I believe you both are missing the point. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the issue isn't the abortion itself, it's the fact that once a mother in China discovers her unborn child to be female, the chances of abortion are exponentially higher, if not guaranteed. This is likely due to the two-child policy. After all, a woman cannot lead a family. You need a son to continue the bloodline. This is why there are a lack of women in China, and why they opt to kidnap women from other countries.
It's not just India and China but countries in the Caucasus such as Armenia, which have a very high rate of sex-selective abortions and gender/sex-imbalances in the country. To my surprise, Liechtenstein is one of the very few countries in Europe that has a very high gender/sex-imbalance in the country, which is odd because I can't find any data or history about sex-selective abortions or gender preferences in the country.
As I said before the jannie swept my post up, female kids in China don't count towards the child limit, and the same thing happens in India where there's no anti-natalist policy in place.
But yes, I guess feminists see this like alt-righters see black crime, as an statistic to prove how oppresed they are.
Yes, if the first child is female. However, nothing is preventing the abortion of the second child if it also happens to be female. The two-child policy is a failsafe in case the first child is female. This may have slightly aided the imbalance of male and female populations in the country, but the abortion rate of female fetuses will still be exponentially higher than that of male fetuses.
And to be fair, sex-based oppression is very much a real thing, whether you chose to believe it or not, and there's not much anyone can do about it.
It's not just India and China but countries in the Caucasus such as Armenia, which have a very high rate of sex-selective abortions and gender/sex-imbalances in the country. To my surprise, Liechtenstein is one of the very few countries in Europe that has a very high gender/sex-imbalance in the country, which is odd because I can't find any data or history about sex-selective abortions or gender preferences in the country.
From what I was able to find, that data about Liechtenstein is from one year, and there were only 75 babies born. Male babies are naturally slightly more common to begin with, and in a country with that few children it’s easier for it to look skewed.
From what I was able to find, that data about Liechtenstein is from one year, and there were only 75 babies born. Male babies are naturally slightly more common to begin with, and in a country with that few children it’s easier for it to look skewed.
I was taking to a friend about the Rosario Dawson trans assault case. One point we talked about was if he started calling me he/him there really wouldn't be anything I could do about it. I could correct him, I could leave and basically just not associate with him anymore. But if I tried to sue him? I would be laughed out of court.
But if you're trans that's a whole different ballgame. Why? Since when should I or anyone have to coddle a perfect stranger? The threat of having your life ruined? Because you don't want to be "polite"?
These questions may sound rhetorical but it's like seeing a bunch of lemmings headed for a cliff and trying to ask them why as they march along.
I sincerely don't think they took their job seriously. Look at how shit the photograph looks. While the lighting in the photo is pretty good, it doesn't help that the troon is really ugly and badly composed in the photo.
I was taking to a friend about the Rosario Dawson trans assault case. One point we talked about was if he started calling me he/him there really wouldn't be anything I could do about it. I could correct him, I could leave and basically just not associate with him anymore. But if I tried to sue him? I would be laughed out of court.
But if you're trans that's a whole different ballgame. Why? Since when should I or anyone have to coddle a perfect stranger? The threat of having your life ruined? Because you don't want to be "polite"?
These questions may sound rhetorical but it's like seeing a bunch of lemmings headed for a cliff and trying to ask them why as they march along.
With the rising amount of troons' delicate fee fees being hurt by misgendering, the woke lobby have been trying making it illegal to misgender them and some will even go through the troubles of a pointless lawsuit. I doubt that courts will take misgendering lawsuits seriously in the future if these scenarios were to occur more often.
I was taking to a friend about the Rosario Dawson trans assault case. One point we talked about was if he started calling me he/him there really wouldn't be anything I could do about it. I could correct him, I could leave and basically just not associate with him anymore. But if I tried to sue him? I would be laughed out of court.
But if you're trans that's a whole different ballgame. Why? Since when should I or anyone have to coddle a perfect stranger? The threat of having your life ruined? Because you don't want to be "polite"?
These questions may sound rhetorical but it's like seeing a bunch of lemmings headed for a cliff and trying to ask them why as they march along.
also his Twitch, there must have been so much literal violence misgendering before he added those pronouns front and center View attachment 1774976
cow crossover with monicaaaaaah View attachment 1774969
they are equally creepy, please date each other and leave lesbians alone
I've more or less resigned myself to the whole gender horseshit, but you can't change your sex. You weren't born a woman and you'll never be female sexed. In fact, health professionals need to know you are biologically male to make informed decisions about your healthcare but who fucking cares anymore.
I never understood why changing your sex legally also means changing your birth certificate. That's like having multiple layers of lying, and what for?
It's the perfect heist! Now no one will ever know... unless they look at them or talk to them or read of their tranny screeds... or... shit. What is even the point then?
