2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
"i dont like your evidence because i can't refute it"

which lawsuit proved masks works against covid or that climate change is real?

e: how uninformed do you have to be to think that the standard of evidence is officiated by a court? that's way more hivemind than we joke about.

The standard of evidence bit IS officiated by a court. If you don’t like the court‘s decision on your evidence, go to a higher court then petition for a change in the laws on how evidence is handled later, because changing the rules after your evidence is mishandled probably won’t help you because of ex post facto laws (again, this is why you appeal). Sure, the legislature can in fact change the rules on the standards of evidence, but the judges will always be the one charged to uphold them. Usually an idiotic judge eventually gets the boot later down the line from either impeachment or the courts themselves via disbarring, so most judges won’t play around too much with evidence admission.

Uhh sorry buddy there is a big difference. If the US government decides to censor you, you can't do anything about it. If Google or Twitter decide to censor you, you can just use a different service or make your own.

If the US government decides to censor you, you go to the courts. Then you collect your fat paycheck from being a legitimate victim of a First Amendment violation. Google and Twitter don’t run the risk of being busted for literal millions of dollars for shutting you up. Note that the New York Post hasn’t sued Twitter yet. It should be open and shut, but because Twitter isn’t the US government, they are practically untouchable due to the fact that the New York Post can’t easily prove damages due to the Streisand Effect giving them all of the clicks (and therefore ad revenue) for a time.
 
Expecting a surge of techbro grifters coming after Trump supporters selling webshit solutions to social and political problems.
If a techbro can create a serious alternative to big tech like Parler is trying to, then he will be very rich because Lord knows if boomers and Trump supporters want to throw money at something even as stupid as Q they can.
 
us humans
Your kind are not welcome here. Last warning.


Coconutmilk Tulsi lobbying for Trump to pardon Assange and Snowden. That would be an appropriately big balled move. It has to happen.


If a techbro can create a serious alternative to big tech like Parler is trying to, then he will be very rich because Lord knows if boomers and Trump supporters want to throw money at something even as stupid as Q they can.
True alternatives will not be allowed. Controlling the flow of information is too valuable. Any firm not under a spookyolk will be forced under or forced to relinquish control to the totalitarian globalist regime. There is no peaceful solution out of the mess Western society is in.

Too many assume that there is some free market. There is not.
 
You can but it's the payment processors wouldn't or backing that's missing. Even parler cucked at the beginning stages.
To be fair to them, this is the first period in history where a large number of people could go decades to centuries back in time ideologically speaking due to internet echo chambers and unprecedentedly easy access to old or fringe perspectives. Probably scares a lot of people. Most stable societies up to now have had everyone who mattered on the same page regarding 95% of issues, because they were all on the same stage of "progress" or "subversion". I'm starting to think that social change (whether caused by KGB agents, Jews, or just the process of people adapting to new societal conditions) hasn't greatly accelerated, we're just more aware of how radical the difference was between then and now.

Before Edward Gibbon invented modern history historical scenes tended to be portrayed as if they happened right where the artist/author lived at the same time he wrote/painted it. I'd imagine a similar leap in popular understanding occurred with the rise of the internet. Chaucer's Knight's Tale has ancient greeks getting medieval, this 16th century painting shows the Shapur (d. 270 AD) and his soldiers dressed and armed like 16th century Germans &c.

You know that stupid shitlib meme about how "political disagreements are about taxes, not my right to exist as a troon"? On that specific point it's bullshit, but it shows they're scared of the window widening, even if they lack the self-awareness (or honesty) to realise they're causing most of it.
 
Last edited:
You can but it's the payment processors wouldn't or backing that's missing. Even parler cucked at the beginning stages.
Hmm... then maybe a law needs to be a nondiscrimination law holding banks and payments processors liable if they discriminate against any person/company not violating the law. Seems like a better move than trying to regulate tech platforms.

Or perhaps Parler, or some other platform, could register as a 501(c)3 and rely on tax-deductible donations rather than ad money.
 
Getting laid is seriously not that difficult if you just bat within your range. Women want sex as much as men do, just be up front about it. If you can't get laid with dating apps, I don't know what to say.
Uh huh. That's why lesbian bed death is a thing and a couple of generations of fags litterally fucked themselves to death.

Believing men and women have the same libido is absurd.
 
So, evidence has been released. Any one with the legal know-how mind reading and state the ramifications for this? Because it looks fucking serious from my perspective.



Alexandra.png


Alexandra 2.png
 
Hmm... then maybe a law needs to be a nondiscrimination law holding banks and payments processors liable if they discriminate against any person/company not violating the law. Seems like a better move than trying to regulate tech platforms.

Or perhaps Parler, or some other platform, could register as a 501(c)3 and rely on tax-deductible donations rather than ad money.

They'll get at will protection so as long they don't state why they are discriminatory they'll be fine.
 
I'm sorry, but I just can't imagine how anyone could think that taking away women's right to vote could end any way, but badly.

You think gender-relations are bad now?

You think tensions are bad now?

You think the violence is bad now?

You think the country is on the cusp of a civil war now?

Take away half the population's right to vote, and just see what fucking happens.

The country will look like fucking Afghanistan in under two years.
This is yet another reason why I think taking their votes are dumb. The genie is out of the bottle, trying to force women back into roles that died off decades ago after they've had generations of deeply ingrained brainwashing put in is harmful to everyone. We need to find someway of moving forward instead of trying to bring back a dead society.
Look i am not saying that we have to emulate mindbreak hentai into reality, but we might have to.
 
