Callum Nathan Thomas Edmunds / MauLer93 / MauLer and the EFAPshere - Objective discussion about not-Channel Awesome featuring Rags, Southpaw and more!

  • Thread starter Thread starter LN 910
  • Start date Start date

Are MauLer's videos too long?

  • Yes

    Votes: 186 13.0%

  • No

    Votes: 389 27.2%

  • Fuck YES

    Votes: 853 59.7%
  • Total voters
    1,428
In other news, right now MauLer is gloating over the Chipman/Ellis twitter spat.
Capture.PNG

Capture 2.PNG
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Peach Pit, Scarface1, ChevroletBlackboard and 3 others
biscuitscilia said:
I dunno, if that was true he would've gotten rid of Rags by now.
Click to expand...
I had this dumb theory in my head due to Jay and part of the fandom turning on Rags, that it's not outside of the realm of possibility for Mauler's core audience to take a sharp turn left. Annoying the channel's more widespread audience and the 'Fandom Menace' creators in the process.

PenguinSuitAlice said:
In other news, right now MauLer is gloating over the Chipman/Ellis twitter spat.

View attachment 1726735
Click to expand...
Weird that shoe doesn't have him blocked.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: biscuitscilia
Shieldman said:
I had this dumb theory in my head due to Jay and part of the fandom turning on Rags, that it's not outside of the realm of possibility for Mauler's core audience to take a sharp turn left. Annoying the channel's more widespread audience and the 'Fandom Menace' creators in the process.


Weird that shoe doesn't have him blocked.
Click to expand...
I don't think mauler himself is egregiously offensive. He's just an irritating bit of grit, about which a lolpearl has formed.

But then, I've been considering MovieBob for the last few days so maybe my view is skewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peach Pit, PenguinSuitAlice and 6thRanger
biscuitscilia said:
I dunno, if that was true he would've gotten rid of Rags by now.
Click to expand...
Rags is double edge weapon , the fanbase loves it when he is a dick to the right people/things but hates him when he is a dick to the wrong people/things.
That's why i doubt they're going to get rid of him , sure he'll fuck up and be bitchy about avatar but everything will be ok when he does that for TLOU2 or the boys
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 6thRanger, Draza, ωσкє вℓυє мυѕℓιм qυєєη and 1 other person
Redlettermedia made a recent video on The Boys Season 2, and had a positive opinion on it. Considering EFAP's opinion on it, I wonder how they will react to their idols dissappointing them again. However it should be noted that they haven't talked about the Boys in a while or done an actual EFAP on positive review yet. But they just dug up TLOU2 again last EFAP so who knows?
 
PenguinSuitAlice said:
Redlettermedia made a recent video on The Boys Season 2, and had a positive opinion on it. Considering EFAP's opinion on it, I wonder how they will react to their idols dissappointing them again. However it should be noted that they haven't talked about the Boys in a while or done an actual EFAP on positive review yet. But they just dug up TLOU2 again last EFAP so who knows?
Click to expand...
After watching it, it's probably very likely they might cover it on EFAP. Both Rich and Jay like and praise the stuff they don't like, it's a fairly short video, and considering what happened with RobotHead, some EFAP fans are definitely going to think it exposes Jay and Rich as hacks (for real, this time) and that they should "know better." IIRC, didn't Mauler say they're planning on doing an EFAP on Plinkett's prequel videos?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PenguinSuitAlice
biscuitscilia said:
After watching it, it's probably very likely they might cover it on EFAP. Both Rich and Jay like and praise the stuff they don't like, it's a fairly short video, and considering what happened with RobotHead, some EFAP fans are definitely going to think it exposes Jay and Rich as hacks (for real, this time) and that they should "know better." IIRC, didn't Mauler say they're planning on doing an EFAP on Plinkett's prequel videos?
Click to expand...
The main aspects that Jay and Rich seem to like about it is the black comedy aspect and Homelander. From what I can remember, MauLer and co. do not seem to regard the comedy aspect of The Boys to be important.
 
PenguinSuitAlice said:
The main aspects that Jay and Rich seem to like about it is the black comedy aspect and Homelander. From what I can remember, MauLer and co. do not seem to regard the comedy aspect of The Boys to be important.
Click to expand...
It's only one of the main reasons why this show is popular so of course they don't care about it.
You can't objectively measure humor and the gay furry doesn't find it funny so it's not important.

Also, Rich and Jay are nerds who want to enjoy media.
EFAP are a bunch of autists who feel the constant need to be correct about everything.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chaosbandit, Lensherr, Korpon and 3 others
Idiotron said:
You can't objectively measure humor
Click to expand...

True, but that didn't stop Fringy (and I think also Mauler) from trying to argue that Bojack Horseman wasn't funny. I remember them saying the show wasn't funny, then described the types of jokes in the show, but never actually argued *why* it wasn't funny. It's weird 'cause Mauler got pissy at Joseph Anderson for saying Soma wasn't scary, I guess it's okay when it's media you don't like?
 
OTView said:
True, but that didn't stop Fringy (and I think also Mauler) from trying to argue that Bojack Horseman wasn't funny. I remember them saying the show wasn't funny, then described the types of jokes in the show, but never actually argued *why* it wasn't funny. It's weird 'cause Mauler got pissy at Joseph Anderson for saying Soma wasn't scary, I guess it's okay when it's media you don't like?
Click to expand...
If I can remember correctly, MauLer also finds Aqua Teen Hunger Force unfunny. However I could be wrong. It could have been Fringy or Rags that said that.
 
Forgot to post this, or watch it. New EFAP. Seems they are jumping on the fact that Bob Chipman is relevant again. I'll watch it later.
Edit: They are going on a stupidly long tangent about sexual relationships because of an idiotic joke Chipman made and it just won't end.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back