Okay, I'm putting on my best tinfoil hat for this one:
The "give up private property forever" part sounds a little too convenient and tinfoil-y for me. How are they going to force you to give up private property? They can institute most of their totalitarian program like the concentration camps, people investigating you for compliance, using "public health" as an excuse, but how can they forbid you from owning property?
The best guess I can come up with is that they will institute something like the social credit score used in China. Depending upon how much debt you are in, your current credit score, and how un-/likely you are to pay your existing debt, that would count against you. Have a low enough score, and you could be excluded from certain types of employment, financial transactions, or other services (a bad credit rating can already be used to justify not hiring you to work in a bank, or to charge you more for insurance, or even cancel an insurance policy; they would just ramp it up).
If you have unmanageable debt (including student loans, as well as mortgage and/or consumer debt), and have lost your job/business, and are on the brink of losing everything, you'd be the prime target for this. They would go after the most financially vulnerable segments of the population first, because those are the people not only least likely to fight it, but most likely to see it as their salvation. Anybody who has anything to lose, and any real hope for their future well-being, is much more likely to resist it.
An awful lot of young people, burdened by student loans, and struggling to get by at shitty jobs in cities with ever-rising rents, and who already don't hold much hope that they will ever own property in their lives, might be the first to jump at this--because getting rid of their student loans, with their ever-accruing interest, and at least getting UBI and a pod to live in and not have to work for it? That may seem liberating to the most beaten-down of them. Getting that, in exchange for never being able to own property? It may seem like a no-brainer. Young Millennials and Zoomers will be among the most eager adopters (along with older adults who are perennial losers).
Once you get past the first tier of truly desperate individuals who are willing to sign on, there will be tiers where it gets increasingly difficult to convince people to accept that devil's deal. There will be people who feel down, but not yet out, and they don't want to give up everything they've worked for. But a lot of them will--if there is a prolonged, manufactured financial crisis, and their debt gets sold to increasingly ruthless financial entities, and if the limitations they face under a new social credit system prove too crushing, they'll eventually give in.
The difficulty here is to break these people so they acquiesce, without triggering massive, organized rebellion. I don't see how there won't be rebellion, however--but it will end up squashed, and will never make the news.
And then there are the individuals who own property, but have no debt--some of whom are very wealthy but not part of the "elite" decision-making class, and some of whom might be considered poor, and a lot of levels in between. This is very much a minority of people. And while some may end up caving in under the burden of higher taxes, or because they've lost their livelihood, others will retain just enough independence to stay out of the pods.
Let me guess, the excuse is "we need to pay for the cost of COVID-19 and since you aren't vaccinated/didn't sign our debt forgiveness plan you're a liability so we need to take your property and sell it at auction to raise money." And if you do sign their debt forgiveness you've legally signed it all over to the bank so not letting them seize it is theft?
The "you will never be able to own property" bit could be justified by the fact that the government has discharged all of your debt, given you money to live on, and housed you, and you are indebted to the government for that, so you simply don't get the privilege of owning land.
Maybe there will be a loophole that you potentially could regain the right to own land once you've repaid the government every penny they've spent in bailing you out and supporting you, in which case state lotteries will make a fortune advertising that fantasy. Because being a pod-dweller, with UBI and free wi-fi, is not going to be enough to satisfy most people long-term.
What do they plan to do with people who aren't in any debt, don't need their plan, and want to keep their private property? These are the sort of people who are good with money and know what an offer too good to be true is (and this group would include globohomo types and coronapanic tards). Not to mention it would lead to a lot of confusion when stupid people who didn't read the fine print suddenly find cops in their house arresting them for theft.
I suspect the planners of the Great Reset don't expect to force everybody into the pods. After all, they, and members of their social caste, aren't going to live that way; they will still own property. The small percentage of property owners who own their property outright, and have the skills and financial means to cope with any loss of income and whatever demerits might appear on their social credit score may, in fact, be allowed to remain. Having a lot to lose, they're likely to keep their heads down and not cause trouble, especially since they're also likely to be a despised class scapegoated by the pod-dwellers.
But prohibitively high inheritance taxes, or eliminating inheritance of property altogether (unless you can afford an attorney to advise you of the legal loopholes the elites use), would further reduce the number of households owning property over time. Because while these motherfuckers seem to be in a hurry to enact their plans, they're actually playing a long game.
(This is turning into the outline for a dystopian novel, but I've got hungry cats screaming at me, so enough.)
