Gabriel Sickel / ThisIsGabe / KhordKitty / KhordiKit / Khordz / PianoKat / Xyniroz / Ghörfn / yiffyiff123 / Deborah Kay Butler / Buttercuppedbun - Deadbeat Wannabe-Actor MGTOW Pedo-zoophile - Divorced father of 2 sons. Tried grooming them as infants to be cub furries. Tried to groom a 17yo into sex. Ex-wife cucked him for a pedo. She took the kids. He fucked the family dog. His mom likes horse cock

[Spoonomancer]

Loaded question. You have to assume that only babyfurs talk to babyfurs. No one thinks that nor has anyone ever thought that.

please answer my question. Are you a babyfur or are you only friends with a lot of babyfurs, despite being a father of a young child? It's kind of suspicious whenever you announce that you're friends with several babyfurs.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

When more sensible lolcows earn a thread on the Farms, they are quick to either remove themselves from whatever got Kiwis attracted to them in the first place, or they leave the internet.

You haven't done either. You've been repeatedly told that associating with known sex offenders, nazi furs, and diaper furs is a bad idea and you continue to do it. You've been told that sending dick pics to a 17-year-old is fucking gross and immoral and you continue to defend it. You're pre-emptively blocked by tons of furries due to your shitty reputation and your refusal to admit the problem is you. You were so neglectful of your children that it will be nothing short of a miracle if your visitation rights aren't completely revoked.

You could make a lot of ethical arguments about the Farms archiving your numerous fuckups, but none of them hold water. You are not constitutionally guaranteed the right to privacy and anonymity online, you are only protected from unlawful government intrusion.

You want all this to stop? All you have to do is remove yourself from the internet. Log out of the Farms, delete your Twitter/FA/Telegram. Seriously, if you were capable of shutting the fuck up, this thread would be dead in a month and we wouldn't know nearly a fraction of the information about you that we know now.

Optimistic. We told him to do that months ago in exchange for scrubbing up the thread so he could have a better chance at his custody agreement. He instead spit in my face & then whined when he wanted the offer again but got shot the fuck down

please answer my question. Are you a babyfur or are you only friends with a lot of babyfurs, despite being a father of a young child? It's kind of suspicious whenever you announce that you're friends with several babyfurs.

He doesn't need to respond to that. He already answered this when he told that 17yo CSA victim that he's a babyfur. Gabe has continuously denied that
1. He said that &
2. It's true--
-- despite the overwhelming evidence outside of that admission supporting he's one.

Also I do love how he's still on about " Baby Doxing " despite me removing Deb's dox WEEKS ago due to it being out of date. I know where the children are but I'm not sharing that info since they're with an uninvolved party as far as I can tell.

> Not talking to people who fantasize about fucking children and animals means you're in an echo chamber

This statement is literally so fucking stupid I can not begin to dissect it.

> I've had the same job for over a year

No, he hasn't. We've literally proven that beyond a definitive doubt at this point.

> If I was lying about having a job then WHAT IS THE POINT OF THAT?

It would mean that you're a deadbeat. Which we've firmly established. If you have a job but you're not telling the court about it, you're lying in order to avoid payment. If you DON'T have a job, then you're a lazy POS with nothing better to do than stalk talk to 10,000 people a day who won't nothing to do with you.

> I never associated with any sex offenders or nazi furs. --- Glad I don't have any friends like that.

Demonstrably false. There are multiple sections detailing how he did. Pulling the " I'm Jewish " card to escape this does nothing for the argument. There were plenty of Jewish people selling out their own kind during the Holocaust in order to delay the inevitable.

I've never sent a dick pic to a 17 year old.

No. He did flash his cock and balls to a 17yo though that had already expressed NON-CONSENT to the issue as well as being a previous CSA survivor. Which is MUCH worse than sending a photograph.

You've been played by pathological liars

Gabe hasn't played anyone except himself so idk what he's trying to say here lol

 

[KhordKitty]

please answer my question. Are you a babyfur or are you only friends with a lot of babyfurs, despite being a father of a young child?

Friends with a lot of babyfurs, they make up less then 1% of the contact list.

Again you’re assuming I only talk to people who I agree with. I talk to everyone who wants to talk to me. I especially like to talk to those who are different from me.

Optimistic. We told him to do that months ago in exchange for scrubbing up the thread so he could have a better chance at his custody agreement. He instead spit in my face & then whined when he wanted the offer again but got shot the fuck down


He doesn't need to respond to that. He already answered this when he told that 17yo CSA victim that he's a babyfur. Gabe has continuously denied that
1. He said that &
2. It's true--
-- despite the overwhelming evidence outside of that admission supporting he's one.

