2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The site is being strange with me right now (using Tor), so my apologies if this has already been posted:

It appears that Tucker Carlson flat out lied last night on his show. Powell did email a previously unrevealed affidavit to him in response to his demands for more evidence.

video related:

Very stupid move on her part if true. But it does essentially confirm Tucker is controlled opposition and pozzed as fuck.

Also, if the reason you think the site is weird for you right now is 'cause you can't hand out any stickers, don't worry, we can't either, seems Null's having issues.

EDIT:

I cannot like due to weird internet, so I will say it here

See? Yeah noone can right now, IT thread was already warned, it ain't user issues it's server issues.
 
I understand and appreciate your thoughtful points detailing the legal hurdles to achieve their marxist evil goals, but all of your points hinge upon the "law" being upheld and enforced. I would say the current events are demonstrating the law is only as good as who will actually enforce it and the bias of individual political judges can very easily disregard the law. I am not as optimistic as you are on this.
Barack Obama's administration has ignored more laws and constitutional rights than any previous administration in our history, and even they couldn't ignore being repeatedly shut down by the courts (and it happened a lot). I think the actual Democratic elite won't be so blatant in trying to ignore the laws as the marxists, since there power also relies on those laws and courts being in place. The marxists will be emboldened and keep pushing this, and they'll really be a problem in the next twenty years when the old Democrats are gone and are replaced by the woketards. Realistically, the DNC will probably push censorship and anti-hate speech through Big Tech, because they're not subject to the Bill of Rights like the government is. They are, however, subject to Congress's enumerated Commerce Clause powers, especially as they're currently defined, and that will very likely bite them in the ass IF the GOP ever choose to seriously go after them. I am worried about Section 230 and the Democrats' plans for it, but any realistic attempt to enact hate speech laws will very likely be challenged by decades of first amendment cases that have pushed for the exact opposite.
 
I beg to differ. Consider how many bogus narratives persist to this day:
  • Columbus proved the world was round in a time when everyone thought the earth was flat
  • Abraham Lincoln wasn't racist
  • The Germans were solely at fault for WW1
  • Joe McCarthy went after Hollywood commies who dindu nuffin because he was a big poopyhead meanie
  • Drumpf called white supremacists "very fine people" and colluded with Russia
  • Not sure what retard school you went to but the prevailing narrative is Columbus thought he would hit Asia and the educated class thought the world was round.
  • By the standards of the 1860s yes, Abraham Lincoln wasn't racist. Greek's thought ducks came from leaves (or some sort of similar shit that would sound ridiculous today). There is something called context.
  • Again, this is bullshit. I don't know why you believe this to be a persistent narrative as I almost always hear "Germans were unfairly blamed for WWI which led to animosity that resulted in WWII"
  • Yes, hollywood pushes this one a lot. Does anyone not grasping at straws really give a shit about McCarthyism?
  • The modern media is full of idiots that are routinely mocked and even in their own bullshit polling nobody trusts them. I think you overestimate the influence of an industry mainly consumed by boomers in their 60s. Its very likely their ratings collapse after this, that shit was already dying pre-trump.
And you use the term "conspiracy"; well, I know it's your attempt at a thought-terminating cliche, but you're not technically wrong. All you need for a "conspiracy" is: two or more parties, working in tandem, to do something illegal or illicit. That is not a high hurdle.
Or maybe Trump lost due to mail in votes being counted after all other votes like in each swing state do to election law changes and the amount of fraud is minor at most? But nooooooo, can't deviate from the narrative of my hugbox!
 
The site is being strange with me right now (using Tor), so my apologies if this has already been posted:

It appears that Tucker Carlson flat out lied last night on his show. Powell did email a previously unrevealed affidavit to him in response to his demands for more evidence.

video related:
Tucker is really digging himself a hole here, huh? Perhaps someone higher up at FOX told him to get along with it and he did. I see why @deeplyhigh changed her profile to Alex Jones. At least he has balls and has nothing to lose.
 
I see your point. I am still trying to figure out everything myself.

