- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
Found on /pol/ - Affidavit of Russell James Ramsland Jr., part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group LLC.
Sizeable if verifiable
2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.
- Thread starter Pickle Dick
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
Found on /pol/ - Affidavit of Russell James Ramsland Jr., part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group LLC.
Sizeable if verifiable
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
In Michigan, perhaps. I don't think it could be used outside of it. Smart money's on the democrats pushing the idiot who made the threats under the bus so as to not implicate anyone higher up.
But on the other, it's yet another on the pile of "this election is super fishy and proper audits are needed."
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
We already got parts posted here by @Gustav Schuchardt but we didn't get the full transcript if I remember correctly, so it's real, and it's happening. And my god I shall repeat a meme 'cause:
I did mean Michigan's part of the election, whatever you americans call that. Either way, my question would be how the fuck they plan on throwing that guy under the bus. I mean, I know they'll try because they always try that, but we saw the SoS threaten them with arresting them too and we got people saying they've been looking into how to take them off the board. So this is clearly an organized effort, I don't really think it can be pushed into a turk head like that anymore.
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
They stopped teaching civics in skewl, a shitload of this information is absolutely new to me.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Remember, everything the left is doing right now is to create a false sense of legitimacy, because everyone, even the left, can look at shit like the 4 AM 136,000 vote drop and knows instinctively, that it's bullshit.
Trump was never supposed to get as far ahead as he did election night. They weren't supposed to have to rig it that much -- or that badly. And he sure as shit wasn't supposed to dispute it or try and look into it.
Yeah the RINOs are coming out but the left is just as fractured right now as the right. There's a feel in the air. Even the local TDS Biden supporters are subdued as fuck when they dismiss the idea of Trump overcoming this.
If he flips a state, all hell is going to break loose.
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
This shit is like watching the Summit War season of One Piece. It's one huge fight with a bunch of moving parts and I have no clue what's going on or who anybody is but the parts with White Beard are pretty badass.
- Joined
- May 27, 2020
Well, it's the middle of the night and I'm bored, so: lecture time
Some of you will know that the terms "Right" and "Left" originate with the French Revolution, with the members of the French parliament having their seating arranged in a manner where the supporters of the monarchy were sitting to the speaker's right and the revolutionaries to his left. Furthermore, some of you may also know that most of this first class of the right ended up having a one-night stand with Madame la Guillotine, and a new group of even more radical leftists came to fill the seats, while the first class of the left became the new right. But what do these terms mean? The manner is often painted as restriction on the Right and freedom on the Left, monarchists and democrats (ideology, not party), or Communism and Fascism. But I think to actually determine what these things are, I should first correct the assumption that Right and Left are anywhere close to a resemblance of reality.
Instead of "Right" and "Left", I posit that the two true political stances are "Conservative" and "Radical". The Conservative is just fine with the way the world is, be that because he is genuinely happy, content in his misery, a "centrist cuck", or simply wants to grill. He may be able to identify things that he wishes were another way, but he is not upset enough about them to do anything. The Radical, on the other hand, is discontent with the state of the world, and is willing to put effort into changing it to align with his desires. Radicals come in all shapes and forms, each trying to pull society as a whole in their chosen direction. For the sake of visual metaphor, imagine our Conservative at the center of a circle of Radicals, each one pulling at a rope around his waist: whoever musters the most strength pulls the Conservative towards him. The Conservative does not like being pulled around, he will grumble and protest, but in the end he settles into his new spot; after all, it's not that different from his old one. Sometimes when this happens, the Radical will be satisfied, contented that he has pulled society to where he wanted it, and settles down, becoming a Conservative himself. On the opposite end, sometimes a Conservative refuses to be moved, and by the shifting of everyone around him, he himself becomes a Radical, of the variant known as "reactionary". He thinks the move was a stupid idea, and thus it should be undone, and applies his efforts towards achieving this end.
So, now that I've laid this out, where do the concepts of "Right" and "Left" fit into this? I think it is a common mistake to say that the Left has changed, that at some point it went from "good" to "bad". Such arguments are, ultimately, subjective, and serve no value in actually understanding the matter. Instead, I suggest we go back as far as possible and find a through-line: the thing that has remained consistent across their entire history.
