2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Übertroon]

Am I missing something? More mail in ballots were requested than returned? That seems normal.

No, the fact that the republicans outnumbered the democrats when it came to mail in ballot requests and yet people keep serving up the line that more democrat mail in ballots are supposed to justify the ridiculous jump Biden got while everyone was sleeping

 

[I-chi]

Sure, but I know you guys won't. You'll just move the goalposts as you guys always do. Trump said something, so you guys 100% unquestionably believe what he says.

> It'll get laughed out of courts
> It'll never get to the SC
> They'll laugh this one out like all the others.
> You're the REAL fraudsters

Where oh where will we backstep to next. Scream louder.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Sure, but I know you guys won't. You'll just move the goalposts as you guys always do. Trump said something, so you guys 100% unquestionably believe what he says.

If that were the case, than many people on the Farms that do support Trump would not be criticizing him for the Section 230 stuff. You can still like a president without agreeing with everything they say.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Google and youtubes parent company is alphabet. Now I aint got proof but the conspiracy theorist in me thinks it refers to America s alphabet agencies.

CIA FBI NSA and so forth.

Just a thought

Why would the alphabet agencies run a shell company named after themselves?
Why?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfWxORracT8

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

No, the fact that the republicans outnumbered the democrats when it came to mail in ballot requests and yet people keep serving up the line that more democrat mail in ballots are supposed to justify the ridiculous jump Biden got while everyone was sleeping

That doesn't take into account how vote counting works.

States have different jurisdictions, each of which does the counting. The areas then report the numbers. The ones that had higher Democratic turnout (i.e. Wayne County) were reporting their numbers when that "jump" occurred. The areas with more people generally take longer to count votes because there's more numbers. Is this your first election?

If that were the case, than many people on the Farms that do support Trump would not be criticizing him for the Section 230 stuff. You can still like a president without agreeing with everything they say.

There's a significant amount that are totally fine with removing Section 230 because he wants to. But again, I will ask you... If the SC laughs this lawsuit out of court, will you stop with the "fraud" stuff?

 

[mindlessobserver]

Listen rethuglikkkan MAGAtard, following the US Constitution is voter suppression.

But seriously, if anyone is guilty of voter suppression because those ballots end up invalidated, its the election officials who specifically broke the roles. Its the people who specifically went out of their way to harvest/cure fraudulent ballots, then went ahead and mixed them with legitimate ballots.
If PA ends up having its ballots invalidated, they need to blame the SOS & PASC, but most specifically the people who went ahead and mixed the ballots that the USSC specifically told them to hold aside with the regulars, then went and destroyed the evidence.

This entire mess is an direct result of this very mindset. The method by which we elect the President has deviated from it's original intent for centuries and now in glorious 2020 the powers that be took it one step too far. The only question is whether they will be allowed to get away with it. That is the general thrust of Texas' lawsuit. Either we follow constitutional law or we dont.

If the Supreme Court does not address this and tries to duck the issue, then the Union will be dealt a crushing blow it may not recover from.

 

[soy_king]

Their SC said it was fine. I thought you speds wanted your states rights? You are fine with your daddy taking the election stuff to the SC, but states can't do that? You're making it obvious you don't care what it takes, even election fraud, as long as your daddy wins

I think people also want people to have their government function along the dictates of the Constitution, which explicitly says that state legislatures, NOT state judiciaries, get to decide how to choose their electors.

 

[DeadFish]

Why would the alphabet agencies run a shell company named after themselves?
Why?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfWxORracT8

In high school there was an undercover officer giving a presentation. He was telling stories of his 20 year career. One was about how he inflitrated a gang under the alias Pete A zria.

They do funny shit like that as a flex and as an in joke

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

> It'll get laughed out of courts
> It'll never get to the SC
> They'll laugh this one out like all the others.
> You're the REAL fraudsters

Where oh where will we backstep to next. Scream louder.

"Every other lawsuit was laughed out of court. This one will be different! Just as Q predicted!"

Bookmarked this to laugh at your retard ass when this is thrown out. This one went straight to the SC because it was state vs state.

 

[Coconut Gun]

So what's an approximate time of when we will probably hear something from the SCOTUS, or are we just firmly in "who the fuck knows, this is all unprecedented" territory?

 

[dorxter¼]

This isn't your ordinary Streisand effect, this is... ADVANCED STREISAND EFFECT.

