- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
Just mentioning 2 and 3 has long been associated with crazy. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s instant ignore.He IS telling them to just look him up, so he's not just spewing stuff they'll tune out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just mentioning 2 and 3 has long been associated with crazy. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s instant ignore.He IS telling them to just look him up, so he's not just spewing stuff they'll tune out.
Left wing has gone full crazy and so far they are doing pretty damn good.Just mentioning 2 and 3 has long been associated with crazy. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s instant ignore.
True. But at this point, I doubt any person who's part of the online right wing hasn't heard of Soros being mentioned. And most normies are already on the left's side, so trying to court them is pointless.Just mentioning 2 and 3 has long been associated with crazy. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s instant ignore.
How many times do I have to say this: the Left plays by different rules. Their racist voter suppression conspiracy is acceptable and just; your stand alone complex voter fraud is insane and treasonous.Left wing has gone full crazy and so far they are doing pretty damn good.
Maybe the right wing needs more crazy to translate into action. Something of consequence rather than rallies and slogans and more tweets full of blue balls.
Maybe "the Left" really is just the course of civilisation embodied. Maybe the only true rightist in Uncle Ted, everyone other "conservative" just wants to roll back to a previous iteration (typically the one that prevailed when they were children).How many times do I have to say this: the Left plays by different rules. Their racist voter suppression conspiracy is acceptable and just; your stand alone complex voter fraud is insane and treasonous.
Reactionaries want to roll back, most “conservatives” want the frog boiled slowly.Maybe the left really is just the course of civilisation embodied. Maybe the only true rightist in Uncle Ted, everyone other "conservative" just wants to roll back to a previous iteration (typically the one that prevailed when they were children).
Sorry sweaty, I just checked netflix and there was nothing about "color revolutions" on there, there was something on pornhub about it but I am not into BBC porn (at least not anymore).
"Slow and steady wins the race"-Conservatives, probably.Reactionaries want to roll back, most “conservatives” want the frog boiled slowly.
What most people don’t understand, however, is that private actor aren’t just free to regulate viewpoint. They are required by government to regulate viewpoints. What a paradox! Government can require a private actor to undertake regulation over speech that the government couldn’t itself take? Yes!
The thought experiment above is just a hypothetical, but the fact pattern it describes is real. The potential conflict between employer liability law and freedom of speech has been known for decades.
25 years ago, Eugene Volokh, in “How Harassment Law Restricts Free Speech,” 47 Rutgers I. Rev. 563 (1995) argued that hostile environments law should be limited to face-to-face verbal harassment directed at particular individuals because otherwise it would impinge on freedom. Had Volokh’s view held, we wouldn’t be in this situation. But it didn’t win the day.
J.M. Balkin’s did. In “Free Speech and Hostile Environments,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 8 (Dec., 1999), pp. 2295-2320, Balkin argued in favor of employer liability for hostile environments, even at the cost of free expression. Balkin’s views are now mainstream. Most jurists, certainly all progressive ones, argue that it is a good thing, a just thing, for speech to be regulated by private actors.
And Volokh and Balkin’s debate took place a decade before social media existed. The stakes are much higher now. The leading jurists of our day openly argue that private corporations should be, must be, and are legally and ethically obligated to censor offensive viewpoints. Consider this article at Lawfare:
The ever-increasing centrality of social media as a public space for exercising basic rights is likely to prompt more and more demands that platforms depart from their traditional “hands-off” approach and adopt new human rights-based content moderation policies. Furthermore, once online platforms begin to engage in extensive content moderation, the public may expect them to incur responsibility for harm caused by offensive content that they could and should have blocked. Put differently, nce social media companies have become in practice “arbiters of speech,” including in difficult cases that raise sensitive questions about freedom of expression, there are good reasons to subject their power to moderate content to legal checks and balances.
If nothing else, a very chilling outlook on private censorship.Put simply: Since our government cannot regulate content for being offensive, private corporations can, should, and must do so!
People, at least on the left, seem to whole heartily agree with private censorship. If only, because it targets right-wing people. Or those who ask too many questions. Can't wait for it to target left-wing people, so they can finally realize the beast they nutured.If nothing else, a very chilling outlook on private censorship.
Cop psychology is rooted in order though, especially in true believer types. It's inevitable when one has to read the law long and hard enough and the consequences the state can pursue. The organization itself selects against rebel types. And that's just the good cops, never mind all the sociopaths that joined because they get to have a freaking gun.No actually it shouldn't especially since there's even less policemen out there able to both enforce the elite's decrees or protect their sorry asses. There's only a few entities that could stop the police from turning on the elite if they decide to quite literally hold them hostage.
The Left got destroyed down ballot because they went fucking nuts. Did you miss the Progressives crying because the moderates and establishment Democrats blamed them for said assraping or how Joe's entire message since he won has been ending the demonization and healing the divide in the country?Left wing has gone full crazy and so far they are doing pretty damn good.
Maybe the right wing needs more crazy to translate into action. Something of consequence rather than rallies and slogans and more tweets full of blue balls.
He forgot to add "Read Culture of Critique"
Imagine thinking tweeting about troons daily is centristThe Left got destroyed down ballot because they went fucking nuts. Did you miss the Progressives crying because the moderates and establishment Democrats blamed them for said assraping or how Joe's entire message since he won has been ending the demonization and healing the divide in the country?
There's a reason Joe and Kamala did a marathon sprint to the center these last few weeks.
The problem is, healing requires them to enact enough Trump policies for the base to believe they are sincere and not thieves. Therefore, there will not be any healing and at minimum 70 million people that oppose Democrats just for having a D next to their name. It also doesn't help that Hollywood is also in charge of healing that divide and they are the most degenerate people on the planet. Said neo-Libs may want to dump their commies, but they're the ones that go out and beat the competition. All it will take is if the Trump voters decide to inflict communism against Hollywood, who absolutely deserve it. After all, any idiot can wear a black hood and mask. False-flagging Antifa isn't that hard, it's that the Trump voters are reluctant to engage in terrorism.The Left got destroyed down ballot because they went fucking nuts. Did you miss the Progressives crying because the moderates and establishment Democrats blamed them for said assraping or how Joe's entire message since he won has been ending the demonization and healing the divide in the country?
There's a reason Joe and Kamala did a marathon sprint to the center these last few weeks.
I'm reading his tweets right now and there's barely any troon pandering. * seriously it's like 3 tweets over the last three weeks 2 of which were blatant pandering since they were on that tranny holiday *Imagine thinking tweeting about troons daily is centrist
Because my buddy Evo came in and didn't realize what was going on. Evo's mostly been sitting things out.wait why in the fuck are people responding seriously to bait posts again?
View attachment 1757216
Fulton is the heart of the Hivemind, but Dekalb, Cobb, and Gwinnett are all well within the monstrosity of the Atlanta area. Its strange that Fulton & Dekalb got left out given that they are arguably the two most crooked urban shitholes.
Cant say I've heard much about Cherokee County.
Didn't this drop or am I misremembering?Biden is up by around 14,000 or so in Georgia