From a demographics perspective, let’s leave fraud out for a second, I cannot see the Dems lasting. Biden feels like a Dubya to me, a man who likely should have never won and because he won the party he was affiliated with became the laughing stock of politics for years on end. The problem with the Dems is the question, “what is next?” Their only goal was beat Trump, now that that is over, how the hell are they going to keep this party together? The Dem party is comprised of two generations at the moment, maybe three if you include Silent. The main two generations have like nothing in common other than TDS. Older Dems have made Obama their Reagan and seem heavily reluctant to leave that era while Millenials are going insane with absurdist policies. Living in the past and demanding huge change fundamentally do not go together. Old Dems love Joe, Pete, Kamala, and other new-Libs while the new ones call them shills, they cannot be more different. Once again, taking out fraud, I cannot see a lasting Dem party, the groups are too different to last both support and law maker wise.

Now with fraud, I have no idea? They may get away with it this time, which terrifies me, but I do feel that at some point it will get called out. Now of course this will not be peaceful. I expect Proud Boys to go to war if they pull this garbage in 24. Hell, I expect radical Dems to try to assassinate their masters if they pull another Bernie, as they are fully willing to go ape-sh@t if necessary. If fraud is in play, I will be optimistic and say it will be resolved, but it will not be a pretty resolve and we are likely taking a 1/2 decade work towards restoring order to a full or longer, which, God Damn! I have no idea what the future is, and I really just want to be off this roller coaster. This ride has pretty much ruined most of my “greatest years” being high school and college, and I am kinda grasping to find anything good. I still have hope, even for Dems, as I do believe their are sensible ones (more than Kiwis give credit to), but this situation is bad. My hope is that enough jump on board this anti-establishment train to end this, but with the media machine being, well itself, and nostalgia holding many back, it will be difficult.
lmao read what you said dude. Civil War? Open street battles? And no, a bunch of fucking hooligans on both sides punching each other doesn't count as a street battle or going to war. The fucking French are dealing with armed ethnic gangs having running street battles in full on military kit. What we've got are discontent riots at best. People start going to the street to go to war and they'll be curbstomped so hard and fast you'd think they were reenacting the Gulf Wars. There will be no armed uprising because as long as the institutions themselves are still in place it will be child's play to quash both the dissident right and the dissident left. Go look up the days of rage. Go look up the years of lead. That kind of shit neither fixes things in their sides favor or results in institutional change.

Do read what you're saying. You keep having to lean back on "barring fraud" or "if fraud is in play" as if those are even questions. Yes, regardless of the outcome here fraud will exist. To be more accurate, rigging will continue to exist. You keep trying to put through this narrative that surely the Democrats will implode soon. Have you not witnessed the last two Democrat Presidential Primaries? What are those progressive cucks going to do? They've literally watched their controlled opposition of a candidate get cucked by the institutional Democrat apparatchik bulls who fuck their policies like a cheap whore. After watching that show twice, how do they act? How have they responded to that?
ok-boomer-biden-political-cartoon.png


They responded like the absolute cucks they are. Don't look for them to overturn the system. Can't be the eternal underdog if you get to bang the hot chick in the end. They'll do nothing. The days of rage did nothing except ensure that the neoliberals controlled the party.

You are living on pure cope. I mean look at this shit:

If fraud is in play, I will be optimistic and say it will be resolved, but it will not be a pretty resolve and we are likely taking a 1/2 decade work towards restoring order to a full or longer, which, God Damn! I have no idea what the future is, and I really just want to be off this roller coaster.
pepe.jpg


How are you not embarrassed to post this? You're like one step off from the Q Boomers who believe in "Trust the Plan!" and that Jesus is gonna descend to save us from the communists. Seriously, stop making predictions based off of baseless hope. It's not healthy. That much copium can kill.
 
Very stupid move on her part if true. But it does essentially confirm Tucker is controlled opposition and pozzed as fuck.

Also, if the reason you think the site is weird for you right now is 'cause you can't hand out any stickers, don't worry, we can't either, seems Null's having issues.
Thank you! I didn't know if that was the extent of the weirdness or not.