So, where does the Left begin? I have already brought up the French Revolution, but I think the trend goes back even farther, even without name. It is generally accepted that the American Revolutionaries were to the "Left" of the British Empire, but does it go back even further? For myself and for the sake of brevity, I believe that the genesis of the concept of Left can be found within the Magna Carta, the first time since the Fall of Rome that the power of a king was directly restricted. So, then, from the first blow against monarchy to today's neon-haired Marxists, this motion has been generally described as "Leftward", and from this I think we can finally deduce what the Left is: the destruction of social barriers.
This is the key meme of the Left: to tear down walls set between people. From the barrier between Kings and Peasants, between White and Black, between Men and Women, and between Rich and Poor. This is all the left has ever done, and all it will continue to do. The question of why this meme, among all the vast realms of human thought, has been so successful and long-lived is beyond the scope of what I'm in the mood to write about today, as I don't feel like speculating/getting screeched at about Jews.
With the Left identified then, we move on to the much simpler question of what constitutes the "Right". Simply put, the "Right" is "everyone who is not pulling Left." They are all the same burden to the Left, and so they get lumped in together, and as the Left has moved on its way, more and more groups have split off to become Conservatives and eventually Radicals: constitutional monarchists, republicans (small R), segregationists and the latest break: TERFs. The only distinction the Left makes between any of these groups is if their resistance is passive (Conservative) or active (Radical): Conservatives that grumble but ultimately get in line are simply the "Right", while those that pull against them become "Far Right", "Alt-Right", or the "Basket of Deplorables". Or to put it another way, the "Far Right" consists of those who fear that if the Left keeps kicking down walls, sooner or later the are going to bring the down the whole damned house, and with the rise of what has been dubbed "Bio-Leninism" to the forefront of Leftist thought, we see now that this is not simply a risk, it is the plan. The Left insists that a glorious paradise awaits on the other side of the next wall, while the Far Right tries desperately to get them to stop, and Conservatives wish everyone would just stop screaming for a minute.
Instead of "Right" and "Left", I posit that the two true political stances are "Conservative" and "Radical". The Conservative is just fine with the way the world is, be that because he is genuinely happy, content in his misery, a "centrist cuck", or simply wants to grill. He may be able to identify things that he wishes were another way, but he is not upset enough about them to do anything. The Radical, on the other hand, is discontent with the state of the world, and is willing to put effort into changing it to align with his desires. Radicals come in all shapes and forms, each trying to pull society as a whole in their chosen direction. For the sake of visual metaphor, imagine our Conservative at the center of a circle of Radicals, each one pulling at a rope around his waist: whoever musters the most strength pulls the Conservative towards him. The Conservative does not like being pulled around, he will grumble and protest, but in the end he settles into his new spot; after all, it's not that different from his old one. Sometimes when this happens, the Radical will be satisfied, contented that he has pulled society to where he wanted it, and settles down, becoming a Conservative himself. On the opposite end, sometimes a Conservative refuses to be moved, and by the shifting of everyone around him, he himself becomes a Radical, of the variant known as "reactionary". He thinks the move was a stupid idea, and thus it should be undone, and applies his efforts towards achieving this end.
So, now that I've laid this out, where do the concepts of "Right" and "Left" fit into this? I think it is a common mistake to say that the Left has changed, that at some point it went from "good" to "bad". Such arguments are, ultimately, subjective, and serve no value in actually understanding the matter. Instead, I suggest we go back as far as possible and find a through-line: the thing that has remained consistent across their entire history.
So, where does the Left begin? I have already brought up the French Revolution, but I think the trend goes back even farther, even without name. It is generally accepted that the American Revolutionaries were to the "Left" of the British Empire, but does it go back even further? For myself and for the sake of brevity, I believe that the genesis of the concept of Left can be found within the Magna Carta, the first time since the Fall of Rome that the power of a king was directly restricted. So, then, from the first blow against monarchy to today's neon-haired Marxists, this motion has been generally described as "Leftward", and from this I think we can finally deduce what the Left is: the destruction of social barriers.
This is the key meme of the Left: to tear down walls set between people. From the barrier between Kings and Peasants, between White and Black, between Men and Women, and between Rich and Poor. This is all the left has ever done, and all it will continue to do. The question of why this meme, among all the vast realms of human thought, has been so successful and long-lived is beyond the scope of what I'm in the mood to write about today, as I don't feel like speculating/getting screeched at about Jews.
