded me of someone!

bismark.jpg
 
View attachment 1738894

This is what I've been worried about for a while. The system in the affected states mixed in the votes and thus made it impossible to pull bad ones out after the fact.

So what remedy can be put in place, exactly? Sending things to the legislature?
That and a couple other things immediately come to mind, they(the SCOTUS) could simply subtract the number of invalidated envelopes from the vote count, since each envelope(s) only has one ballot each, IIRC. Or, maybe, the SCOTUS could just go full fuck-you mode and reset the count to what it was when everyone supposedly was going to bed and would continue the count in the morning. They also could, strictly theoretically speaking here, since there's not enough time now, probably, order a redo of the election in the states that are currently being contested legally. If they did that now, it would probably wind up with a contingent election.
 
Last edited:
How many times can a presidential candidate ask for a recount? Apparently the one that's totes gonna happen is gonna be recount #3. What happens if they just stay stuck in the 1% margin forever?
Until the December 14th deadline. Gore did it in 2000. It was the SC ruling plus the threat of the FL legislature sending in their own slate which ultimately made him fold.

Note also that recounts continued even after the SoS certified the results.
 
How many times can a presidential candidate ask for a recount? Apparently the one that's totes gonna happen is gonna be recount #3. What happens if they just stay stuck in the 1% margin forever?
There is no limit (as far as I know), with not even certification being a hard deadline if the courts order it, but I imagine that each request for a recount comes with diminishing returns- you can only justify having yet another recount so many times. In this case, it should be easily justifiable due to the thin margin and improper conditions of the recount (lack of signature verification and observers not being allocated appropriately), but if the outcome doesn't change even with a proper audit, I doubt Trump's team can go much further (that being said, the odds of Trump legitimately losing any of these 5 states seem pretty low to me, the strongest statistical evidence in my opinion being the bellwether counties).
 
And aren't we a federal republic more than a "Democracy?'

stop being ableist using words they don't understand since they're not used in YA novels.

I'm just spitballing how easy it would be to disrupt all the shit these types rely on to have their comfy lifestyles, and it's uh... yeah.

warrants reposting (take it with a grain as usual)

civil war.jpg
 
Until the December 14th deadline. Gore did it in 2000. It was the SC ruling plus the threat of the FL legislature sending in their own slate which ultimately made him fold.

Note also that recounts continued even after the SoS certified the results.
HAHAHA so it literally doesn't matter that they've been certified, get fucked blackpillers.
 
Most likely since Bolsonairo knows how rigging elections work and will definitely be way more prepared.
Yeah, about that, he denounced the lack of clarity in vote counting despite having won. No one took him seriously because, well, he won fair and square. The only odd thing was that somehow, the Worker's Party candidate Fernando Haddad (who entered the race in the place of former president Lula, who went to jail before the campaigns started and was ineligible by a rule he himself implemented when he was prez) went to the second round against him, despite spending a good portion of the 2018 campaign coasting around 10% of the voting intentions. Then suddenly he rose all the way to second place and had the support of all the major candidates that were left out.

This year we had municipal elections, and moderate candidates won most of the seats, with the Worker's Party losing even more. They're politically done for, actually, but the left itself is far from dead. An even further left-wing party gained about a dozen seats, and they're in the race to snatch the São Paulo mayor house, a very important political stronghold. This, coupled with the fact that most of the candidates Bolsonaro supported lost their respective elections, made some people quite suspect.

Oh, and before leaving Brasília, the Worker's Party spent their tenures stacking our Supreme Court, and they're the ones calling the most important shots here. Bolsonaro doesn't have a majority in either the Congress or the Senate, and the SC is always undoing his amendments and important decisions, and not even the armed forces seem too keen to work with him. His victory is treated as an anomaly that wasn't supposed to happen, and the other spheres of power can and will screw him over if given the opportunity.
 
HAHAHA so it literally doesn't matter that they've been certified, get fucked blackpillers.

Certification was always a matter of measuring the GOP's balls more than anything. Anyone who thought it'd legally matter wasn't paying attention.

That said between all of what the Dems have been recorded doing to those 2 to get their signature, and that now we're hearing they didn't even actually sign and the Dems just ran with it anyway, ironically enough we've gotten far better than we would if they simply didn't sign, because that shit can and will be used in court to prove coercion and lax standards, which is more than enough to cast doubt on the whole election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back