Also I do love how he's still on about " Baby Doxing " despite me removing Deb's dox WEEKS ago due to it being out of date. I know where the children are but I'm not sharing that info since they're with an uninvolved party as far as I can tell.


This statement is literally so fucking stupid I can not begin to dissect it.


No, he hasn't. We've literally proven that beyond a definitive doubt at this point.


It would mean that you're a deadbeat. Which we've firmly established. If you have a job but you're not telling the court about it, you're lying in order to avoid payment. If you DON'T have a job, then you're a lazy POS with nothing better to do than stalk talk to 10,000 people a day who won't nothing to do with you.


Demonstrably false. There are multiple sections detailing how he did. Pulling the " I'm Jewish " card to escape this does nothing for the argument. There were plenty of Jewish people selling out their own kind during the Holocaust in order to delay the inevitable.


No. He did flash his cock and balls to a 17yo though that had already expressed NON-CONSENT to the issue as well as being a previous CSA survivor. Which is MUCH worse than sending a photograph.


Gabe hasn't played anyone except himself so idk what he's trying to say here lol

If he’s Catching a Breath, it’s to lie. Never forget, the liar said I was going to film school in New York. It’s just one of the endless group of lies. Serial pathological liars and the gullible go together like Koolaid and Jonestown.

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

Friends with a lot of babyfurs, they make up less then 1% of the contact list.

Again you’re assuming I only talk to people who I agree with. I talk to everyone who wants to talk to me. I especially like to talk to those who are different from me.

That's a very verbose way of saying you copypaste weird shit to thousands of furries and only the babyfurs respond to it.

 

[Jolyne THICCujoh]

Friends with a lot of babyfurs, they make up less then 1% of the contact list.

Again you’re assuming I only talk to people who I agree with. I talk to everyone who wants to talk to me. I especially like to talk to those who are different from me.


If he’s Catching a Breath, it’s to lie. Never forget, the liar said I was going to film school in New York. It’s just one of the endless group of lies. Serial pathological liars and the gullible go together like Koolaid and Jonestown.

Catch Your Breath may have slipped up once but everything else they have exposed has been on point, proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, and can't be refuted by any of your butt hurt.

While your sad replies can be entertaining, a smart man who cares about not being a social pariah would just do his damndest to take a chance to delete their thread and ultimately come out better than they would be if they did what you are currently doing. But you would rather be a clown at the circus shitting his pants in front of the crowd and getting angry when they laugh at him.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

I think the funniest thing is that the only reason he's back here is because he got dragged on Twitter again for defending Kyle Rittenhouse. Deleted everything before I could grab

 

[Pizdec]

I think the funniest thing is that the only reason he's back here is because he got dragged on Twitter again for defending Kyle Rittenhouse. Deleted everything before I could grab

Sounds like Gabe, fucker can't hold his ground on his own opinion so he just DFEs.

ETA: by the way Gabe, you defending Kyle doesn't give you brownie points here, just a heads up.

 

[KhordKitty]

ultimately come out better than they would be if they did what you are currently doing

Doesn’t work that way. It’s impossible for me to apologize for or learn from actions alleged in unproven defamatory statements.

I think the funniest thing is that the only reason he's back here is because he got dragged on Twitter again for defending Kyle Rittenhouse

More lies, I never defending Kyle. I asked questions about it. That’s all. How can I learn about a hotbutton issue if I don’t ask questions?

 

[SIGSEGV]

Serial pathological liars and the gullible go together like Koolaid and Jonestown.

There wasn't any KoolAid involved in the Jonestown massacre, it was Flavor Aid.

 

[Jolyne THICCujoh]

Doesn’t work that way. It’s impossible for me to apologize for or learn from actions alleged in unproven defamatory statements.

No, I'm talking about CYB's previous offer of deleting shit that directly connects you to your PROVEN heinous shit if you removed your internet presence and you responded by making an absolutr buffoon of yourself and have DOUBLED DOWN to where this thread grows at least 10 pages whenever you show up.

If there was ANYTHING intelligent in your body, it left when you squeezed one off in a your toilet.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

No, I'm talking about CYB's previous offer of deleting shit that directly connects you to your PROVEN heinous shit if you removed your internet presence and you responded by making an absolutr buffoon of yourself and have DOUBLED DOWN to where this thread grows at least 10 pages whenever you show up.

If there was ANYTHING intelligent in your body, it left when you squeezed one off in a your toilet.

