Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Like at what point Box said it was okay to fuck an underage republican. I’m still on page 50. There are so many fucking highlights.

To be fair, I don't think BixBox cares if the kids lean one way or the other politically before he fucks and grooms them.

I want people to respect me, not like me.

You're aiming too high there, champ.
 
Last edited:
no matter what rumors you might have heard, I assure you Sig does not have a sock.

Some people might think it's funny to pretend to be him, but it is not him.
That guy only had 4 posts. I managed to MATI all 4 before he was banned. 2 were in this thread and 2 were talking about sig. suspicious.

To be fair, I don't think BixBox cares if the kids lean one way or the other politically before he fucks and grooms them.
grooming is retarded. you're supposed to raise kids so they find a partner and get married. grooming is right there next to "crony capitalism" on the list of dumbest terms ever.
 
1608513071089.png

@BoxerShorts47 it was a sock, but not Sig.

Satisfied?
 
grooming is retarded. you're supposed to raise kids so they find a partner and get married.

Then why do you keep arguing for it, dude? When people bring up children aren't old enough to make informed decisions on stuff like this, you deflect and say that there's plenty of people over 18 who are still too immature to make these choices, yet you always argue for lowering the age of consent rather than raising it? Why is that? Shouldn't you want parents to be able to raise their kids longer if such a thing is necessary?

Then again, you didn't really mention parents at all. So who are you claiming is supposed to shape the minds of these young, impressionable girls in this scenario? Their future husbands? It really sounds like that's where you're going, you fucking groomer.

How am I supposed to respect you when you have the same mentality as the pedo-seeking tranny trash that you claim to hate? Neither of you care about the kids you push this shit on so long as you can fulfill your fetishes.

You need help, son.
 
Then why do you keep arguing for it, dude? When people bring up children aren't old enough to make informed decisions on stuff like this, you deflect and say that there's plenty of people over 18 who are still too immature to make these choices, yet you always argue for lowering the age of consent rather than raising it? Why is that? Shouldn't you want parents to be able to raise their kids longer if such a thing is necessary?

Then again, you didn't really mention parents at all. So who are you claiming is supposed to shape the minds of these young, impressionable girls in this scenario? Their future husbands? It really sounds like that's where you're going, you fucking groomer.

How am I supposed to respect you when you have the same mentality as the pedo-seeking tranny trash that you claim to hate? Neither of you care about the kids you push this shit on so long as you can fulfill your fetishes.

You need help, son.
Boxy isn't very smart, and tends to logically contradict and cuck himself constantly.
 
see? all you have to do is keep being based like this and people will like it.

cause Ralph is insufferable. anyway, more good posts like this one please!


For a blip there was a chance, but-


another reason to lower to the age of consent.


- got to fuck the children. This may be a personal fastest self-cuck record.


One hundred years ago, your mother could never have afforded to keep an idle son stocked with tendies and child pornography.


Prostitution is one of the world's oldest professions. She'd be fine!


View attachment 1800877
I'll take that as a "yes", then.


Boxy saw himself there, and agrees that is autistic. Nice self-cuck.


the leftists have already normalized UBI (tendies) and non-contact pedophilia including. cp.


You admit to adhering to the left? You are guilty of both, you sell out.


To be fair, I don't think BixBox cares if the kids lean one way or the other politically before he fucks and grooms them.



You're aiming too high there, champ.


Too high indeed, considering his manlet height.
 
Then why do you keep arguing for it, dude? When people bring up children aren't old enough to make informed decisions on stuff like this, you deflect and say that there's plenty of people over 18 who are still too immature to make these choices, yet you always argue for lowering the age of consent rather than raising it? Why is that? Shouldn't you want parents to be able to raise their kids longer if such a thing is necessary?

Then again, you didn't really mention parents at all. So who are you claiming is supposed to shape the minds of these young, impressionable girls in this scenario? Their future husbands? It really sounds like that's where you're going, you fucking groomer.