And on publicizing the new affidavit, the big thing preventing the release of all of the sworn statements is that the people giving those statements almost always do it under legal confidentiality so as not to suffer blowback before the trial starts.

Apparently they got another witness to waive their confidentiality to present their sworn testimony to the public. So, sending the information to A big """Conservative""" Talk show would be a big splash. Powell lost nothing by doing this.
 
Or maybe Trump lost due to mail in votes being counted after all other votes like in each swing state do to election law changes and the amount of fraud is minor at most? But nooooooo, can't deviate from the narrative of my hugbox!
"We're not gonna call the election even though we're at 99.9% of precincts reporting and Drumpf is ahead....

Oh look! Tens of thousands of mail-in ballots were found in a porta-shitter tank, and every last one of them went for Biden! Oh look. 40,000 more were found in a Uhaul, all for Biden! Oh, wowee, 100,000 more appeared at 4am, again all for Biden! With no down-ballot votes! What a cowinky-derka-derpa-ding-dong-dink! This Is What Democracy Looks Like™️!"
 
Last edited:

McEnany is being asked about the meeting Trump is having with the Michigan Law Makers.

As you would expect she's constantly being asked why Trump will concede. She's saying litigation is still going on.
I notice the press pool is even smaller and the usual suspects are not there. They are really giving the illusion Trump is done and want to move onto whatever mouthpiece the Bidens put up. Plus Kayla has great finesse to fighting with these scum compared to Sarah Sanders or Sean Spicer.
 
PA legislature passed a resolution to begin an audit of the election; https://www.post-gazette.com/news/p...r-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148

I'll C&P the article here if that's allowed:

Divided Pennsylvania House gives approval for audit of 2020 election​


Ford Turner The (Allentown, Pa.) Morning Call

4-5 minutes




HARRISBURG — A deeply divided state House on Thursday voted to approve a Republican-sponsored measure that sets up a near-immediate audit of the 2020 election, citing inconsistencies and confusion in the electorate as evidence the process must be improved for future elections in the state.
The chamber voted 112 to 90 for a resolution that told the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee, or a contractor it will hire, to conduct the audit and report back by early February.
Republicans argued they were responding to constituents who were confused by some of the procedures as the state conducted a high-turnout election during a pandemic and under greatly expanded mail-in voting eligibility.
Democratic arguments that the measure should be revised or was unconstitutional were defeated by the GOP majority.

“There is no need to fear this audit. I welcome it. We all should welcome it, to find out what went right and what went wrong,” said Bedford County Rep. Jesse Topper, the prime sponsor of the resolution.
The resolution does not require approval by Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf or the state Senate. There is no limit on how much the committee can spend on the study.
Separately, the Department of State plans another “risk limiting” audit under a pilot program to apply statistical tools that will measure the election’s accuracy and check for possible interference.
This second audit is to involve data from every county.
Democrats attacked the proposal, calling it unconstitutional, damaging to democracy and unnecessary.
Mr. Wolf issued a written statement by email during the debate, saying any audit done by this approach would be “incomplete, duplicative and unreliable.”
The committee is expected to generate a report that is to include, for each county and for the state as a whole:

• For both absentee and mail-in ballots, the number of applications received, the number that were approved by the county board of elections, and the number returned by voters that were subsequently canvassed.
• The number of qualified voters who used provisional ballots.
• The number of applications for absentee ballots from people who were not registered to vote, but subsequently did submit a voter registration application in time for the election — and the same information concerning mail-in ballots.
• For each county, the date and time that the county board of elections began pre-canvassing absentee ballots and mail-in ballots.
Reviews of incidents with voting machines; of “any inconsistent treatment” of mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day; of any inconsistencies in the way counties processed “deficient” ballots; and of access given to poll watchers and “authorized representatives.”
The House vote came the day after its State Government Committee approved the resolution in a party-line vote.
Mr. Topper, State Government Committee interim Chairman Seth Grove and other Republicans said the need for the audit was not suspected fraud but a widespread uncertainty that the election had been conducted fairly and in even-handed fashion across the state.
The resolution cites as a reason for the audit a “litany of inconsistencies” in the way the election was carried out and a resulting loss of public confidence. It says “Pennsylvania citizens have questioned the process by which the 2020 general election has been conducted.”
Mr. Topper noted that within his own district, one county allowed certain ballots to be “cured” — or have procedural mistakes corrected — while another did not.
“That’s not fraud, but that’s confusion in the district that I represent,” Mr. Topper said.
The Associated Press contributed.

