Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Null
Null Wins Again :story: :story:
Stripe Mafia bans porn hub saying child porn :punished::punished:
2020 keeps on rolling web bad news december
1607641208263.png

1607641238485.png
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: BSC
What is the difference between this thread and the other election thread?
The other one's a mirror of what the socjus types were going through around this point in time in 2016 - claiming the country was "going to fall apart," "going to be destroyed," "america is over," etc. They're verymuch a bunch of people who hate anyone that breaks their comfy gamer den.

In here, there's a bit more banter and people tend to analyze every last fart that Trump makes for its sound qualities in guaranteeing the election. The other thread will get you the news as it breaks, but half of the time they don't understand what it is or what it means; in here will give you a better idea of the bigger picture, and is as a result a little slower.
 
What is the difference between this thread and the other election thread?
it was talk about wild ride up to election - bidden vs trump.
Bidden won
trump trying to littigate & test the courts see how far he can go
supreme court being slow & most likely won't here texas case
mask is slipping from every big company to take people rights from them before january &
Bowing the fuck on trump in saying he had his chance before 2020 but now no one cares what he does & will just over rule or veto trump.
pretty much now were talking about fun doom shanginans coming from closing of roaring 2020.
 
There's a top drawer lunatic brief just been filed against the Texas supreme court case. I'll archive a bit of it because it will probably disappear shortly, it breaks just about every rule for a supreme court filing.
It's just page after page of absolutely nutty conspiracy shit, and there are 10 (TEN!) attachments fully of affidavits of the form "I, being a zen garden designer, can tell by the pixels that this election was rigged."

The thing is the plaintiffs aren't some nutcase from the podunk county militia. Some of them are actually elected state legislators, and this wasn't filed by Lionel Hutz, attorney at law but by the same Thomas More Center asswipes who have been masterminding this whole crazy episode. If those guys don't face discipline from their respective bar associations I'll be very surprised.

I'll attach the complaint and a sample appendix. The rest you can read over at the docket while it lasts if you want a laugh.
 

Attachments

There's a top drawer lunatic brief just been filed against the Texas supreme court case. I'll archive a bit of it because it will probably disappear shortly, it breaks just about every rule for a supreme court filing.
It's just page after page of absolutely nutty conspiracy shit, and there are 10 (TEN!) attachments fully of affidavits of the form "I, being a zen garden designer, can tell by the pixels that this election was rigged."

The thing is the plaintiffs aren't some nutcase from the podunk county militia. Some of them are actually elected state legislators, and this wasn't filed by Lionel Hutz, attorney at law but by the same Thomas More Center asswipes who have been masterminding this whole crazy episode. If those guys don't face discipline from their respective bar associations I'll be very surprised.

I'll attach the complaint and a sample appendix. The rest you can read over at the docket while it lasts if you want a laugh.
p.3 - Cite State Statutes and Constitutions

They've brought in the real professionals, folks.
 
Insanity...

106 House Republicans Support Trump-Backed Lawsuit To Overturn Election​

A group of 106 Republican House members, more than half of the GOP caucus in the chamber, signed an amicus brief filed Thursday in support of a lawsuit backed by President Trump that seeks to overturn the election.
KEY FACTS
The brief is led by Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.), who, in an email obtained by Forbes, told his colleagues Trump personally asked him to recruit supporters for the lawsuit, which aims to invalidate electors in four states Joe Biden won: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia.
The lawsuit was brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and is supported by Republican attorney generals in 17 other states – 6 of whom are trying to directly intervene and 10 of whom met with Trump for a private lunch at the White House on Thursday.
The suit claims the states’ electors should be invalidated because expanded mail-in voting due to the Covid-19 outbreak resulted in widespread fraud and irregularities – an allegation that has already dismissed by courts numerous times.
Just a handful of Republican House members have gone on the record opposing the lawsuit, with retiring Rep. Paul Mitchell (R-Mich.) calling it a “loyalty test” and outgoing Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-Va.) telling Forbes, "I really respect some of these people but this stuff is preposterous … that list is being built on disinformation.”
The brief argues a sizable portion of the American public has “serious doubts” about the integrity of the election and says it’s the “solemn duty” of the Court to determine whether the election was secure – though those doubts, primarily among Trump supporters, were likely sown by a deluge of unfounded fraud claims made by the president.
A handful of prominent Republicans, including former Sens. John Danforth (R-Mo.) and Lowell Weicker (R-Conn.) and former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, filed their own brief opposing the case, as did 23 other states and territories, while Ohio’s Republican attorney general filed a brief arguing federal courts “lack authority to order legislatures to appoint electors without regard to the results.”

