2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A_Callow_Youth said:
An open letter to the Federal Law Enforcement Officer(s) that monitor this thread

Dear Federal Agent,

With the recent confirmation that you are, indeed, keeping an eye on this thread, I thought that I may as well take a moment to speak to you. I do not mean this as an indictment or accusation against your person, but I would beseech you to hear me out.

To start, I'm curious what you were told when you were assigned to watch over us. Did they tell you we were a haven for Right-Wing extremists? That one mass shooter already came from here, so be on the lookout for another? Did they call us a hive of Neo-Nazis? Or did you simply receive your orders to monitor this thread with no further explanation? Hell, could you even be my or someone else's personal tard wrangler, and you simply stumbled upon SIGSEGV's post by happenstance?

I don't presume that I'm going to get an answer, but that highlights my real concern: I don't know what you and your agency are up to, and that scares me. I distrust authority, for I know that people do the wrong thing all the time, be it out of malice, self-interest, or simple negligence. Instead, all I have to go on is the actions of your agency and the actions of the Federal Government, and must draw my own conclusions from there, and what I see is, in a word: Evil. I see a government that continually attempts to limit our access to firearms, tacking more exceptions onto a right deemed paramount, citing safety and a desire to save lives, heedless of the fact that government have, do, and will continue to kill more than crime will ever accomplish. I see a government that gives itself the power to invade our privacy, monitor our communications, and track our locations, once again, for our own safety. I see a government that tells us to stay at home for two weeks, so that emergency facilities can be set up and the millions of people that are going to die from the second coming of the Spanish Flu can die in proper hospital facilities, and the next thing we know, nine months have gone by and we are being told that we can't have our families over for Thanksgiving or Christmas, lest the millions of deaths finally arrive. I see a government that threatens to not restore my civil rights and liberties unless I submit to mandatory body modification. I see a government that props up monopolies in the universities, media and technology industries, and in return these sectors do the things that the government cannot, controlling the spread of information and ideas into something that supports the government. I see a government that will blatantly violate the Will of the People to ensure that the first man in a century to present a real threat to it is removed.

Perhaps these things came of a deliberate plan, or perhaps they were the end result of tens of thousands of people making millions of decisions, collating into a discernible pattern. I wish to assume the latter, but as the years have gone on, the line between malice and negligence has become increasingly blurry, and decreasingly relevant. I don't say this as an indictment of America, if there is one constant to humanity, it is that given enough time, all forms of governance will trend towards tyrrany. I do say this as an indictment of the Federal and State governments, who continue seeking to oppress us, ostensibly for our own good, to preserve our lives at the expense of all that makes life worth living.

Maybe you've already moved on, content that I'm just another far-right anarchist nutjob. If not, then I sincerely thank you. Like you, I once took an oath of alliegence unto the Constitution, to defend it against enemies both foreign and domestic. Perhaps that was a red flag for you, perhaps I am one of those oathkeeper psychos. But I ask you in return, do you believe that the general path of our government is one that treats the Constitution as a guide to be followed, or as an obstacle to be overcome? When a judge makes an interpretation of the Second Amendment so far removed from both its text and intent that is may as well be a rewrite, is that following the Constitution, or replacing it? When a law enforcement officer enforces that ruling, is that following the Constitution, or ignoring it? Here is my stance: if a civil conflict should erupt between the Federal Government and a faction that seeks to restore the sovereignty of the Constitution without the layers upon layers of judicial activism, bureaucratic bullshit and flagrantly unconstitutional laws, I intend to throw in my lot with the latter. Have I just gone too far? Is Null going to wake up to another phone call about one of his members acting up? Or does that not need to be done because your agency already knows who I am? I have been very lax in my cybersecurity over the years, it would not be hard to figure out who I am. Hell, for all I know, there is already a bug on my computer, reporting this as I type it. What is to stop the FBI, CIA, NSA or DHS from creating a spyware program and ensuring that the antivirus programs make an exception for it? Do you have the faith in your peers and superiors to have the moral grounding to say "no, this is too far, security is not worth this"? Am I already on a threat list somewhere? Will I get a knock on the door the day shit kicks off, or will I be shot in my bed like Duncan Lemp, a tragic victim of a negligent discharge? I don't know, and that scares me. Let me put it this way: you don't get the option to assume that somebody is joking, if SIGSEGV had truly been serious about what he said, and you neglected to report it on the grounds that it was clearly a joke, what would have happened would have been, at least in part, your fault. Similarly, it would be negligent for me to assume that power is not being used; if your agency can do a thing, then why would it not? You may say "because it's wrong", but I would counter that you, as a law enforcement officer, should know better than most that relying on people to act in a just manner is a fool's errand.

I suppose that I will close with this: where is the point where you will draw the line? What will it take to make you say "no, this is too far, security is not worth this"?

I don't know, and that scares me.

