2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Honest Coyote]

You retards didn't even read what I wrote, did you?

Let me guess, this is an appropriate response?

So Kiwi's, how have you guys been coping with this terrible year? Me, I just spent the last week reading Sonic Fanfiction. I'm not joking when I say that Sonic Fanfiction is only thing keeping me alive.

Man, everybody is way too doomer cause it's trendy, just like they were about 2016. 2020 has been pretty good for me: got a huge raise in January, and am set for another at the end of this year. If life sucks for you, disconnect from the digital and work harder.

So, they have begun to purge Trump supporters in Michigan.

https://breaking911.com/a-michigan-trump-supporters-house-was-bombed/

View attachment 1771542

I'm not saying this is a lie, but let's not jump to conclusions. There have been right wing false flags as well as left wing false flags. Until more comes out, something about this doesn't quite click for me. Why would you wait until a month after the election, that you officially-ish (?) won, to do this, yet not wait another so your guys already in office?

 

[DeadFish]

It's a risk - and 90%+ of politicians are completely risk averse.

Yeah well this decade going provide no safe harbor.

There are going be a lot of damned if ya do and dammed if ya dont.

The gop needs either grow a back bone or join the democratic party.

Also zedkissed im not mad ya rating me dumb. Im mad cause I forgot who your avatar is.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Purdue has better odds of winning but Lauffifer will definitely lose to the kang.

Warnock is a certified lunatic, too. That he's even allowed to run for any office is disgusting and very dangerous.

No archive of the Twitter page?

It seems that they've been nuked:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1324543970886750213

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1335732939393556480

 

[JambledUpWords]

It's a risk - and 90%+ of politicians are completely risk averse.

If there’s anything they should take away from Trump’s strategy, it’s his risk-taking. To me, I think that if more politicians were courageous enough to actually say what they mean and risk unpopularity, they’d be way better off. As seen with Trump, he’s practically made a brand of using any negative attention to his advantage and using it to gain more sympathy. Frankly, in 2016 I was really on the fence about Trump, but the unnecessarily negative press made me feel bad for him and want to learn more about his actual policies, more than I would have had the media been neutral or positive towards Trump. These politicians miss the real reason why people like Trump and just think that they can mimic the way he speaks, but without conviction or action behind it, it means nothing and people see through that.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Apparently Kelly Lauffifer or whatever her fucking name is, didn't have the balls to say Trump won the election in some debate against the nigger as WaPo reports.

What is with these cucked GOP fucks, what is there to lose in a deep red state like Georgia to say Trump won. Might have increased turnout. Purdue has better odds of winning but Lauffifer will definitely lose to the kang.

That's because he didn't win, you retard

 

[JambledUpWords]

That's because he didn't win, you retard

If this plays out like Bush vs. Gore, you might be singing a different tune. It is best to not be presumptuous, because pride does come before fall.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

If this plays out like Bush vs. Gore, you might be singing a different tune. It is best to not be presumptuous, because pride does come before fall.

Considering Trump is 1-45 or whatever in court and his lawyers are legit incompetent when it comes to law, it ain't gonna happen.

Florida in 2000 was way different than 2020. The SC isn't going to do what you guys think they will; it doesn't work that way

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Supreme Court meeting has been bumped up to the 8th to cure safe harbor issue.

 

[The Wicked Mitch]

If there’s anything they should take away from Trump’s strategy, it’s his risk-taking. To me, I think that if more politicians were courageous enough to actually say what they mean and risk unpopularity, they’d be way better off. As seen with Trump, he’s practically made a brand of using any negative attention to his advantage and using it to gain more sympathy. Frankly, in 2016 I was really on the fence about Trump, but the unnecessarily negative press made me feel bad for him and want to learn more about his actual policies, more than I would have had the media been neutral or positive towards Trump. These politicians miss the real reason why people like Trump and just think that they can mimic the way he speaks, but without conviction or action behind it, it means nothing and people see through that.

At the rally in GA this was especially apparent with Loeffler, Trump handed her the mic and compared to him it was like hearing a hollow tin can spew out rehearsed lines. Completely uninspired

 

[Michael Jacks0n]

The funny thing is, that if Bernie had run against Trump and beat him by 60 gorillion votes as THE MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY I might have actually believed it.

At least a lot more than I do for Joe.

As someone who hates libshits, SocDems, and Bernouts, I agree with you 100%. A populist vs. populist presidential race would be a true clash of the titans scenario. The fact that an 80-year old dementia patient who rarely appears in public and is a Neocon in all but name somehow caught more votes than the first black president is just bullshit, plain and simple. With millennials and their student loan debt, they would have dragged themselves across miles of AIDS-tainted broken glass just to vote for Bernie if he were on the ticket and promised to abolish all debts. Instead somehow Sleepy Joe managed to win in a "landslide" victory despite having the same exact political beliefs as Dubya did in the 2000's when the same millennials rocked against Bush.

“She remains at large.”

"She's gradually getting away!"

 

[Dude Snakes]

That's because he didn't win, you retard

If the supreme court hears the case in any of these states I think your belief that Biden won fair and square (days after the election after after key battleground states stopped counting lol) will be proven wrong. What happens if it does turn out that Dems rigged the election? Will it give you pause about voting for them again or are you just a rabid partisan?

 

[JambledUpWords]

Considering Trump is 1-45 or whatever in court and his lawyers are legit incompetent when it comes to law, it ain't gonna happen.

