Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

[Prophetic Spirit]

Oh no Opal ( who is on this thread) is an artist who drew for Lily and she blew up at her for drawing her too "Fat" If lily can't masturbate to it it's wrong and abusing her that the only fanart rule.
View attachment 1747214

for me personally, that art was miles better than what she gets from Mikay or Alexis Ginger.

Damn, i was alarmed for nothing. But thanks for clarify it for me. And that's more T H I C C N E S S than fat.
I sense vibes from that incident with the SU fandom who threaten a girl in DevianArt's fanart about a skinny Rose Quartz years ago before the official revelation

 

[Mac Tíre na Gealaí]

So as y'all are probably aware, a WoW expansion launched last night and Blizzard has finally responded to all the complaints that Sylvanas' plans and motives have been shrouded in mystery for 4 years. There's a cinematic that takes place between Anduin and Sylvanas where she literally just tells us what her endgame has been.

Spoiler: WoW Rant

So in WoW, every living being that dies goes to the Shadowlands, a separate plane of existence. Their souls are taken before a being called the Arbiter, whom experiences every aspect of their soul in an instant and sends them to an appropriate afterlife. Recently something has incapacitated the Arbiter, which has sent every soul that has died throughout the multiverse to The Maw, basically WoW Super Hell. Souls have power in the Shadowlands, called Anima, and all the souls flooding into the Maw has allowed the Jailer to harness their anima and make him, and by extension Sylvanas, far more powerful.

Sylvanas has allied with the Jailer because she believes that he will be able to tear down the system that the Shadowlands established. She claims that they will finally have choice, free will, even hinting at being able to choose who they love?
Anduin also states the obvious: "What makes you believe you're not just a weapon to achieve his ends?" which Sylvanas just ignores.

So, here's what I believe will be revealed: When Sylvanas killed herself ontop of Icecrown, she was sent to the Maw. Not because she was actually destined for it, but because the Jailer saw potential in her and intervened. She experiences terror and torture in the Maw and feels that her fate was completely undeserved (which, at that time, I would agree with). The Jailer comes in and is like "Sucks, huh? But if you help me you can avoid this", you know, lying through his teeth. So she makes a pact with him and has since set out to get this whole plot in motion.

At this point it seems that they're going to go the bullshit redemption route: Jailer backstabs Sylvanas, Sylvanas realizes the error of her ways, helps the Champions of Azeroth to defeat the Jailer, and then her and Nathanos probably fuck off into some corner of the Shadowlands never to be seen again.

Now, hopefully they don't go this route because it would be incredibly unsatisfying for all involved and, really, would just be the biggest fucking cop-out. Maybe Sylvanas is actually planning to turn on the Jailer, or something.
Either way, Sylvanas can eat the biggest bag of dicks.

tl;dr: Sylvie feels completely justified converting an immeasurably massive amount of souls into raw power just so she can avoid an eternity she may or may not have been justified in having. Fuck Sylvanas.

 

[ColdArmadillo288]

I don't know how relevant or not this could be, but I feel like this video from someone that tested positive for Covid is a real eye opener regarding how truly hideous and abhorrent Liliana's attitude towards Covid has been. Despite having caught the virus twice, and therefore making herself even more likely to spread it to others, the fact she still acts like it's nothing worth worrying too much is appaling to say the least.

On other news, I searched "Lily Orchard" on youtbe. I didn't add response, reaction or anything, just her name, and I feel like putting here some of the other results that came out. I haven't had time to see all of them on their entirety, but they being the first results even before her own video series is funny to me.

Talking about the Opal's fanart incident:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=097uv0TUVXI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR7y7t_eNhc

About the writing tips:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq4pvVKvkVw (just an archive of it)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMHJERVTQP4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E807s4FIyms

I didn't include those videos that have already been linked before.

Truth. I saw a news story today about a 10 year old boy who passed away from covid - and a news story where a funeral had taken place with 3 people to be buried who died within days of each other - a mother and her 2 sons dying of COVID-19. It is no joke and it infuriates me to no end that Lily doesn’t treat it as such.