Sincerely,

A Patriot
Click to expand...
Lol, calm down
t. Federal Agent
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: George Geef, GrayWater, Super Kami Guru and 30 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
It does seem to have worked out that way, doesn't it?

I mean he got the DNC to fact check and help him temper his lawsuit, for free, for weeks. The media helped him a/b test every one of his arguments in front of the American people, despite them ostensibly laughing them off. He's been able to swing the "was the election stolen" polling nation wide from 30/50 to 55/30. A majority of the country now thinks the election was invalid.

And ultimately, the only lawsuit that could be something other than an appeals case, was one state going after another, and then bringing Trump in later. Which NO ONE saw coming.

Do I think he would have preferred if one of the other lawsuits had won and he hadn't had to go this route? Of course. But this worked out REALLY WELL for him.
Click to expand...
Potential bonus: revealing the judges that are biased as fuck.
the fall of man said:
No surprise the tranny shills have a presence

View attachment 1778042
View attachment 1778043
View attachment 1778044
Click to expand...
God damn this is some fucking retardation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef and spiritofamermaid
CrippleThreat said:
Had to go back to this one:


The media works fast!
View attachment 1778070
View attachment 1778081
View attachment 1778086
View attachment 1778090
View attachment 1778089
View attachment 1778093
View attachment 1778094

View attachment 1778078
View attachment 1778073

It's too easy.
Click to expand...

That is so fucking funny that the media's counter argument to the Ohio and Florida argument is to cite an election where the loser was also the victim of an electoral fraud screwjob.

1960 is a can of worms the media doesn't want to opened because if people start looking into that and see how Nixon got screwed in Illinois and Texas that'll do some damage to their narrative.

That's pretty fucking dumb on the media's part.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: George Geef, Vault Boy, spiritofamermaid and 11 others
The Wicked Mitch said:
Around $90k including some truly degenerate lotto tickets, ie Trump winning genuine blue states, the popular vote, landslide electoral votes etc

Currently about $75k still at play

Also around $10k on a Republican Senate majority

Given the horrifying levels of third world fuckery though I would gladly forfeit all of it if it meant BTFO'ing this fraud and the aparatus behind it.
Click to expand...
damn how tf do you afford that
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: BSC, George Geef, spiritofamermaid and 3 others
Another Powell lawsuit dismissed. (this time in Wisconsin)
fcd2421e-3793-4e99-8495-5f27d4437809.png


 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef, Exterminatus, spiritofamermaid and 15 others
CrystalHead said:
That is so fucking funny that the media's counter argument to the Ohio and Florida argument is to cite an election where the loser was also the victim of an electoral fraud screwjob.
Click to expand...
That's what Trump wants his followers to think.
CrystalHead said:
1960 is a can of worms the media doesn't want to opened because if people start looking into that and see how Nixon got screwed in Illinois and Texas that'll do some damage to their narrative.
Click to expand...
90% of shitlibs will never look into it and the other 10% will deny that there was a screwjob or will go "Well JFK DID become president so Drumpf BTFO".

There won't be any damage to their narrative. That tweet actually reinforces their narrative that Trump is an uneducated fool who has no idea what he's talking about, while MAGAtards that are woke to the 1960's election will have their "fake news" narrative confirmed.

Remember - the truth has nothing to do with any of this.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: George Geef, PepsiVanilla, spiritofamermaid and 8 others
CrippleThreat said:
Honestly, I can imagine this big lolsuit being tossed just because Trump is on board, just for the full 2020 experience. Without him, this is some historic 9-0 decision in the making. With Trump's backing, it becomes figurative AIDS to touch.
Click to expand...

Doubtful, simply because he has a solid 5-4 majority in his favor. Three of these justices were directly picked by him and the two most recent ones were pretty much crucified by the media for it.

We know ACB and Kavanaugh are a lock. Gorsuch is very likely a lock since the arguments Texas makes would line up with his core judicial philosophy.

Alito's definitely in since he's issuing the ultimatum that led to Texas jumping in, and there's a good chance Thomas is on board too.

Kagan and Sotomayor will obviously oppose this. Breyer and Roberts are coin flips, but let's be real here, Roberts will oppose this since he's a textbook Bush era neocon with a hatred of Trump. Breyer's the only actual coin flip despite being seen as one of the liberal judges.

We've got a 5-4 majority barring some freak last-second decision.

Even if TDS seems like it'd fuck everything up, the states that are spearheading this are largely Southern and the South is already seen as the "evil bad guy" part of the country that urban bugmen and dangerhairs like to vilify, so they even have a ready scapegoat to pass the buck onto.

There's no fear of reelection or impeachment for backing Trump but there is fear of court-packing if Harris gets in.

The High Prophet of Truth said:
Why’s that?
Click to expand...

Unironically because 2020 is an awful and insane year and it's always wise to expect the absolute worst-case scenario this year, even if it doesn't make sense or seem likely.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: George Geef, Exterminatus, Vault Boy and 19 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back