Furthermore, illegal migrants are not really that good an indicator of wages. I guess I'll have to explain for those on the back rows.
So, economics 101 people: Illegal migrants damage the lower classes, a lot. This is due to increased criminality, lack of hygiene, competition for jobs, strain on the infrastructure, etc. Etc. Etc.
HOWEVER. what they don't damage that much is the wages and GDP. Because illegal migrants aren't even counted for wages in most cases (since businesses that hire illegals tend to be the ones that also claim they didn't hire anyone, you know due to their illegal working conditions, if they planned on being legal about that and pay minimum wage they'd have no reason not to hire legal migrants and locals to begin with, and these groups are usually far more productive under those conditions.) So while the competition by illegals can drive wages lower, statistically that isn't so noticeable, instead the effect is more often seen in unemployment and criminality related statistics, that's where you see illegals are awful.
Wages more often than not are actually driven by productivity. Usually businesses that are more productive pay better wages, 'cause they want their employees to stay productive and loyal, and if you pay a shit wage you're just gonna get drained as soon as a competitor passes you and will get disgruntled employees being unproductive on purpose. THAT is what that statistical measure tells you most of all.
So to those doubting the effect of this tax cut on the market, stop it, marchessa is right, not bleeding companies is a very important part of having an economy. Now I'm not gonna stand here and justify tax havens of course, taxes are an important part of keeping a country afloat. Money doesn't grow on trees. But it's all about striking a balance between not bankrupting the country and not stifling the businesses, and with the everchanging environment of international economics shifting wildly as it pleases there simply is never a real good answer just acceptable levels of issues to fix later, which is why while we can tell what paths are downright catastrophic we can never truly know what the right option is until a decade or so after the fact when it's really obvious what we should've done.