2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
California flipping... Nigga what type of hopium you're on?

I was referencing hopium bae who claimed Trump got 410 including Cali before the cheating. I wasn't being serious.

If cali flips ill turn my whimsical trolli avatar to the colors of the California flag with a bear at the bottom right for a month.

Don't make bets on 2020! Jeb's still on the race! Slow and Steady yellow tide bitches!

Fauci the Great says we need lockdowns and mask mandates at least until 2022.

See this is the issue with having a blasted reptilian in power. Idiot hasn't yet grasped that human beings need this thing called an "economy" to eat! Fucking martians getting sloppy with their recruiting I tell ya.

What truly worries me is the EU copying this bullshit in the name of saving money.

Catalonians already tried to lobby for electronic voting for the Galician and Basque elections in preparations to shove it down our throat next february for theirs. They were told to stuff a sock in it. Northern spaniards ain't afraid of no fucking coof and after the last referendum (and now Dominion's connection to them) seems backlash's gonna be strong. And if the ultrapozzed spanish press can't fucking hide that shit I doubt anything outside of central europe will fare any better, so look out for france/germany/their bastard offspring inbetween/maybe poland but I doubt even that one, rest is safe. (Note for any eastern european kiwi, I wasn't talking about eastern europe's Galicia when talking about the elections, we got another one up there. Medieval naming conventions were trash apparently.)

Yes. I think desperate conservatives comiting a mass shooting then government officals riding the backlash is a very likely outcome of the intial year or so of Biden's presidency.

It will be a great way to shame people out of talking about the election and the right wing will implode again arguing if it was a flase flag or not.

I'm surprised it hasn't happened already.
 

H.R. 1, dubbed the “For the People Act,” would nationally mandate automated mailing out of ballots to registered voters for elections while prohibiting states from having photo-ID requirements for ballot submission or signature verification of ballots”
I can see this being seriously challenged as unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment. It would really depend on how SCOTUS treats its past decision regarding the Voting Rights Act. That may be promising just because Roberts wrote that decision, even though it related to a different aspect of the Voting Rights Act.
 
I can see this being seriously challenged as unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment. It would really depend on how SCOTUS treats its past decision regarding the Voting Rights Act. That may be promising just because Roberts wrote that decision, even though it related to a different aspect of the Voting Rights Act.
Lower courts would just claim zero standing. It’d be a total uphill battle to even reach the SC.
 
Last edited:

H.R. 1, dubbed the “For the People Act,” would nationally mandate automated mailing out of ballots to registered voters for elections while prohibiting states from having photo-ID requirements for ballot submission or signature verification of ballots”
This is like the total reverse of what any corrupt shithole that tries to unfuck itself does. Like that hot indian from yesterday said.

Goddamn you white people generally speaking have basically moral degenerated superbad and just use dumb minorities as a excuse to justify it. Like every negative thing the injuns said about the white man is basically all coming true lol.

Man the elite class really want to turn itself into the most corrupt shithole possible. Douglas Murray was probably right a couple of weeks ago that this is backlash against the enlightenment itself.
 
Here's the thing: Democrats (and most Americans for that matter) LOVE their pop culture. Give them a good movie or a show or a sporting event, they'll be in blissful ignorance of the world around them. And for the left, give platitudes to diversity, LGBT rights, or BLM, and you'll have them eating out of the palm of your hand. It's actually pretty easy.
You can't just "LOOK AT THE FUNNY FACE" if there's extreme poverty, starvation, and overregulation. That works now, it won't work forever as the situation gets worse.
 
Lower courts would just claim zero standing. It’d be a total uphill battle to even reach the SC.
This is different. This is going to the idea that the Federal government is intruding on the states' time-honored right to choose how to run their elections, which is also expressly enumerated in the Constitution. The Democrats will then raise that this is within their province under the Equal Protection provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which permits them to interfere if they can demonstrate racial animus or disproportionate targeting of groups by suspect class. The states have very clear standing, as their constitutional right to choose how they run their own elections is being infringed.
 
The Donald spent a whole lot of time and energy shilling for Benjamin Netenyahu whenever he had political troubles or was up for reelection
Just for Bibi to jam the knife in his back at the last second, congratulating Biden early on being "president-elect"

I wonder what all the Evangelical Zionists in this country will think of Trump getting the Judas treatment?
Trump is a New York City billionaire who made his money in real estate. It doesn’t get any more Jewish than that. All the people claiming he’s an anti-semite were beyond delusional and it’s not surprising he cared more about Israelis think of him than his white working class voter base who ultimately cost him the election when they didn’t show up for him. Whoops!

Look, like any other honest human being I recognize jews as the parasites they are, but you have to admit, being against globalism is inherently anti-jewish. I would think he played nice mostly to get along (i.e. not get nuked from orbit by the jewish power structures) and tried his best to focus on appealing to the nationalistic side of jews. I'm not sure if this is how he thinks about it, but on some level he recognizes that in the current climate you can't treat the cause directly. Or, in other terms, he thought the most tactful strategy was to force populism on them economically, politically, and socially, with some influence on demographic control, not unlike how they've been forcing globalism on us.

Being blatantly hostile to them is by far the more humane way (subversion is a worse evil than outright hostility) but while that remains out of reach, we should take what we can get.
 
This is different. This is going to the idea that the Federal government is intruding on the states' time-honored right to choose how to run their elections, which is also expressly enumerated in the Constitution. The Democrats will then raise that this is within their province under the Equal Protection provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which permits them to interfere if they can demonstrate racial animus or disproportionate targeting of groups by suspect class. The states have very clear standing, as their constitutional right to choose how they run their own elections is being infringed.
But nobody has been “harmed” yet. It’s the same trick they pulled this election. Sue early, and you lack standing. Sue afterwards, and oops too late can’t do anything.
 
After watching the Michigan hearing, I have just one question: how is it that the Democrats, a party obsessed with pc crap and whatever, manages to be that rude and obnoxious?
Think slavery. It's gone in all but spirit, as the game's only changed. Blacks are still whipped (lol) to the Democrats. Nothing's changed besides "be nice" culture instead of caning people to death over issues.
 
Here's an interesting thought experiment. Let's suppose you wake up tomorrow and look at this thread or your favorite Trump friendly news site. And they say 'Good news! Trump has finally done X!'

What would X need to be for you to say 'Holy shit! That's a step too far! I disavow'

And I'm not talking about refusing to sign the NDAA unless CDA§230 is revoked which I think we can all agree is completely bonkers and indefensible. I'm talking about more mainstream stuff like invoking the Insurrection Act, declaring martial law, locking up Jack Dorsey, etc.
 
im saying "lol how the fuck you fall gor an obvious gayop?'
I guess in a similar way people who believe that this election can be overturned at this point through spineless GOP legislatures or esablishment courts.

Hope, desperation, and a sprinkle of autism.
 
But nobody has been “harmed” yet. It’s the same trick they pulled this election. Sue early, and you lack standing. Sue afterwards, and oops too late can’t do anything.
Yes. What I'm saying is that such a law, if enacted, would almost immediately be challenged as unconstitutional, and would very likely be ruled to be such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef
You can't just "LOOK AT THE FUNNY FACE" if there's extreme poverty, starvation, and overregulation. That works now, it won't work forever as the situation gets worse.
As spiritually and mentally taxing as the modern day is for a lot of people, they can still eat and get money. I don't buy anything but the essentials, and I still skirt by, but I don't go to bed hungry. As more people lose their jobs and businesses that aren't mega corporation owned shut down, you'll see people get more desperate and angry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back