🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dance gunty.

First it was show reciepts. Then it was not those reciepts. Then it was reveal your source. Then it was whats wrong with this screen cap. Then it was back to who is your source. Its never going to be enough. I could show you a video of ralph getting pegged by may while strangling faith and screaming out "LETS FUGGGGIIIINNNN GOOOOO[!" And withing three posts it would be 'show that playing on a tv with your dick in your hand'.

Believe the leaks or dont.
What do you have to say about Faith being your ultimate source, where Mr Vickers is getting his info? She's crazy and unreliable with the truth.
 
I really enjoy the PPP heelturns it separates those who have to be spoonfeed a narrative to follow and those who can read in to the kayfabe. Im kind of suprised that so many people here don´t get his schtick.
Ja vol ofcourse PPP and Godwinson are spergs thats what makes them fun. I espically love when they pretend they are enemies and there are some autists who fall for it everysingle time like clockwork. Im curious if Faith will runaway to Ethan again, i think theres a large risk that she will she seemed like she wanted him back in the leaks.

The leaks seem credible as there are two diffrent writting styles that are extremly similiar to the way Ralph and Faifai writes.
But i still have some questions
1. @Elric of Melnibone Seriously who are you? You came in with a massive superority complex you seem like a sap that would be easy to play. Whats your relationship to Matt? Why would Matt give you the leaks?
2. Is Matt really the leaker? again, Elric seem like a guy that would be easily fooled.
3. Whos making a play here? Content starved for months and months then 400 screenshots pop up and all of a sudden 400 new accounts appear in the thread it doesnt make sense.
4. Are we getting the whole story here or the faith edit?
Is Elric actually Vickers? I don’t even care who the source is when the corn is this ripe and sweet. I’ll be making mine cream corn. 💦 🌽
 
Is Elric actually Vickers? I don’t even care who the source is when the corn is this ripe and sweet. I’ll be making mine cream corn. 💦 🌽
No, I made the same mistake because they're both boomerish, Elric is a man called MrButtsomething on Twitter, he seems to get along with Vickers and his daughter.

Edit: Seems like he only gets the info from Mr Vickers, who gets the info from his daughter, I don't know how reliable both are, and Faith clearly has some sort of Cluster B disorder (even his father said so back in the first Godwinson interview) so perhaps these info leaks are not that reliable
 
Last edited:
I really enjoy the PPP heelturns it separates those who have to be spoonfeed a narrative to follow and those who can read in to the kayfabe. Im kind of suprised that so many people here don´t get his schtick.
Ja vol ofcourse PPP and Godwinson are spergs thats what makes them fun. I espically love when they pretend they are enemies and there are some autists who fall for it everysingle time like clockwork. Im curious if Faith will runaway to Ethan again, i think theres a large risk that she will she seemed like she wanted him back in the leaks.

The leaks seem credible as there are two diffrent writting styles that are extremly similiar to the way Ralph and Faifai writes.
But i still have some questions
1. @Elric of Melnibone Seriously who are you? You came in with a massive superority complex you seem like a sap that would be easy to play. Whats your relationship to Matt? Why would Matt give you the leaks?
2. Is Matt really the leaker? again, Elric seem like a guy that would be easily fooled.
3. Whos making a play here? Content starved for months and months then 400 screenshots pop up and all of a sudden 400 new accounts appear in the thread it doesnt make sense.
4. Are we getting the whole story here or the faith edit?
I am a literal nobody. Im not an eceleb, I make no money through online ventures, I am not related to the vickers, I am not related to Ralph, I am not ex gunt guard. I am just a single nobody that reached out to a man and struck up a conversation that went places. If you go back through my posts, at one point I mentioned Vickers guns from his facebook post. Shortly after that he mentioned something about my post on twitter but did not name me in it. Thats when I first contacted him.

The first point of me working with him towards a common goal was around the time of the sex tape or website going up, and all I started doing was monitoring the thread for him so he did not have to see 100's of pictures of his daughters asshole.
 
No that's a solid point. I mean he could believe Faith too but if he's got her phone in his hand and is saying, "look, these are the actual messages" than I'd say that's pretty credible. Like if Elric is looking at that shit on camera or something, which who knows maybe he is? (Probably be good to mention that).

That doesn't mean Faith isn't withholding something. I'm thinking about manipulative shit a retarded teenager could say. She could have very well hinted at shit like a threesome or something, she could have agreed to something verbally then lied about agreeing to it. That wouldn't work on a normal functioning person, but it would sure as fuck work on someone getting black out drunk who probably doesn't quite remember conversations he's had. I guess what I'm thinking is there's more to this, and it's probably really weird.

My reason for believing the leaks is due largely in part to Ralph's reaction to them, or rather the lack of a reaction. This is the same dude who will go scorched earth on someone for the smallest slight or quip, the same dude who was quick to call Null a pedophile in retaliation of a fucking "South Park" reference.


