Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The likelihood of the Trump campaign delaying the certification of the vote in even a single state is extremely low, so low as to not be worth considering. The Trump campaign's lawsuits are not filed with the intention to win on the merits in any event (or even to survive a motion to dismiss, for that matter). The strategy mainly seems to throw everything at the wall and jam as much shit as possible into the filings to confuse and overwhelm the public. Courts don't give a shit about an unsworn affidavit by a guy in Texas who claims that Dominion raped and murdered his wife, but if you slap it in your filings and show it off to your base, people who don't know any better might think you're on to something. Rudy and Powell get up and have their press conference talking about things they never alleged in court or in their pleadings to drum up media attention and fleece more money out Trump's base. Everyone walks away with a nice little Christmas bonus.

The only case I can think of that has a chance to meaningful impact the vote total (although not the outcome of the election) is Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, which isn't a Trump campaign case and existed before the election began.
Apparently the GOP observers in Wisconsin are challenging every single ballot, slowing the recount process to a crawl. I do wonder if they could delay the certification in Wisconsin by doing this.

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...-election-officials-accuse-trump-observers-of
 
457347C7-8D67-4F7F-AA9E-8381ACA03286.jpeg


EDIT:

HK moved this here, as he's being a little bitch right now. It's literally what's happening in the Spedsidential Election thread - a bunch of cucks to a cheeto desperately posting conspiracy theories and huffing from copium.
 
Last edited:
You open with the presumption that there is no evidence presented that will suggest fraud. So I take your argument as a complete non-starter. Even random analysts from the public have made suggestions that things might not be above board. Electoral Trends, Bellwether States and Counties, the bizarre freeze at 4am. You open that there is literally no evidence, Biden was simply more popular than Hillary and Obama, despite barely campaigning and calling a lid, often before 12pm. Despite Trumps record crowds during his rallies. It was all fake, Trump must've paid them all, it was all a well crafted conspiracy?

Trump just paid thousands to come out so the mainstream media could minimize and often not even bother highlighting his rallies, yeah that's it. It's simply too complicated, couldn't he have better spent that money bribing people if that was the case? Bribing election officials? Instead of rallies the MSM won't cover?
As someone who has tried, you're wasting your time. He has terminal TDS, and would never admit fraud happened if it was done in front of him.
 
As someone who has tried, you're wasting your time. He has terminal TDS, and would never admit fraud happened if it was done in front of him.
I am still waiting for this fraud. Trump's own lawyers, when under oath, said there's no evidence of fraud. So if you got this evidence, I am sure that Rudy would like to see it by now. You Trumpers seem to not understand how the government works, though. It's not going to happen. Unless you'd like to make a wager?

Certification has not happened. There is no result yet.

They just demand full audits and the audits reveal enough bs to flip things.
It's happened in a lot of states and the others will certify on Monday. It's not going to happen. Unless you'd like to make a wager?
 
Voting tests were a thing in the 1960's. These were mostly given to black voters. Here's an example of one from Louisiana.
View attachment 1742165
View attachment 1742170
Have fun passing this.
It took me 10 seconds, at most, to complete each question.
You'd fail at the first question and the last two. It's blatantly impossible for a few of them.
Are you retarded or something? "Draw a line around the number or letter of this sentence" means "draw a line around the number, 1, directly preceding the word draw." The penultimate question can be solved by drawing a cross (looks like a "t") above the first s in cross, drawing a line under the space between "place" and "a" and then drawing a circle around the word "the" that appears before the word "second" (the second "the" in that line.) The final one would look this like;

Untitled.png
 
Why not, I’m sleep deprived and this sounds like fun.
If the courts overturn the results (that is, Trump is declared the winner), I will make a post of your choosing. If Biden is the winner still, then you make a post of my choosing.

None of that dumb ban or doxing stuff. Just something fun
 
If the courts overturn the results (that is, Trump is declared the winner), I will make a post of your choosing. If Biden is the winner still, then you make a post of my choosing.

None of that dumb ban or doxing stuff. Just something fun

You still have to larp as 80s Hogan for trump's 100 days and I have to larp as a doomer under the gimmick "Copium Flavored Haribo" for biden's 100 days.
 
It took me 10 seconds, at most, to complete each question.

Are you retarded or something? "Draw a line around the number or letter of this sentence" means "draw a line around the number, 1, directly preceding the word draw." The penultimate question can be solved by drawing a cross (looks like a "t") above the first s in cross, drawing a line under the space between "place" and "a" and then drawing a circle around the word "the" that appears before the word "second" (the second "the" in that line.) The final one would look this like;

View attachment 1742275
It’s a basic intelligence test that anybody should be able to pass. You both just outed yourselves as retarded.
Read the rules carefully. The entire point of this is to be able to arbitrarily exclude people for any given reason. The first question breaks pretty much every single rule of tests I've ever seen in including the number as part of the sentence. 7 is made to make you fail 6, same with 22 and 21. The last one can easily be used to exclude you by simply having north mean the actual direction, so even the box won't save you, as the paper doesn't have to be pointing north when you write it.
 
Bad news guys, you are still worse than /pol/ I got used to it slowly, and I started to really appreciate the depth of comments. Even the quality of shills on /pol/ is better. I guess KF gets some dregs, because it's not that relevant.

Do you understand that the purpose of this entire circus is not for anybody to win, it's to rile you up, is to make some of you, less balanced, even violent and homicidal.

I think some of the posters on /pol/ were right, they didn't even want Biden to win. They don't want this colored skank either. The side-show with Giuliani is also a diversion. The point is to make Orange Man Bad into a literal Hitler "stealing democracy", and to rile up those who are easy to rile up.

And you can give me as many moons as you want, but I am pretty sure that they do have servers. NSA, that is...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back