- Joined
- Oct 6, 2014
Which A & N member is blubbering in this video? Bets start at five bucks.
That guy: Trump's given more for this country than anyone!
Trump: (pays 750 dollars in taxes.)
Trump: (doesn't go to 'Nam cuz his feet hurt.)
Sure, Jan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which A & N member is blubbering in this video? Bets start at five bucks.
Oh yeah, there's a big assumption underlying a lot of Trump support that all the other elites are just as vile as he is, he just doesn't hide it. Which turns any of his flaws into positive traits, because sure he might have openly done {crime}, but at least he isn't pretending like he doesn't do {crime} which would somehow be even worse.Like I said, it's a cult. They so mad at any criticism of Trump. Trump could shit his pants on live TV and they'd bend over backwards to say it was to own the libs
McConnell would be a logical choice except that he's an uncharismatic turd that everyone outside of Kentucky (and a lot of people in KY) hates. Similar logic applies to Pelosi, she's also a shrewd and effective political operator but no one really likes her. It was the same thing that screwed Hillary Clinton who was good at working with politicians (on both sides) but who was uncharismatic and whose political history made her a swamp creature instead of a politician who appealed to the nation.Realtalk, if I was a deep red conservative instead of a filthy disloyal moderate (I even regularly vote split ticket, gasp and alarm!), I'd more be saying McConnal 2024. Because as much as his turtle face weirds me out, every major long lasting (the problem with doing everything via executive order is the next guy can just as easily undo it immediatly) conservative success of the Trump admin can be traced to him making Donald sit the fuck still for the 5 min required for the senate to rubber stamp something to end up on his desk.
McConnell would never have any traction for a national election. He can win in Kentucky because anyone can win there with an R next to their name on the ballot but his campaign would die day one when anyone brings up his wife and her family's connections to China which are 100x as fishy as anything Biden's ever been accused of.Realtalk, if I was a deep red conservative instead of a filthy disloyal moderate (I even regularly vote split ticket, gasp and alarm!), I'd more be saying McConnal 2024. Because as much as his turtle face weirds me out, every major long lasting (the problem with doing everything via executive order is the next guy can just as easily undo it immediatly) conservative success of the Trump admin can be traced to him making Donald sit the fuck still for the 5 min required for the senate to rubber stamp something to end up on his desk.
If he is alive in 2024 I will eat @Techpriest's hat, dude looks like a reanimated corpse now.Realtalk, if I was a deep red conservative instead of a filthy disloyal moderate (I even regularly vote split ticket, gasp and alarm!), I'd more be saying McConnal 2024. Because as much as his turtle face weirds me out, every major long lasting (the problem with doing everything via executive order is the next guy can just as easily undo it immediatly) conservative success of the Trump admin can be traced to him making Donald sit the fuck still for the 5 min required for the senate to rubber stamp something to end up on his desk.
Nobody cares about the unfair press coverage the Trump administration gets as much of the actual voter fraud we're seeing. CNN and Wapo have a right to be exceptional, but their ignorance is disgusting. How the fuck does Trump gain so many votes compared to 2016, but loses to a dementia riddled absent candidate who gets multiple votes over him than Hillary?Like I said, it's a cult. They so mad at any criticism of Trump. Trump could shit his pants on live TV and they'd bend over backwards to say it was to own the libs
[citation needed]actual voter fraud we're seeing.
Have you ever considered maybe because voter turnout is higher? Have you ever considered maybe people actually preferred Biden much more compared with Hillary?How the fuck does Trump gain so many votes compared to 2016, but loses to a dementia riddled absent candidate who gets multiple votes over him than Hillary?
McConnell received thousands in donations from ballot machine lobbyists (how the fuck is that even a thing?) last year, shortly before shooting down two bills designed to increase ballot security. Bills which, if passed into law, would have made ESS and Dominion (pretty much the only names in ballot machine deployment) subject to new, stricter, regulation and the financial burdens associated with same.Realtalk, if I was a deep red conservative instead of a filthy disloyal moderate (I even regularly vote split ticket, gasp and alarm!), I'd more be saying McConnal 2024. Because as much as his turtle face weirds me out, every major long lasting (the problem with doing everything via executive order is the next guy can just as easily undo it immediatly) conservative success of the Trump admin can be traced to him making Donald sit the fuck still for the 5 min required for the senate to rubber stamp something to end up on his desk.
Here's a good compilation of voter fraud with sources in the past. Even Republicans are not goody-two-shoes when it comes to voter fraud. If it can happen in the Republicans favor it can happen in the Democrats favor. It's a security risk of our democratic republic. If Biden wins legitimately, fine. Destroying ballots for Trump, duplicating ballots for Biden in the count, ballot harvesting, Non-citizens voting, dead people voting, people voting twice, and machine "malfunctions" are all here.[citation needed]
Lawsuits for these voter fraud were filed and later lost btw, recounts were done and Biden is still winner
Have you ever considered maybe because voter turnout is higher? Have you ever considered maybe people actually preferred Biden much more compared with Hillary?
But don't you know? Trump doesn't need evidence, it's obvious that the votes were stolen by International Communism and put on a fake server, and Trump won California! The only reason that Republicans won down-ticket was because they were disloyal traitors who sided with the Communists!Ah, yes, the actual voter fraud, so evident that every judge has dismissed all cases pertaining to it, even Republican judges, even Republican judges appointed by Trump!
