Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

The same reason all of Breadtube exists. The rise of anti-SJW's shook up the very large subsection of the left that's obsessed with being the cool kids. They're desperate to recapture the image of being edgy rebels without giving up any of their societal control, Vaush seems like he's getting that shit done because he appeals to retarded 13 year olds who are incapable of seeing all his hypocrisies or how shallow his arguments are.

By the way, has Vaush made any answer videos to obvious left wingers sock puppeting as right wing strawmen on that email of his yet?

Also, people should not underestimate how talking quickly is a shallow signal to smoothbrains that "this person must be smart!" Destiny and others, while conducting very little research and only basically saying "that doesn't seem right to me, give me more sources I won't ever read" they have certain debate tactics that are designed to throw people off and fog the issue. If people have never been in a debate, it's kind of like being in any other fight in that your adrenaline is raised and you're trying to think ahead and you might miss things.
This is why upon reviewing a debate you may notice things that you didn't notice before, especially if someone is laying down a full 30 second rapid fire case and they like to bury little points in there so they can say later "he dodged that question!" This is obviously magnified since so many of Vaush's debates aren't actually based on history or research,, but what ought to be and proposed with weird hypotheticals.
I remember when Striker debated Destiny and they were talking about music, and Striker made the point that there is such a thing as objectively good music and objectively bad music, while Destiny went on about how everything has always sucked and also everything is subjective. The slight of hand there is good because by arguing for subjectivity you are almost proving subjectivity in itself. He doesn't believe in objectively good music, which means there isn't and the very fact they disagree proves him right.

Vaush is the type who would say like 2 years ago how Jordan Peterson is an idiot's version of a smart person, which while making no sense is ironically the thing an idiot trying to sound smart would say.
 
Also, people should not underestimate how talking quickly is a shallow signal to smoothbrains that "this person must be smart!" Destiny and others, while conducting very little research and only basically saying "that doesn't seem right to me, give me more sources I won't ever read" they have certain debate tactics that are designed to throw people off and fog the issue. If people have never been in a debate, it's kind of like being in any other fight in that your adrenaline is raised and you're trying to think ahead and you might miss things.
This is why upon reviewing a debate you may notice things that you didn't notice before, especially if someone is laying down a full 30 second rapid fire case and they like to bury little points in there so they can say later "he dodged that question!" This is obviously magnified since so many of Vaush's debates aren't actually based on history or research,, but what ought to be and proposed with weird hypotheticals.
I remember when Striker debated Destiny and they were talking about music, and Striker made the point that there is such a thing as objectively good music and objectively bad music, while Destiny went on about how everything has always sucked and also everything is subjective. The slight of hand there is good because by arguing for subjectivity you are almost proving subjectivity in itself. He doesn't believe in objectively good music, which means there isn't and the very fact they disagree proves him right.

Vaush is the type who would say like 2 years ago how Jordan Peterson is an idiot's version of a smart person, which while making no sense is ironically the thing an idiot trying to sound smart would say.
It's all bad faith arguing from top down and trying to win a TKO through confusion and linguistic jujitsu. If either the autistic manlet Destiny or Vaush actually cared about a debate they wouldn't sperg out and attempt to deflect and deny and "fact"-flashbang their way through everything but since that's what audiences are looking for that's what we get: content ready made for a shitty ownage compilation video made by simps for simps. At the end of the day the purpose of the "debate" is the purpose, not trying to get your point across or convince the other guy of its superiority.

Low IQ sophistry from people you wouldn't trust to watch your house and feed your fish if you had to leave for a week.
 
Also, people should not underestimate how talking quickly is a shallow signal to smoothbrains that "this person must be smart!" Destiny and others, while conducting very little research and only basically saying "that doesn't seem right to me, give me more sources I won't ever read" they have certain debate tactics that are designed to throw people off and fog the issue. If people have never been in a debate, it's kind of like being in any other fight in that your adrenaline is raised and you're trying to think ahead and you might miss things.
This is why upon reviewing a debate you may notice things that you didn't notice before, especially if someone is laying down a full 30 second rapid fire case and they like to bury little points in there so they can say later "he dodged that question!" This is obviously magnified since so many of Vaush's debates aren't actually based on history or research,, but what ought to be and proposed with weird hypotheticals.
I remember when Striker debated Destiny and they were talking about music, and Striker made the point that there is such a thing as objectively good music and objectively bad music, while Destiny went on about how everything has always sucked and also everything is subjective. The slight of hand there is good because by arguing for subjectivity you are almost proving subjectivity in itself. He doesn't believe in objectively good music, which means there isn't and the very fact they disagree proves him right.

Vaush is the type who would say like 2 years ago how Jordan Peterson is an idiot's version of a smart person, which while making no sense is ironically the thing an idiot trying to sound smart would say.
And, yet, Peterson's latest comeback managed to garner millions more views and interaction than this nonce ever could.
 
How does this retard still have support from other lefties?

Like how has he not lost them yet

While most breadtubers are soy boys or troons who have to hide behind weirdly sexual and overproduced sophistry, these streamers like Vaush and Hasan are active and aggressive. When your used to HHbomberguy or contrapoints droning on hearing vaush aggressively and quickly yell at hiss opponents is a change of pace. He is also far more offensive then his contempories giving his fans a feeling of being the "cool sjws" who focus on real leftism and not fake PC culture (even though at the end of day Vaush just stays in the progressive left bubble despite the occasional outburst).
 
I am super surprised that super intelligent Vaush can't avoid falling into the super obvious rabbit hole trap that he's up to his earlobes in and still falling
 
The same reason all of Breadtube exists. The rise of anti-SJW's shook up the very large subsection of the left that's obsessed with being the cool kids. They're desperate to recapture the image of being edgy rebels without giving up any of their societal control, Vaush seems like he's getting that shit done because he appeals to retarded 13 year olds who are incapable of seeing all his hypocrisies or how shallow his arguments are.
Yeah pretty much this. I have heard from actual far leftists, the ones who Vaush and co. are pretending to speak for (poor, lower class, and have experienced how the system caters to the upper class) and they do not like Vaush at all. They can catch the grift from a mile away and view him as an obstacle, worse than regular liberals, centrists, and right wingers.
 
Yeah pretty much this. I have heard from actual far leftists, the ones who Vaush and co. are pretending to speak for (poor, lower class, and have experienced how the system caters to the upper class) and they do not like Vaush at all. They can catch the grift from a mile away and view him as an obstacle, worse than regular liberals, centrists, and right wingers.
/r/GenZedong, Reddit's most extreme tankie community, think he's a dirty liberal too. They're so far left that even AgainstHateSubreddits consider them extremists.
 
How does this retard still have support from other lefties?

Like how has he not lost them yet
No enemies on the left, except maybe tankies, who are obnoxious on Twitter, but they bite their tongues when speaking to Vaush. He hasn't beefed with any -real- leftists though, and if you consider Destiny part of the left you're a retard.
 
No enemies on the left, except maybe tankies, who are obnoxious on Twitter, but they bite their tongues when speaking to Vaush. He hasn't beefed with any -real- leftists though, and if you consider Destiny part of the left you're a retard.
He gets called out by random twitter drones from time to time saying things like "if you like Vaush, don't follow me". But its true they never show up.
 
I pity his cats

Literally
vaushjak.jpg
 
Back