View attachment 1776942
View attachment 1776943

This is just...not good. For the last 4 years, the only "TV" I've watched is about 30 minutes or so of youtube while eating a light snack before bed. Originally, I only watched educational programming tutorials, but the recommendations slowly lead me down a Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan rat hole for years which I'd blast through at 2x. What I watch now is quite random, but still directed and a very hard habit to break. Most of the other "free" video sites have crappy apps and even crappier recommendations. I really don't want to go to youtube anymore. Is there any legit alternative? (and as a bonus, are any of them looking for a freelance python/postgresql developer lol)

 

[HTTP Error 404]

The Robert's Court is notoriously squishy though. You just know they absolutely do not want to have to take up the Texas Lawsuit. The Supreme Court likes being a contemplative body where they get to review other peoples fact finding and the decisions of other courts. Even Bush V. Gore was simply a review of the ruling and fact finding of the Florida Courts. Texas is asking to come in cold and actually put these 4 states on trial in the Supreme Court. This is usually done over something mundane like water rights, or who exactly is responsible for fixing a bridge over a river that divides the two states.

At the same time though, refusing to hear the case carries its own risks. Texas could turn around and order its congressional and Senate delegations to dispute the election in Congress and probably be helped with a pile on by the 7 other states planning to send in Amicus. It's a real mess, made all the worse by the media lying and obfuscating the entire thing.

I certainly hope that this makes someone disputing the election in Congress a certainty. The SCOTUS is the legal remedy, there are still political ones. Remember that the left generally doesn't understand civics at all, they're almost SovCit levels of retard in some ways, only propped up because they organize like hell and cheat even more. If there's election fuckery levers CAN be pulled that haven't been in decades or centuries but still absolutely exist, no matter how much Pelosi and Schumer wish to pretend otherwise.

 

[Übertroon]

That doesn't take into account how vote counting works.

States have different jurisdictions, each of which does the counting. The areas then report the numbers. The ones that had higher Democratic turnout (i.e. Wayne County) were reporting their numbers when that "jump" occurred. The areas with more people generally take longer to count votes because there's more numbers. Is this your first election?

But then why keep up the false talking point that the democrats had more mail in ballots? Just say certain counties had a abnormally high amount of mail in ballots for that particular candidate

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

So what's an approximate time of when we will probably hear something from the SCOTUS, or are we just firmly in "who the fuck knows, this is all unprecedented" territory?

WI/GA/MI/PA need to respond tomorrow

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

So what's an approximate time of when we will probably hear something from the SCOTUS, or are we just firmly in "who the fuck knows, this is all unprecedented" territory?

Somewhat of the second, but all of the states accused of fraud (MI,GA,PA) have to have a response filed by tomorrow.

 

[JambledUpWords]

There's a significant amount that are totally fine with removing Section 230 because he wants to. But again, I will ask you... If the SC laughs this lawsuit out of court, will you stop with the "fraud" stuff?

No, because I have conviction that fraud did actually occur, regardless of how SCOTUS rules. If I were to suddenly change my tune on that after the ruling, I’d be a hypocrite. I care more about being true to myself and my own convictions rather than what people tell me to think. Additionally, if I just changed my mind on there being no fraud after very clearly supporting the case that there was fraud, I’d sound like an opportunistic RINO, and RINOS bother me.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

This is just...not good. For the last 4 years, the only "TV" I've watched is about 30 minutes or so of youtube while eating a light snack before bed. Originally, I only watched educational programming tutorials, but the recommendations slowly lead me down a Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan rat hole for years which I'd blast through at 2x. What I watch now is quite random, but still directed and a very hard habit to break. Most of the other "free" video sites have crappy apps and even crappier recommendations. I really don't want to go to youtube anymore. Is there any legit alternative? (and as a bonus, are any of them looking for a freelance python/postgresql developer lol)

And now you know why Alphabet(Google) is willing to pay billions a year to keep Youtube running.

It literally gives them power over "the new TV."

 

[Zero Day Defense]

WI/GA/MI/PA need to respond tomorrow

inb4 muh laches

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

No, because I have conviction that fraud did actually occur, regardless of how SCOTUS rules. If I were to suddenly change my tune on that after the ruling, I’d be a hypocrite. I care more about being true to myself and my own convictions rather than what people tell me to think. Additionally, if I just changed my mind on there being no fraud after very clearly supporting the case that there was fraud, I’d sound like an opportunistic RINO, and RINOS bother me.

Jesus Christ himself could tell you that fraud didn't occur and you still would insist on it. Trump's own lawyers, under oath, said there's no evidence of voting fraud, yet you still sperg on that there was all because your cult leader said so.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

WI/GA/MI/PA need to respond tomorrow

Response

"UmM ThIS Is WhAT DeMoCrAcY LoOKs LiKe?!? We HaD tO BrEAk AliTo'S OrDeRs aND puLl OuT BaLlOtS UNdEr ThE TaBlE?!?"