First Published November 19, 2020, 8:09pm
 
Last edited:
Looks like the clown the Trump campaign are rolling out with an affidavit about 'election fraud in Venezuela' is a Leamsy Salazar. Salazar is a CIA spy who is suspected of being involved in the poisoning of Hugo Chavez, for whom he acted as a bodyguard.
Lmao as soon as they came out with the Chavez shit I knew their source would be fuckin CIA. They need new material, surely they wore out 'pinning your own election interference on the commies' at least a generation ago.
 
Here is some more autistic data analysis for the four states, This is a graph that charts the % of total vote, and the percent of how much each batch favours candidate.

Wisconsin.jpg

if the Blue balls are below 50% the votes favour Trump, if they are above the dashed line, they favour Biden.

When the election ended, (and it did) you can see how the votes were distributed, big circles represent the cities, they are above the dashed lines, Biden got more big circles, Trump got the rural areas, smaller circles, PAY ATTENTION TO THE SMALLER CIRCLES they will come later, a swarm of smaller circles in a very linear pattern, represent the smaller cities Trump won.

Trump won Wisconsin by a large difference.

After 90%¨of the votes were counted, Biden recieved A gigantic ammount of votes, in a margin that wasn't found in any precinct in the state, right after you see what happened, the votes for Trump were LOCKED, they simply didn't appear anymore after 90%, you would think this is a coincidence except it happens in even more blatant ways in the other states.

not only they were locked at the 50% margin, you can see a very strange linear pattern on Trumps votes starting from the 70% mark.

now for the real fun, lets look at the distribution in PA.

Pennisylvania.jpg

look at the chaotic distribution of votes right before they stopped the count and look at what happens to the Trump votes, not only they lock to a line again, (compared to Bidens chaotic dumps) but they also get progressively skewered towards EXACTLY 50% Trump recieved no batches after 6. NOV where he won, Biden won 100% of the batches after that.

You see not only Biden is winning gigantic dumps of votes, but also Trumps votes are being actively locked AND CORRECTED.

Look at Georgia

Georgia.jpg

You can point exaclty where Trumps votes margins are fucking locked to a line, (remember the more downards the balls the bigger the margins for Trump, they are LOCKED) but also they are being skewered to a neutral margin where it nets ZERO votes for him (50% mark).

Michigan
Michigan.jpg

Look at the line of Trumps votes being formed, look at it being switched ALL the way over 50%, compare to Bidens votes and how chaotic they are, look at the post midinight dump they gave Biden to make him close the gap it wasn't enough,

the above makes us reach the final conclusions:

1- The share of Trumps votes are being artificially limited, and followed a locked linear pattern that got progressively skewered towards Biden in each of these states.

in an untampered election, Trumps votes would appear in a random chaotic pattern, its highly indicative that:

a- there is a way to discriminate which candidate is recieving votes and to change that share, by limiting it and skewering it to another candidade

b- this is highly indicative of a computer aided operation, since these corrections would be extremelly difficult to do in a ballot per ballot basis manually, most probably, an vote wheighting algorithm was clearly used.




2- Biden got massive dumps of votes that highly suprass his biggest vote margins in any county, and it wasn't enought to guarantee a win over Trumps margins.

Mail-in ballots schemes and voter fraud would be able to generate this number of excess ballots, however they were not enough to skew the margins towards a Biden win.

