Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

I’m wondering if they assume the gyno will always be female. Plenty of male ones exist. I don’t think a dude would be pleased with that. But hey.
Oh they definitely do. They don't want to include men in their fetish, only women. Because they get off on a woman having to look at and touch them and be forced to call their dick "feminine".
 
Last edited:
. . . It pinged my use of “governess” and “boys and girls” as potentially offensive to people. Instead use “child caretaker” or “children”! Excuse me?
That's as horrifying to me as anything I've seen in this thread to date. Absolutely do not take that suggestion, @Coffee Druid , that is some utter bullshit right there.
 
I don't think he looks so masculine that I would notice that he's a man if I wasn't looking for it, but he does have certain traits that are definitely male. His chin is large, but probably within a couple deviations of a Scandinavian woman. His hairline is high, but again, within in a couple standard deviations of a Scandinavian woman. What really stands out to me is the length of his nose.

Also, from the SRS thread I saw this and I'm kind of amazed it hasn't been posted here. Apparently some plastic surgeon in KY has been intentionally mutilating trannies.
1604111009099-png.1697023

I'm not prone to sympathizing with trannies (at least not anymore), but that's totally fucked. The fact that she moved from Chicago to Louisville for the surgery makes me think that either she no longer had anything for her in Chicago or that he made completely unrealistic promises about what he could deliver.
My question is, if you’re moving states anyway, why go to RED Kentucky? That wouldn’t be my first choice of where I’d expect to find trans allies.
 
I'm not prone to sympathizing with trannies (at least not anymore), but that's totally fucked. The fact that he moved from Chicago to Louisville for the surgery makes me think that either he no longer had anything for him in Chicago or that he made completely unrealistic promises about what he could deliver.
I guess you've never been to Chicongo before.
 
That's as horrifying to me as anything I've seen in this thread to date. Absolutely do not take that suggestion, @Coffee Druid , that is some utter bullshit right there.
Like I ever would. I'm doing a presentation on education in 1700s Europe, it's kind of important to distinguish that sort of thing. Makes me wary of Microsoft Office. At least it's through my university and I didn't actually pay for it (besides miscellaneous school fees I guess).
 
I guess you've never been to Chicongo before.
I haven't, but I'm sure that we can both agree that a tranny is more likely to get support, both socially and medically, in Chicago than Louisville. Even if only by virtue of Chicago's size she would have had a better shot at finding a qualified SRS surgeon. I suspect that Fox promised her that he was either the best SRS surgeon in the region or he told her he'd do it for free.
 

I saw this article from stating that 51 studies have reported that transitioning improves mental well-being of transgender people. I haven't looked into the methodologies of these studies. But it seems to be quite contradictory to my experiences with Western trannies, even the proclaimed "transmed" ones I've met.

Many of them state that, yes, they're happier about gender. So maybe the study is correct. But most of them seem to still have mental issues and lack of self awareness in one way or another - like there's an underlying issues transitioning doesnt fix. Or the older, quieter one, there's a version feeling that they accepted more that transitioning wasn't magic and they simply learned to accept themselves as they are, mutilated or not.

Sometimes they seem to talk about how they're medicated and creating stories about how it was a hard decision to them but eventually they're glad they transitioned. But they just sound like addicts to be honest. - that's something I feel with many who says they have depression and "drugs saved their lives". That they seem to not be able to look deep why they feel the thing they did. Just keep living in some sort of zombified bliss state.

I feel like there's an idea of sunk cost fallacy too. I wonder what do you think about the "reported happiness" Vs actual state of troon derangement?
 
I mostly look for the brow ridge, strong jaw, masculine hairline, or Adam's apple. Can you tell me how this one is so obviously male. I can't see it, but I would like to know.
Others have commented but his face is just...male. He looks like a dude in makeup. From experience it seems women generally are better at clocking mtf troons (even if they're not sure what's off necessarily) but it's pretty hard to miss imo and it's not just one thing but the combination of small things, I think. He's definitely pretty and I think the makeup, hair, and clothes can be a little blinding but he still has a cleft chin, very long face for a cis woman, very strong jaw, long nose, pronounced brow ridge, male hairline, and thin hair. There could totally exist a masculine cis woman who has some of these traits, but the combination of all of them screams male.

Granted, I can't clock ftms as easily or instinctively so maybe there's something to women being able to clock mtfs and men clocking ftms?
 
My question is, if you’re moving states anyway, why go to RED Kentucky? That wouldn’t be my first choice of where I’d expect to find trans allies.
Louisville, particularly the hipster parts, are not like the rest of Kentucky. She could easily build out a friendly bubble. The typical groups are already infested with troons and it is a fairly gay friendly city.
 
I saw this article from stating that 51 studies have reported that transitioning improves mental well-being of transgender people. I haven't looked into the methodologies of these studies. But it seems to be quite contradictory to my experiences with Western trannies, even the proclaimed "transmed" ones I've met.
Without even getting to the individual methodologies, one thing a reviewer of the studies must keep in mind is the Hawthorne Effect. The subjects perform better (in this case, appear to be more happy) simply because they are aware of being observed. It is a phenomenon very hard to control in troon studies (the only conceivable way to get around it is to do double-blind trials with placebos, which is obviously impossible in troon cases). So I'm more inclined to believe in population-based (rather than case-based) studies, in which the subjects are not being monitored. The population-based studies I have in mind are suicide statistics, utilizations of psychiatric care service, etc. And such studies have indeed shown trooning out has little effect, no effect, or even adverse effect in psychiatric outcome.

Cornell U doesn't even mention the reviewer's name(s). Their review process simply consists of someone reading out the papers and sorting them out in respective bins: "beneficial" and "mixed or null" (the studies that showed harm are unlikely to get published and are not included in Cornell's list, but a responsible reviewers should at least make an effort to track the authors down) This is not college material; a twelve-year old kid can do it.
 
Last edited:
Back