KEY BACKGROUND

Trump has sought to overcome his loss by any means necessary. His campaign and allies have launched (and mostly lost) dozens of lawsuits to try to throw out absentee ballots, block certification and invalidate electors in the states buttressing Biden’s electoral college win. Trump has even resorted to putting pressure on officials, calling county officials in Detroit and GOP leaders in Pennsylvania, meeting with Michigan GOP leaders and urging Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey to help overturn their states’ results.

BIG NUMBER

54%. That’s the share of the House GOP caucus – which consists of 196 members – that signed the amicus brief. Just 23 Republicans in the House and Senate have broken with Trump’s refusal to concede and acknowledged Biden as president-elect, as have two Trump administration officials.

SURPRISING FACT

The list of Republicans who signed the brief includes 16 from states whose results are being challenged by the lawsuit: 7 out of 9 Republican congressmen in Pennsylvania, 4 out of 8 in Georgia, 4 out of 6 in Michigan, and 1 out of 5 in Wisconsin.

TANGENT

Several attorneys general backing the lawsuit have taken flak from major Republican figures in their states. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) – whose state’s attorney general Ken Paxton introduced the lawsuit – called it “very unusual” and a “long shot.” Utah Gov. Gary Herbert and Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox criticized Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes’ support of the lawsuit as “an unwise use of taxpayers’ money,” while Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) called it “simply madness.”

CHIEF CRITIC

Perhaps the staunchest critics of the lawsuit have been officials in the states whose results are being challenged. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, filed a response calling the lawsuit “without factual foundation,” while Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, a Republican, said many of Texas’ claims have “no basis.” Wisconsin’s attorney general called it an “extraordinary intrusion.”

WHAT TO WATCH FOR

The case is likely to fail after the Supreme Court declined to even hear a similar case brought by Pennsylvania Republicans. Instead, the lawsuit has proven something of a conservative litmus test for Republican politicians, with Johnson telling colleagues Trump was eagerly awaiting a list of supporters.

 
  • Islamic Content
  • Informative
Reactions: revmoo and BSC
There's a top drawer lunatic brief just been filed against the Texas supreme court case. I'll archive a bit of it because it will probably disappear shortly, it breaks just about every rule for a supreme court filing.
It's just page after page of absolutely nutty conspiracy shit, and there are 10 (TEN!) attachments fully of affidavits of the form "I, being a zen garden designer, can tell by the pixels that this election was rigged."

The thing is the plaintiffs aren't some nutcase from the podunk county militia. Some of them are actually elected state legislators, and this wasn't filed by Lionel Hutz, attorney at law but by the same Thomas More Center asswipes who have been masterminding this whole crazy episode. If those guys don't face discipline from their respective bar associations I'll be very surprised.

I'll attach the complaint and a sample appendix. The rest you can read over at the docket while it lasts if you want a laugh.
You're not kidding. This is better than Roy Moore's one where even voting on a day that isn't election day should be illegal. This is my jam.
What is the difference between this thread and the other election thread?
This is the fact based one, although a number of retards have invaded it over the past couple days.
 
Last edited:
There's a top drawer lunatic brief just been filed against the Texas supreme court case. I'll archive a bit of it because it will probably disappear shortly, it breaks just about every rule for a supreme court filing.
It's just page after page of absolutely nutty conspiracy shit, and there are 10 (TEN!) attachments fully of affidavits of the form "I, being a zen garden designer, can tell by the pixels that this election was rigged."

