Senator from North Carolina to Push Copyright Violations for Streamers as Felony Offense - Shockingly He's Taken Donations from Media Companies


Tillis Pushes Prison Time for Online Streamers After Pre-Election Hollywood Cash Blitz

Congress has once again put itself in a situation of having to pass a last-minute omnibus bill to fund the government and prevent a shutdown. These truly are must-pass bills since much of the government grinds to a halt without them, so they often get used as vehicles for controversial bills that can’t pass on their own. Senators and representatives work out backroom deals to attach their pet measures to funding for things like food inspections and airport safety and then dare their colleagues to object.

This time around, one of the measures being crammed into the omnibus is a proposal from Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) to turn unauthorized commercial streaming of copyrighted material like an album on YouTube, a video clip on Twitch, or a song in an Instagram story into a felony offense with a possible prison sentence rather than a misdemeanor, according to Protocol. The text of the measure has not been publicly released yet, but it is expected to be broadly similar to past entertainment industry-backed attempts to criminalize unauthorized streaming, such as the provisions of the SOPA/PIPA bills in 2012 that sparked an unprecedented internet “blackout” protest or the Commercial Felony Streaming Act, which prompted Justin Bieber to say that its sponsor, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), should be “locked up.”

“A felony streaming bill would likely be a chill on expression,” said Katharine Trendacosta, associate director of policy and activism with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “We already see that it’s hard enough in just civil copyright and the DMCA for people to feel comfortable asserting their rights. The chance of a felony would impact both expression and innovation.”

Tillis, the chairman of the Intellectual Property Subcommittee, was recently re-elected for another six-year term by a margin of less than 2% over his Democratic opponent. In the final stretch of his campaign, Tillis received a surge of campaign contributions from PACs affiliated with entertainment companies and trade groups that lobby Congress for aggressive copyright enforcement against internet users, including prison time for unauthorized streaming.

In the third and fourth quarters of 2020, Tillis’ campaign and leadership PAC received donations from PACs affiliated with the Motion Picture Association, Sony Pictures, ASCAP, Universal Music Group, Comcast & NBCUniversal, The Internet and Television Association, Salem Media Group, Warner Music, and others in the entertainment and cable industry that seek to suppress the unauthorized sharing of content. Many other entertainment industry PACs gave Tillis contributions earlier in the 2019-20 cycle, totaling well over $100,000, according to Federal Election Commission records. Executives of Fox Corporation, Sony Entertainment, Charter Communications, and CBS also made large donations to Tillis in the third quarter of this year.

“The Hollywood and entertainment groups … have an absolutely massive undue influence on copyright law in Congress,” said Electronic Frontier Foundation policy analyst Joe Mullin. “It’s really impossible to understate it.”

Many of these companies have executives on the board of an astroturf nonprofit called Creative Future that advocates for felony streaming legislation and other strict copyright measures opposed by internet freedom groups. Creative Future lists hundreds of small studios as coalition members on its website, but one would have to consult its 990 filing with the Internal Revenue Service to see who is really directing the group. Creative Future’s board of directors includes John Rogovin, executive vice president and general counsel of Warner Bros. Entertainment; Leah Weil, senior executive vice president and general counsel of Sony Pictures Entertainment; and Kimberley Harris, executive vice president of Comcast Corporation and general counsel of NBCUniversal, among several other Hollywood executives.

Creative Future, which called Tillis “our hero on the Hill” in a March 2020 interview, is a rebranding of a group called Creative America that was formed in 2011 to advocate for SOPA and PIPA. Creative America’s website now redirects to Creative Future’s website. Creative Future is listed as a “related organization” and a recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars in financial transfers on the Motion Picture Association’s annual 990s.

In 2018, Tillis was one of three senators who benefited from a fundraiser hosted by Motion Picture Association CEO Charles Rivkin and major Hollywood studios.

“I was a professional musician for a decade and I don’t know of a single working artist who thinks of Tom Tillis as a champion,” said Evan Greer, deputy director at internet freedom group Fight for the Future. “He consistently pushes for draconian copyright policies that benefit big corporations, not independent creators, and threaten free expression and human rights in the process.”

“Pushing for more Internet censorship and threatening streamers with prison time doesn’t benefit artists, but it’s exactly what Tillis’ corporate donors seem to want,” Greer added.

The felony streaming measure is part of a package of three bills related to intellectual property rights that are being added to the omnibus, according to Protocol.

One, the CASE Act, would create a new court within the U.S. Copyright Office for expediting copyright claims that critics say could help copyright trolls and giant companies go after ordinary internet users. People found to have shared a copyrighted piece of content could be penalized with a fine of up to $30,000, according to the bill text. Creative Future supports this bill. The third, known as the Trademark Modernization Act, is supposed to crack down on fraudulent trademark filings from foreign countries. Each of these bills have small cohorts of backers in Congress, but Tillis is an original co-sponsor of the CASE Act and the primary sponsor of the trademark bill.

Tillis’ office did not respond to Sludge’s request for comment.

This doesn't seem shady at all.
 
Yeah, aside from sending them to Caledonia State Prison Farm, this will just be another excuse to just fill up the cells, in addition to promoting whatever censorship agenda that this guy is trying to push.
 