 

[ShiftyBoi]

Here we have the latest of the pokemon comic. You'll be surprised to learn: it's bad.

https://archive.li/kfrzf

I'd like to condemn Lily demonizing Lizzy more in the comic, but knowing Lizzy doesn't care kind of makes it funnier.
Like yeah Lily has owned Lizzy once again, many years later in her awful pokemon comic while Lizzy does essential work and gets paid for commissions while not giving two fucks about Lily anymore. Scathing.

Also the art be bad. One of the weirdest details is the picture of the girl with butterfree in the background. But the only thing indicating it's a picture is a thin square around it, there's no tint added or reflection to indicate it's in a frame, so it looks like a disembodied head in a square.

 

[ActuallyAutistic]

Here we have the latest of the pokemon comic. You'll be surprised to learn: it's bad.

https://archive.md/kfrzf

View attachment 1747427
View attachment 1747428
View attachment 1747430
View attachment 1747432
View attachment 1747433
I'd like to condemn Lily demonizing Lizzy more in the comic, but knowing Lizzy doesn't care kind of makes it funnier.
Like yeah Lily has owned Lizzy once again, many years later in her awful pokemon comic while Lizzy does essential work and gets paid for commissions while not giving two fucks about Lily anymore. Scathing.

Also the art be bad. One of the weirdest details is the picture of the girl with butterfree in the background. But the only thing indicating it's a picture is a thin square around it, there's no tint added or reflection to indicate it's in a frame, so it looks like a disembodied head in a square.

Imagine being so petty and spiteful that you continue to trash your ex in your wish fulfillment comic to prove "how much better off you are without her" while showing your inability to let go of things, which ironically would show that you were better off without them. Lily doesn't understand relationships or writing. Who knew?

 

[Son Goku Baku]

A part of me kinda likes the metaphor of "she was like the sun but she met her at night", but the stupid addition of "sun is evil" just takes away any weight to it, also the fact that the sun is literally on the other side of the world during the night so it doesn't make a lot of sense and why would G even compare L to the sun in the first place, unless the idea was to explain to the hybrid thing on term it will understand? When someone talk that way about a person, they usually mean that they were too beautiful to look out close or that being too close is what burned them like Ikarus. But then G ruins that meaning by adding the night and is again the problem of how that fits.

I'm probably thinking too hard about it, but just wanted to point that out out. I like the idea, the execution is too clumsy.

Is that supposed to be the ginger fuck toy? Because if she is, is this a way to introduce your own girlfriend on the comic? Just goshing about your engagement with someone else and shitalking your ex? You're not going to have any scene of she even seeing Comic!Liliana first? Not even implied that she already knew about the engagement and was supportive of it? If you didn't already knew about the fucktoy you wouldn't even know who she is or what is her relationship with anyone here. No? It's a lot more important to shit talk an ex that has moved on for a year now?

Or if she not a girlfriend and is just added as a friend, I can't imagine how it would feel for your own girlfriend you claim to adore to friendzone you on her own fantasy work. We all know that the fucktoy is just the back up for when/if Mikaila grows a backbone, but still, you'd expect Liliana to be less obvious about it.

 

[Prophetic Spirit]

The entire comic is utterly gold in a ironic meaning. @ShiftyBoi , @ActuallyAutistic and @Son Goku Baku are right about don't letting go, the same ass shit we talked days ago.

I'm more concern the time when her few sympathizers gonna leave this toxic behavior. Imagine actually Lily talking about that like: "I don't know why everybody leaves me, probably because they're a worthless pieces of shit" and if that day comes, i'm not gonna be surprised.

This is the best example of thinking about a human breathes the same air as you.

 

[saladimitate]

Here we have the latest of the pokemon comic. You'll be surprised to learn: it's bad.

https://archive.md/kfrzf

View attachment 1747427
View attachment 1747428
View attachment 1747430
View attachment 1747432
View attachment 1747433
I'd like to condemn Lily demonizing Lizzy more in the comic, but knowing Lizzy doesn't care kind of makes it funnier.
Like yeah Lily has owned Lizzy once again, many years later in her awful pokemon comic while Lizzy does essential work and gets paid for commissions while not giving two fucks about Lily anymore. Scathing.