I’m...confused. What is forced fertility in troon world? In the real world it’s coercive impregnation, usually done by an abuser to control the other partner, but since that is an actual real world tangible problem that impacts actual human beings in a real and tangible way, the troon cannot be referring to that. I mean of course there’s the kind of forced fertility that porn stories are written about, ie teenage girls being factory farmed like cows...but troons are as best I can tell responsible for an overwhelming amount of the content in that subgenre, so can’t be that either.
So what imaginary problem is this about? The natural result of puberty on an intact and functioning body that renders them capable of reproducing at some point should they choose to do so? That’s it isn’t it.
I’m...confused. What is forced fertility in troon world? In the real world it’s coercive impregnation, usually done by an abuser to control the other partner, but since that is an actual real world tangible problem that impacts actual human beings in a real and tangible way, the troon cannot be referring to that. I mean of course there’s the kind of forced fertility that porn stories are written about, ie teenage girls being factory farmed like cows...but troons are as best I can tell responsible for an overwhelming amount of the content in that subgenre, so can’t be that either.
So what imaginary problem is this about? The natural result of puberty on an intact and functioning body that renders them capable of reproducing at some point should they choose to do so? That’s it isn’t it.
I guess they're talking about FtMs and 'forced fertility' would be refusing to yeet their perfectly healthy ovaries because they decided they don't need it anyway?
It's the perfect heist! Now no one will ever know... unless they look at them or talk to them or read of their tranny screeds... or... shit. What is even the point then?
It's so that they can have a little piece of paper to wave at the transphobes to prove that they are true and honest. The major flaw in this is that nobody else needs the government to tell people if they are male or female. In the same way that the government turned around and allowed changes to these documents, they could just as easily turn around change them back again. Everyone will always be the sex they were born as, and no bureaucratic chicanery can change that.
Reminds me of when I went to watch some doccumentary on big machines/buildings or some shit like the boat that turns into an oil rig and about 20 minutes in I hear the tranny voice and had to watch it for another 5 minutes till they showed the speaker, turned it off put on some shit about lions instead.
Something recently made me think of an activist in good ol' California who I discovered in the last election, Victoria Fierce. As you might have guessed from that name, Victoria isn't actually a woman.
I didn't do much research on him at the time because I don't live in Alameda County, but I assumed that he was just an earnest autistic man who had been inducted into the trans cult and had an autistic obsession with public transportation. But a quick perusal shows that he's got other irons in the fire. He's a techie (I think his job is graphic design though) refugee from rural Ohio, and he's a major proponent of building more apartments in Berkeley. For those of you who don't know Berkeley, a lot of old Berkeley buildings have recently been torn down to put up more luxury apartments for tech workers, many of these still lay fallow. And because these apartment buildings haven't been as profitable as the developers had hoped the next wave of luxury apartments have just remained abandoned construction sites. But don't worry, Vicky Fierce is on the case, fighting to bring these developers into residential Berkeley!
His pro-real-estate-developer stance seems to have made him enemies among anti-gentrifiers.
To be fair, while he is probably contributing to the extreme gentrification of The Mission, I think he's just stupid, not malicious.
Anyway, he's moved on to public transportation as his new cause. He's got the radical belief that public transportation should be free; I'm not actually against this, but I have a feeling that he doesn't have much of a plan for it beyond "just don't charge anybody LOL". He did not do very well.
He's claiming he won Laney College, but as far as I know Laney College has no residents other than homeless people. Nimitz Freeway has no residents other than homeless people. Basically he only won districts that are primarily homeless people.
Not that much else to say about him, possibly a mineable source of milk, possibly not. His twitter's real boring though. The election map and this retweet were the only funny stuff.
His Youtube seems a lot more promising, but I'm not going to trawl through it anytime soon. Personal campaign
I think that other than being so painfully autistic there's really not much to him.
From what I was able to find, that data about Liechtenstein is from one year, and there were only 75 babies born. Male babies are naturally slightly more common to begin with, and in a country with that few children it’s easier for it to look skewed.
For reasons we aren't sure about yet, male fetuses self-abort more often in times of stress for the mother, and Liechtenstein has one of the world's highest GDPs so that factor probably isn't present. You can actually see on birth ratio maps that sub-Saharan Africa (poor countries with no history of female infanticide) have a more even birth ratio than richer countries.
This is off topic-ish for this thread but I love this shit. Older men also tend to have fewer male offspring. I wonder if these countries with more poor people and more 50 year old men marrying teenagers developed a norm for female infanticide for this reason.
Lmao like anyone wants to force these creepy incels to be pregnant. How can a dude get pregnant anyway? Or impregnate anyone else if he's a complete incel?
So what imaginary problem is this about? The natural result of puberty on an intact and functioning body that renders them capable of reproducing at some point should they choose to do so? That’s it isn’t it.
Oh I actually saw this on /r/ukpolitics last week. It's buried in one of the threads about Tavistock.
You are correct. Basically it was some troon complaining about not getting GnRH agonists and how puberty was going to cause irreversible changes to his body. Which, apparently, GnRH agonists won't.