Last edited:
Our Copyright laws are fundamentally broken. Without getting too into it, they're a patchwork mess of hastily added on provisions with often conflicting protections, and what few user rights exist are getting effectively made obsolete by corporate shenanigans. Even the DMCA, while in theory supposed to prevent egregious copyright trolling, is a complete failure because it puts too much authority in the hands of the platforms.
 
From Wikipedia said:
Tillis opposes net neutrality.[109] In 2017, he co-sponsored the Restoring Internet Freedom Act, a bill to nullify the Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Order.[110] In March 2017, Tillis voted for the Broadband Consumer Privacy Proposal that removed the FCC's internet privacy rules and allowed internet service providers to sell customers' browsing history without their permission.[111]
In May 2020, Tillis voted against an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to bar warrantless surveillance of web browser history.[112] In April 2020, Tillis, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee's intellectual property panel, wrote that he was concerned that the Internet Archive's "National Emergency Library" initiative, which temporarily expanded access to its 1.4 million-book collection during the COVID-19 shutdown, violated copyright law. He argued that the Internet Archive was deciding to "re-write copyright law at the expense of authors, artists, and creators"; the Internet Archive argued that it was a licensed library in the state of California and that the Copyright Act of 1976 "provides flexibility to libraries and others to adjust to changing circumstances."[113]
This guy is the ISPs' and the copyright mafia's wet dream at the same time. Two awful tastes.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: LurkTrawl
Wait a second I think I have a picture of this guy around here somewhere...
1607667485309.png
 


Copyright strikes and takedowns aren't particularly new to content creators. It is well known at this point that using songs without permission will likely end up in your video being taken down or demonetized. Now, a US Senator is pushing a bill (conveniently attached to an omnibus spending bill) that would make using copyrighted material a felony instead of a misdemeanor.

Last month, Twitch faced thousands of DMCA takedowns from various rights holders. The problem got so bad (with streamers being taken down for using in-game sound effects) that Twitch was forced to tell streamers that they were safest just muting all game audio. While some took umbrage with Twitch—allegedly for taking the "side" of copyright holders over content streamers—there isn't much that the company can do, given that it doesn't have the right or ability to determine who ultimately owns the rights to a creation.

Things are only getting worse with the introduction of a bill that would reclassify copyright strikes as a felony offense. The proposal would come attached to a spending bill that is supposed to keep the United States government and its 456 various agencies open for the next year (or a few days as has become the norm). According to Protocol.com, an offshoot of Politico, Chairman of the US Senate subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Thom Tillis (R), is seeking to add the provision in the "must-pass" spending bill.

Last year, the then Director of the United States Copyright Office, Karyn A. Temple sent a letter to Tillis and ranking subcommittee member Christopher Coons (D) explaining why copyright strikes should be considered a felony. Temple quoted a paper that was published, in part, by the President and CEO Global Innovation Policy Center at the United States Chamber of Commerce that focused on the effect piracy has on Hollywood as the reasoning behind making streaming copyrighted material a felony. Additionally, she quoted a blog post that simultaneously comments on the harm that "stream ripping" (a practice that is equivalent to using a tape recorder to record a song from the radio) has on the music industry, while also admitting that it's "not as big an issue in the US as it is internationally."

Senators Thom Tillis and Christopher Coons asked the Copyright Office Director Karyn Temple, "Do you believe that increasing the criminal penalty for the unauthorized streaming of copyrighted material from a misdemeanor to a felony would better deter illicit streaming? If yes, what specific statutory changes would you recommend?" She responded by saying, "The Copyright Office has previously supported statutory amendments that would provide the same felony-level penalties for criminal streaming as for criminal reproduction and distribution."

The Copyright Office, in essence, is seeking to make it so that a public performance of a work (streaming) is treated the same as if you were selling bootlegged copies of an Avengers movie for your own profit. A group of 18 different organizations is urging congressional leadership to decline to include the language in the omnibus spending bill that will be considered in just a few days. If what former Director Temple suggested is indeed in the spending bill, it will mean the end of "polite" takedowns of videos and may result in the criminal prosecution of anyone who runs afoul of Hollywood, the music industry, and even other content creators.
 
Seeing this paragraph makes me MATI.

Temple quoted a paper that was published, in part, by the President and CEO Global Innovation Policy Center at the United States Chamber of Commerce that focused on the effect piracy has on Hollywood as the reasoning behind making streaming copyrighted material a felony. Additionally, she quoted a blog post that simultaneously comments on the harm that "stream ripping" (a practice that is equivalent to using a tape recorder to record a song from the radio) has on the music industry, while also admitting that it's "not as big an issue in the US as it is internationally."

This is why omnibus bills, passed for the Budget especially, should be done away with. This is where all the pork barrel bullshit is jammed in so the piggies in Congress can please the lobbyists and continue to feed at the trough. By all mean, we wouldn't want to hurt Hollywood. If it isn't really a large problem in the U.S., why is the U.S. passing a bill on it???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimjamflimflam
TBF, I'm not entirely against Twitch thots (like Hasan Piker) having to face actual consequences for copyright infringement, but I know that copyright law is fundamentally broken in this country to favor large multimedia conglomerates and the DMCA is very seriously flawed to the point where it actually results in blatant copyright violations. The House of Mouse is by far the biggest offender (if you want to really get pissed off, read about what they did to the estate of A.A. Milne or the author of Mary Poppins), but pretty much all of the big companies have engaged in some form of fuckery.
 
Back