2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[murdered meat bag]

crowder has an annoying voice and his jokes are family guy tier,

The Q Anon bitch who got into congress is already living up to her prophesied legacy
View attachment 1741784View attachment 1741791
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1329885028625637383 ( https://archive.md/TrL0I )
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1329897694563872770 ( https://archive.md/zM6wp )

oh fuck this is too good, oh ah ohahhhhhh

 

[awoo]

View attachment 1741808

the algorithm has been cracked

https://twitter.com/reallowkeylukey/status/1330144650863185924
https://archive.fo/3K7ow

we miss you Tay
(from twitter replies)

 

[CrippleThreat]

From everything here with the PA hearing and how bad the defense was on top of lawyer harassment, this ruling doesn't seem surprising, only in how blatant they're protecting the state's total disregard for election law. Just a way for the judge to feed the Sunday Morning talkshows with more Drumpf is finished BS. And it makes it easier for the Supremes to slap it down.

And I can't wait for CNN to say "Yet another blow to the Trump campaign," when they know this is going to SCOTUS.

The judge had them do a do-over because the defense was that bad, and unless Hell freezes, they were never let Trump pass.

The only thing good about the defense was how they inadvertently showed how pozzed everything was with the judge and court.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

So can someone answer this question: Let's say that the PA case goes before SCOTUS and they rule in favor of Trump's team and allow for the direct allotment of electors. How will this affect the other lawsuits in MI, WI and maybe (probably not) Georgia?

Legally? Nothing.

Meta-level? It would indicate the SCOTUS is ready to go nuclear.

Media-level? It would be the end for the Dems, they'd loose the narrative completely and the media would go insane over it.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Neither side was going to leave it at the State level, the quicker they throw it out, the quicker it gets to where it'll matter.

Yeah, but the judge could have at least decided against the people who 1) were defending ballots in a state where it was illegal to do so and 2) defending it as not a violation of the Equal Protections clause.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

Yeah, but the judge could have at least decided against the people who 1) were defending ballots in a state where it was illegal to do so and 2) defending it as not a violation of the Equal Protections clause.

If you thought he was doing that after he gave the defense do over time for no reason you're drinking rainbows for the morning coffee. Truth is, game was pozzed from the start.

 

[Bartleby]

Yeah, but the judge could have at least decided against the people who 1) were defending ballots in a state where it was illegal to do so and 2) defending it as not a violation of the Equal Protections clause.

Well, one of the harsher lessons to learn from all this is, despite what you'd expect from the profession, judges aren't as impartial as they should be, and it's a shame that a lot of this hedges on just a few people, assuming this all ends up going to SCOTUS.

 

[Cristobal’s Colon]

Ok that's actually extremely funny but now they gotta explain how they did it because it is brilliant.

Tweet contained a link to an Evangelical Christian blog mentioning Sidney Powell.

 

[Psychic Espeon]

Neither side was going to leave it at the State level, the quicker they throw it out, the quicker it gets to where it'll matter.

Well, he has until December 8th to turn things around.

 

[wopirish]

Average user of this thread, I hope your meme magic and praying to Kek works out for you guys
View attachment 1741466

Is that Ethan Ralph's brother?

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Ok that's actually extremely funny but now they gotta explain how they did it because it is brilliant

I think it's the "six million" because that's the purported vote margin at the moment.

And I can't wait for CNN to say "Yet another blow to the Trump campaign," when they know this is going to SCOTUS.

The judge had them do a do-over because the defense was that bad, and unless Hell freezes, they were never let Trump pass.

The only thing good about the defense was how they inadvertently showed how pozzed everything was with the judge and court.

iirc, some of the rule changes were done by the court in PA, so they weren't going against themselves now.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

It'll be thrown out as hearsy.

You misspelled 'heresy'.

So can someone answer this question: Let's say that the PA case goes before SCOTUS and they rule in favor of Trump's team and allow for the direct allotment of electors. How will this affect the other lawsuits in MI, WI and maybe (probably not) Georgia?

I've honestly got no idea what will happen. I can't see how the SCOTUS can't take this but how will it rule?

Here's the PA dismissal

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.203.0_2.pdf

 

[Cristobal’s Colon]

You misspelled 'heresy'.

Hearsay is what they meant, but either works.

Here's the PA dismissal

The pdf mentions an accompanying memorandum. Did they not make it public?

 

[Jaimas]

View attachment 1741670
View attachment 1741672
View attachment 1741677
View attachment 1741695
View attachment 1741715

https://archive.md/K6g4q

Hold the fuck on. I may be having another elaborate hallucination, but was this shit not exactly what happened in 2000 with the recount, and it inevitably coming out that the Observers were right to object because Bush ultimately did, in fact, win?

 

[737 MAX Stan Account]

 

[Pickle Dick]

Decided to add @Tour of Italy's daily schedule to the OP, even though it might be a little outdated by this point.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

So I guess this is not good news?

I am starting to think Rudy Giuliani isn't the legal genius that people in this thread told me he was

 

[Reisen Storm]

View attachment 1741864

Republicans sure won this election.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

You misspelled 'heresy'.



I've honestly got no idea what will happen. I can't see how the SCOTUS can't take this but how will it rule?

Here's the PA dismissal

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.203.0_2.pdf

Judge Matthew Brann, presiding

Wikipedia is already on it with their trademark impartiality:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_W._Brann

He became briefly famous when he presided over a case which was part of President Trump's attempt to steal Pennsylvania's presidential electors.

 

[Empty]

View attachment 1741561

Biden supporters are some of the most hypocritical, shameless people I have ever seen in my entire life, but calling Joe a communist is equally as dumb as calling Trump a fascist or a nazi (at least as long as you have a common sense, you should admit it).