Also the art be bad. One of the weirdest details is the picture of the girl with butterfree in the background. But the only thing indicating it's a picture is a thin square around it, there's no tint added or reflection to indicate it's in a frame, so it looks like a disembodied head in a square.

Everything bad is pretty much said already but wanted to add just the annoyance that is Mik's paneling. People read from *left* to right, so that first panel is way confusing. As a comic maker myself, it's a bit infuriating

 

[Typical Anime Trap]

Here we have the latest of the pokemon comic. You'll be surprised to learn: it's bad.

https://archive.md/kfrzf

View attachment 1747427
View attachment 1747428
View attachment 1747430
View attachment 1747432
View attachment 1747433
I'd like to condemn Lily demonizing Lizzy more in the comic, but knowing Lizzy doesn't care kind of makes it funnier.
Like yeah Lily has owned Lizzy once again, many years later in her awful pokemon comic while Lizzy does essential work and gets paid for commissions while not giving two fucks about Lily anymore. Scathing.

Also the art be bad. One of the weirdest details is the picture of the girl with butterfree in the background. But the only thing indicating it's a picture is a thin square around it, there's no tint added or reflection to indicate it's in a frame, so it looks like a disembodied head in a square.

How can someone put so little detail into the background and yet leave me with so much to ponder. The picture of the girl with purple hair is supposed to be Ginger but it just looks like a window because there's no difference between the backgrounds. Also I've made this complaint before but who in the world would ever paint their entire fucking living area royal purple?? It's such a straining color and it clashes so badly with everything. They could've made the walls purple but why not just make them like a nice lilac color or a white with purple tints? I know my questions will never be answered because its just Mik being inexperienced and not knowing proper color theory but it still surprises me how bad it manages to look.

I also want to draw attention to the sculpture of G's head they have? Why do they have that? how did they make that? Its like making a sculpture of your pets head and then putting it on display with your cat in the room. Only your cat can speak and thinks like a human. Also every time G is drawn her hands get fatter. By the next comic they'll be half the size of her body.

Another nitpick I have is why does Mikaila put "le" in front of everything? "le flop" is cringeworthy and I legitimately haven't seen anyone use it since 2012, so to me its just a really weird thing that they keep putting in.

 

[Armored Hero Fanfic]

Here we have the latest of the pokemon comic. You'll be surprised to learn: it's bad.

https://archive.md/kfrzf

View attachment 1747427
View attachment 1747428
View attachment 1747430
View attachment 1747432
View attachment 1747433
I'd like to condemn Lily demonizing Lizzy more in the comic, but knowing Lizzy doesn't care kind of makes it funnier.
Like yeah Lily has owned Lizzy once again, many years later in her awful pokemon comic while Lizzy does essential work and gets paid for commissions while not giving two fucks about Lily anymore. Scathing.

Also the art be bad. One of the weirdest details is the picture of the girl with butterfree in the background. But the only thing indicating it's a picture is a thin square around it, there's no tint added or reflection to indicate it's in a frame, so it looks like a disembodied head in a square.

it's going to have been 2 years. somehow.
How has it only been two years since December 3rd 2018?
I suspect this will be the extent of talking about Lizzy though.
but also we just jumped straight into the fucking christmas arc with out even really finishing the arc with Mara, somehow lily wasn't even able to focus on pokemon lesbians. I can't tell if thats a sign of the interest in this comic degrading even harder or if lily is just unable to feign interest in anything that isn't drama that revolves around the unlaunchable romance between C!LIly and Gardevoir

 

[Lurk Jurk]

Sweet buttery Christ my dude get over Lizzy. This has nothing to do with the plot at hand, this is information that's already been told to the audience. This has zero point but for Jerry to keep obsessively trying to control Lizzy's life because she's the one that escaped. He really is furry troon Onision.

 

[The Iconoclast]

View attachment 1744648

If this is considered "genetically superior", then fucking euthanize me now.

You know, Jerry idolizing Bob makes sense now.

 

[Armored Hero Fanfic]

You know, Jerry idolizing Bob makes sense now.