To be fair, the worst he'd done that we knew about was the cub party incident & some questionable shit across Twitter & FA. Once we crossed the threshold of him grooming a minor, there was NOTHING that could persuade me to remove this.

It's gonna be fun watching him shit himself again.

 

[Pizdec]

More lies, I never defending Kyle. I asked questions about it. That’s all. How can I learn about a hotbutton issue if I don’t ask questions?

Because you wanna be a dumb shit.

Here, it's abridged, but here, because you obviously can't be bothered to do research.

 

[TFT-A9]

But like, what's the point? If I say anything you'll say it's a lie.

Because you keep fucking lying you stupid asshole

 

[Rat Lord]

Oh shit I actually fucking summoned him.

 

[KhordKitty]

To be fair, the worst he'd done that we knew about was the cub party incident & some questionable shit across Twitter & FA. Once we crossed the threshold of him grooming a minor, there was NOTHING that could persuade me to remove this.

It's gonna be fun watching him shit himself again.

Catch a breath to lie again. I already posted GPS proof the cub party incident never happened. It was a fun play on words joke I put on Twitter that was taken out of context and given false context by Saphy.

It’s impossible to groom someone to have a lawful consentual sex act because by definition the word grooming, in the context of sex, can only apply to unlawful acts. Either don’t know what the word grooming means, or you’re falsifying your own definition for lulz.

Anyone who takes this website seriously needs a serious reality check. They post false information for entertainment purposes only.

Because you keep fucking lying you stupid asshole

I have not lied on this thread at all. The OP and contributors are repeatedly lying. I’ve repeatedly posted proof which is buried, then the lies are repeated over and over. Then you all gaslight me for causing defamation to happen when it’s impossible for any action of mine to cause defamation to happen.

I'm talking about CYB's previous offer of deleting shit

At this point only the stupidest human beings on earth would ever trust anything that comes out of the mouth of KiwiFarmers.

 

[FakeishNamedicoot]

Catch a breath to lie again. I already posted GPS proof the cub party incident never happened. It was a fun play on words joke I put on Twitter that was taken out of context and given false context by Saphy.

It’s impossible to groom someone to have a lawful consentual sex act because by definition the word grooming, in the context of sex, can only apply to unlawful acts. Either don’t know what the word grooming means, or you’re falsifying your own definition for lulz.

Anyone who takes this website seriously needs a serious reality check. They post false information for entertainment purposes only.

I have not lied on this thread at all. The OP and contributors are repeatedly lying. I’ve repeatedly posted proof which is buried, then the lies are repeated over and over. Then you all gaslight me for causing defamation to happen when it’s impossible for any action of mine to cause defamation to happen.

At this point only the stupidest human beings on earth would ever trust anything that comes out of the mouth of KiwiFarmers.

It's a site for laughing at retards, retard. We compile information for the sake of pointing and laughing. Yet you take it seriously enough to come back and "defend yourself".

You're here because we pay attention to you.

 

[Pukebucket]

Catch a breath to lie again. I already posted GPS proof the cub party incident never happened. It was a fun play on words joke I put on Twitter that was taken out of context and given false context by Saphy.

It’s impossible to groom someone to have a lawful consentual sex act because by definition the word grooming, in the context of sex, can only apply to unlawful acts. Either don’t know what the word grooming means, or you’re falsifying your own definition for lulz.

Anyone who takes this website seriously needs a serious reality check. They post false information for entertainment purposes only.

I have not lied on this thread at all. The OP and contributors are repeatedly lying. I’ve repeatedly posted proof which is buried, then the lies are repeated over and over. Then you all gaslight me for causing defamation to happen when it’s impossible for any action of mine to cause defamation to happen.

At this point only the stupidest human beings on earth would ever trust anything that comes out of the mouth of KiwiFarmers.

So let me just get this straight; pressuring someone through extensive, manipulative boundary-pushing to deliberately break down the consent barrier "isn't grooming" because it only constitutes as abuse so long as it is tied to a specific unlawful act, such as child molestation.

... Except in those same logs you admit to providing that person with drugs, which is actually an unlawful act regardless of whether you think weed, shrooms, or E should be legal or not. While some of these drugs are legal now depending on state, distribution (whether for free or for profit) was still a felony at the time in New York when those conversations happened. You were providing drugs to an unstable young adult who was only scraping the most minimum legal age requirement to consent to sex with a grown adult to begin with, a teen who was still financially dependent on their parent and was in a vulnerable state of mind.