With the Left identified then, we move on to the much simpler question of what constitutes the "Right". Simply put, the "Right" is "everyone who is not pulling Left." They are all the same burden to the Left, and so they get lumped in together, and as the Left has moved on its way, more and more groups have split off to become Conservatives and eventually Radicals: constitutional monarchists, republicans (small R), segregationists and the latest break: TERFs. The only distinction the Left makes between any of these groups is if their resistance is passive (Conservative) or active (Radical): Conservatives that grumble but ultimately get in line are simply the "Right", while those that pull against them become "Far Right", "Alt-Right", or the "Basket of Deplorables". Or to put it another way, the "Far Right" consists of those who fear that if the Left keeps kicking down walls, sooner or later the are going to bring the down the whole damned house, and with the rise of what has been dubbed "Bio-Leninism" to the forefront of Leftist thought, we see now that this is not simply a risk, it is the plan. The Left insists that a glorious paradise awaits on the other side of the next wall, while the Far Right tries desperately to get them to stop, and Conservatives wish everyone would just stop screaming for a minute.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
The fucking dominion voting machines were reporting FRACTIONS of a vote?
"15.93 votes for Biden?"
How the fuck wasn't that caught earlier?
"Yeah we'll give Trump 53/100ths of a vote and Biden 47/100ths of one. That's fair right?"
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
Semi-related: Wano is everything wrong with current era One Piece. Its Marineford but really awful IMO.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
As the affidavid (and Gustav's transcrip) explain it, it's because Dominion has a function to insert blank votes to be "write ins" later. Then you can at any point go and tell Dominon the percentage of Write Ins going to each candidate and it will calculate how much TV each gets by this by dividing the number of write ins by your percentage.
Issue with that is, if you gave it a percentage that results in votes being broken, since the algorithm only cares about TV matching % of vote, it will go ahead and fraction votes like that as a result.
In other words, this can only happen if voting fraud is involved. And also the guy that coded that part of Dominion was thankfully a fucking idiot. Yeah I think we can go ahead and stop saying "they're not sending their bets" 'cause they actually are it's just that their best isn't very good.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
The fact that they openly have a feature that is basically "Press button: Rig Election" is amazing to me on so many levels.
Of course, it's used in every swing state that the blue team might need to rig and no one of import caught it until it was "too late," so...
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
I'd be even more grateful if the relevant people actually gave a shit that Dominion defrauds the vote out the ass, but they're the ones who implemented it in the first place.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
This has to be a factor.
Since everything is going to be just dandy now under Kweenie Kamala, viewership will tank harder than Bernie did post-super Tuesday.
What are they going to talk about now?
- Wu flu? Even neoliberals are getting tired of lockdowns, and they're usually the biggest cucks for following what the TV says.
- Ex-President Trump? No one who still watches TV will care following Jan 22 unless CNN wants to resort to reporting about Twitter spergs demanding he be locked up or some shit.
- Riots that will inevitably happen every time a jogger loses his sneakers? Such things will never ackshually happen under the Kween's watch, so you can't report that either.
- Dicksuck the Harris administration? Nobody watches the news for positive coverage. Even airports would change the channel.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
Ethnic Germans angry at a corrupt political establishment? This can only end well.
Taco
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
They did a manual audit of every paper ballot. So if there was some machine switching votes from Trump to Biden it would have been completely obvious. It wasn't there.
The people overseeing Georgia elections at a state level would definitely not roll over if they thought there was actual widespread Democratic fraud. The secretary of state ran on a platform of voter ID laws and the governer purged almost 2 million names from GA voter registration rolls when he was secretary of state most of which were in blue districts and accused the Georgia DNC of attempted election cybercrime less than a month ago before it was explained that what he thought was a cyber attack was a planned security test by his own election staff. They would both love nothing more than for some widespread voter fraud to be discovered because it would significantly advance both of their agendas related to future election laws they want enacted and the fact they aren't jumping on the current election fraud claims says a lot.
The fact is people are actually looking at all these claims of voter fraud and none of it is coming up with evidence of the widespread fraud scheme Trump is claiming. That's why he's getting blown out in court 47 loses and one win and the one win was just letting the poll watchers stand slightly closer to the area the ballots were being counted (the distance was previously increased due to covid).