View attachment 1747914

it's like the perfect collision

 

[Son Goku Baku]

On that whole twitter fight thing over her writing tips Liliana did told a minor that "not everyone gets wet when two women abuse each other" or something like that, so it seems that Liliana even admires the creepiness of his idol and has the same level of self-awareness. Maybe I'm just old fashion, but I don't fancy 30 year old women talking about getting wet to minors.

Edit to add: If the ginger character is not the fuck toy, then who's it? Did she ever appeared before and Liliana just forgot to mention her name on the actual comic because she assumes her fanbase already knows?

 

[thebananaonion]

View attachment 1747430
View attachment 1747432
View attachment 1747433

Maybe im beating a dead horse here but... this is another kind of autistic reference. Explaining things to autistic people in a way that relates to them personally so they can understand is like, basic autism understanding 101


Kid doesnt understand how biology works? explain it to him using the pokemon breeding method and just say this but with extra steps. Maybe a kid has a hard time planning, think of their day's schedule like train route time schedules and how each train is it's own activity. I know these seem obsurd to people like us but it just 'clicks' in an autistic person's mind. I hope i explained this well enugh but i'm going off personal encounters and what ive read upon in my spare time through books.

Explaining lizzy is like the sun makes it easier for bonnie to understand 'ohh this person is as bad as the thing i hate the most, THE SUN!' helps give gravity to this individual, a person bonnie wouldn't care for otherwise.


Bonnie isnt autistic coded my fucking ass...

Lily claimed to have worked with autistic people in the past-one of her potential lies i kinda just think is true. Maybe this experience is subtly making it's way into her story without her realizing it but doubbles down on it NOT being autistic rep because she fears the hypocrasy of 'dont other nonbinary people as monsters' (doiuble trouble) yet she has an autistic child whos just a monster- theworst thing you can depict an autistc person as (both physically looking like a monster and hypothetically 'this human is so otherly that its acting like a monster at this point')

 

[GayDemiBoy]

Lily claimed to have worked with autistic people in the past-one of her potential lies i kinda just think is true. Maybe this experience is subtly making it's way into her story without her realizing it but doubbles down on it NOT being autistic rep because she fears the hypocrasy of 'dont other nonbinary people as monsters' (doiuble trouble) yet she has an autistic child whos just a monster- theworst thing you can depict an autistc person as (both physically looking like a monster and hypothetically 'this human is so otherly that its acting like a monster at this point')

I think this might be on the money. Lily's claimed to have worked with both kids and autistic people. I have feeling she might have worked with autistic children which is why she ended up having this scene because of that experience of trying to explain a foreign concept to them in terms and subjects they best understand. Mixed in with the fact Lily has watched shows made for far younger children like MLP where they will also have these sorts of explanations thrown in so a child viewer won't be lost, I think Lily believes this is how all children are able to grasp concepts they aren't familiar with.

Though, it's very weird to talk to your toddler about having an ex fiancée. More so have it explained to them by your sentient pet your child calls momma. Most parents aren't going to talk or describe former partners unless they were directly involved in the child's life long enough for the child to question where they went. I could see this being a topic to talk to a older child when they were about to start dating to help show them the possible signs of abuse in a relationship but Bonnie is like 5-8. She isn't going to realistically start dating till way later, though knowing Lily she will write her dating Clara (The child she gave Ralts to) as a child most likely, so it's strange. It's really clear this is just to try and drag Lizzy some more more so since Lily has gotten a new twitter. Though Lizzy most likely has Lily, Ginger, and Mikaila blocked so if Lily even posted it she's not gonna see it. Lily's just really hoping to try and get a reaction to help prove that Lizzy is totally the mean abuser like she's been yelling about for two years.

 

[Devil-Man]

Another nitpick I have is why does Mikaila put "le" in front of everything? "le flop" is cringeworthy and I legitimately haven't seen anyone use it since 2012, so to me its just a really weird thing that they keep putting in.