How am I supposed to respect you when you have the same mentality as the pedo-seeking tranny trash that you claim to hate? Neither of you care about the kids you push this shit on so long as you can fulfill your fetishes.

You need help, son.
1. post puberty is not a child.
2. you do believe they are old enough to make these types of decisions.... but only when the partner is 2-3 yr older than them.
3. by treating them as children they remain as children. you're supposed to start giving them adult responsibilities so they become adults.

you're fucking retarded and part of the reason this nation is falling apart.
Are you serious a boomer?
You have absolutely no old man wisdom.
now get lost dumbass.
 
3. by treating them as children they remain as children. you're supposed to start giving them adult responsibilities so they become adults.


Learn literacy and grammar. Get a job. Move out of mommy's basement.

By your own logic, you are not an adult. You can't even vote in Boxtopia!
 
I LITERALLY CAN'T STOP BEING A PEDOPHILE NIGGER.

You're so focused on fucking preteen pussy that you're incapable of grasping that, maybe, advocating lowering the age of consent isn't going to magically turn little Becca into tradwife material just because you've suddenly given grown men the legal ability to stick their dicks into her 12 year old snatch.

Treat them like adults and they'll suddenly start acting like adults? How incredibly naive. I only need to cite you as an example to validate my argument as to why parents should be allowed to keep their little retards shackled away for their own protection until they hit their thirties. You utter baboon. You literal nigger.
 
You're so focused on fucking preteen pussy that you're incapable of grasping that, maybe, advocating lowering the age of consent isn't going to magically turn little Becca into tradwife material just because you've suddenly given grown men the legal ability to stick their dicks into her 12 year old snatch.

Treat them like adults and they'll suddenly start acting like adults? How incredibly naive. I only need to cite you as an example to validate my argument as to why parents should be allowed to keep their little retards shackled away for their own protection until they hit their thirties. You utter baboon. You literal nigger.
Are humans post puberty children or adults? Simple question. Answer it!
 
Are humans post puberty children or adults? Simple question. Answer it!
Puberty is necessary but not sufficient to adulthood.

You remind me of a really scummy lawyer I knew, though in his case he knew perfectly well his questions were broken. He was a sleaze; I'll give you benefit of the doubt that you're just incredibly stupid.
 
Are humans post puberty children or adults? Simple question. Answer it!


Since puberty is the basis for age of consent to you, then lowering it goes against your post puberty benchmark. Unless what you mean is external appearance, in which case it is partial or mid-puberty. Post puberty would be the early to mid 20s, as it includes the brain; so here are your options:

1. Say 'mid-puberty' to convey you mean external appearance, as saying 'post puberty' is incorrect.

2. Advocate for the age of consent to be in the 20s, if you insist on using 'post puberty', as that definition is correct.

3. Stop wanting to fuck the Disney Channel's primary demographic.
 
Puberty is necessary but not sufficient to adulthood.

You remind me of a really scummy lawyer I knew, though in his case he knew perfectly well his questions were broken. He was a sleaze; I'll give you benefit of the doubt that you're just incredibly stupid.
Okay so what is sufficient?
 
I was using "puberty" in the way Boxy does, i.e., "do you have hair down there." It's certainly true that an 18 year old's brain is still mush.

I'm not one of those people who thought he "had all the answers" at 18; that's something stupid people say. I knew I still had a lot to learn, but what I wasn't aware of, which is bizarre to look back on, is how very inefficient my thinking was. I was extremely easily manipulated, highly sensitive to group opinion and the desire to be seen as good and correct.

Things that were huge challenges to me then are the sort of things I'd dismiss with an eyeroll and a derisive snort twenty years later. It wasn't a lack of education, or a social construct. My brain just wasn't finished baking. All eighteen year olds are idiots.

The age of consent is fairly arbitrary; this much is true. What boxy doesn't get is that 18 is already really pushing it for what could rightly be considered an adult.
 
Back