This isn't even going into the fact that the act of filming or sharing pornography with someone under 18 is still federally recognized as being illegal regardless of the age of consent for a given state. Gabe, if you were sending that 17-year-old porn (even drawn furry porn) as an enticement, or getting/sending illicit photos to one another at any point (and if I'm recalling the chat correctly, it sure sounded like you were) then you were likely still committing a felony regardless of whether or not New York law says you can fuck unemancipated teens.

Distribution and sharing of any pornography (not just images of minors) with someone under the age of 18 is considered a nationwide felony regardless of whether it was pornography of them or someone else, especially if it is done over the internet where federal law reigns supreme.

And you fail to understand how befriending a teen who was a full decade your junior, giving them booze and drugs and them showing them your dick after they explicitly asked you not to multiple times isn't at least an act of sexual harassment?

Pretty sure every victim of coercive consent would like a fucking word with you bud.

 

[SIGSEGV]

I’ve repeatedly posted proof which is buried

I told you to post links to those posts, and you have yet to deliver. I'm not going to comb through your post history, so either show me the goods or shut the fuck up.

 

[KhordKitty]

I told you to post links to those posts, and you have yet to deliver

That’s a lie. If it’s not, link go the post where you told me to post links.

So let me just get this straight; pressuring someone through extensive, manipulative boundary-pushing to deliberately break down the consent barrier "isn't grooming" because it only constitutes as abuse so long as it is tied to a specific unlawful act, such as child molestation.

... Except in those same logs you admit to providing that person with drugs, which is actually an unlawful act regardless of whether you think weed, shrooms, or E should be legal or not. While some of these drugs are legal now depending on state, distribution (whether for free or for profit) was still a felony at the time in New York when those conversations happened. You were providing drugs to an unstable young adult who was only scraping the most minimum legal age requirement to consent to sex with a grown adult to begin with, a teen who was still financially dependent on their parent and was in a vulnerable state of mind.

This isn't even going into the fact that the act of filming or sharing pornography with someone under 18 is still federally recognized as being illegal regardless of the age of consent for a given state. Gabe, if you were sending that 17-year-old porn (even drawn furry porn) as an enticement, or getting/sending illicit photos to one another at any point (and if I'm recalling the chat correctly, it sure sounded like you were) then you were likely still committing a felony regardless of whether or not New York law says you can fuck unemancipated teens.

Distribution and sharing of any pornography (not just images of minors) with someone under the age of 18 is considered a nationwide felony regardless of whether it was pornography of them or someone else, especially if it is done over the internet where federal law reigns supreme.

And you fail to understand how befriending a teen who was a full decade your junior, giving them booze and drugs and them showing them your dick after they explicitly asked you not to multiple times isn't at least an act of sexual harassment?

Pretty sure every victim of coercive consent would like a fucking word with you bud.

A police officer, who was lied to about the location of the conversation, read the whole thing and said they couldn’t charge anything be because there was no evidence of any illegal activity. You’re lying about literally what is in the logs to begin with.

 

[Jolyne THICCujoh]

Catch a breath to lie again. I already posted GPS proof the cub party incident never happened. It was a fun play on words joke I put on Twitter that was taken out of context and given false context by Saphy.

It’s impossible to groom someone to have a lawful consentual sex act because by definition the word grooming, in the context of sex, can only apply to unlawful acts. Either don’t know what the word grooming means, or you’re falsifying your own definition for lulz.

Anyone who takes this website seriously needs a serious reality check. They post false information for entertainment purposes only.

For fucks sake, do you just not HEAR what comes from your trap?

Even if you were "joking", people would still find it concerning that you even CONSIDERED bringing young children to a group of people NOTORIOUS for wanting to fuck kids and sexualizing everything about children and childhood.
And like PukeBucket said, you yourself brought the kid drugs when it was ILLEGAL and showed her your dick KNOWING she was a victim of sexual abuse as a child. Don' those BOTH fit the definition of "wanting to do something illegal"? The amount of denial is dizzying. I would say you should man the fuck up and turn yourself in so you can become the local bottom bitch but that would be too kind.
And if this evidence is OH SO FALSE...why haven't you substantially disproven anything? You just dance around the accusations and try to convince us that "well, its actually NOT shitty and disgusting what I did".

Choke on your own cum, mouth breather.

I have not lied on this thread at all. The OP and contributors are repeatedly lying. I’ve repeatedly posted proof which is buried, then the lies are repeated over and over. Then you all gaslight me for causing defamation to happen when it’s impossible for any action of mine to cause defamation to happen.

This is such a bullshit claim that I would have to make 2 posts just to debunk all the shit you've lied about.

At this point only the stupidest human beings on earth would ever trust anything that comes out of the mouth of Gabriel Sickel

FTFY