Not only votes were being generated to Biden but the biggest contributor to these margins are not the magic ballots 96% for Bidden, the limiting of the share of the votes that happened to Trump were the most crucial fator in changing the election patterns in these states, Trump probably won in a landslide, and the tampering was most probably made by a machine calculation, not low level voter fraud, even is massive dumps Biden would not have won these states had Trumps votes not being actively limited and skewered towards him.
 
Last edited:
They are, however, subject to Congress's enumerated Commerce Clause powers, especially as they're currently defined, and that will very likely bite them in the ass IF the GOP ever choose to seriously go after them.
Never bet on congressional Republicans to grow a sack and save us. They haven't yet. They won't if this garbage that big tech is currently pulling is allowed to fly.
 
  • Late
Reactions: ConfederateIrishman
Here is some more autistic data analysis for the four states, This is a graph that charts the % of total vote, and the percent of how much each batch favours candidate.

View attachment 1739399
if the Blue balls are below 50% the votes favour Trump, if they are above the dashed line, they favour Biden.

When the election ended, (and it did) you can see how the votes were distributed, big circles represent the cities, they are above the dashed lines, Biden got more big circles, Trump got the rural areas, smaller circles, PAY ATTENTION TO THE SMALLER CIRCLES they will come later, a swarm of smaller circles in a very linear pattern, represent the smaller cities Trump won.

Trump won Wisconsin by a large difference.

After 90%¨of the votes were counted, Biden recieved A gigantic ammount of votes, in a margin that wasn't found in any precinct in the state, right after you see what happened, the votes for Trump were LOCKED, they simply didn't appear anymore after 90%, you would think this is a coincidence except it happens in even more blatant ways in the other states.

not only they were locked at the 50% margin, you can see a very strange linear pattern on Trumps votes starting from the 70% mark.

now for the real fun, lets look at the distribution in PA.

View attachment 1739400
look at the chaotic distribution of votes right before they stopped the count and look at what happens to the Trump votes, not only they lock to a line again, (compared to Bidens chaotic dumps) but they also get progressively skewered towards EXACTLY 50% Trump recieved no batches after 6. NOV where he won, Biden won 100% of the batches after that.

You see not only Biden is winning gigantic dumps of votes, but also Trumps votes are being actively locked AND CORRECTED.

Look at Georgia

View attachment 1739401
You can point exaclty where Trumps votes margins are fucking locked to a line, (remember the more downards the balls the bigger the margins for Trump, they are LOCKED) but also they are being skewered to a neutral margin where it nets ZERO votes for him (50% mark).

Michigan
View attachment 1739403
Look at the line of Trumps votes being formed, look at it being switched ALL the way over 50%, compare to Bidens votes and how chaotic they are, look at the post midinight dump they gave Biden to make him close the gap it wasn't enough,

the above makes us reach the final conclusions:

1- The share of Trumps votes are being artificially limited, and followed a locked linear pattern that got progressively skewered towards Biden in each of these states.

in an untampered election, Trumps votes would appear in a random chaotic pattern, its highly indicative that:

a- there is a way to discriminate which candidate is recieving votes and to change that share, by limiting it and skewering it to another candidade

b- this is highly indicative of a computer aided operation, since these corrections would be extremelly difficult to do in a ballot per ballot basis manually, most probably, an vote wheighting algorithm was clearly used.




2- Biden got massive dumps of votes that highly suprass his biggest vote margins in any county, and it wasn't enought to guarantee a win over Trumps margins.

Mail-in ballots schemes and voter fraud would be able to generate this number of excess ballots, however they were not enough to skew the margins towards a Biden win.

Not only votes were being generated to Biden but the biggest contributor to these margins are not the magic ballots 96% for Bidden, the limiting of the share of the votes that happened to Trump were the most crucial fator in changing the election patterns in these states, Trump probably won in a landslide, and the tampering was most probably made by a machine calculation, not low level voter fraud, even is massive dumps Biden would not have won these states had Trumps votes not being actively limited and skewered towards him.
reposting for another page, this is the source for the graphs https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329543841217540096.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back