Florida in 2000 was way different than 2020. The SC isn't going to do what you guys think they will; it doesn't work that way

You’re still assuming things. Bush’s cases were all rejected before the Supreme Court. Also, since it is multiple states, for all we know, December 14 might not be the end of it. As of right now, Biden has more opportunity to lose states soon and Trump’s only option is to gain states. Since the fraud cases are all similar, and Supreme Court cases create precedents, if one state goes to Trump, others might follow. Finally, the Supreme Court decision over gay marriage in 2016 affected multiple states at one time, so multi-state cases aren’t exactly unheard of.

 

[Bartleby]

Something I haven't seen pointed out is that if a contingent election takes place on January 6th (assumedly in the scenario that one House rep and one Senator object to the certification of contested state electoral votes, and it goes to the constitutional remedy of a contingent election), it would be undertaken by the new House since they're scheduled to meet from January 3rd, 2021 to the same date in 2023. With the current House, the state votes would result in 26 for Trump, 23 for Biden and 1 undecided if you assume they every Republican votes Trump and every Democrat votes Biden. With the new House, it would actually be even better, with 27 for Trump, 20 for Biden and 3 undecided.

The difference here is that Iowa went from a +1 Democrat margin to a +1 Republican margin, and Minnesota and Michigan went from a +2/+1 Democrat margin respectively to being tied. However, the assumption it all goes by party lines is too optimistic considering that Republicans have a tendency to reach across the aisle (aka be total cucks). If we instead make the safer assumption that all the non-contested states, and contested states that don't have Republican majorities in the House will vote the same way the electors did (in the scenario that the projected map right now doesn't change by December 14th), then that results in 25 for Trump and 23 for Biden.

The two contested states with Republican majorities are Georgia and Wisconsin, and after briefly checking the Republican representatives for each state (through Wikipedia for transparency), it seems that the Georgian ones actually have a backbone and will vote for Trump (and they can afford for one of them to cuck, since there are 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats), while the Wisconsin ones are more up in the air and so I assume will vote for Biden. If both states cuck, that's a 25-25 tie, and since an absolute majority is required (i.e. at least 26) to elect a president, history shows that they'd just keep repeating the vote over and over again until at least one state gives in and flips. I think that if a contingent election does happen, it's likely to go 26-24 in favor of Trump with Georgia being the deciding factor, but if it's a tie at first, Republicans will eventually give in and Biden would be elected. Here's a link to each Georgian House representative if you want to judge for yourself- they all seem like staunch right-wingers to me rather than RINOs, but you never know when it comes to Republicans.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

If the supreme court hears the case in any of these states I think your belief that Biden won fair and square (days after the election after after key battleground states stopped counting lol) will be proven wrong. What happens if it does turn out that Dems rigged the election? Will it give you pause about voting for them again or are you just a rabid partisan?

You’re still assuming things. Bush’s cases were all rejected before the Supreme Court. Also, since it is multiple states, for all we know, December 14 might not be the end of it. As of right now, Biden has more opportunity to lose states soon and Trump’s only option is to gain states. Since the fraud cases are all similar, and Supreme Court cases create precedents, if one state goes to Trump, others might follow. Finally, the Supreme Court decision over gay marriage in 2016 affected multiple states at one time, so multi-state cases aren’t exactly unheard of.

Considering Trump's own lawyers admit, under oath, there was no fraud, I'd say Biden's chances are really, really good. Since you're so confident, wanna make a wager?

 

[MrJokerRager]

That's because he didn't win, you retard

Don't jinx it now for His Fraudulency Sleepy Jim Joe Crow Beijing Biden.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Don't jinx it now for His Fraudulency Sleepy Jim Joe Crow Beijing Biden.

Better than Dumbass "let's nuke a hurricane" Donnie or Trailer Park "I want to fuck my own daughter" Trump

 

[JambledUpWords]

Considering Trump's own lawyers admit, under oath, there was no fraud, I'd say Biden's chances are really, really good. Since you're so confident, wanna make a wager?

If you’re going to say stuff like that, at least provide sources. Show me where Trump’s lawyers said there was no fraud.

 

[CrystalHead]

Barnes is of the opinion that Rudy getting the Kung Flu won't have much of an impact as things are moving away from the court of public opinion to the court of law as we get closer to SCOTUS.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

If you’re going to say stuff like that, at least provide sources. Show me where Trump’s lawyers said there was no fraud.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont-11605271267

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud.

The thing is, they can lie all they want in those "hearings" (which are basically just Trump rallies) or on Twitter all they want, but under oath, they'd get cucked bad by the Bar Association if they lie under oath.

Anyway, want to do the wager? I am proposing if you are right, I eat a perma ban. If I am right, you will create a post of my choosing, and @secret watcher eats a ban (since he obviously agrees with you and is a sped). I am even giving you plus odds, and the chance to rid A&N of the liberal menace that is me

 

[JambledUpWords]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont-11605271267

The thing is, they can lie all they want in those "hearings" (which are basically just Trump rallies) or on Twitter all they want, but under oath, they'd get cucked bad by the Bar Association if they lie under oath.

Anyway, want to do the wager? I am proposing if you are right, I eat a perma ban. If I am right, you will create a post of my choosing, and @secret watcher eats a ban (since he obviously agrees with you and is a sped)

You provided a source, but I’d rather have videos and tweets from his lawyers, as those are more likely their real thoughts. Show me videos and tweets instead, I prefer my news not tampered with by journalists.