Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

It is not wasting your time when I tell you that

1. You are arguing for having an age of consent and not having an age of consent.

2. You imply that you want to have sex with underage girls when you say that girls mature at different ages. Some girls mature at 12, others not at 12. Have an age of consent at 12 and that would mean you want to bonk them all, sexually mature or otherwise.

You just can't argue your point and are making excuses. Also, I will start working to make sure you get that -15k reaction score. I will also make our private correspondence public.

Of course, if you don't want this to happen, dox yourself.
ya threatening people is a great way to show loyalty.

1: People caught that assumption (if we're being generous) without me or anyone else saying anything. People who had no idea who you were saw your arguments about age of consent and called you a pedo. Stop with the victim complex you pussy.

2: You waste your own time by being here, we've gone in circles for dozens of pages since your return and almost nothing has changed. So why are you here? It isn't really "sharpening your rhetoric" if it is the same shit. We've been here for months and most of your "fans" like me still think the same shit about you. So I'm not sure if your constant repetition is working and even if it were because you are playing the long game who really cares? We're an active audience of maybe a couple dozen at best from what I can tell. We aren't exactly "big picture" are we? Your "big picture" would be the general white community which I assume requires your manifesto to truly tap into. So why waste your time or are you just trying to wait out the clock to see how the US election turns out?
you leave first.
 
Boxy's defense against being called a pedo boils down to saying a prisoner isn't a homosexual for raping men; he just can't find any women.


Imagine being such a drooling doofus that you can't even manipulate an 18 year old into touching your peepee, and therefore feel forced to diddle kids.
 
Boxy's defense against being called a pedo boils down to saying a prisoner isn't a homosexual for raping men; he just can't find any women.


Imagine being such a drooling doofus that you can't even manipulate an 18 year old into touching your peepee, and therefore feel forced to diddle kids.
justify age of consent at 18 instead of 17 or 16 or 15 or 14. etc?
 
ya threatening people is a great way to show loyalty.

I am not obliged to be loyal to you. Not at any point of our correspondence. You are evasive, you accused me of "concern trolling" so I have no qualms threatening you.

Address my concerns, post your dox or I will release the private correspondence and negrate you to -16k seeing that you are already approaching -15k.
 
Last edited:
we have, many times. But I'll put it into words you can understand:
teenagers are fucking retarded and can't make informed decisions.
there aren't any retard 21 yr old? or 28 yr olds?
you haven't justified why 18 is a better age than 17 or 19.
you have 0 justification for 18 as age of consent

I am not obliged to be loyal to you. Not at any point or our correspondence. You are evasive, you accused me of "concern trolling" so I have no qualms threatening you.

Address my concerns, post your dox or I will release the private correspondence and negrate you to -16k seeing that you are already approaching -15k.
go ahead but I think that just makes you look bad.
 
there aren't any retard 21 yr old? or 28 yr olds?
you haven't justified why 18 is a better age than 17 or 19.
you have 0 justification for 18 as age of consent
There are retards of all ages and exceptions are normally made for them under law.
18 is the age of majority, legally. Therefore it makes sense to pin the AoC there.

go ahead but I think that just makes you look bad.
You advocate for fucking children, you don't get to have an opinion on what "looks bad", faggot.
 
There are retards of all ages and exceptions are normally made for them under law.
18 is the age of majority, legally. Therefore it makes sense to pin the AoC there.


You advocate for fucking children, you don't get to have an opinion on what "looks bad", faggot.
"18 is the age of majority, legally"

this is the dumbest social construct.
1. 18 isn't a majority. It's closer to the quater.
2. legality is circular logic fallacy. It's like citing the bible and saying look this is correct because the bible says so.
 
don't tease, either drop the PMs or don't.

Alright, you have a point. @BoxerShorts47 isn't serious about arguing anyway.

Here goes!

Screenshot_20201123-234750_Samsung Internet.jpg
Screenshot_20201123-234758_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20201123-234807_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20201123-234816_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20201123-234825_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20201123-234833_Samsung Internet.jpg


I guess I have to write his manifesto for him.
 
"18 is the age of majority, legally"

this is the dumbest social construct.
1. 18 isn't a majority. It's closer to the quater.
2. legality is circular logic fallacy. It's like citing the bible and saying look this is correct because the bible says so.
Laws are literally social constructs, you drooling fucking chimp. They are constructed to maintain societal cohesion and to stop, for example, some uppity potato-chewing slavturd from raping any children they feel like with impunity.
So you're in favour of removing the rule of law, then @BrokenSperm47? You would like to see what a lawless country looks like? I promise you; you really wouldn't.
 
Back