ah but i keep my cellphone location on, also have a gopro strapped to my belt and upload the videos to a 100tb server along with keeping meticulous diaries with a list of peiple who can provide alibis.
in other words, the kavanaugh defense.
now lets see if you own a barn and a horse and the vet report your hirse was fucked.
Nono, I don't have to prove that my horse was fucked at all. In the same way that you don't have to prove that there was fraud - I just assert it, give you some video clips. Look! Foot prints in the snow. Look! He's walking kindof funny. And you're not in a wheelchair. Coincidence? And I've proven it, it happened.
We will need to see an exacting list of all of your cellphone locations, the entirety of the footage from that gopro sever, and we will need to conduct interviews with every person who gives an alibi to conclude that you did not fuck my horse. I will then accuse a member of your family of doing the same thing, so I suggest you prepare their gopro-gps-diary situation as well.
The kavanaugh accusations were dumb bullshit kafkatraps. That doesn't mean that you now get to pretend that elections are "fraudulent until proven secure" despite that literally never having occurred in the long list of US elections you could've dredged up. This is the most basic way that law and accusation functions.
No, I'm pretty sure you're posting the positive claim that there was no fraud and that this election was fair and balanced. Which most of us are claiming the negative claim that because of anomalies, and certain changes that it wasn't as fair as is presented. You also mentioned prior elections IIRC keep in mind like one of my previous posts, even in 2016 election results were called into question, and many people have speculated and had inklings of issues with prior elections probably since time immemorial with small evidence here and there.
So the positive claim that the elections were fair and free of fraud is already less likely, and the most evidence postured to prove it is appeal to authority and "My friend Pedro said so."
"There was not fraud" is not a positive claim, which is anyways not terminology that is useful here.
When you make a fraud accusation, you are asserting something that has differed from the norm. What, then, is the norm? How were any elections before this one rigorously proven "secure"?
None of your evidence has thusfar made it through a court of law, with one small exception in GA which hasn't even bothered with the state farm arena video.