The one actual fraud case found was in a local race in LA. They blew that wide open before the voting even started so none of the actual fraudulent ballots were ever even submitted. The other outlier is one election in Nevada for a county commissioner seat or something where they are voting again but after the recount it was within 10 votes and they had under 0.1% of ballots they couldn't validate because of mostly mundane stuff like damage or signature issues.
It's whatever. I hate Trump and Biden but clearly some people borderline worship politicians these days and refuse to believe Trump or Hillary could just lose an election for being generally unlikable to the majority of Americans. I see people in here having wild fantasies that some massive voter fraud is about to be uncovered or even that Trump will "go nuclear" and somehow circumvent the vote and get some supreme Court victory or rogue state legislators will hand him electors. It's just not going to happen guys. If there was any evidence of fraud that could flip GA to Trump the people in charge of looking into it would be all over it because it would basically guarantee they win the 2 Senate runoffs as well. Up in PA they are suing blue districts for a insignificant percentage of ballot discrepancies trying to get the entire pool thrown out while ignoring red districts they won with a higher percentage of ballot discrepancies and their case is falling apart while they are down by about 80k votes. In Wisconsin they are hoping to close a 20k vote margin in a recount. To actually won they'd need literally everything to go perfect from here on out and it's just not going to happen.
I know some of you guys aren't trying to hear this and some of you will still claim fraud for the next four years like the most idiotic Hillary shills did but this election is over. No courts or state legislatures are going to throw out hundreds of thousands of votes across 3+ states and there is no secret German server with all the Trump votes on it. The only way Trump stays in office is a legit "fuck you I'm calling on the military to keep me on as president even though I lost the election" style coup and if that's what you're calling for good luck with that.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Yawn. More "cope cope cope" bullshit.
So the Dominion numbers in MI obviously had the RCV rigging algorithm enabled. I wonder if the logs from WI/PA/GA/AZ/NV all show the same percentage-of-a-vote red flag?
So the Dominion numbers in MI obviously had the RCV rigging algorithm enabled. I wonder if the logs from WI/PA/GA/AZ/NV all show the same percentage-of-a-vote red flag?
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
Wait, the president can just randomly proscribe entire organisations with the insurrection act at will? How the hell did the US stay a Republic for so long?
And once they've lost track of what anything means, they can convince themselves that getting a senile old neolib who will screw over anyone who isn't in the top 0.1% (or happens to have the prerequisites for teaching critical theory) into office is "winning".
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
This election is literally straight from the fucking third-world, and if this isn't resolved peacefully, it will be followed eventually by third-world violence. Kinda paraphrasing Razorfist here a bit, but when the contrarian hipster asshole is right, he's right. A lot more than Trump's second term is on the line here, which is why this fraud being stopped is so very important.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
You'd be surprised how often you'll find functions on government programs that are obviously meant to subvert proper proceedure. They usually have an excuse, in this I believe the excuse they use is that it's meant to be used for when pre-counted ballot boxes come from other circumscriptions, for the one putting the votes together to simply add in votes and percentages and be done with it. Of course the excuse is thinly veiled as fuck, specially since he could just use Excel Spreadsheets for that, but they usually are.
First thing this happened to me was with the Bolsas de Empleo. I think the translation for that is Employment Exchange but I'm not sure. Basically the way public organisms hire people.
Typically, when a new kind of employee is set, a basic set of parameters are added to note what profiles we want to get employed there. Like, if it's the informatics department, we want a programming background, medics want a medical background, optometrists require a career in said field, etc. These profiles can be permanently altered if, say, we get new machines that require said employees to have a better background on that field.
As you can imagine, the public sector here in spain looks at the exchange, grades people through a program, then adds that to an entrance exam, and chooses automatically who gets in and who doesn't.
Right well, fun fact. There's another function. One that changes the requirements ONLY FOR ONE ROUND. As in, "we're gonna require employees of this kind to have this type of degree, but only for this year, and go back to normal later." As you can imagine... This is some grade A bollocks that allows the ones using the program to just fucking rig it and get their friends chosen that way. You'd think then that this is some kinda nuclear option that would result in hardcore investigations if found to be used.