Apparently Dominion Votings has a response to Sidney's lawsuit. Reposted here without comment.
While Dominion Voting Systems is not named as a defendant, on Wednesday, November 25, 2020, Sidney Powell released what appears to be a very rough draft of a lawsuit against the Republican governor and secretary of state of Georgia alleging a bizarre election fraud conspiracy that—were it possible—would necessarily require the collaboration of thousands of participants, including state officeholders, bipartisan local elections officials, thousands of volunteer Election Day poll watchers in thousands of locations across the state of Georgia, federal and state government technology testing agencies, private elections service companies, and independent third-party auditors. This quite simply did not occur.


Dominion Voting Systems is the gold standard for transparent and accountable voting equipment. The allegations included in the draft complaint are baseless, senseless, physically impossible, and unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. We stand with the state and local elected officials and bipartisan election volunteers that this suit maliciously maligns.


In Powell's error-filled document, she repeats a number of baseless allegations about Dominion Voting Systems, which she has made in public since Election Day.


The allegations about DVS most relevant to the election outcome in Georgia are that votes tallied on a Dominion vote tabulator were somehow manipulated on a statewide basis to elevate the count in favor of the Democratic presidential candidate. It is important to understand that this is not possible—not on a machine-by-machine basis, not by alleged hacking, not by manipulating software, and not by imagined ways of "sending" votes to overseas locations. But even if it were possible, it would have been discovered in the statewide handcount of votes.


Dominion's systems are secure as certified by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). In fact, all voting systems must provide assurance that they work accurately and reliably as intended under federal U.S. EAC and state certification and testing requirements. Further, Dominion source code is verified and secure. Third-party test labs chosen by the bipartisan U.S. EAC and accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) perform complete source code reviews on every tabulation system that is federally certified in the U.S.


Every vote from a Dominion device in Georgia is documented on an auditable paper trail and creates a verifiable paper ballot available for hand-counting. In fact, the Georgia handcounts, independent audits, and machine tests have all repeatedly affirmed that the machine counts were accurate.


In addition, Powell makes a number of allegations that go beyond Dominion's role in Georgia's elections—which is only to provide the ballot tabulation systems. For the record, again, Dominion does not develop voter-registration systems, poll-books, signature verification software, or provide vote-by-mail printing. These parts of the voting process are instead supported by other companies and controlled by the state and local officials who run elections in hundreds of thousands of voting places across the country.


These assertions in the Powell filing are non-sensical and unsupported by any presentation of evidence. However, to respond to some of her specific assertions about Dominion:


  • Dominion was not "founded by oligarchs and dictators." It was founded in Toronto, Canada, and it is now a proud nonpartisan American company. Dominion has attested to its ownership—under penalty of perjury—to local, state, and federal agencies, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which includes all U.S. national security agencies.
  • Dominion is not, and never has been, owned by Smartmatic. Neither has Smartmatic ever been a subsidiary of Dominion, as the complaint asserts. Dominion is an entirely separate company—they do not collaborate in any way and have no affiliate relationships or financial ties. Dominion does not use Smartmatic. These are all facts verifiable in the public record as well as in regulatory and legal filings.
  • Dominion has no ties to the Venezuelan government, nor any other foreign government, including China and Iran. Dominion has never participated in any elections in Venezuela and has no connection or relationship with the now deceased former Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. Other companies have serviced elections in Venezuela, but Dominion is not one of them.
  • Dominion does not have operations in Germany including an "Office of the General Counsel."
  • Dominion Voting Systems are in fact auditable—and are audited and tested regularly by multiple government agencies and independent third parties. All electronic devices used in the U.S. must be designed to be audited.
  • Dominion's system does in fact include a paper ballot backup to verify results. In fact, thousands of elections officials in Georgia just completed the largest vote recount in American history using the paper ballots produced by Dominion devices.
  • Dominion's system cannot be manipulated by a technician in the way Powell alleges. This has been confirmed by the government agencies that have certified Dominion equipment.
  • Despite repeated counts and audits, there is no evidence of any kind that any voting system deleted, lost, or changed votes in Georgia, or in any of the other 28 states that use Dominion devices. Certifications and audits have instead shown the accuracy, transparency, and reliability of Dominion's systems.
  • The federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security verified that there is no evidence that this election was in any way compromised. In fact, they have called it the most secure election in American history.
  • Servers that run Dominion software are located in local election offices, and data never leaves the control of local election officials.
  • There were no "glitches" with Dominion's voting systems, and no unauthorized or last-minute software updates occurred.
  • There were no "data breaches" of Dominion software by anyone, let alone rogue foreign actors.
  • Human errors did occur in some counties but were resolved quickly by county officials before the canvass process.
  • Votes are not processed outside the United States. Votes are counted and reported by county and state election officials—not by Dominion, or any other election technology company.
  • Election safeguards—from testing and certification of voting systems to canvassing and auditing—prevent malicious actors from tampering with results.

Sidney Powell's wild and reckless allegations are not only demonstrably false, they have led to stalking, harassment, and death threats to Dominion employees. This criminal activity has been duly reported to the appropriate law enforcement agencies, and we intend to hold Ms. Powell, and those aiding and abetting her fraudulent actions, accountable for any harm that may occur as a result.
Archive
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Number one reason you know they're bullshitting. If all the stuff they say is impossible really was impossible, they'd be suing her. If she's lying they've got a clear cut case of defamation.

They'll wait for the Biden administration to declare Powell a Tommy Robinson/Michael Flynn/Emannuel Goldstein so that all court cases against her succeed and all cases for her fail before suing. Until then they'll just talk shit in a way that is easily quotable by MSM journos writing hit pieces on her.

This sort of thing is why Trump needs to go full Pinochet on Democrats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back