If you're going to keep being so adamant about voter fraud, grow some balls and join the other loons shitting up D.C. right now. Until then, go post your totally legit wordpress statistics in A&H with everyone else. The burden of proof falls on the plaintiff, not the defendant, and so far most of the evidence of major voter fraud has come from some guys who know some guys, some other guys who remember a couple statistics formulas from getting their B.S., a group of lawyers who can't remember which state they're litigating in, and their boss who spent around three weeks posting pictures of a crackhead's dick on social media while calling it evidence of collusion with a foreign government.Here's a good compilation of voter fraud with sources in the past. Even Republicans are not goody-two-shoes when it comes to voter fraud. If it can happen in the Republicans favor it can happen in the Democrats favor. It's a security risk of our democratic republic. If Biden wins legitimately, fine. Destroying ballots for Trump, duplicating ballots for Biden in the count, ballot harvesting, Non-citizens voting, dead people voting, people voting twice, and machine "malfunctions" are all here.
Thank you for joining us, Mr President. I was concerned that you had not been gracing us with at least one of your demented, lunatic speeches every day, as per the rest of your administration.Nobody cares about the unfair press coverage the Trump administration gets as much of the actual voter fraud we're seeing. CNN and Wapo have a right to be exceptional, but their ignorance is disgusting. How the fuck does Trump gain so many votes compared to 2016, but loses to a dementia riddled absent candidate who gets multiple votes over him than Hillary?
The topic at hand is indeed about voter fraud so I'll give you that, you're correct for this link. Even so, bringing to the next point.....
Instead of me going "lol Wordpress" like the previous posts, I'll actually read the article and this is what I gathered:Even Republicans are not goody-two-shoes when it comes to voter fraud. If it can happen in the Republicans favor it can happen in the Democrats favor. It's a security risk of our democratic republic. If Biden wins legitimately, fine. Destroying ballots for Trump, duplicating ballots for Biden in the count, ballot harvesting, Non-citizens voting, dead people voting, people voting twice, and machine "malfunctions" are all here.
My summary of the article said:The article goes into a summary about how election fraud is common in US, most due to mail ballots. The article then details about how election officials are actually bad at catching errors because there's lack of stories about how they caught small errors along with possibility of massive election fraud for the past few years. The article then lists few instances of eye witness accounts, illegally openly carried out elections which makes it easier for voter fraud to take place. The article then lists 5 significant lines of statistical evidence suggesting fraud:
1. Dead people voting in PA
2. Biden got huge advantage via mail-in/absentee votes in Pennsylvania and Michigan than any other swing state.
3. In Wisconsin, "after the nighttime pause in reporting, vote shares shifted in favor of democrats *within* city wards".
4. Extremely high turnout in Wisconsin, specifically Milwaukee.
5. Bell weather counties correctly predicted every US election of the last 50 years until Biden's.
The article ended by saying that these arguments do not show that Trump would win the election without the voter fraud, but shows that Biden did not win a fair election either.
There was actually record turnout ON BOTH SIDES because people were REALLY PISSED about this specific election. I can't imagine why.And the courts have found that all of Trump's cases lack sufficient evidence. I don't know what else to tell you, other than maybe Trump needs to hire better lawyers. Voter fraud certainly happens, but no one has provided sufficient evidence for a court that it has happened to a level that will necessitate overturning or discarding a sufficient number of votes to flip the election.
EDIT: LMAO that wordpress![]()
It’s pretty accurate but doesn’t analyze why those things could happen without voter fraud occurring. It looks at everything in isolation and doesn’t analyze the evidence beyond the surface and the conclusion it sets out to make. That’s bad science and bad history and bad analysis.The topic at hand is indeed about voter fraud so I'll give you that, you're correct for this link. Even so, bringing to the next point.....
Instead of me going "lol Wordpress" like the previous posts, I'll actually read the article and this is what I gathered:
Is this an accurate summary of the article, or there's other stuff I miss? If yes, the article even says that election fraud is very common in the US for the "past few decades" so I'll ask you this, would this imply that every president for the "past few decades" might not (keywords: "might not") win the election legitimately? If yes to that as well, I'll end this with one last question: Why does all of this only brought up when Biden wins?
It's obvious Trump knew he was going to lose in advance so he immediately started screaming fraud weeks before the actual election, much as he was screaming fraud while he was winning against Hillary. He's just a bitter, angry loser who screams fraud at anything that doesn't go his way. He doesn't give a fuck whether or not there was fraud, he just knows his moronic worshippers will buy any dumb shit he says.It’s pretty accurate but doesn’t analyze why those things could happen without voter fraud occurring. It looks at everything in isolation and doesn’t analyze the evidence beyond the surface and the conclusion it sets out to make. That’s bad science and bad history and bad analysis.
Isn't it funny how people are NOW concerned about government fraud when it affects Trump?Here's a good compilation of voter fraud with sources in the past. Even Republicans are not goody-two-shoes when it comes to voter fraud. If it can happen in the Republicans favor it can happen in the Democrats favor. It's a security risk of our democratic republic. If Biden wins legitimately, fine. Destroying ballots for Trump, duplicating ballots for Biden in the count, ballot harvesting, Non-citizens voting, dead people voting, people voting twice, and machine "malfunctions" are all here.