After going back and forth with the sperg, Josh hammers home the point that he didn't have any issue with Ralph and was confused as to why he was so worked up over such an innocuous joke. Ethan Ralph then states without a hint of irony that he interpreted the "corn" joke as a call for everyone to disassociate themselves from him. That was what he managed to gleam from "we must sacrifice him to the corn so that we might get a good harvest"

With all that in mind, why in the fuck is the Ralphamale so silent on this particular issue? If there's no validity towards the claims being lobbed at him, you think he'd show the same fire and fury that was on display in that video. Hell, if he really was being accused falsely, I dare say he'd be justified in mouthing off to the haters who bought into the story. That wouldn't be the smart thing to do, but at the very least we'd understand where the vitriol comes from. But no, he's just sitting around his little hovel tweeting about raslin' and shit. That more than anything else is what makes me think that there's something to this accusations. If it were a matter of optics I'd understand, but this is Ethan fucking Ralph we're talking about.
 
Yeah, I was away from this thread for a while but aside confirming Vickers was Vickers, did any of his leaks required great burden of proof to make fun of Rad Roberts or the exchanges he posted on edited format on his site were taken at face value?

I think what is more telling is that of all the information he has provided, of all the stories he has told, we haven't been able to pick apart any major discrepancies in any of it.

It's easy to make up a lie, however to carry a lie forward into the future is difficult - if people are paying attention. This is because you need to remember exactly what you said, who you said it to and you need to maintain this.

In police interviews, well those ran by competent police, they are trained to get the subject to start wide and then to have them hone in on the particular event. There are a few reasons for this, but the relevant one here is the idea of building pretext. If an interviewee doesn't know what an interviewer knows, and if they lie about something in the pretext then it might allow an interviewer to pull apart their story. This is much easier to do when someone is being dishonest, because it's not easy to make up explanations on the fly, to remember what it is you have said which is untrue and to do so when you are uncertain what the interviewer knows is stressful. This is the reason excuses made up by retarded people like Ralph or DSP never stand up to scrutiny for long, it's too difficult to keep a story like this straight when people are constantly interrogating your every move.

The fact Mr. Vickers has told a consistent story, that has no major discrepancies and which matches up accurately with the timeline as we understand it lends credibility to what he has said - rather than say a small titbit of info that later turned out to be true.

Could he by lying now? Yes, but I would trust him over any other character in the situation.
 
Last edited:
What do you have to say about Faith being your ultimate source, where Mr Vickers is getting his info? She's crazy and unreliable with the truth.

Are you fuckers being disingenous on purpose? Do you remember that Matthew Vickers alleged, and it is probably 100% true, he had access and was logging ALL of Faith's conversations and interactions remotely? No?
 
imagine being gaytor and having your lord and master @KeeKee call you a pedophile by implication.

I legit wonder how many deep cover Gunt Guards are in this thread. There are a couple of people who are sus. They'll make a "poll" type post, like asking how many people used to be fans of Ralph vs how many have always hated him to throw suspicion off themselves. But then they'll go through ALL of the posts making good points and rate them all "autistic."
Whenever someone makes a good point, I've been clicking to see who rated it what, and it's ALWAYS the same faggot who has rated it Autistic in a sea of Feels, Agrees, and Winners. This is just something I've noticed.
 
I think what is more telling is that of all the information he has provided, of all the stories he has told, we haven't been able to pick apart any major discrepancies in any of it.

It's easy to make up a lie, however to carry a lie forward into the future is difficult - if people are paying attention. This is because you need to remember exactly what you said, who you said it to and you need to maintain this.

In police interviews, well those ran by competent police, they are trained to get the subject to start wide and then to have them hone in on the particular event. There are a few reasons for this, but the relevant one here is the idea of building pretext. They don't know what you know, and if they lie about something in the pretext then it might allow you to pull apart their story. This is much easier to do when someone is being dishonest, because it's not easy to make up explanations on the fly, to remember what it is you have said which is untrue and to do so when you are uncertain what the interviewer knows about you. This is the reason excuses for retarded shit people like Ralph or DSP never stand up to scrutiny for long, it's too difficult to keep a story like this straight while under scruitny.

The fact Mr. Vickers has told a consistent story, that has no major discrepancies and which matches up accurately with the timeline as we understand it lends credibility to what he has said - rather than say a small titbit of info that later turned out to be true.
The point was Vickers confirmed being the one that leaked the convo so this new requirement for confirmation is kinda odd when we went along with way looser shite.
 
I legit wonder how many deep cover Gunt Guards are in this thread. There are a couple of people who are sus. They'll make a "poll" type post, like asking how many people used to be fans of Ralph vs how many have always hated him to throw suspicion off themselves. But then they'll go through ALL of the posts making good points and rate them all "autistic."
Whenever someone makes a good point, I've been clicking to see who rated it what, and it's ALWAYS the same faggot who has rated it Autistic in a sea of Feels, Agrees, and Winners. This is just something I've noticed.
Eh this thread was nore positive to ralph some people just like him because they're also trashy without necessarily being outside raiders
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back