Because people found the initial "le" gag to be lousy, so Jerry and Mik decided to hammer it in as much as possible out of petty spite, like everything else he does.

it's going to have been 2 years. somehow.
How has it only been two years since December 3rd 2018?
I suspect this will be the extent of talking about Lizzy though.
but also we just jumped straight into the fucking christmas arc with out even really finishing the arc with Mara, somehow lily wasn't even able to focus on pokemon lesbians. I can't tell if thats a sign of the interest in this comic degrading even harder or if lily is just unable to feign interest in anything that isn't drama that revolves around the unlaunchable romance between C!LIly and Gardevoir

I'm not a psychologist, but isn't it common for abusers to keep their victims in mind even after they had left?

New stream of Shadowlands.

https://youtu.be/GykUeMev4Bk

 

[Lime Rogue]

The picture of the girl with purple hair is supposed to be Ginger but it just looks like a window because there's no difference between the backgrounds

I honestly thought it was like a glitch or something at first, lol. It looks terrible.

 

[Duine In Cudromach]

I really don't think Bonnie is supposed to be autistic coded.

For one, those things about how you teach an autistic child in context of what they understand? That's pretty common in how to teach young children to begin with. Young children aren't capable of abstract thought (and Bonnie is supposed to be roughly three years old so she's barely beyond object permanence and self-identification), so when you talk to them about these higher concepts you have to do it in a way they can directly relate to. Hell, if you're explaining a concept to adults who have no personal experience with something you usually have to back up a little and give them a simile so help bridge the knowledge gap. Go find an older person and teach them more than surface-level computer function; you will find yourself digging for relatable metaphor in order to help ease them into new concepts.

This is also why children's cartoons use metaphor to teach more complex ideas. Kids just don't have any frame of reference and don't yet have the mental capacity for that level of abstraction, so you show them something they can understand and they will (ideally) carry the concept with them as they grow up and reach stages where they can retain that information.

No. I think Bonnie can be explained far more simply-- Lily is a shitty writer.

Bonnie doesn't necessarily come across as behaving like a 'real child' because she isn't based on a real child, she's based on idealized child tropes cranked up to eleven in order to create Lily's perfect precocious child. All she does is exist to be cute, and exaggerating 'child-like' tendencies like finding an inanimate object to to consider a nemesis (the sun) or intentionally annoying other people just for validation and attention (that weird and intensely unfunny peanut butter skit). She's there to ask cute questions and make cute reactions and just be an accessory that sometimes recalls 'cute' moments from children that are taken less from actual experience with children and more from the way children are written in sitcoms.

This creates a child character that doesn't really act like a child but more of a pastiche of what people who haven't interacted with children for years think that a chid would be like-- a pure, innocent creature with some marginal flights of fancy characteristics that are meant to come across as cute and charming but are mostly just obnoxious or uncomfortable.

On a broader scale this is just plain the result of bad research and transplanting ideas that you didn't really think about yourself. You'll find this all over her stories, where she just grabs things she likes and plunks them in without actually thinking of how things work or doing any deeper consideration. Bonnie is just her Quintessential Child Character cobbled together from tropes she likes; Aliana is just her Quintessential Badass Sith cobbled together from tropes she likes,; Anevay is her Quintessential Hero from Nothing who is just cobbled together from tropes she likes. Hell, some of her Tales of the Val'kyr stories have tried to explain the economy and governance of Val'kyr society by just grabbing things she approves of from the real world without realizing that the billion year old space angels are probably going to function differently than 21st century Earth. It's all just part of Lily creating a thing from loosely-related concepts of what she's seen in media (rather than firsthand or through research) and just shoving that into her work without doing any of the buildup that made the original concept work in its context.

So I think Bonnie isn't intended to be autistic or autistic-coded, she's just a consequence of a writer who can barely figure out how to put on a pair of pants.

(Although on a similar note, the insistence that she isn't autistic came from anons praising her for her 'autistic representation' in Bonnie and Butterfree. Lily at the time insisted that this was intentional and that she could use the character to explore autistic... what's the word. Actions? Traits? It's obvious it wasn't at all what she intended and was just writing child-like characters through the lens of how she thought child characters should be written, but suddenly she was getting praise for it so now it's official. Then some people were offended and she caught backlash and within days suddenly none of that was true and you're all stupid for assuming this thing Lily had just said was still relevant once people stopped loving her for doing it. That's all Lily's writing is, responding to positive and negative stimuli because she demands the endorphin rush from being praised by strangers on the Internet.)

