- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
That was a joke.now i see why you thought an obvious troll bullshitting about sending rudy his affidavits was real.
It's like reading what Nathan Higgers or IFuckingLoveJoeBiden posts and taking them seriously.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was a joke.now i see why you thought an obvious troll bullshitting about sending rudy his affidavits was real.
California flipping... Nigga what type of hopium you're on?
If cali flips ill turn my whimsical trolli avatar to the colors of the California flag with a bear at the bottom right for a month.
Fauci the Great says we need lockdowns and mask mandates at least until 2022.
What truly worries me is the EU copying this bullshit in the name of saving money.
Yes. I think desperate conservatives comiting a mass shooting then government officals riding the backlash is a very likely outcome of the intial year or so of Biden's presidency.
It will be a great way to shame people out of talking about the election and the right wing will implode again arguing if it was a flase flag or not.
I can see this being seriously challenged as unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment. It would really depend on how SCOTUS treats its past decision regarding the Voting Rights Act. That may be promising just because Roberts wrote that decision, even though it related to a different aspect of the Voting Rights Act.![]()
Tom Cotton: House Democrats Want National Mandate for Vote-by-Mail
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) noted that Democrats' legislative priorities include a national mandate for vote-by-mail and ballot harvesting.www.breitbart.com
“H.R. 1, dubbed the “For the People Act,” would nationally mandate automated mailing out of ballots to registered voters for elections while prohibiting states from having photo-ID requirements for ballot submission or signature verification of ballots”
So you are saying I should change back my sig to "Hard earned puzzle pieces"?now i see why you thought an obvious troll bullshitting about sending rudy his affidavits was real.
Lower courts would just claim zero standing. It’d be a total uphill battle to even reach the SC.I can see this being seriously challenged as unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment. It would really depend on how SCOTUS treats its past decision regarding the Voting Rights Act. That may be promising just because Roberts wrote that decision, even though it related to a different aspect of the Voting Rights Act.
This is like the total reverse of what any corrupt shithole that tries to unfuck itself does. Like that hot indian from yesterday said.![]()
Tom Cotton: House Democrats Want National Mandate for Vote-by-Mail
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) noted that Democrats' legislative priorities include a national mandate for vote-by-mail and ballot harvesting.www.breitbart.com
“H.R. 1, dubbed the “For the People Act,” would nationally mandate automated mailing out of ballots to registered voters for elections while prohibiting states from having photo-ID requirements for ballot submission or signature verification of ballots”
So you are saying I should change back my sig to "Hard earned puzzle pieces"?
You can't just "LOOK AT THE FUNNY FACE" if there's extreme poverty, starvation, and overregulation. That works now, it won't work forever as the situation gets worse.Here's the thing: Democrats (and most Americans for that matter) LOVE their pop culture. Give them a good movie or a show or a sporting event, they'll be in blissful ignorance of the world around them. And for the left, give platitudes to diversity, LGBT rights, or BLM, and you'll have them eating out of the palm of your hand. It's actually pretty easy.
This is different. This is going to the idea that the Federal government is intruding on the states' time-honored right to choose how to run their elections, which is also expressly enumerated in the Constitution. The Democrats will then raise that this is within their province under the Equal Protection provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which permits them to interfere if they can demonstrate racial animus or disproportionate targeting of groups by suspect class. The states have very clear standing, as their constitutional right to choose how they run their own elections is being infringed.Lower courts would just claim zero standing. It’d be a total uphill battle to even reach the SC.
The Donald spent a whole lot of time and energy shilling for Benjamin Netenyahu whenever he had political troubles or was up for reelection
Just for Bibi to jam the knife in his back at the last second, congratulating Biden early on being "president-elect"
I wonder what all the Evangelical Zionists in this country will think of Trump getting the Judas treatment?
Trump is a New York City billionaire who made his money in real estate. It doesn’t get any more Jewish than that. All the people claiming he’s an anti-semite were beyond delusional and it’s not surprising he cared more about Israelis think of him than his white working class voter base who ultimately cost him the election when they didn’t show up for him. Whoops!
But nobody has been “harmed” yet. It’s the same trick they pulled this election. Sue early, and you lack standing. Sue afterwards, and oops too late can’t do anything.This is different. This is going to the idea that the Federal government is intruding on the states' time-honored right to choose how to run their elections, which is also expressly enumerated in the Constitution. The Democrats will then raise that this is within their province under the Equal Protection provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which permits them to interfere if they can demonstrate racial animus or disproportionate targeting of groups by suspect class. The states have very clear standing, as their constitutional right to choose how they run their own elections is being infringed.
Think slavery. It's gone in all but spirit, as the game's only changed. Blacks are still whipped (lol) to the Democrats. Nothing's changed besides "be nice" culture instead of caning people to death over issues.After watching the Michigan hearing, I have just one question: how is it that the Democrats, a party obsessed with pc crap and whatever, manages to be that rude and obnoxious?
I guess in a similar way people who believe that this election can be overturned at this point through spineless GOP legislatures or esablishment courts.im saying "lol how the fuck you fall gor an obvious gayop?'
Yes. What I'm saying is that such a law, if enacted, would almost immediately be challenged as unconstitutional, and would very likely be ruled to be such.But nobody has been “harmed” yet. It’s the same trick they pulled this election. Sue early, and you lack standing. Sue afterwards, and oops too late can’t do anything.
As spiritually and mentally taxing as the modern day is for a lot of people, they can still eat and get money. I don't buy anything but the essentials, and I still skirt by, but I don't go to bed hungry. As more people lose their jobs and businesses that aren't mega corporation owned shut down, you'll see people get more desperate and angry.You can't just "LOOK AT THE FUNNY FACE" if there's extreme poverty, starvation, and overregulation. That works now, it won't work forever as the situation gets worse.