Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is what they want to you believe happened. That some cabal of well orchestrated Oceans 11 bullshit was pulled off in multiple states by 50's something wine mom election volunteers.

I mean, this is what Sidney Powell actually believes.

1607096352460.png


How deep does the rabbit hole go? Dominion was also concurrently running a fraud scheme for Trump!
 
You've gotta give them credit. Putting the fake ballots in wheeled suitcases was a nice touch. The average PAWG/Sheboon Dem poll worker would get puffed from eating a big mac so actually carrying tote bags would be way beyond them. Having the cases in place before the count under tables covered in black tablecloths, good stuff. OK they didn't count on hidden cameras but all in all, given what they had to work with, well done.
Too much Copium huffing leads to hallucinations and paranoia as evidenced here.
 
Wait, so now it wasn't the hacked voting machines, or is the plan to go back to that one next?
It’s everything at once: it’s the hacked voting machines, it’s the mail-in ballots, it’s the secret suitcase full of fake ballots, etc. Didn’t you listen to Trump’s speech?
 
There's nothing really wrong with electronic voting if there's a human readable paper receipt that the voter has to verify.

Not with the current state laws involving ballot scanners or receipt-DREs where only a "random" selection of 0.5-2% of those ballots get recounted in the event of an audit, no matter the margin. That is extremely insecure given the state officials decide what those 0.5-2% of ballots are.

There shouldn't be any electronic counting involved because states are lazy by default and will do anything not to have to ever audit or check a mismatch between results and receipts beyond a "random" 0.5-2% selection of ballots which they themselves decide.

For those watching this argument, I"m saying Republicans are being selective given in-person electronic voting is the most insecure form of voting heavily used today, and the companies associated with the machines are historically tied to Republicans.


The electronic voting machines create a paper ballots afterwards that the voter can see. AZ, GA, PA, MI and NV all have every ballot cast backed up on paper.
No state has a law that I know of that makes use of those receipts in any meaningful form. There's something in election integrity called "chain of command", which is basically only strong the day of the election.

Keeping a bunch of receipts in state controlled buildings, where they only have to recount 1-2% of those weeks later, which they themselves select, in the event of an audit, is not "secure"

That's why multiple countries did day-of, publicly observed, locality based, hand-counted, hand-filled paper ballots after the Russian propaganda scare, because it's by far the most secure form of voting.

I'm not making the claim any party did more fraud then the other I'm just saying if people care about election integrity, they'd go after ES&S and Diebold machines, which are historically Republican owned companies, not fucking mail in voting first lol. Although mail-in voting has similar (albeit less) chain of command issues to DRE receipt recounts weeks later, there's obviously a solution here, which is in-person hand-filled locality counted and publically observed paper ballot.
 
Last edited:
If Dems can run all these ballot stealing ops, without anyone leaking it or getting caught. I think they should run the government because they are really good at this stuff.
They're so good at it they even transformed into Republicans and did it in Georgia and Arizona those bastards
 
This is what they want to you believe happened. That some cabal of well orchestrated Oceans 11 bullshit was pulled off in multiple states by 50's something wine mom election volunteers.
Why do they have to be well orchestrated?
Clearly doing it incompetently is good enough.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: revmoo
Would have gotten away with it to, if it weren't for those low rez webcams and pesky right wing bloggers!
They'll probably get away with it anyway.
9/11 taught me you don't have to be competent to fool the whole world, you just have to be unscrupulous and rely on people's naivete
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jimjamflimflam
They'll probably get away with it anyway.
9/11 taught me you don't have to be competent to fool the whole world, you just have to be unscrupulous and rely on people's naivete

Yea electing Duyba was a mistake.

They'll probably get away with it anyway.
9/11 taught me you don't have to be competent to fool the whole world, you just have to be unscrupulous and rely on people's naivete

Yea electing Trump was a mistake.
 
all that and they forgot to cheat for Susan Collins who was trailing by 12 points in the polls and kept the Senate red. Morons.

Everyone who is not trump is a democrat globalist evil zionist plant, and I know this because people on the internet agree with me sometimes (except when they don't, but those are also democrat globalist evil zionist plants). Susan collins got to win because she's a democrat plant, and the senate is just all democrats at this point tbh since they aren't passing emergency legislation to invalidate the election and make trump president again
 
The perfect political system is a King with the divine right of God, a moral duty to do God's will, and a legal right of the people to lynch him whenever they judge him to have failed in that duty.
What's the method for choosing a new king once the old one ends up being lynched?

Also, is there a mechanism in place for preventing each new king from being immediately lynched upon taking office?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back