NOPE! After a scandal where directives were found to be using it for obvious corruption the government simply made it so now all functions related to employment are overseen by a board of unioners made up of the unions that cover the specific organism (with power based on number of affiliates each one has) and they get to choose it instead.
And yes, this indeed results on the unions having a reunion once a year to decide what changes they'll be making for this year with that program. Where they recieve the profiles the directives want to alter and how and vote on wether or not they pass it. And yes, that reunion might as well be called "the yearly round of plug ins."
That said, in some weird ass backwards way it kinda works. Because the requirement to change a profile is high enough that it's pretty hard for the directives to owe favors to THAT many people on organisms with a healthy amount of different unions, so typically the "favors owed" in exchange are shit the unions have been saying should be done forever, which is to say ways to clean up other corrupt nonesense and fix some very glaring issues with our current infrastructure. So in a way it kinda fixes more than it breaks.
But still, when I learned that not only was that function available, and not only had it been used to plug in friends but also kick out people the directives didn't want, and indeed not only did everyone know it was being used that way, but they were in on it. Yeah that's the point at which I realiced holy fuck you can't trust no one even related to the government in any way. I mean, I know at least some of them are honest, and try to fight it. But they are the extreme minority I can tell you that for a fact, and the tools they used are rigged to the point where even the honest ones sooner or later will have to start playing the favor game if they want anything fixed.
Never trust anyone who claims his organization, be it public or private, is 100% clean. 'Cause either they're lying, or they're delusional. I was honestly not surprised Dominion had those kind of functions inserted, I'm just surprised they were blatant enough to get caught like this.
Typically, when a new kind of employee is set, a basic set of parameters are added to note what profiles we want to get employed there. Like, if it's the informatics department, we want a programming background, medics want a medical background, optometrists require a career in said field, etc. These profiles can be permanently altered if, say, we get new machines that require said employees to have a better background on that field.
As you can imagine, the public sector here in spain looks at the exchange, grades people through a program, then adds that to an entrance exam, and chooses automatically who gets in and who doesn't.
Right well, fun fact. There's another function. One that changes the requirements ONLY FOR ONE ROUND. As in, "we're gonna require employees of this kind to have this type of degree, but only for this year, and go back to normal later." As you can imagine... This is some grade A bollocks that allows the ones using the program to just fucking rig it and get their friends chosen that way. You'd think then that this is some kinda nuclear option that would result in hardcore investigations if found to be used.
NOPE! After a scandal where directives were found to be using it for obvious corruption the government simply made it so now all functions related to employment are overseen by a board of unioners made up of the unions that cover the specific organism (with power based on number of affiliates each one has) and they get to choose it instead.
And yes, this indeed results on the unions having a reunion once a year to decide what changes they'll be making for this year with that program. Where they recieve the profiles the directives want to alter and how and vote on wether or not they pass it. And yes, that reunion might as well be called "the yearly round of plug ins."
That said, in some weird ass backwards way it kinda works. Because the requirement to change a profile is high enough that it's pretty hard for the directives to owe favors to THAT many people on organisms with a healthy amount of different unions, so typically the "favors owed" in exchange are shit the unions have been saying should be done forever, which is to say ways to clean up other corrupt nonesense and fix some very glaring issues with our current infrastructure. So in a way it kinda fixes more than it breaks.
But still, when I learned that not only was that function available, and not only had it been used to plug in friends but also kick out people the directives didn't want, and indeed not only did everyone know it was being used that way, but they were in on it. Yeah that's the point at which I realiced holy fuck you can't trust no one even related to the government in any way. I mean, I know at least some of them are honest, and try to fight it. But they are the extreme minority I can tell you that for a fact, and the tools they used are rigged to the point where even the honest ones sooner or later will have to start playing the favor game if they want anything fixed.
Never trust anyone who claims his organization, be it public or private, is 100% clean. 'Cause either they're lying, or they're delusional. I was honestly not surprised Dominion had those kind of functions inserted, I'm just surprised they were blatant enough to get caught like this.
- Joined
- May 27, 2020
According to the article that was linked, all restrictions on the usage of the Insurrection Act were removed in 2006, because somebody thought that was a good idea. As for the bigger picture, the notion of "fuck you, I'm the government" began either with the Civil War or the New Deal, depending on who you ask, and somehow it has generally restrained itself from exercising this power too blatantly.
- Status