The thing is the plaintiffs aren't some nutcase from the podunk county militia. Some of them are actually elected state legislators, and this wasn't filed by Lionel Hutz, attorney at law but by the same Thomas More Center asswipes who have been masterminding this whole crazy episode. If those guys don't face discipline from their respective bar associations I'll be very surprised.

I'll attach the complaint and a sample appendix. The rest you can read over at the docket while it lasts if you want a laugh.
Did you read this one?
AMAZING
1607653801100.png

1607653980000.png
GOOD WORK MEXICAN LADY WITH FAX MACHINE YOU CAUGHT THE NIGGERS VOTING
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: BSC
YouTube reportedly employs Chinese software engineers who have formerly worked for CCP-run institutions or China’s People’s Liberation Army.
View attachment 1780464

YouTube – the Google-owned video platform making headlines for vowing to censor all content flagging “election fraud or errors” – employs software engineers with ties to the Chinese Communist Party, The National Pulse can reveal.
A host of software engineers for the platform have formerly worked for Chinese Communist Party-run institutions, raising the question as to why a revolving door exists between YouTube and the China-based universities.

A software engineer for the video platform since May of 2019,Tai Jinjiang, previously worked as a project manager for Guanghzou Shian Technology.

Jinjiang detailed his work for the China-based firm as playing a “major role in successful PLA certification of ShiAn terminal by Ministry of Public Security, State Secrecy Bureau, and IT Evaluation Center.”

In other words, Jinjiang led software efforts on behalf of the PLA – appearing to reference China’s People’s Liberation Army – and a host of Chinese government-led intelligence bodies. What’s more, he notes he “garnered numerous staff awards for excellent performance.”


JINJIANG’S JOB DESCRIPTION.
Additionally, Xiao Chen – who lists himself as a software engineer at YouTube since November of 2020 – previously served as a Research Assistant at Sun Yat-Sen University.

The university – which recently dispatched a researcher to the U.S. who pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over ties to China – has also seen its Supercomputing Center on the U.S. government’s entity list since 2015 – a “list of people and companies the U.S. government deems a national security risk.”


CHEN’S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY.
Another software engineer, Xifei Huang, has worked at YouTube since February 2014 despite previously working as a Developer for Beijing-based Peking University.


HUANG’S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY.
Peking University – which has also seen its researchers sentenced by the FBI for stealing intellectual property and failing to disclose Chinese Communist Party ties – is funded and controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.

The university also counts former and current party apparatchiks among its leadership, including its leader: a former head of the country’s spy agency’s Beijing branch.

Fan Yang, another YouTube software engineer since April 2017, interned for China Telecom, labeled by the U.S. Department of Defense as collaborating with the Chinese military for over two decades.

Yang later served as a research assistant at Fudan University, which recently cut “freedom of thought” from its charter under Chinese Communist Party demands. During Yang’s Fudan stint, five Chinese military-linked hackers based out of Fudan University were indicted for stealing U.S. secrets.


YANG’S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY.
The unearthed ties cast YouTube’s decision to ban all content disputing a victory for Joe Biden – the Chinese Communist Party’s preferred candidate – in an interesting light. It similarly calls into question reports of YouTube automatically deleting Chinese-language phrases critical of the Chinese Communist Party, which the platformer attributed to “an error in our enforcement systems.”

The revelations also add to a growing list of American tech corporates hiring Chinese Communist Party-linked individuals including Facebook and Twitter. Twitter appointed Dr. Fei-Fei Li as an advisor despite her attendance at several Chinese Communist Party-backed conferences and cooperation with a “leading artificial intelligence research body at Tsinghua University, a prestigious Chinese academic institution that also conducts AI research for the Chinese military.”
View attachment 1780471
View attachment 1780470
View attachment 1780472
View attachment 1780475
Did you even read the fucking thread that you're in? This has nothing to do with the election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back