 

[King_Boo_Official]

I really don't think Bonnie is supposed to be autistic coded.

For one, those things about how you teach an autistic child in context of what they understand? That's pretty common in how to teach young children to begin with. Young children aren't capable of abstract thought (and Bonnie is supposed to be roughly three years old so she's barely beyond object permanence and self-identification), so when you talk to them about these higher concepts you have to do it in a way they can directly relate to. Hell, if you're explaining a concept to adults who have no personal experience with something you usually have to back up a little and give them a simile so help bridge the knowledge gap. Go find an older person and teach them more than surface-level computer function; you will find yourself digging for relatable metaphor in order to help ease them into new concepts.

This is also why children's cartoons use metaphor to teach more complex ideas. Kids just don't have any frame of reference and don't yet have the mental capacity for that level of abstraction, so you show them something they can understand and they will (ideally) carry the concept with them as they grow up and reach stages where they can retain that information.

No. I think Bonnie can be explained far more simply-- Lily is a shitty writer.

Bonnie doesn't necessarily come across as behaving like a 'real child' because she isn't based on a real child, she's based on idealized child tropes cranked up to eleven in order to create Lily's perfect precocious child. All she does is exist to be cute, and exaggerating 'child-like' tendencies like finding an inanimate object to to consider a nemesis (the sun) or intentionally annoying other people just for validation and attention (that weird and intensely unfunny peanut butter skit). She's there to ask cute questions and make cute reactions and just be an accessory that sometimes recalls 'cute' moments from children that are taken less from actual experience with children and more from the way children are written in sitcoms.

This creates a child character that doesn't really act like a child but more of a pastiche of what people who haven't interacted with children for years think that a chid would be like-- a pure, innocent creature with some marginal flights of fancy characteristics that are meant to come across as cute and charming but are mostly just obnoxious or uncomfortable.

On a broader scale this is just plain the result of bad research and transplanting ideas that you didn't really think about yourself. You'll find this all over her stories, where she just grabs things she likes and plunks them in without actually thinking of how things work or doing any deeper consideration. Bonnie is just her Quintessential Child Character cobbled together from tropes she likes; Aliana is just her Quintessential Badass Sith cobbled together from tropes she likes,; Anevay is her Quintessential Hero from Nothing who is just cobbled together from tropes she likes. Hell, some of her Tales of the Val'kyr stories have tried to explain the economy and governance of Val'kyr society by just grabbing things she approves of from the real world without realizing that the billion year old space angels are probably going to function differently than 21st century Earth. It's all just part of Lily creating a thing from loosely-related concepts of what she's seen in media (rather than firsthand or through research) and just shoving that into her work without doing any of the buildup that made the original concept work in its context.

So I think Bonnie isn't intended to be autistic or autistic-coded, she's just a consequence of a writer who can barely figure out how to put on a pair of pants.

(Although on a similar note, the insistence that she isn't autistic came from anons praising her for her 'autistic representation' in Bonnie and Butterfree. Lily at the time insisted that this was intentional and that she could use the character to explore autistic... what's the word. Actions? Traits? It's obvious it wasn't at all what she intended and was just writing child-like characters through the lens of how she thought child characters should be written, but suddenly she was getting praise for it so now it's official. Then some people were offended and she caught backlash and within days suddenly none of that was true and you're all stupid for assuming this thing Lily had just said was still relevant once people stopped loving her for doing it. That's all Lily's writing is, responding to positive and negative stimuli because she demands the endorphin rush from being praised by strangers on the Internet.)

So Lily wants to have her cake and eat it to. She’ll take the praise from people calling Bonnie good autistic representation, while simultaneously warding off a multitude of detractors by avoiding direct labeling and relying on plausible deniability.
Come to think of it, wasn’t that how the Big Bang Theory writers treated Sheldon?
Isn’t that ALSO an approach she calls “not real representation” when it’s done by people she doesn’t like?
Huh.