Real world odds, absolutely fucking zero. It makes absolutely zero sense for this to happen, no way in fucking hell does the Trump team have to evidence to make Biden decide "No Refunds" is the best course of action.
What I meant is even if Roberts made these assignments with some kind of autistic plan in mind, that would be retarded because it's pointless. There is no plan here. It might give a very slight advantage to Trump if there are more emergency motion rulings that get ignored. That's about it.
I'd say it's more pride and not wanting to give Trump an easy win is why Biden won't concede. He has to have SOME knowledge of the Anti Trump Revolution to be where he is.
New York Democrat member of the House. One of the front-runners for Speaker / House minority leader when Pelosi finally dies
Or, he wants to give those circuits the conservative judges so it'll be harder for the Right to argue bias, lest the court challenges flop?
B-but muh ace attorney makes me all knowing about law, even if im too retarded to do something as simple as request court documents
The PA-GOP was supposed to hold a hearing with Dominion, today. They were all set and scheduled, and then at the last minute Dominion backed out of the hearing, refused to attend, and immediately started to lawyer up. I haven't been able to verify which law firm they brought on to represent them, but I don't need to because I already know it's going to be Perkins Coie, because every single time that something unusual happens around the DNC or an election, Perkins Coie climbs out of the walls to try and fix it.
I really don't know what people are expecting to see within the "proof" and "evidence" that's heading to the courts. Do people expect that ballots with mismatched signatures come with a small message declaring that they're fake ballots? Do they think that an elected official trying to skew the results in someone's favour by restricting their meaningful access to oversight is done with a twirl of the mustache and a flick of the cape? There's currently more than enough evidence and circumstantial evidence to warrant an inordinate amount of suspicion and to conduct an audit and an investigation.
If someone is going to completely ignore all of the pieces sitting on the table, then I don't care about their opinion because it becomes meaningless. "Evidence" does not mean something is an absolute definitive, evidence is a building block to help support your allegation. Is a discarded knife definitive proof of a murder? Is a wadded up stash of money definitive proof of a robbery? Is a footprint outside of a window definitive proof of a break-in?
No. They are parts of a whole used to come to the most-likely conclusion. Is every, single piece of evidence that's been presented thus-far evidence of a significant problem in the election when observed individually? No, of course not, but as a whole it's very clear that something is wrong. If I found footprints outside of my window, change missing from my counter, one of my windows slightly ajar, and dirt in my livingroom, did a break-in not occur because I wasn't able to see the person who did it?
If the Dominion voting systems have been causing a systematic problem in all of our elections since their induction, Dominion isn't exactly going to leave that laying on the diningroom table. They're not going to head every memo with "Fuck Trump; Rig Elections", they're going to do everything in their power to prevent being caught out, which is generally how criminals operate, welcome to the real world. I don't know what sort of magical and definitive and undeniable evidence that these people are expecting to see, but it probably involves someone missing their nose and hair and waltzing around in a black cloak.
You especially don't hand evidence to the fucking media before you introduce it into the courts, unless you're going in there with the intention of losing your case. This is doubly true when you have the media and members of the opposing, political party circling you like jackals, threatening you and your family's safety if you say something you shouldn't or refuse to certify an election. We're talking about systemic, potentially nation-wide fraud spanning back more than a decade. We're talking about shifting of power balances, about questioning the foundation of every single election we've held since the turn of the century, about the potential corruption at the core of a political apparatus that could topple an entire political party if the allegations are true.
People have been killed for much, much less.
I would have never discovered this website, if it was wasn't for that fine Australian gentleman blasting "Gas Gas Gas".
The dissent in that case was glorious, they ignored the majority's written opinions except to embarrass Roberts by including some juicy snippets of what he wrote before he cucked out. One analysis of the opinions that was good for luls said "The dissent totally ignored the majority, as if its arguments were not even worthy of being responded to"
There isn't really a way that the cases can succeed or flop based on emergency motion rulings. It really has no implications one way or another. The circuit court in its decision can and frequently does toss emergency rulings from the assigned SC justice in the trash. Same thing with the SC if they agree to take an appeal
You'd think the Blue Congress would be eager to give Biden anything he wants.
Yeah, well it ain't blue yet.
Honestly, if this whole thing leads Roberts to just pack it in and retire, that'd be hilarious. I mean, Roberts doesn't seem like the guy to stick around just to be a thorn in Trump's side looking to behead the monster.
And if you think this is any indication to who he is.... https://twitter.com/RepJeffries
Rackets seems to think that the reason voter fraud is so hard to prosecute is that you require that kind of smoking gun proof to get anywhere, and that only happens if the riggers are cartoonishly blatant about it.
The PA-GOP was supposed to hold a hearing with Dominion, today. They were all set and scheduled, and then at the last minute Dominion backed out of the hearing, refused to attend, and immediately started to lawyer up. I haven't been able to verify which law firm they brought on to represent them, but I don't need to because I already know it's going to be Perkins Coie, because every single time that something unusual happens around the DNC or an election, Perkins Coie climbs out of the walls to try and fix it.
I really don't know what people are expecting to see within the "proof" and "evidence" that's heading to the courts. Do people expect that ballots with mismatched signatures come with a small message declaring that they're fake ballots? Do they think that an elected official trying to skew the results in someone's favour by restricting their meaningful access to oversight is done with a twirl of the mustache and a flick of the cape? There's currently more than enough evidence and circumstantial evidence to warrant an inordinate amount of suspicion and to conduct an audit and an investigation.
If someone is going to completely ignore all of the pieces sitting on the table, then I don't care about their opinion because it becomes meaningless. "Evidence" does not mean something is an absolute definitive, evidence is a building block to help support your allegation. Is a discarded knife definitive proof of a murder? Is a wadded up stash of money definitive proof of a robbery? Is a footprint outside of a window definitive proof of a break-in?
No. They are parts of a whole used to come to the most-likely conclusion. Is every, single piece of evidence that's been presented thus-far evidence of a significant problem in the election when observed individually? No, of course not, but as a whole it's very clear that something is wrong. If I found footprints outside of my window, change missing from my counter, one of my windows slightly ajar, and dirt in my livingroom, did a break-in not occur because I wasn't able to see the person who did it?
If the Dominion voting systems have been causing a systematic problem in all of our elections since their induction, Dominion isn't exactly going to leave that laying on the diningroom table. They're not going to head every memo with "Fuck Trump; Rig Elections", they're going to do everything in their power to prevent being caught out, which is generally how criminals operate, welcome to the real world. I don't know what sort of magical and definitive and undeniable evidence that these people are expecting to see, but it probably involves someone missing their nose and hair and waltzing around in a black cloak.
You especially don't hand evidence to the fucking media before you introduce it into the courts, unless you're going in there with the intention of losing your case. This is doubly true when you have the media and members of the opposing, political party circling you like jackals, threatening you and your family's safety if you say something you shouldn't or refuse to certify an election. We're talking about systemic, potentially nation-wide fraud spanning back more than a decade. We're talking about shifting of power balances, about questioning the foundation of every single election we've held since the turn of the century, about the potential corruption at the core of a political apparatus that could topple an entire political party if the allegations are true.
People have been killed for much, much less.
The only thing is likely to be "special" is how voting info and ballots are handled. From what I was told the NYC BOE just made shit up last November and this year. Also revealing is how workers with years of experience were locked out of working early voting because they'd be the ones who would immediately notice something isn't right.
